The Thread Where We List The People Who Put Kanye As Their Token Rap Album on an indiecentric top 10 2004 list

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (354 of them)
Wilco went top ten! Modest Mouse had a number one modern rock hit!

miccio (miccio), Friday, 31 December 2004 18:44 (nineteen years ago) link

in a perfect world a whinier Rush, the slack-ass remnants of Jonathan Fire*Eater, Living Colour with no skills or rhythm section and old alt-rock bands I've been listening to for years would be at the top of the pop charts.

exactly. I take away from the semi-gibes that he doesn't think the world of these bands, but that the pop charts are without such marginally different - from the charts and each other - bands, and poorer for it.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 31 December 2004 18:44 (nineteen years ago) link

I hate that fucking blinkered "oh the world would be great if the hyped bands that appeal to my subculture were accepted by the monoculture" mentality. These AREN'T should-be-number-ones, they're fuckin' alt-drivel of varying degrees and most are available at Wal-mart.

miccio (miccio), Friday, 31 December 2004 18:47 (nineteen years ago) link

and they ARE attracting more and more to their sonic cults, wtf. these guys aren't playing sports bars to dwindling numbers

good point. I didn't know Modest Mouse were so big. But is he saying that he wishes Coheed (who?) and the Walkmen were even bigger than Wilco, who he then comparatively reduces in market share (even while they are growing in their fan base) to a 'cult'?

gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 31 December 2004 18:47 (nineteen years ago) link

I mean name bands that deliver similar gifts as popular groups but don't get promotion if you want to make that argument. The bands he lists all have money behind them (except arguably TV On The Radio, who all the same won the Shortlist Prize).

miccio (miccio), Friday, 31 December 2004 18:49 (nineteen years ago) link

my last point might be an unlikely event, but he may (may) be suggesting that more boats would lift the tide. the record companies think he's wrong.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 31 December 2004 18:50 (nineteen years ago) link

these ARE record company boats. all are on majors (except TV). i know what he's suggesting. It's a common bullshit argument and I used to make it all the time in high school.

miccio (miccio), Friday, 31 December 2004 18:51 (nineteen years ago) link

and for clarification I'm listening to TV On The Radio this second and I'd probably like the Walkmen if they brought back Stuart Lupton. I just know why these bands aren't as big as linkin park or green day or whoever and I don't think it speaks ill of the US that they aren't (for the reasons I listed above).

miccio (miccio), Friday, 31 December 2004 18:58 (nineteen years ago) link

In a perfect* world, certain bands would be bigger than they are? This is his vision of perfection? Dare to dream!

don, Friday, 31 December 2004 18:59 (nineteen years ago) link

no, that's not what he's saying. he's saying that even a few years ago - maybe as many as ten, though - there were a lot more medium-sized bands, which was better than a few big ones. i don't think how well his examples of potential additional medium-sized bands fit is so germane to the argument.

yes, these are record company boats. he wants the smaller boats to be bigger and maybe the bigger boats to lose a few of their amenities.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 31 December 2004 19:09 (nineteen years ago) link

way to project

miccio (miccio), Friday, 31 December 2004 19:13 (nineteen years ago) link

quite possibly. but I think I'm reading closer.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 31 December 2004 19:14 (nineteen years ago) link

(than anyone who wants to laugh at him)

gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 31 December 2004 19:14 (nineteen years ago) link

I hate that fucking blinkered "oh the world would be great if the hyped bands that appeal to my subculture were accepted by the monoculture" mentality. These AREN'T should-be-number-ones, they're fuckin' alt-drivel of varying degrees and most are available at Wal-mart.
-- miccio (anthonyisrigh...), December 31st, 2004.

Miccio! Miccio! Miccio!

latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 31 December 2004 19:21 (nineteen years ago) link

I hate that fucking blinkered "oh the world would be great if the hyped bands that appeal to my subculture were accepted by the monoculture" mentality. These AREN'T should-be-number-ones, they're fuckin' alt-drivel of varying degrees and most are available at Wal-mart.

I agree. But I don't see that being his argument, necessarily. I think you're too tied to his examples.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 31 December 2004 19:58 (nineteen years ago) link

Assuming that is what he's saying, do we know there aren't more medium-popular bands than ten years ago? More bands using groovey new stuff like the Internet to go around dinarch conglometates? of course, might not be so* many more actually making medium-money by being medium-popular (mmmSoulseekcoughcough)(how do you chart that sort of download, so how do we know etc.)

don, Friday, 31 December 2004 20:01 (nineteen years ago) link

that's an itneresting idea - maybe there are fewer medium bands because there are more small ones

gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 31 December 2004 20:04 (nineteen years ago) link

or, right, it is easier to find out about all the different small ones so more time is spent in the finding out

gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 31 December 2004 20:05 (nineteen years ago) link

the phrase "medium bands" is making me chuckle for some reason.

Al (sitcom), Friday, 31 December 2004 20:09 (nineteen years ago) link

and/or the internet provides so much content regarding known likes that the record companies and promoters no longer have as much access to the known-like media market to plug unknowns so they have to concentrate their resources to get through to the listeners

gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 31 December 2004 20:09 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm not sure I get why anybody wants the bands they like to be more popular, unless said bands aren't doing well financially and popularity would mean they wouldn't starve. But that's usually not what's meant by that kind of statement -- it's usually more like, Wouldn't it be awesome if the entire world had my powers of discernment? Which I'm not sure why you would want that or what it would accomplish.

jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 31 December 2004 20:10 (nineteen years ago) link

I comprehend - but don't understand - why anyone wants their favorite bands not to be popular. It's because the band is part of their identity, their identity is premised upon distinction, and a mass band loses its significance as a marker. But bands are more important to me as conveyors of ideas that I want to have purchase in the marketplace. I want the band to be as big as they can be without the reduction of the idea to meaninglessness.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 31 December 2004 20:14 (nineteen years ago) link

of course, on this model, if the band reaches a certain level of popularity, it may well lose its reason for being. i'm not sure there's anything wrong with that. but does any band today reach that level? probably.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 31 December 2004 20:16 (nineteen years ago) link

but those bands deal with small ideas?

gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 31 December 2004 20:18 (nineteen years ago) link

by which i mean ones that are too broad?

gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 31 December 2004 20:18 (nineteen years ago) link

Mark Lanegan's "Bubblegum" won't make anyone's list even though it was better than most--not even as the token junkie album of the year.

shookout (shookout), Friday, 31 December 2004 20:20 (nineteen years ago) link

It made DeRo's list.

jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 31 December 2004 20:21 (nineteen years ago) link

well that's too bad, now all the ILMers, with their DeRo-ism, will hate it.

shookout (shookout), Friday, 31 December 2004 20:23 (nineteen years ago) link

T.I. is a great rapper. Haikunym U R Crazy (though T.I. is also a great songwriter).

Shmool McShmool (shmuel), Friday, 31 December 2004 20:26 (nineteen years ago) link

miccio, do you reall think Klosterman is a more successful writer than you because of obviousness and privledge?

shookout (shookout), Friday, 31 December 2004 20:35 (nineteen years ago) link

he's saying that even a few years ago - maybe as many as ten, though - there were a lot more medium-sized bands, which was better than a few big ones.

this same argument was also made in the following years: 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1998, 1997, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1993, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1989, 1988, 1987, 1986, 1985, 1984, 1983, 1982, 1981, 1980, 1979, 1978, 1977, 1976, 1975, etc. my guess is that it was first made a few years -- maybe as many as ten, though -- after edison invented the phonograph. no, strike that. my guess is it was first made a few years after man walked upright for the first time.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Friday, 31 December 2004 21:33 (nineteen years ago) link

this same argument was also made in the following years: 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1998, 1997, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1993, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1989, 1988, 1987, 1986, 1985, 1984, 1983, 1982, 1981, 1980, 1979, 1978, 1977, 1976, 1975, etc.

no it wasn't

gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 31 December 2004 21:38 (nineteen years ago) link

Yeah wtf T.I. is a fucking great rapper, probably my favorite of the year. His album was uneven but as far as his rapping, shit is top notch, even when he decides to beat a dead horse (lil flip) over and over and over.

And to the "what's wrong w/ not liking gangsta?" question:

Basically, "gangsta" is being used as a catchall to describe something that has a lot more social implications than "just" gangsta rap - certain "kinds" of rap by certain "kinds" of rappers etc. etc. etc. It's not too difficult to see that there's a lot more too it than preferring de la soul to nwa.

xp gab, absolutely it was.

deej, Friday, 31 December 2004 21:42 (nineteen years ago) link

(x-post)
yes it was. the details may have changed over the years -- from jann wenner to lee abrams to hitmen to mtv to the internet to clear channel to jann wenner -- but the context is always the same. radio was more open to more bands in the '60s, man. it wasn't so business business business in the '70s, man. mtv played more music by more bands in the '80s, man. indie rock thrived in the '90s, man. blah blah blah.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Friday, 31 December 2004 21:46 (nineteen years ago) link

radio was more open to more bands in the '60s, man. it wasn't so business business business in the '70s, man. mtv played more music by more bands in the '80s, man. indie rock thrived in the '90s, man.

ok maybe, but all of these arguments - with the exception of MTV, which I'll exclude, because it wasn't a mass phenomenon in its early years and/or had to reach a position of power before it could be exercised - seem more about diversity of style rather than diversity of artists. in the '70s, the bands all sounded the same, but there were more of them. today, there's quite a bit of diversity on top 40 radio, but there aren't too many bands.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 31 December 2004 22:25 (nineteen years ago) link

>in the '70s, the bands all sounded the same

chuck, Friday, 31 December 2004 22:59 (nineteen years ago) link

on the radio? the trebly production? help?

gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 31 December 2004 23:24 (nineteen years ago) link

did anyone mention the new yorker's list of the ten notable cds of 2004? kanye is on there as the lone rapster. unless you count dizzzzzeeeee. probably someone did.

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 1 January 2005 00:04 (nineteen years ago) link

perhaps some people were too busy confusing black sabbath and the cars with kc & the sunshine band and firefall to have noticed.

clayrod henry nimple, Saturday, 1 January 2005 00:12 (nineteen years ago) link

my 12 Best Archival Releases Of 2004 features a token Welshman among the brits and yanks:

15.60.75 - Jimmy Bell's Still In Town
Crime - San Francisco's Still Doomed
Meic Stevens - Outlander
Nektar - Journey To The Centre Of The Eye
Nektar - A Tab In The Ocean
Pere Ubu - One Man Drives While The Other Man Screams
Arthur Russell - Calling Out Of Context
Wire - Wire On The Box:1979
Minor Threat - First Demo Tape
The Homosexuals - Astral Glamour
Bunnybrains - Box The Bunny
Sun Ra Research - Sun Ra Research

Big Bummer: that david byrne world psychedelic classics african comp that doesn't have any psychedelic music on it. there oughta be a law. the above list is exclusive to this thread and will not be posted elsewhere.

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 1 January 2005 00:12 (nineteen years ago) link

it was all about compression in the 70's.

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 1 January 2005 00:13 (nineteen years ago) link

a lot of 70's stuff still sounds best coming from a car radio.

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 1 January 2005 00:14 (nineteen years ago) link

World Psychedelic Classics 3, LOVE'S THE REAL THING (or A REAL THING) is great Afrofunk! Not "psychedelic" except in the educationally fun sense (WPC 1 was one of their Os Mutantes, probably the comp; 2 was that initial Shuggie Otis reissue)

don, Saturday, 1 January 2005 01:59 (nineteen years ago) link

xpost Cuz is right: yeah yeah the 60s had Top Forty radio, but forty's not many slots when you had all those regional labels, plus some of the crazier big labels like Warners had what was called the "throw it at the wall and see what sticks" release plan, where you just projectile vomit 200 LPs a week or something, most of the time with 0 promotion, or as little as possible, depending on the contract. FM radio wasn't til late 60s/early 70s in a lotta places, and even then, just a certain range (usally like: John Fahey si, Stooges no). With live gigs, you (muso and listener) were at the mercy of Bill Graham or his many local loser/wannabees. Technology was a problem; if you could get something recorded and mastered right, still had to deal with the pressing plant, and a minium order there, and then how to sell it (at the gig? Possibly, if "Bill" was even willing to take a cut. More likely, out of your trunk in the parking lot, if at all. Go around, shop by shop, like the rackjobbers did for the real labels) It's gotta be better now! Even just information, you can get today's news today, not waiting for the new obsolete edition of the Whatchamacallit Guide to replace the old etc.(great readin', but yknow)

don, Saturday, 1 January 2005 02:13 (nineteen years ago) link

online rap purists in early 2004 = kanye is great, rips off rza but whatever, loved his mixtape stuff before, album is neat

online rap purists in late 2004 = kanye is a coon and i will punch him the face

the worm turned like a motherfucker on kanye with a lot of heads. limited research states that ghost and madvillain were tops for most people, but kanye made very few lists when polled at boards and shit.

then again..

white rock crit + non-violent, accessible black rap = pazz and jop

i liked it when it first dropped, but it went from maybe five or six songs i liked a lot to me just ripping 'spaceship' and giving the disc to my 10 year old sister for christmas.

also, i was pretty shocked by the lack of rap on my list. i had m.i.a, the streets and dizzee, none of which are trad-rap. also had madvillain, rjd2 and ghost. john smith and masta ace would've gotten in if i though they had a chance to make it in pazz and jop. which is weird, considering i heard maybe 60-70 rap albums this year.

whatever, most would call this year pretty light for solid rap albums. i thought kanye was gonna be popular with indie folks when i first heard his tape drops in 2002 but not quite to this extent.

Rollie Pemberton (Rollie Pemberton), Saturday, 1 January 2005 03:04 (nineteen years ago) link

Where do people who aren't interested in rap hear their rap? Is it really that he's "laudably gangsta-free" that's winning him blueberry boat proximity? that so many lists are so otherwise similar is a bit irking tho.

mac, Saturday, 1 January 2005 06:42 (nineteen years ago) link

miccio, do you reall think Klosterman is a more successful writer than you because of obviousness and privledge?

remove the word "than you" and yes. This is soooo not about me. I'm Budgie Klos! My time will come.

miccio (miccio), Saturday, 1 January 2005 06:56 (nineteen years ago) link

just to clarify:
I love T.I. very much
his disc -> my top ten

but his stuff's composed,
and I think his guest rapping
is just not as tight

urban legend's GREAT
not spotty at all to me;
I am a big fan

Haibun (Begs2Differ), Saturday, 1 January 2005 07:31 (nineteen years ago) link

and drunk

Haibun (Begs2Differ), Saturday, 1 January 2005 07:38 (nineteen years ago) link

Budgie:good, although I could live without the ballady bits. Klos: aim higher, Manthony!

don, Saturday, 1 January 2005 16:14 (nineteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.