Daft Punk - Human After All

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1439 of them)

Well, I waited for A Grand Don't Come For Free, and the excitement built up to such a pitch that when I finally got the record I could barely hear it, if that makes any sense.

― roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 14:52 (nineteen years ago) link

http://rapidshare.de/files-de/39755 5/Daft_Punk_-_Robot_Rock__Yes_Real_ .mp3.html

Really really real?

― JakeWithBrain!, Thursday, 20 January 2005 20:51 (nineteen years ago) link

Oh robot Christ, these two months are going to take forever. (wonder if we're going to beat that Dave Matthews thread though. :)

― Omar (Omar), Thursday, 20 January 2005 20:59 (nineteen years ago) link

Broken link

― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:01 (nineteen years ago) link

Jake: really really real!

Has anybody figured out what the sample is?

― Essdot, Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:12 (nineteen years ago) link

Would anyone like to reassemble that into a working link for me?

― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:13 (nineteen years ago) link

the file is now gone. jake, do you mind yousending it please?

― mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:25 (nineteen years ago) link

What kind of limit is 46???

― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:25 (nineteen years ago) link

http://rapidshare.de/files-de/397555/Daft_Punk_-_Robot_Rock__Yes_Real_.mp3.html

You have to wait a few seconds for it to download - that's what the 46 is. I still can't decide if I like the song...

― Vinnie (vprabhu), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:29 (nineteen years ago) link

Actually I remember having similar thoughts about "Aerodynamic" when I first heard it. Just too simple. But now I really love that song so we will see.

― Vinnie (vprabhu), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:31 (nineteen years ago) link

Me neither. Is the quality (rather) bad or is it just my speakers?

― JakeWithBrain!, Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:32 (nineteen years ago) link

Quality sounded fine to me but I can't listen to it that loudly at the moment.

― Vinnie (vprabhu), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:35 (nineteen years ago) link

is it just me or does this song suck ass?

― wercheki, Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:38 (nineteen years ago) link

it's a little samey, innit.

― mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:43 (nineteen years ago) link

Quality is not all there. A good track, but nothing mind-blowing.

Also, a lot of there records are a little "samey".

― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:44 (nineteen years ago) link

Quality of the mp3 is poor I should say. (apart from track quality)

― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:45 (nineteen years ago) link

Actually, I just found myself dancing in my chair.

― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:46 (nineteen years ago) link

i don't mean samey as in repetitive, spencer, i just mean they don't seem to *do* much with the refrain over the course of the song, do they? give me some filter sweeps, some volume pans, something!

― mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:47 (nineteen years ago) link

Ah, right, but I do like how the "robot rock" vocal starts to meld with the "guitar".

― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:50 (nineteen years ago) link

haha there's a vocal?! fuck office speakers!!

― mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:51 (nineteen years ago) link

this would be ok as a filler track. there are vocals?

― bnw (bnw), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:53 (nineteen years ago) link

i don't know if it's me or my computer or the link or what, but i still can't get it to d/l... anyone else using safari have a problem?

― firstworldman (firstworldman), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:53 (nineteen years ago) link

Haha, yeah, I think this track will definitely sound better at full CD quality.

― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:54 (nineteen years ago) link

Hahaha I was confused for similar reasons mark p!

― Vinnie (vprabhu), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:58 (nineteen years ago) link

OMG, I think I love this.

― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 20 January 2005 22:02 (nineteen years ago) link

can't download, I think.

― RJG (RJG), Thursday, 20 January 2005 22:05 (nineteen years ago) link

spencer otm, it's growing on me exponentially too. i wish i was at home so i could blare it.

― mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 20 January 2005 22:08 (nineteen years ago) link

yes. download help please. or email? please thanks yes. great.

― firstworldman (firstworldman), Thursday, 20 January 2005 22:08 (nineteen years ago) link

just click the link and wait for about 46 seconds.

― mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 20 January 2005 22:09 (nineteen years ago) link

it isn't always that simple, I think, but I got it.

I can e-mail it. where to?

― RJG (RJG), Thursday, 20 January 2005 22:11 (nineteen years ago) link

I understand Ronan's concern about this being a Prodigy regurge, but really, it's MUCH MORE than that. I f*cking love it. One thing to note is how well an unknown track seemed to go down at that party video above.

― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 20 January 2005 22:11 (nineteen years ago) link

i would love it if you emailed it to the address i have here... i clicked the link and waited 2 minutes 3 times and nothing happened...

― firstworldman (firstworldman), Thursday, 20 January 2005 22:20 (nineteen years ago) link

here you go dudes:

http://s24.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=2MGRO4UNT95MX10KR4FBUAH6ZF

― mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 20 January 2005 22:24 (nineteen years ago) link

thank you ever so much!

― firstworldman (firstworldman), Thursday, 20 January 2005 22:26 (nineteen years ago) link

Is that still 128 kbps?

― JoB (JoB), Thursday, 20 January 2005 22:27 (nineteen years ago) link

aye.

― mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 20 January 2005 22:27 (nineteen years ago) link

mark rules

― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 20 January 2005 22:27 (nineteen years ago) link

sounds good if it did not immediately grab me!

― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 20 January 2005 22:36 (nineteen years ago) link

Rock!
Robot Rock!

― Magic City (ano ano), Thursday, 20 January 2005 22:47 (nineteen years ago) link

shit this song is going to be awesome REALLY loud in a good quality rip.

― Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Thursday, 20 January 2005 23:03 (nineteen years ago) link

Or, you know, a proper 12"...

― JoB (JoB), Thursday, 20 January 2005 23:20 (nineteen years ago) link

it's them fer-sure

― nick.K (nick.K), Thursday, 20 January 2005 23:25 (nineteen years ago) link

Like, totally.

― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 20 January 2005 23:26 (nineteen years ago) link

Still not feelin' it, dawgs.

― jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 20 January 2005 23:30 (nineteen years ago) link

http://www.ishkur.com/Daft_Punk_-_Robot_Rock.mp3

This is so fucking good!

― djdee2005 (djdee2005), Thursday, 20 January 2005 23:35 (nineteen years ago) link

this is the first 4 bars of Breakwater's "release the beast" repeted about 20 times. Totally pathetic.

― jed_ (jed), Thursday, 20 January 2005 23:36 (nineteen years ago) link

Pathetically awesome!

― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 20 January 2005 23:42 (nineteen years ago) link

DOOT! dooo do dododododo!
DOOT! dooo do dododododo!
DOOT! dooo do dododododo!
DOOT!! DOOT!!! DOOT!!! dodododododo....

― vahid (vahid), Thursday, 20 January 2005 23:47 (nineteen years ago) link

Yes!

― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 20 January 2005 23:47 (nineteen years ago) link

ok this is good! drum fills! jesus this is so much better than the shitty mpeg.

it's like the old Scott Grooves remix, total psychosis

― Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 20 January 2005 23:48 (nineteen years ago) link

Skipping 1339 messages at this point... Click here if you want to load them all.

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.