Nirvana C/D

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (874 of them)
Man you really took that to heart.
Guess I struck a nerve :-p

AaronHz (AaronHz), Thursday, 30 September 2004 21:48 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm not ashamed of wapping my pud. It makes my tummy feel funny.

noodle vague (noodle vague), Thursday, 30 September 2004 21:50 (nineteen years ago) link

Ok, I'll humor you by actually answering one of those questions:

but has it occurred to you that not everybody thinks, say, The Beatles or Nirvana are that interesting?

The Beatles and Nirvana changed ideas about popular music in their respective decades. If that at the very least is not interesting to you, what are you doing following pop music in the first place??????

AaronHz (AaronHz), Thursday, 30 September 2004 21:51 (nineteen years ago) link

Pop Music (TM): "It's PudWa-stic!"

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Thursday, 30 September 2004 21:54 (nineteen years ago) link

Amen to that!

Nowell, Thursday, 30 September 2004 21:56 (nineteen years ago) link

what are you doing following pop music in the first place??????

Listening to stuff I like.

And wapping my pud to it.

noodle vague (noodle vague), Thursday, 30 September 2004 21:57 (nineteen years ago) link

The most interesting band in the world is Night Ranger.

Nowell, Thursday, 30 September 2004 21:58 (nineteen years ago) link

Are John Lennon's fans "vulture fans"? Jimi Hendrix's? Elvis'? Ian Curtis'? Jim Morrison's? Nick Drake's? This is rock n roll brother! Dead rock stars are part of the bargain!

AaronHz (AaronHz), Thursday, 30 September 2004 21:58 (nineteen years ago) link

NOODLE VAGUE FOR THE LAST TIME IT DOESN'T MAKE A DIFFERENCE WHAT THE FUCK YOU OR I ACTUALLY LIKE TO LISTEN TO. THAT'S NOT WHAT I WAS TALKING ABOUT.

AaronHz (AaronHz), Thursday, 30 September 2004 22:00 (nineteen years ago) link

yeah but the kids shoulda loved Tad instead, wakak wakka

x-post

latebloomer (latebloomer), Thursday, 30 September 2004 22:01 (nineteen years ago) link

Dead rock stars are my favorite rock stars. There's so much mystery. About what could have been...
I've never heard Tad before.

Nowell, Thursday, 30 September 2004 22:02 (nineteen years ago) link

I doubt I sit around listening to Nevermind and Sgt. Pepper's any more than you do, noodle vague.

Once AGAIN: I'm talking about media perceptions and subjective hipster (READ: KNEEJERK) reactions to them here.

This is not about you, but it will be if you keep pushing it...
Fuck it, give me 5 non-media/success overexposure related reasons you actually like Mudhoney better than Nirvana. I'm seriously interested in knowing why. Be sure to be strong and interesting about it.

AaronHz (AaronHz), Thursday, 30 September 2004 22:07 (nineteen years ago) link

Yeah, I guess I was missing the point there. Still, I think my answer would be something along the lines of the canon not being an immutable object, that it changes with time as bands are revalued, that every band's importance or influence changes as music moves in new directions, and that questioning the received opinion of a band needn't be a hipster pose but can be a sincere attempt to criticise some of the implied values attached to them.

noodle vague (noodle vague), Thursday, 30 September 2004 22:08 (nineteen years ago) link

The Beatles and Nirvana changed ideas about popular music in their respective decades. If that at the very least is not interesting to you, what are you doing following pop music in the first place??????

Oh for cryin' out loud. NIRVANA DIDN'T "CHANGE IDEAS ABOUT POPULAR MUSIC". They merely co-opted someone else's formula and went to the bank with it. They did it well, yes, but in NO WAY IMAGINABLE was their impact comparable to the Beatles'.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 30 September 2004 22:09 (nineteen years ago) link

Aaron is so smart.

Nowell, Thursday, 30 September 2004 22:09 (nineteen years ago) link

Alex I didn't say they did to the same extent. Here we go again...

AaronHz (AaronHz), Thursday, 30 September 2004 22:10 (nineteen years ago) link

I don't like Nirvana, but I kind of like the odd zealotry Nirvana fans show in arguments about them.

Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Thursday, 30 September 2004 22:11 (nineteen years ago) link

Alex I didn't say they did to the same extent. Here we go again..

:::sigh:::

Aaron, you've got to be more careful, then, as your generalizations certainly create that impression.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 30 September 2004 22:11 (nineteen years ago) link

They're just a band!

Nowell, Thursday, 30 September 2004 22:12 (nineteen years ago) link

They did in the sense that they made a kind of music commercially viable that wasn't before. Whether that was a good or bad thing doesn't matter. They're the ones that kicked the door open, and so were the Beatles in the 60's. Obviously the Beatles did it to a much larger extent.

AaronHz (AaronHz), Thursday, 30 September 2004 22:12 (nineteen years ago) link

wap wap wap

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Thursday, 30 September 2004 22:13 (nineteen years ago) link

I never said I was less full of shit than anyone else on here either.

AaronHz (AaronHz), Thursday, 30 September 2004 22:14 (nineteen years ago) link

I wouldn't know. Will there ever be another world-changing band? I would so love to experience something like that.

Nowell, Thursday, 30 September 2004 22:15 (nineteen years ago) link

The drunken point I made last night wasn't exactly that Mudhoney were better than Nirvana (I enjoy listening to Mudhoney more, though, probably because at the time I listened to Nirvana more and now I know their stuff too well) but that Kurt Cobain would give them props, in part because of his own sense of indie authenticity I guess. He certainly had an ambiguous reaction to his own increasing success.

Hey, let's just agree that we're all full of shit, eh?

noodle vague (noodle vague), Thursday, 30 September 2004 22:15 (nineteen years ago) link

There's no reason not to argue about this...crap...

Nowell, Thursday, 30 September 2004 22:16 (nineteen years ago) link

They did in the sense that they made a kind of music commercially viable that wasn't before. Whether that was a good or bad thing doesn't matter. They're the ones that kicked the door open, and so were the Beatles in the 60's. Obviously the Beatles did it to a much larger extent

The Beatles were genuinely trailblazing, though, whereas Nirvana were merely staying within an already formally established style. Again, there's no real comparison here.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 30 September 2004 22:16 (nineteen years ago) link

xpost
....except that it gets boring.

Nowell, Thursday, 30 September 2004 22:17 (nineteen years ago) link

ha! no band worldcahnging like byzantum will be! the end of your chrsitainising ways is at hand and will make your little squabbles aout pansy rock and roll/rythm and blue feces shit music irrelevant.

the nightspirit will come, bringing cold, black northern darkness to the lands

Vas Djifrens, Thursday, 30 September 2004 22:19 (nineteen years ago) link

I can't wait!

Nowell, Thursday, 30 September 2004 22:21 (nineteen years ago) link

Agreed.

But yeah just to make it clear for Alex's generalization concerns. I just thought anyone who knows their stuff would assume I was referring to the "British Invasion" thing and the "Alterna-revolution thing" when making Beatles/Nirvana comparisons. I never meant to imply Nirvana was anywhere near as big or that the Alterna-nonsense was as influential as the British Invasion. However, the Alterna-nonsense's influence HAS already carried on into the next decade, albeit in the form of stale boring MOR faux-grunge bullshit like Nickelback.

The British Invasion obviously bore a greater fruit to anyone paying attention.

AaronHz (AaronHz), Thursday, 30 September 2004 22:22 (nineteen years ago) link

Everybody's hip nowadays, from what I'm reading here.You know what I mean?

Nowell, Thursday, 30 September 2004 22:23 (nineteen years ago) link

The most interesting band in the world is Night Ranger.

The Bitter Tears Of Little Lord Travolta (nordicskilla), Thursday, 30 September 2004 22:24 (nineteen years ago) link

They did in the sense that they made a kind of music commercially viable that wasn't before. Whether that was a good or bad thing
The Beatles were genuinely trailblazing, though, whereas Nirvana were merely staying within an already formally established style. Again, there's no real comparison here.

-- Alex in NYC (vassife...), September 30th, 2004.

well yeah but IN THE CONTEXT OF 90'S MAINSTREAM POP/ROCK (which is what Aaron was talking about), their success turned people on to that sort of music who never would have been into it otherwise. that is why nirvana are considered "important". Obviously they never revolutionized rock and roll itself, that wasn't the argument. And yeah sure some people might believe that but some people think Star Wars is the pinnacle of cinema.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Thursday, 30 September 2004 22:25 (nineteen years ago) link

Xpost

That was a fuckin' retarded thing I said.

Nowell, Thursday, 30 September 2004 22:26 (nineteen years ago) link

It made me think of the Buzzcocks

AaronHz (AaronHz), Thursday, 30 September 2004 22:30 (nineteen years ago) link

Why did I read all this?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 1 October 2004 00:03 (nineteen years ago) link

Because you love me?

AaronHz (AaronHz), Friday, 1 October 2004 00:12 (nineteen years ago) link

I have heard of you.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 1 October 2004 00:14 (nineteen years ago) link

four months pass...
Revive!

"I've heard a track from a new band called Nirvana."

Man is this interesting (and I'm not that big of a Nirvana fan!). I didn't even know there was an Internet back in 1992. I sure didn't have one!!

Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Thursday, 10 February 2005 04:33 (nineteen years ago) link

Oh criminey....must we exhume this thread?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 10 February 2005 15:54 (nineteen years ago) link

UGLY KID JOE RULES

hmmm (hmmm), Thursday, 10 February 2005 15:59 (nineteen years ago) link

just got the Nirvana "Nevermind" album and I think it is awesome! These
kids are so cynical it is humorous and the tunes rock. They also play very
well with their tempo so that there are some slow tunes which make the
screaming guitars all the more racous.


To fully understand the song "Smells Like Teen Spirit" you should catch the
video on MTV. It has them playing a scungy dance in a school gym with an
audience straight from hell, or Seattle, where the band is from. The song
makes blatent fun of the people who listen to it, so pay attention, they
may mean you. At least if you are banging your head. ;)


Jon

latebloomer (latebloomer), Thursday, 10 February 2005 21:18 (nineteen years ago) link

Nowell pwns this thread, obviously.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Thursday, 10 February 2005 21:33 (nineteen years ago) link

Everybody's hip nowadays, from what I'm reading here.You know what I mean?

This should go on the front ILXor.com page.

Un investigador del siglo XXI (AaronHz), Thursday, 10 February 2005 22:34 (nineteen years ago) link

two years pass...

the baby on Nevermind is now 17:

http://www.paxtonland.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/baby-on-nevermind-album-cover.JPG

Bee OK, Wednesday, 27 June 2007 00:18 (sixteen years ago) link

I see a slight Dave Grohl resemblance, hmmm...

marmotwolof, Wednesday, 27 June 2007 00:22 (sixteen years ago) link

I was 18 and Bleach was the bomb. Coming after Mudhoney & Tad but so gutsy, urgent and nervous it was different, above the pack. It kept unexpectedly switching gears in the most surprising, yet natural ways. I still rate it higher than any other release of theirs. Actually when Nevermind blew up I couldn't understand why Nirvana provoked/deserved the big break, although I liked that record a lot, it didn't bring anything new to the game in the way the first album did. I guess it made them slicker and more palatable.

I think I've mentioned this elsewhere, but seeing the video of Smells Like Teen Spirit on a hotel TV in a remote mexican town during a long cross-country trip was an unbelievable experience. I had taped the record to bring it along, a gem I shared with very few people. Or so I thought.

blunt, Wednesday, 27 June 2007 01:35 (sixteen years ago) link

"I've heard a track from a new band called Nirvana."

love this

billstevejim, Wednesday, 27 June 2007 05:34 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, that was amazing to read those reactions.

Anyway, I'm listening to that Singles box set and it's pretty classic all by itself. Okay, it has "Smells Like Teen Spirit", which we're all so very tired of, but it also contains "Even In His Youth," "Aneurysm," "Come As You Are," "Endless, Nameless," "School," "Drain You," "Sliver," "Polly," "Been A Son," (the previous five songs being live recordings), "In Bloom," "Lithium," "Curmudgeon," "Heart-Shaped Box," "Milk It," "Marigold," "All Apologies," "Rape Me" and (yes, it's here) "Moist Vagina." All in all not a bad introduction to them, and leaning way more toward Classic than Dud.

(Man, after all this time "Heart-Shaped Box" still sounds incredible.)

Lostandfound, Wednesday, 27 June 2007 06:34 (sixteen years ago) link

Classic! "The Story Of Simon Simopath" and "All Of Us" were both excellent albums! ;)

Geir Hongro, Wednesday, 27 June 2007 10:12 (sixteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.