Taking Sides: Smiths vs. REM

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (175 of them)
I only ever really took an interest in R.E.M. via a friend and y'know it passed away again over time.

I loved The Smiths, but they're a hard band to carry on loving in the same way after a certain age.

I pick... Throwing Muses!

rollin', rollin', rollin', keep them dogies rollin', rawhide! thread (fandango), Thursday, 17 August 2006 03:01 (seventeen years ago) link

NAIHF has 14 tracks.

REM and the smiths are my two favorite bands; but the smiths are happy music for me now, while REM still invokes emotional responses in me.

and up is in my top three REM albums. took me seven years to get into it, but now it's a must.

hndinglove (hndinglove), Thursday, 17 August 2006 03:37 (seventeen years ago) link

six months pass...
Also, both (the Smiths and REM) were unmistakably influenced by the Blue Oyster Cult.

interesting that this was brought up by dave q. b/c the very 1st time i'd ever heard "don't fear the reaper" (back in the mid 80s), i thought that it sounded a LOT like REM. or at least proto-REM.

Eisbaer, Thursday, 1 March 2007 10:11 (seventeen years ago) link

My postulation was that worthy as The Smiths and REM were at the time, their relevance in the musical spectrum nowadays is diminished, and that perhaps they aren't essential for an understanding of where music 'is'.

Who cares? When Relevance Anonymous wasn't listening to Talking Heads and Gang of Four in 2000, did this diminish these bands' legacies?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 1 March 2007 12:03 (seventeen years ago) link

the very 1st time i'd ever heard "don't fear the reaper" (back in the mid 80s), i thought that it sounded a LOT like REM. or at least proto-REM.

Do you think this goes beyond just a shared Byrds influence?

Sundar, Thursday, 1 March 2007 15:04 (seventeen years ago) link

Smiths are awesome, REM aren't. Though that may just be my irrational hatred for anything coming out of UGA town.

Curt1s Stephens, Thursday, 1 March 2007 18:11 (seventeen years ago) link

I was into the Smith and REM - at the moment I can't listen to the Smiths, I can listen to REM - this'll probably change

roger whitaker, Friday, 2 March 2007 00:22 (seventeen years ago) link

nine years pass...

I have no stats to back this up. It is entirely a feeling of mine, but it seems to me that when it comes to today's overall cultural relevance, the balance tips so much in favor of The Smiths.

Van Horn Street, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 21:39 (eight years ago) link

erm duhhh

Laertiades (imago), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 21:46 (eight years ago) link

I think we were talking in another thread about how REM has fallen out of favor, based on the fact that their records can mostly be had for cheap and don't seem to be sought out by younger people.

Kinda hard to compare, though, since REM put out almost four times as many studio albums. Imagine if they'd split up after Lifes Rich Pageant.

dc, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 21:48 (eight years ago) link

Not good bands

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 21:50 (eight years ago) link

True. Theyre great bands

i;m thinking about thos Beans (Michael B), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 21:56 (eight years ago) link

Love both but I'm going for REM.

Robert Adam Gilmour, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 22:05 (eight years ago) link

Surprised darragh doesnt like REM actually

i;m thinking about thos Beans (Michael B), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 22:07 (eight years ago) link

I like both, but I'll take any '80s R.E.M. album over any Smiths album.

// 166,000 W A N K E R S // LOVE (Turrican), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 22:33 (eight years ago) link

Idk I feel like the sublime introspection REM was lauded for only surfaces in fleeting glimpses in their actual recorded output

i;m the worst poster e9er (Drugs A. Money), Friday, 11 March 2016 11:52 (eight years ago) link

Idk I feel like the sublime introspection REM was lauded for only surfaces in fleeting glimpses in their actual recorded output
--i;m the worst poster e9er (Drugs A. Money)

I'm on board with this observation.

MatthewK, Friday, 11 March 2016 12:40 (eight years ago) link

I don't recall introspection being a particularly prominent critical touchstone for R.E.M. It's probably not the biggest thing someone would look for in Michael Stipe's lyrics.

timellison, Friday, 11 March 2016 15:20 (eight years ago) link

Yeah, I think REM is famous for creating hard-to-articulate feelings and mood, not for sublime introspection!

Guayaquil (eephus!), Friday, 11 March 2016 16:10 (eight years ago) link

^this

Jesperson, I think we're lost (James Redd and the Blecchs), Friday, 11 March 2016 16:21 (eight years ago) link

As much as I love Rourke's playing, I think that Berry/Mills were easily the superior rhythm section, and R.E.M. made quite a lot of records which I still enjoy listening to in full. The only Smiths album that I honestly think works from start to finish is The Queen Is Dead, although I've come to appreciate Meat Is Murder a lot more recently.

// 166,000 W A N K E R S // LOVE (Turrican), Friday, 11 March 2016 18:32 (eight years ago) link

REM bores me to tears these days, Smiths still vital, funny, evocative, surprising, detailed.

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 March 2016 18:35 (eight years ago) link

I'd guess that REM will, over time, be more influential on a subtle musical level and The Smiths will be more influential on a conceptual level. The latter is what tends to get written about. Personally I prefer Smiths.

dlp9001, Friday, 11 March 2016 18:46 (eight years ago) link

their actual recorded output
you know this brings up an interesting point more broadly, which is that I wonder how much of the initial R.E.M. impact is due to what a phenomenal live band they were early in their career? Also makes me wonder about other bands whose live shows exceeded their recording impact.

campreverb, Friday, 11 March 2016 20:03 (eight years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.