― Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 25 October 2005 18:41 (eighteen years ago) link
― ken taylrr never her (ken taylrr), Tuesday, 25 October 2005 18:49 (eighteen years ago) link
― Andy_K (Andy_K), Tuesday, 25 October 2005 18:55 (eighteen years ago) link
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Tuesday, 25 October 2005 22:18 (eighteen years ago) link
― milton parker (Jon L), Tuesday, 25 October 2005 22:46 (eighteen years ago) link
the fuck? no place for hermeneutics in thinking about music?
i guess i am looking for answers about broken beat? in that kelley polar reminds me of broken beat? ie, as jerry the nipper (sort of) puts it, "with the addition of bongos, rhodes keyboards and afro-positive divas, this drum + bass track is now a JAZZ FUSION MASTERPIECE"
― vahid (vahid), Wednesday, 26 October 2005 21:41 (eighteen years ago) link
― tricky (disco stu), Wednesday, 26 October 2005 21:48 (eighteen years ago) link
No Vahid I wasn't saying that you can't make these sorts of comments, i was just honestly curious about whether you thought anything flowed from whether we think of Kelley Polar as IDM or pop or dance or [x] - it's precisely because I think there is a place for hermeneutics in thinking about music that I ask these questions, because I think these sorts of decisions can have effects on what we think of a piece of music, whether it is "good" or "bad" etc.
I don't have an opinion yet because I haven't heard the album.
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Thursday, 27 October 2005 01:11 (eighteen years ago) link
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Thursday, 27 October 2005 14:01 (eighteen years ago) link
― biz, Thursday, 27 October 2005 14:16 (eighteen years ago) link
― tricky (disco stu), Thursday, 27 October 2005 15:21 (eighteen years ago) link
the genre confusion is one of the things that makes it interesting to me. (just like our mammoth "what is deep house" thread)
― tricky (disco stu), Thursday, 27 October 2005 15:29 (eighteen years ago) link
― biz, Thursday, 27 October 2005 15:33 (eighteen years ago) link
actually that's not entirely true. when i listen to this, i do not think of genre for a second (well now i probably will). it is in the context of this thread and our discourse here that i find the genre confusion interesting.
speaking of splitting hairs, morgan geist is from new jersey not detroit, but point taken.
― tricky (disco stu), Thursday, 27 October 2005 15:41 (eighteen years ago) link
― biz, Thursday, 27 October 2005 15:43 (eighteen years ago) link
― tricky (disco stu), Thursday, 27 October 2005 15:45 (eighteen years ago) link
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Thursday, 27 October 2005 15:47 (eighteen years ago) link
xpost, completely agree dan - "idm" is now largely shit and a completely moronic genre name.
― tricky (disco stu), Thursday, 27 October 2005 15:49 (eighteen years ago) link
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Thursday, 27 October 2005 15:53 (eighteen years ago) link
― tricky (disco stu), Thursday, 27 October 2005 15:57 (eighteen years ago) link
― tricky (disco stu), Thursday, 27 October 2005 16:02 (eighteen years ago) link
― tricky (disco stu), Thursday, 27 October 2005 16:03 (eighteen years ago) link
― biz, Thursday, 27 October 2005 16:04 (eighteen years ago) link
― tricky (disco stu), Thursday, 27 October 2005 16:08 (eighteen years ago) link
― Mark (MarkR), Thursday, 27 October 2005 16:20 (eighteen years ago) link
― tricky (disco stu), Thursday, 27 October 2005 17:08 (eighteen years ago) link
no dummy, because my mom knows what disco is and if i played her kelley polar she'd just say "oh, more electronic noise?" she can tell the difference between disco and other music but to the 99% of the populace that don't listen to minimal electronica this simply isn't disco, or nu romantic or pop or whatever.
― vahid (vahid), Thursday, 27 October 2005 17:45 (eighteen years ago) link
― dummy, Thursday, 27 October 2005 18:08 (eighteen years ago) link
― strongo hulkington's ghost (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 27 October 2005 18:11 (eighteen years ago) link
― etc, Thursday, 27 October 2005 19:20 (eighteen years ago) link
that nagging vocal bit in "my beauty in the moon" . . . andrew suggested "wood beez" or limahl's neverending story theme, ha.
I love how it's neuromantic but w/out the emotronica quality that the junior boys/superpitcher/&c have - it's so urbane! both baroque/choral AND on a great gatsby jazz age tip! i'd argue that there's no indie in this record's DNA.
― etc, Thursday, 27 October 2005 19:27 (eighteen years ago) link
― etc, Thursday, 27 October 2005 19:32 (eighteen years ago) link
wait, I see the point, we've all been hoodwinked! we love broken beat!!!!!
― Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 27 October 2005 20:29 (eighteen years ago) link
every song I dance to is magic,every room I'm in keeps on moving,when I sleep my dreams are filled with motionit never gets, never gets, never gets...oooo, oooo, oooo . . ."
= some of my favourite lyrics of the past few years - the implication & deferment of "you" in the first verse is up there w/phil oakey also avoiding "you" in "love action".
hmmn, possible convergent evolution w/indie - magnetic fields' "all the umbrellas in london"/"rats in the garbage of the western world", if they'd actually sounded like the NY discos stephin merritt has undoubtedly hung out at.
― etc, Thursday, 27 October 2005 20:49 (eighteen years ago) link
― c7n (Cozen), Thursday, 27 October 2005 21:12 (eighteen years ago) link
― c7n (Cozen), Thursday, 27 October 2005 21:14 (eighteen years ago) link
it's nice to see you have such a nuanced defn of IDM!
― vahid (vahid), Friday, 28 October 2005 00:31 (eighteen years ago) link
Not a trick question! If I ask the same question while listening to Luciano, the answer is "Yes!"
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Friday, 28 October 2005 03:37 (eighteen years ago) link
― Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Friday, 28 October 2005 05:27 (eighteen years ago) link
― etc, Friday, 28 October 2005 06:44 (eighteen years ago) link
― login name (fandango), Friday, 28 October 2005 13:52 (eighteen years ago) link
― Mark (MarkR), Friday, 28 October 2005 14:11 (eighteen years ago) link
― Bidfurd__, Friday, 28 October 2005 14:13 (eighteen years ago) link
― Arnault (arc73hk), Sunday, 30 October 2005 02:40 (eighteen years ago) link
― The Brainwasher (Twilight), Sunday, 30 October 2005 19:05 (eighteen years ago) link
― brittle-lemon (brittle-lemon), Sunday, 30 October 2005 22:04 (eighteen years ago) link
― Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Monday, 14 November 2005 13:35 (eighteen years ago) link
― Jedmond (Jedmond), Monday, 14 November 2005 14:31 (eighteen years ago) link
re: the comments on the review about the "laziness" of the artwork. They found a cool picture they liked and used it. They didn't know it had been used by the Shalabi Effect, and shockingly didn't know it was used on the insert to a Pearl Jam CD. I don't see why the hard time.
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Monday, 14 November 2005 16:52 (eighteen years ago) link