I have had it up to here waiting for the Beatles catalogue to be remastered

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (6055 of them)

"They are talking about vinyl though. (The big controversy: Will they use the digital masters or go back to the analog tapes?)"

I have seen a bunch of vinyl reissues lately. Are they not remasters?

Nate Carson, Tuesday, 29 December 2009 02:13 (fourteen years ago) link

as far a i know, the remasters haven't come out on vinyl yet.

Thus Sang Freud, Tuesday, 29 December 2009 02:26 (fourteen years ago) link

Vinyl remasters are coming in 2010, I have March/April in my head, but that may not be right.

krakow, Tuesday, 29 December 2009 11:55 (fourteen years ago) link

Wow a lot of people are paying $29.99+ for vinyl reissues of the old masters. Hah.

Nate Carson, Tuesday, 29 December 2009 21:08 (fourteen years ago) link

lol...it's funny now, but who knows what they'll charge for the vinyl remasters... we could all be laughing on the other side of our wallets next year.

have worked my way through the mono box up to Pepper...holy wow. Lucy alone kind of spun my head a little bit. I think I might like the mono version more than the stereo. Well, right now at 6.30 on Tuesday night. That'll change tomorrow.

VegemiteGrrrl, Wednesday, 30 December 2009 02:32 (fourteen years ago) link

Does anyone know if the remasters are now standard for radio play? I've heard a good bit of Beatles on the air over the weekend, in particular one station playing the entirety of Abbey Road, and they sounded really good (and had many previously mono-in-US tracks in stereo).

Adam Bruneau, Wednesday, 30 December 2009 04:45 (fourteen years ago) link

I'd guess most radio DJs are all over this. It's not exactly going to be "under their radar".

I too have heard some massive-sounding Beatles tracks on the radio of late.

Nate Carson, Wednesday, 30 December 2009 07:27 (fourteen years ago) link

I remember radio started playing the CD versions of the old albums as soon as they appeared (mid-to-late 80s), so I am sure they have done this time around too. Mainly the stereo versions as they are the most "mainstream" ones these days.

Tied Up In Geir (Geir Hongro), Wednesday, 30 December 2009 14:04 (fourteen years ago) link

radio changes the sound of things so much it's not really fair to judge them based on that.

akm, Wednesday, 30 December 2009 18:44 (fourteen years ago) link

I spent a 2 hour coach journey to the airport yesterday listening to mono-masters.

the first 5 tracks off disc 2 puts the album in the top 5% of all music.

McCartney's bass in rain possibly does that all by itself.

not going near Sgt. Pepper till Ive digested the other albums more thoroughly.

currently Hard Days Night is my toppermost of the poppermost.

my opinionation (Hamildan), Thursday, 31 December 2009 11:22 (fourteen years ago) link

Playing the monos through the stereo even more enjoyable than headphones too, btw. The whole box may be the best Christmas present ever. Cannot stop listening!!!

VegemiteGrrrl, Friday, 1 January 2010 00:02 (fourteen years ago) link

Playing mono records on stereos with two speakers is just false.

;)

Nate Carson, Friday, 1 January 2010 00:30 (fourteen years ago) link

Lol! I toyed with the idea of ripping out all the speakers except the center channel but Mr Veg got mad... goddamn futurists.

VegemiteGrrrl, Friday, 1 January 2010 00:45 (fourteen years ago) link

I think you should really cut off one of your ears.

Nate Carson, Friday, 1 January 2010 00:46 (fourteen years ago) link

Quite right! New Year's resolution: ear augmentation surgery, one ear in the middle of my forehead, both canals blocked and diverted into one main canal. All mono, all the time.

VegemiteGrrrl, Friday, 1 January 2010 01:25 (fourteen years ago) link

You, Van Gogh, and Brian Wilson. Elite company you keep!

Nate Carson, Friday, 1 January 2010 01:38 (fourteen years ago) link

simply move the two speakers together = mono.

my opinionation (Hamildan), Friday, 1 January 2010 15:19 (fourteen years ago) link

Really? Wow.

goldwax, Friday, 1 January 2010 17:40 (fourteen years ago) link

"Fold-down" mono for the lose.

Did you say you were going to mangle the light? (staggerlee), Friday, 1 January 2010 17:57 (fourteen years ago) link

Prezactly.

goldwax, Friday, 1 January 2010 18:10 (fourteen years ago) link

two weeks pass...

hey dudes, what's up i got the stereo box for my birthday! who wants to talk about THE BEATLES.

tylerw, Wednesday, 20 January 2010 20:10 (fourteen years ago) link

i'm listening to Yellow Submarine right now! I've never owned it before. Harrison's peak?

tylerw, Wednesday, 20 January 2010 20:15 (fourteen years ago) link

The stereo Submarine sounds SO GOOD.

You're a lucky man to get such a cool present.

EZ Snappin, Wednesday, 20 January 2010 20:17 (fourteen years ago) link

i kinda like the george martin sdtk bits here -- a friend from way back in college had this old car w/ an 8-track player and one of the few cartridges she had was Yellow Submarine. So listening to these orchestral things is making me think of driving around the Hudson Valley late at night.

tylerw, Wednesday, 20 January 2010 20:24 (fourteen years ago) link

she also had a tom jones live album which was pretty intense.

tylerw, Wednesday, 20 January 2010 20:26 (fourteen years ago) link

yo tyler my wife is from Hudson!

I am glad the mono boxes are available again even though I can't afford one.

sleeve, Wednesday, 20 January 2010 23:09 (fourteen years ago) link

you can't afford not to buy a mono box.

my opinionation (Hamildan), Thursday, 21 January 2010 12:21 (fourteen years ago) link

http://www.mikemake.com/#72772/Charting-the-Beatles

DavidM, Thursday, 21 January 2010 13:37 (fourteen years ago) link

http://www.mikemake.com/media/72772/Keys2.3-web-detail2.gif

DavidM, Thursday, 21 January 2010 13:38 (fourteen years ago) link

a thousand times yes....

my opinionation (Hamildan), Thursday, 21 January 2010 15:47 (fourteen years ago) link

Beatles fans are CRAZY (those charts!).
I've got rips of the mono box from a friend ... but I'm not sayin' that somewhere down the line I wouldn't buy the mono box were i to become flush with cash. (and sleeve, i went to lol v@ssar so that area is near and dear!)

tylerw, Thursday, 21 January 2010 15:53 (fourteen years ago) link

listening to SGT. PEPPER right now! What a good album! Weird that I now notice the radical differences in tape speed on "She's Leaving Home"! Weird!

tylerw, Thursday, 21 January 2010 20:16 (fourteen years ago) link

three weeks pass...

Beatles MONO Box Vinyl In Production

A high quality vinyl edition of The Beatles Mono box, a surprise hit for EMI on CD, is in pre-production at Abbey Road, a well-placed source told musicangle.com today. The records are being cut from the analogue master tapes, we've been told. A stereo set is also planned but that may be generated from the 192K/24 bit files in order to keep the reissues consistent among the formats. There is also a 24 bit 44.1K USB stick-based edition enclosed within a green metal apple. That one sound better than the 16 bit CD edition as you may well imagine. Stay tuned for further developments!

http://www.musicangle.com/shownews.php?id=160

Thus Sang Freud, Friday, 12 February 2010 13:02 (fourteen years ago) link

Fuck, Can you imagine how much they are gonna charge for vinyl versions in Mono?

my opinionation (Hamildan), Friday, 12 February 2010 23:37 (fourteen years ago) link

they are going to charge a lot.
in other news, i watched those mini-documentaries last week finally. a waste of time!

tylerw, Friday, 12 February 2010 23:39 (fourteen years ago) link

kinda glad i waited now.

sofatruck, Friday, 12 February 2010 23:40 (fourteen years ago) link

kinda wish I waited now.

Hardcore Homecare (staggerlee), Saturday, 13 February 2010 04:59 (fourteen years ago) link

Darn it -- now they're saying the mono vinyl will be digitally sourced.

Though we were originally told the records would be cut from the analog masters, it appears they will be digitally sourced and from what resolution we haven't yet been able to ascertain. A stereo set is also planned as well as individual stereo album breakouts.

http://www.musicangle.com/shownews.php?id=160

Thus Sang Freud, Thursday, 18 February 2010 12:41 (fourteen years ago) link

two months pass...

Got a copy of Jonathan Gould's 'Can't Buy Me Love' for my birthday. It's as good as I was led to believe it would be, am gobbling up every little detail. The contextual 'sidetrips' are pretty interesting and take it out of the 'then John did something weird and Paul said something naive and George grumbled and Ringo played the drums etc'. His explanation of the Beatlemania-screaming-girl phenomenon was so much more satisfying than the standard 'lol sex' explanations.

His descriptions of the album tracks were like little earworms in my head, I've madly scrambled back to the remasters again, sad crack addict that I am.

Loved this descritpion of "Love Me Do":
Paul's cool delivery of the coy lyric ("So please...love me do") combined with John's raucous harmonica to make the track sound like a collaboration between Noel Coward and Sonny Boy Williamson.

VegemiteGrrrl, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 02:35 (fourteen years ago) link

Haven't read the book; but I have to say that, absent Gould's naming any authoritative source, I don't believe for a second his assertion that "And Your Bird Can Sing" is about Sinatra.

extremely low expectations (which, yes, were "met"). (Myonga Vön Bontee), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 08:54 (fourteen years ago) link

Old Blue Eyes was famous for owing a green bird - a parakeet, if I recall correctly. QED.

Bashful Johnny C. (staggerlee), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 00:05 (fourteen years ago) link

white album remaster $16 on amazon.ca

abanana, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 05:36 (fourteen years ago) link

free at the google

Sleep, that's where I'm a vicodin! (KMS), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 17:30 (fourteen years ago) link

maybe not anymore tho'

Sleep, that's where I'm a vicodin! (KMS), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 17:34 (fourteen years ago) link

thought this revive would actually be about the news that the mccartney catalogue is being remastered and re-released on concord sometime this year. also, three giant collections of mccartney outtakes leaked this week on the internet, but they are pretty underwhelming.

akm, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 20:19 (fourteen years ago) link

thought this revive would actually be about the news that the mccartney catalogue is being remastered and re-released on concord sometime this year. also, three giant collections of mccartney outtakes leaked this week on the internet, but they are pretty underwhelming.

Edited for clarity.

Could be said about any of their solo catalogs, to be honest.

EZ Snappin, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 20:24 (fourteen years ago) link

solo Beatles get a bad rap imho tho all are inconsistent

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 20:33 (fourteen years ago) link

Really don't need more than a greatest hits for any of them.

EZ Snappin, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 20:37 (fourteen years ago) link

eh I disagree but I've become something of a completist recently, mostly because there were so many things I discovered that I loved that weren't on any greatest hits comps (Lennon's "Crippled Inside", or Harrison's "Don't Let Me Wait Too Long" or "Cheer Down", to name a few examples)

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 20:40 (fourteen years ago) link

I have trouble sorting through the dross, unfortunately. I'm sure I'd find some gems, as you have, but I haven't found the inclination to start.

EZ Snappin, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 20:44 (fourteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.