Congratulation to MGMT for their upcoming album

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (499 of them)

anytime a band makes a record with harmonies and reverb, people start talking about the sixties. or elephant six. it's lazy.

mizzell, Monday, 22 March 2010 20:10 (fourteen years ago) link

ha!

johnnyo, Monday, 22 March 2010 20:10 (fourteen years ago) link

what a disaster for MGMT

that new wave hippie disco shit (herb albert), Monday, 22 March 2010 20:11 (fourteen years ago) link

i'm sure the jurnalistz have it harder.

johnnyo, Monday, 22 March 2010 20:13 (fourteen years ago) link

"this album sounds exactly the same as the last one minus the three good songs"

― call all destroyer, Monday, March 22, 2010 3:54 PM (20 minutes ago) Bookmark

^OTM

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 22 March 2010 20:19 (fourteen years ago) link

I can't help but imagine that all of this "we aren't writing poppy songs anymore" business is just to impress a handful of arty girls in Brooklyn.

Back Like That (makeitpop), Monday, 22 March 2010 20:36 (fourteen years ago) link

hey looks like another thread where i'm going to have to suggest ban people who mention "brooklyn" "hipsters"!

call all destroyer, Monday, 22 March 2010 21:06 (fourteen years ago) link

it's interesting to see how makeitpop trolls in threads that he didn't start for the express purpose of trolling

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 21:21 (fourteen years ago) link

I really don't see how that's trolling. Is that opinion so outlandish that it seems like I'm baiting you? C'mon.

Back Like That (makeitpop), Monday, 22 March 2010 21:37 (fourteen years ago) link

these dude were probably out for like a year smashing lapsed weezer fan poon by the truckload and you think they are making a whole album to impress five chicks in brooklyn?

And guess what? I think Pitchfork is going to give it a BM. (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, 22 March 2010 21:46 (fourteen years ago) link

smashing post

call all destroyer, Monday, 22 March 2010 21:54 (fourteen years ago) link

+2

shite new answers (cutty), Monday, 22 March 2010 22:07 (fourteen years ago) link

Well, why else would a band decide to do something so retarded. I'm guessing arty chicks in BK because I think this band is way too calculated and self-conscious to make this album for purely artistic reasons.

Back Like That (makeitpop), Monday, 22 March 2010 22:10 (fourteen years ago) link

you are guessing arty chicks in BK because you have nothing meaningful to say

shite new answers (cutty), Monday, 22 March 2010 22:26 (fourteen years ago) link

tbh if these guys actually have made an album that in any way ends up being commercial or critical self-sabotage, more power to them. it seems like every alt/indie band that gets to about their stature these days gets rubber stamped "they did it again! 7.9!" reviews all around, it'd be refreshing for someone to actually shit the bed and/or piss everyone off for once.

iggy figgy pudding pop (some dude), Monday, 22 March 2010 22:27 (fourteen years ago) link

The song where you go on about how ace Dan Treacy is in the style of one of his recent appalling songs is surely post modernism reaching its lowest ebb.

^^^probably the most depressing three minutes of my life this year

"Where's Momus? He could clear all of this up" (Tape Store), Monday, 22 March 2010 22:35 (fourteen years ago) link

"Someone's Missing" is easily my favorite song of the disc so far. It's over far too quickly, they should have just looped the whole thing once more. The rest is fun but less tuneful than the debut. I still don't understand how these guys got such tremendous hype power so fast.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 00:23 (fourteen years ago) link

because "Time to Pretend" was a monster tune

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 13:10 (fourteen years ago) link

so is what u all are saying is 'mgmt is over'? pheww was a crazy ride but im frankly kinda relieved

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 13:21 (fourteen years ago) link

is it 'time to stop pretending'

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 13:22 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah i think these dudes got tired of the ex-raver poon and are trying to get some of that 16-year old pittsburgh art school "i tried to get into sonic youth but i dunnnooo" action.

johnnyo, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 13:47 (fourteen years ago) link

"Time to Pretend" was great, but I liked "Kids" far less. "Weekend Wars" and esp "The Youth" were my fave tracks on the debut. It's a good second album, if you listened to the whole first one and not just the singles, you'll probably like it. I think they have a really amazing colossal record in them and this is "Congratulation" is definitely not it.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 15:03 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah see i like this new album because it sounds like a more realized "weekend wars".

johnnyo, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 15:19 (fourteen years ago) link

btw seriously dudes don't waste your time handwringing about MGMT for fuck sakes. this is the only life you will ever have.

this band has only ever been good for clowning on.

And guess what? I think Pitchfork is going to give it a BM. (M@tt He1ges0n), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 15:32 (fourteen years ago) link

Joanna Newsom was in the "Kids" video, and the two singles I heard, including "Kids," were alright. that's about it.

ksh, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 15:42 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah it's like that song was cool...it's just some song that will make it on TV late night CD "best of the 00s" type shit...like "sex and candy" or
"steal my sunshine" and shit...

just let it go, this band will never amount to shit, they had one good quasi hit

And guess what? I think Pitchfork is going to give it a BM. (M@tt He1ges0n), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 15:48 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah we should talk about good music. i'm sure that will make us feel better.

johnnyo, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 15:52 (fourteen years ago) link

xp except the 90s were flush with music like that ("rock" bands with an alternative or indie sensibility of some kind that could produce mainstream singles that lots of people enjoyed) and the 00s were....not. that to me is the frustrating thing about mgmt--they had three legitimately good singles and rather than pursuing that sound they're pretty much making bullshit afaict.

call all destroyer, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 15:53 (fourteen years ago) link

huh, i just heard the single for the first time, and i don't understand this thread at all now.

mizzell, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:21 (fourteen years ago) link

also, the little flute solo is funny.

mizzell, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:21 (fourteen years ago) link

Kids is totally like 2kx "Sex and Candy". But if you haven't heard some of the other tracks you should listen to this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EURZuzHyWb0

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:24 (fourteen years ago) link

vid by Eric of Tim & Eric

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:24 (fourteen years ago) link

seems like most people's opinions are colored by some idea about mgmt that doesn't have much to do with the actual music. the amount of hate they inspire is a sign that they're doing something interesting, imho. the first track on this new one i'm particularly digging... great melodies, harmonies, sonic textures, etc. what's to hate?

i also think it's weird these guys are seen as rock stars. they just seem like awkward stoners to me, which is endearing.

also, i love the cover art.

akaky akakievich, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:36 (fourteen years ago) link

the amount of hate they inspire is a sign that they're doing something interesting, imho.

rock solid logic

And guess what? I think Pitchfork is going to give it a BM. (M@tt He1ges0n), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:37 (fourteen years ago) link

exactly. what's to hate? it just sounds like a musical album. made by a band. they made another album before this one that sounded like whatever, and now this one sounds like this. are people accusing this band of being reverse-sellouts or what is the problem?

a band had like two hits and then changed their sound a bit on the next album. is this offensive? unheard of?
maybe you people should listen to the black crowes instead of this indie rock stuff. you're obviously getting confused.

johnnyo, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:51 (fourteen years ago) link

people are accusing them of not being very good

goole, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:53 (fourteen years ago) link

then i take it back, you probably won't like the black crowes either...

johnnyo, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:56 (fourteen years ago) link

love where this thread is going

samosa gibreel, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:00 (fourteen years ago) link

"twice as hard" > "kids"

And guess what? I think Pitchfork is going to give it a BM. (M@tt He1ges0n), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:01 (fourteen years ago) link

it just sounds like a musical album.

ohhhh, i hadn't realized this is a musical album--this changes everything!

samosa gibreel, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:01 (fourteen years ago) link

Conshitulation by MGMT<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LLRk3_nogo

Doran, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:08 (fourteen years ago) link

they made another album before this one that sounded like whatever, and now this one sounds like this.

7/10

-- johnny0

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:09 (fourteen years ago) link

can we turn this into a rockism thing? i've got a looong day left at work.

johnnyo, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:14 (fourteen years ago) link

I don't think they've sold out or really changed their sound all that much. Both those arguments are pretty silly for any band imo.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:44 (fourteen years ago) link

I think it's a case of the songs were just more memorable on the first record and because they are so hyped everyone is reading all this extra stuff into that. I just think it boils down to better songs the first time.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:46 (fourteen years ago) link

honestly surprised that the Ausgang artwork might be the best thing about this album. I was hoping for at least one more "Kids" out of the deal. what the hell Soulwax supposed to remix off of this dud?

like a musical album. made by a band. (fucking in the streets), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:48 (fourteen years ago) link

strangely, parts of this album remind me of Cornelius.

johnnyo, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 18:06 (fourteen years ago) link

^^^stop tempting me to hear it!

actually when this fuckmare of a class assignment is done i will listen to it, and return with judgements

LiveJournal (acoleuthic), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 18:09 (fourteen years ago) link

i dunno, i hear lots of things in it at times. Cornelius, the Chrysanthemums, Homosexuals, late-period Turtles, early Supergrass. Flaming Lips, of course. it's interesting, at least.

johnnyo, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 18:14 (fourteen years ago) link

Wish Cornelius was releasing a new album!

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 18:30 (fourteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.