The Liars - Drum's Not Dead (2006)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (267 of them)
Discussion of this album's merits seems particularly subjective
Well, yes. I think it was Tim Finney who once said that all of our discussions about music won't move beyond the level of our own subjective reactions---I think most of us here agree on that.

I think the notion that the band isn't inspired and doesn't really believe in what they're doing is not remotely valid ("It sounds joyless and monotonous and uninspired, as if they bored even themselves to death while making it."--Melissa); they're obviously very into um, drums, as their evolution as a band has taken them in a more and more rhythm-centric direction.

Perhaps Melissa is wrong. Maybe they were, in actuality, quite excited whilst recording this album. However, I think the point remains that that excitement, if indeed it was present, didn't translate/reflect onto anything in terms of exploring different sonic possibilities. It's a very limited palette, and, as Dominique pointed out, the resulting sketches are unremarkably simplistic.

For the people who don't like this album, what would you put on instead?
Anything else. ;-)

Turangalila (Salvador), Friday, 24 February 2006 01:01 (eighteen years ago) link

x-post

hmm, not comparing sonics (which I might regard as a stylistic element - god I sound like an alien to myself sometimes), it's hard to compare forms and content to other records, chiefly because, like I posted earlier, I don't tend to listen to records that don't seem interesting to me formally, at least a little bit. If we're talking big blocks of structure, big blocks of interraction that don't necessarily evolve or change over time, or are particularly interesting in their own rights, maybe I could say I'd put on the last Orthrelm record. Obviously this is worlds away, stylistically speaking, from the Liars record, but it does involve big, basically simple chunks of monolothic, not extremely inventive forms as a matter of construction. Why I find OV a lot more interesting is 1) because its "parts" seem to pass by quickly (even though in reality, they don't - in fact, it's a very *slow* record in the respect that it takes a long time for different stuff to happen - itself a neat "trick"), so I don't have tons of time to contemplate on its relatively static forms, and 2) it uses its form against itself - that is, it's blasting along for 45 minutes, seemingly never changing (but actually changing), and rather than get bored, I'm lulled ever closer to the smallest details of what's happening. The "big blocks" of activity, of sound, no longer seem like blocks, but of circuits or coastlines or equations that beg to be deconstructed, to be tracked inch by inch. In that light, it seems ultra-intense, unlike my experience with Drum's Not Dead, which is ironically a pretty dead, uneventful experience.

but to be honest, I haven't lived with Liars' record anywhere near as long as I've lived with OV. I was initially drawn to OV just because I thought it sounded cool, and not having that draw with Drum's Not Dead is a big disadvantage

Dominique (dleone), Friday, 24 February 2006 01:08 (eighteen years ago) link

This record sounds nothing like Tago Mago.

cdwill (cdwill), Friday, 24 February 2006 01:26 (eighteen years ago) link

I was just listening to it again. One of my issues with it is with the melodies. They never go anywhere, which makes their randomness kind of obvious. There's no melodic peaks, no tension/release; they're just there... meandering about, floating and adding nothing but the singer's Beck-with-laryngitis voice.

Turangalila (Salvador), Friday, 24 February 2006 01:29 (eighteen years ago) link

Unfortunately. x-post

Melissa W (Melissa W), Friday, 24 February 2006 01:29 (eighteen years ago) link

Like I said, I know the stuff Hopper's talking about is quite different from Liars. But I think the distinction she's talking about -- try vs. do -- is something that's still at issue, on a different level, for Liars. That make sense?

Dom, my complaint on this one isn't to do with accusing these bands of laziness or ease or insufficient meddling (the "presets" issue). I am not against transparency; I'm just not sure that transparency alone excites me. And I do feel like certain acts these days deconstruct their sound to that point of transparency, and deconstruct their form to the point of chaos, and then on some level there's not much left to appreciate. Possibly it's that they believe in formal chaos as an end in itself, which I'm not sure I do; typically when I like something "chaotic" it's because the chaos seems like a side-effect of struggling to create an entirely new kind of "form" (and because it sets that "form" into really stark relief).

This is definitely a side/tangent issue to Liars, though.

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 24 February 2006 01:38 (eighteen years ago) link

Turangalila:
"Well, yes. I think it was Tim Finney who once said that all of our discussions about music won't move beyond the level of our own subjective reactions---I think most of us here agree on that."

Yeah, I'm not new to that concept, that's why I used the qualifier "particularly." Also, do we really want to admit that any discussion of this stuff is pointless?

"Perhaps Melissa is wrong. Maybe they were, in actuality, quite excited whilst recording this album. However, I think the point remains that that excitement, if indeed it was present, didn't translate/reflect onto anything in terms of exploring different sonic possibilities. It's a very limited palette, and, as Dominique pointed out, the resulting sketches are unremarkably simplistic."--you

"They seem very interested in their subject matter and I think they communicate their interest well, I buy into the whole atmosphere of the album, but whether or not someone else does might be entirely subjective, I'm not sure."--me
I don't think simplicity makes it seem less inspired or unremarkable, I could just as easily say its very "focused."

Also, I think it's weird that you'd say there is no "tension/release," because it seems to me that tension and release is a big part of the album.

Matt McEver (mattmc387), Friday, 24 February 2006 02:18 (eighteen years ago) link

I was only pointing out that it seemed you were remarking on the obvious. I don't really see how the reactions to this album album could be more "particularly" subjective than the reaction to any other album. And I suppose your "focused" is my "monotonous."

Turangalila (Salvador), Friday, 24 February 2006 03:19 (eighteen years ago) link

Only heard this the once so far and wasn't really in a situation where I could give it all my attention, so maybe I ought to just shut up. Only came away with quite a blurry impression of it, but then again, on the whole it's possibly quite a blurry album. Nicely narcoleptic. Possibly stating the obvious: there's a similar kind of bored tension to it as Confusion Is Sex-era Sonic Youth perhaps. Was also reminded a lot of the Microphones' Mount Eerie, all that primitive drumming and chanting, and the music moving in and out of focus in sort of an elemental fashion. There's that whole mountain myth making thing too, but I haven't really got my head around the concept of either record enough to elaborate much. I don't know what it all means at the moment, but I think I like it.

NickB (NickB), Friday, 24 February 2006 10:31 (eighteen years ago) link

this album is the best, it's greater than arctic monkeys, the strokes, and chinese democracy COMBINED. take that!

latebloomer: My Baby's A Labrador, He's Beautiful (latebloomer), Friday, 24 February 2006 11:46 (eighteen years ago) link

(seriously though, its really really good)

latebloomer: My Baby's A Labrador, He's Beautiful (latebloomer), Friday, 24 February 2006 11:47 (eighteen years ago) link

Having listened a few more times, I think it's .... just okay. Drum and the Uncomfortable Can, It Fit When I Was a Kid, Drum Gets a Glimpse and the last track are all cool .... the rest end up sounding like inferior variations of these, IMO. I definitely don't think the whole thing is pointless or horrible or whatever, but it seems like they could have used some more ideas ....

Renard (Renard), Friday, 24 February 2006 23:46 (eighteen years ago) link

i like the sparseness of it: it reminds me, and forgive me if i said this upthread, of "the key of dreams" by section 25 (and some of S25's early singles). that sense of stripped-down/pared-back/post-punk experimentation. what i suppose i love about this band is that they don't sound like "musicians" experimenting because they're bored with being able to play "properly", but dudes experimenting because they're eager to ... well, just to play, in every sense of the word.

it is, for me, quite a primal thing: matt mcever sums it up neatly. there are moments where almost nothing is happening, but fuck me: i love the way it happens. or doesn't. if you see what i mean.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 25 February 2006 01:54 (eighteen years ago) link

yeah, vut is there a region code on the dvd?

Christopher Costello (CGC), Saturday, 25 February 2006 02:08 (eighteen years ago) link

"pal: all regions" it says on mine, in minuscule lettering. it's a promo, but i can't see why it'd be any different to the real - UK, anyway - release.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 25 February 2006 02:11 (eighteen years ago) link

i could have seen them in glasgow tonight, incidentally. but i had prior commitments. gah.

i need to watch the films. the third one especially.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 25 February 2006 02:22 (eighteen years ago) link

Okay, I'm new to this band, having bought the CD today. Heard a lot of good things about them but these good things tend to boil down to "they're great!" which tells me very little. On cursory listens they sound like a sort of rubbish version of Black Dice with a little bit of Animal Collective thrown in but without the impact of either band. Am I missing something here?

dog latin (dog latin), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 17:25 (eighteen years ago) link

get the last album, it beautiful. i haven't listened to this new one yet, cause it's released on the 21st here.

Christopher Costello (CGC), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 17:42 (eighteen years ago) link

Am I missing something here?

yes. they're great!

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 18:24 (eighteen years ago) link

Pah. This album is gash.

Wax Cat (Wax Cat), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 18:36 (eighteen years ago) link

I agree with grimly fiendish. I always find this kind of experimental music easy to admire but hard to love, but I'm absolutely addicted to 'Drum's Not Dead'. Can't shake it. Awesome album that fully realises Liars' potential. Where they go next should be really interesting.

yer mam! (yer mam!), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 18:42 (eighteen years ago) link

[...]they sound like a sort of rubbish version of Black Dice with a little bit of Animal Collective thrown in but without the impact of either band. Am I missing something here?
-- dog latin (doglati...), March 8th, 2006. (dog latin) (link)

No, you summed it up quite well. And no, there is nothing "experimental" about this. In fact, that's a part of the problem. It's just... such a nonentity.

Turangalila (Salvador), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 18:46 (eighteen years ago) link

i heard "room on the broom" after it was recommended to me and it didn't move me. and i like noise and psychedelia and postpunk and all that stuff to bits. that said, i listened to the new one again and it's slowly growing on me. a little too early to tell i suppose, but i do wonder what all the fuss is about when we've already got bands like Black Dice and the Lowdown who do something very very similar. there are bits on this record that sound like they were lifted right out of "beaches and canyons" and others that sound like a post-hardcore "sung tongs".

i'll probably be back in a month gushing about how much i love this band, knowing me.

dog latin (dog latin), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 19:13 (eighteen years ago) link

ha! just read the whole thread (should have before posting). People are very polarised by this record.

dog latin (dog latin), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 19:47 (eighteen years ago) link

Oh, and am I the only one who noticed the section that sounds really similar to the Byrds "You Showed Me". I also noticed the "Softest Voice" similarity mentioned upthread. There's also also also a bit that sounds like it was lifted straight from the rolling wave sounds in "Endless Happiness" by Black Dice.

I reckon though that it's all gonna click and I'm gonna love this album one day.

dog latin (dog latin), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 19:51 (eighteen years ago) link

Black Dice are too self-conciously "difficult" for me tbh
Animal Collective I just can't get past the vocals (ugh) or the... actually I'm not sure I can define it, but it doesn't work for me (though I admire & respect them in theory).

Liars are more like a happy medium to me and not 'difficult' to appreciate/enjoy at all!

I don't think this record fully delivers on it's promise as an album however (it's the "songs" mainly) but I'm glad I heard it, because they don't sound lazy, and DO sound like a band who could actually take rock forward to somewhere... and that's a bit of a rare quality right now.

fandango (fandango), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 20:00 (eighteen years ago) link

funny, i think liars would be greatly improved if the guys had better singing voices. what do you not like about the AC vocals par-hasard?

dog latin (dog latin), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 20:01 (eighteen years ago) link

I'm not sure.. but I think it's the same thing I dislike in whatever freak-folk! Is that an answer?

Maybe it seems like an attempt at primitivism or naivity that comes across incredibly mannered and inauthentic & deliberately "ooh weird & childish" about it all (yes I know there's rockism in there).

By contrast (to the music) the fairly average male rock guy voices of Liars come across as oddly refreshing!

I very much doubt I've heard enough of AC's ouvre to be certain about all this though.

fandango (fandango), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 20:22 (eighteen years ago) link

AC's vocals are always different, though...I think they add an uncomfortable element to Feels, but the euphoric harmonizing is what stops Sung Tongs from being too experimental - the melody gives it a base...i feel the same with Drum's Not Dead...for instance, the melody of the last song ends the album on its highest note and leaves the listener feeling warm, but elsewhere (towards the albums end) its often too monotonous, which is how I felt about a lot of their last album (though that was hampered more by the muddy production)

Space Is the Place (Space Is the Place), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 20:33 (eighteen years ago) link

yeh, AC vocals do sound pretty different from song to song.

dog latin (dog latin), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 20:36 (eighteen years ago) link

I'm pretty much in agreement re: ST vs. Feels (much more awkward on a first impression) but I need to hear them both properly still.

fandango (fandango), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 20:37 (eighteen years ago) link

the vocals on sung tongs are better than feels (which still sounds like mercury rev's singer), but it's down to taste. i really like the whole beach boys-go-apeshit vibe on ST.

dog latin (dog latin), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 20:52 (eighteen years ago) link

life is a pigsty

noizem duke (noize duke), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 20:55 (eighteen years ago) link

All these Animal Collective comparisons baffle me. Same w/ Black Dice.

Has anybody heard the new Young People? I'm really digging it right now, it's a sister to Drum's Not Dead — carefully plotted, spare, lots of tribal thrumping, creepy vibey. The two records sound GREAT back-to-back.

Dr. Gene Scott (shinybeast), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 02:27 (eighteen years ago) link

I reckon Liars would sound better with higher production values. Sometimes I want the sounds to kick me in the face but they fall a bit flat.

dog latin (dog latin), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 10:43 (eighteen years ago) link

I think they'd sound completely average & really normal with better production values. I love the production on this record, even if the record itself didn't leave as lasting an impression as I'd hoped.

file under cozy techno (fandango), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 11:40 (eighteen years ago) link

never heard the last one but listening to the Other Music samples now and there's a definate This Heat vibe going on...minus the prog drumming though. Sounds really good.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Thursday, 23 March 2006 19:17 (eighteen years ago) link

Dan, last one even more so

Dominique (dleone), Thursday, 23 March 2006 19:45 (eighteen years ago) link

you'll love it dan. i think it's totally yr kinda record. (i adore it)

Jams Murphy (ystrickler), Thursday, 23 March 2006 19:49 (eighteen years ago) link

this is what i wanted the new tv on the radio album to sound like. instead that album sounded like shit. drums not dead is great.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Thursday, 23 March 2006 19:57 (eighteen years ago) link

"All these Animal Collective comparisons baffle me. Same w/ Black Dice."

that's funny. listening to it with people last night who hadn't heard it yet, the comments all were along the lines of "when did beck join black dice?" and "so, these guys have been hanging out with the animal collective, huh."

prince rupert, Thursday, 23 March 2006 20:07 (eighteen years ago) link

this album continues to grow on me....so hypnotic and just seems to occupy its own little universe...

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Thursday, 23 March 2006 20:12 (eighteen years ago) link

this album totally won me over, in the end. live it was a lot more INYRFACE and PIERCING though. and a lot of fun

willem -- (willem), Thursday, 23 March 2006 20:36 (eighteen years ago) link

no liars no credulity

noizem duke (noize duke), Thursday, 23 March 2006 20:46 (eighteen years ago) link

tru dat.

have you guys heard ft(The Shadow Government)? their album Guns of August I could see appealing to Liars fans...

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Thursday, 23 March 2006 20:59 (eighteen years ago) link

i luv the cover art

meth lab for doug flutie (sanskrit), Thursday, 23 March 2006 21:13 (eighteen years ago) link

to echo various people upthread, if you like this and haven't heard they were wrong so we drowned, check that out too. it's about as good as drum's not dead, if not a little better.

sleep (sleep), Thursday, 23 March 2006 22:04 (eighteen years ago) link

i definitely didn't hate the last record...but i never found a compelling reason to put it on repeatedly. i've probably already listened to drum's not dead more times than they were wrong... and i've only had the former for like a week.

m.c. (clikatowi), Thursday, 23 March 2006 22:27 (eighteen years ago) link

Has anyone else had ploblems playing this on a computer (PC)? I played it before, but now a couple of days later, my computer won't even recognize it as a cd.

T. Weiss (Timmy), Monday, 3 April 2006 01:13 (eighteen years ago) link

T. Weiss, maybe you have the vinyl version like I do?

mikko (mikko), Monday, 3 April 2006 10:46 (eighteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.