M83?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (507 of them)
i asked on the ysi thread but could anyone post that mix or the montag one?

firstworldman (firstworldman), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 18:58 (nineteen years ago) link

so handsome and a perlon t-shirt!

jed_ (jed), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 18:59 (nineteen years ago) link

(oh yeah!)

X-PAT (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 19:00 (nineteen years ago) link

teen angst (luciano remix) ysi

willem (willem), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 20:42 (nineteen years ago) link

:-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 20:42 (nineteen years ago) link

:(

can some kind soul explain why the bloody hell i can't download anything from yousendit? the !!! track (y'know, the one from the other thread) ... i got 29% through and it stuck. i now can't seem to connect at all. this: 1% and it's stuck.

i mean, it works as a web download. surely there aren't firewall issues. are there?

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 20:48 (nineteen years ago) link

(sorry: confusing wording. it's *meant to* work as a web download.)

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 20:50 (nineteen years ago) link

i don't know, seems unlikely though. i could send you the track, can your inbox handle 16.5MB?

willem (willem), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 20:51 (nineteen years ago) link

that's very kind of you, willem, but don't go to any trouble. i should really buy it anyway ;)

i'm just kinda puzzled as to why i'm getting nowhere with what should be a very simple download. is anyone else having problems? is this just a bad night in yousendit world?

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 20:53 (nineteen years ago) link

riiiight. i think it's working now. a logout seems to have helped. i think it's a firefox-related problem of some kind, but i've no idea what. ach well.

thanks again, willem. i assume you have the "don't save me" remixes that i mentioned upthread?

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 21:09 (nineteen years ago) link

jesus christ. 67% and it just decided to stop for no reason. tits!

safari now seems to be doing a much more stable job than firefox. perhaps it's time i re-migrated :)

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 21:17 (nineteen years ago) link

i have the cd-single, yes. bliss.

(x-post: it works for me on safari)

willem (willem), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 21:21 (nineteen years ago) link

yup: it's worked perfectly via safari. weird, eh?

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 21:29 (nineteen years ago) link

sorry to hijack this thread with technical stuff (although, as M83 are my absolute favourite band in the whole world ever right now, i'm glad i'm keeping it active) ... anyway, i asked my big techy mate about the YSI/firefox thing and he gave me an astonishingly detailed explanation involving wonderful metaphors about trunk roads and trucks. but the upshot is: mozilla derivatives with their multiple-connection ways confuse the fuck out of YSI's servers, and firefox doesn't.

coo ur, the things you learn. i'm going back to wget from now on, anyway.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 5 May 2005 08:20 (nineteen years ago) link

Works fine with Windows Firefox...

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 5 May 2005 08:49 (nineteen years ago) link

[angry noise]

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 5 May 2005 08:51 (nineteen years ago) link

mozilla derivatives with their multiple-connection ways

But... Firefox is the prime Mozilla derivative! Maybe you mean Mosaic. I was having some weird connection issues to YSI when you were, I think that they were having problems.

Anyway, this Luciano mix is crazy long! I think it's another one of those where I feel a little shiver every time I hear some element of the original song come in, just because it's so gradual.

mike h. (mike h.), Thursday, 5 May 2005 12:23 (nineteen years ago) link

that's the other problem: after having spent so long fucking about to get the thing, i didn't have time to listen to it or put it on the iPod! but i know it's waiting there for me tonight, hurrah.

which reminds me. i ordered the first M83 album from gooom the other week and it hasn't turned up yet. hmm.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 5 May 2005 12:56 (nineteen years ago) link

ok funsters, decent-quality isolated MP3s of that KCRW show here. if anyone can identify the third song, i'd be much obliged.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Sunday, 8 May 2005 18:41 (nineteen years ago) link

(nb: i haven't listened to it all the way through myself, so if he IDs the songs during the interview bit then, er, sorry for being a mook.)

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Sunday, 8 May 2005 18:44 (nineteen years ago) link

Thank ya sir, am listening now. :-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 8 May 2005 19:08 (nineteen years ago) link

This mix is great!

Also: use Camino, dudes. Mac-specific Firefox. Word.

giboyeux (skowly), Sunday, 8 May 2005 19:10 (nineteen years ago) link

this is lovely - i like them more now i have seen them. the singer is charming (also cute).

jed_ (jed), Sunday, 8 May 2005 19:58 (nineteen years ago) link

The third track is "Unrecorded", from the "Dead Cities ..." album.

Thanks for the mp3's, grimly!

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Sunday, 8 May 2005 20:03 (nineteen years ago) link

what's the band name he name-check's between judas priest (pryst!) and slowdive?

jed_ (jed), Sunday, 8 May 2005 20:04 (nineteen years ago) link

it seems i've missed out by only focussing on the remixes (but theres still time!)

jed_ (jed), Sunday, 8 May 2005 20:11 (nineteen years ago) link

xx-post: is it? wow! i've not listened to "dead cities" in yonks ... i had a quick whizz through the start of each track to see if i could work out what that was, but hey. thanks, though, MiR: much appreciated.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Sunday, 8 May 2005 20:35 (nineteen years ago) link

hmmmmm. actually, listening to "unrecorded" again, i'm not convinced it is! i mean, it's had a serious-ass makeover :)

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Sunday, 8 May 2005 20:45 (nineteen years ago) link

Hang on, I listened again, and you're right ... it's actually "Night" from their debut. Sorry about that!

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Sunday, 8 May 2005 21:00 (nineteen years ago) link

ah, that explains it! of course, if gooom had sent me my copy of the album yet, i'd know that already. grr.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Sunday, 8 May 2005 22:18 (nineteen years ago) link

this if friggin' awesome!

Aerodynamic (Aerodynamic), Sunday, 8 May 2005 23:48 (nineteen years ago) link

is

Aerodynamic (Aerodynamic), Sunday, 8 May 2005 23:48 (nineteen years ago) link

what's the band name he name-check's between judas priest (pryst!) and slowdive?

I think it was Sonic Youth. I was actually a little annoyed that he didn't namecheck the obvious...

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 9 May 2005 00:32 (nineteen years ago) link

Don't worry, Spencer, he'll give praise to your band soon enough.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 9 May 2005 00:41 (nineteen years ago) link

Also, thanks so much for putting these tracks up!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 9 May 2005 00:48 (nineteen years ago) link

Yes, seconded! It was good to hear them. I still will admit "Run Into Flowers" works better as concept than as successful song but I enjoy the new album so much that I'm glad they've finally fully connected with me.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 9 May 2005 01:03 (nineteen years ago) link

Such a fantastic band it hurts. And he's just a wee scraggly chap, who sways like the gopher at the end of Caddyshack and uses the thumbs up without irony (even at the end of the great video for Don't Save Us From The Flames). A ghost is screaming your nameindeed.

Come on, ye YSI. Thanks, Grimly.

stet (stet), Monday, 9 May 2005 01:04 (nineteen years ago) link

Ned, you are still way off the mark on "Run Into Flowers."

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 9 May 2005 01:23 (nineteen years ago) link

Vive la difference!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 9 May 2005 01:27 (nineteen years ago) link

how can run into flowers work better as a concept? i don't understand, cuz i always see music inevitably as a process.

natedey (ndeyoung), Monday, 9 May 2005 04:39 (nineteen years ago) link

and am i the only one who finds the luciano mix of teen angst too prude? the original just delivers too much and the remix just plays with delivering too much.

natedey (ndeyoung), Monday, 9 May 2005 04:49 (nineteen years ago) link

no, natedey, i absolutely agree. i was slightly disappointed by it. that said: i've only listened to it the once.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Monday, 9 May 2005 06:24 (nineteen years ago) link

this is great stuff, thanks for the rip grimlord :-)

willem (willem), Monday, 9 May 2005 14:17 (nineteen years ago) link

how can run into flowers work better as a concept?

In brief (and risking the wrath of the injured Spencer) -- I sense what they were thinking of when they came up with the song and enjoy that, but the end results are kinda flat. (See also most everything by the Killers.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 9 May 2005 14:19 (nineteen years ago) link

ned, it pains me to say this, but you're just plain wrong. this is how it was for me:

scene: mono, the glasgow bar, october 7, 2003. GRIMLY and his MATE, whose birthday it is, are sitting being morose in the corner.

MATE: so anyway, i was thinking ...
[the BARMAN puts a CD in the machine and a SONG starts up. it is buzzy and interesting]
MATE: ... and it's the most incredible idea in the world ever ...
[suddenly the SONG begins a beautiful weaving melody and a glorious series of crescendos]
MATE: and it's really, really important that we talk about it now otherwi ... [clang]
[MATE falls over as GRIMLY rushes past him, grabs the BARMAN by the throat and demands to know what this life-changing piece of music is. it turns out to be "run into flowers", and thus a new dawn in GRIMLY'S life begins. many of his friends receive copies of "dead cities" for their birthdays/christmas, including his MATE, who is so blown away he never remembers his big idea. everyone lives slightly more happily ever after than they would without the healing power of "run into flowers".]

well, something like that, anyway.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Monday, 9 May 2005 17:16 (nineteen years ago) link

risking the wrath of the injured Spencer

Righteousness knows no wounds!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 9 May 2005 17:29 (nineteen years ago) link

The Luciano mix is incredible. It's all about the tease, you maximalists!

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Monday, 9 May 2005 18:37 (nineteen years ago) link

well, something like that, anyway.

Good on yer, that's something close to how I felt when I first heard "Soon." Dead Cities left me cold aside from the final track that just went on forever but did so interestingly. This is one reason why I'm so impressed with the new one, it just feels much more ON -- like leaping out of the speakers and enveloping me immediately on -- and the hyperdrama works whereas the previous one's efforts did not. It felt cold, sterile almost, like those Delgados mega-orchestrated albums that left me terribly cold. The sheer *awe* in which "Run Into Flowers" is regarded with by so many is impressive but I just don't feel it at all.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 9 May 2005 19:01 (nineteen years ago) link

I mean, if this helps in drawing a comparison -- on Rock Action, Mogwai on "2 Rights Make 1 Wrong" created a song which I still think is probably their finest effort, and nailed the crescendo/epic/lead melody combination SO perfectly, so rightly. It stands out still for me as an example of sublime, careful arrangement, of making sure everything is in its place, of huge scope and quiet, reflective detail. It's a song that makes me glad to be alive. So I'm not *un*moved by the prospect of something that does something similar for others, obv., it's just that if I had to measure up the two songs in terms of immediate and lasting impact both, M83 just falls by the wayside, and on its own it's...*searches for the word*...what, nice? Vaguely pleasant? I can't add much more.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 9 May 2005 19:06 (nineteen years ago) link

Ned, your meh-ing of this track is one of the great ILM mysteries for me. It is *easily* one of the top overtly MBV-influenced tracks ever. "Vaguely pleasant"??? Do you have like a mislabeled mp3 or something? I just watched the video again and it's just pure sublime tone and movement, rapturous and melancholy at the same time.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 9 May 2005 19:20 (nineteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.