New Joanna Newsom Album "Ys" Due Nov 14

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (699 of them)
you forgot a word there:

FAUX avant-garde music judged self-indulgent in mainstream publication film at 11

EZ Snappin (EZSnappin), Thursday, 12 October 2006 14:57 (seventeen years ago) link

Oh god, not avant-garde please. I don't want to start being told I don't like"get" this because it's too challenging for me by superior indie fuxx.

eh (fandango), Thursday, 12 October 2006 15:04 (seventeen years ago) link

from Rolling Stone it's practically a reverse-psychology recommendation dudes

eh (fandango), Thursday, 12 October 2006 15:06 (seventeen years ago) link

I still love this. Classifying it as "avant-garde" or "faux avant-garde" is beside the point. It's the music that counts.

Turangalila (Salvador), Thursday, 12 October 2006 15:11 (seventeen years ago) link

Dick Van Dyke Parks.

Ithangyew.

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 12 October 2006 15:12 (seventeen years ago) link

avant-gardeuncommercial is good enough.

eh (fandango), Thursday, 12 October 2006 15:16 (seventeen years ago) link

Yes, releasing an album into the market is a *very* uncommercial move.

Turangalila (Salvador), Thursday, 12 October 2006 15:36 (seventeen years ago) link

I don't want to start being told I don't like "get" this because it's too challenging for me by superior indie fuxx.

If you don't like it, that's fine - I didn't get the memo that says everybody has to like Joanna Newsom, and I'm assuming you didn't either. But applying "meandering" to Ys, the reviewer might as well have said "too many notes" or "I couldn't be arsed to pay attention."

Call it whatever you want, uncommercial, complex, challenging, avant-garde, faux-fairy-wrangling, indie-fuX0r-suX0r-shitbath. But it's not the product of a lack of focus or discipline, and it's not an album that's easily appreciated after a few cursory listens.

Edward III (edward iii), Thursday, 12 October 2006 15:45 (seventeen years ago) link

Plus, avant-garde is a catch-all term for people who are doing shit nobody else is doing. So if hyper-literate harp players with idiosyncratic voices who merge African time signatures with bluegrass and classical western tradition are not considered avant-garde, then please tell me where they are handing out the official badges.

In 1994, the RZA was avant-garde - in my book it's got fuckall to do with snobbery and everything to do with innovation.

Edward III (edward iii), Thursday, 12 October 2006 15:55 (seventeen years ago) link

xpost - ffs!

If you think this records is as easy to market as Britney Spears FINE.

If you think releasing a somewhat less instant & digestible (than her debut) song-suite where every track is around the 10 min+ mark, and is best heard whole is typical Top 40 behaviour...

If you think her voice is in any way "average" and an easy pitch to new listeners...

What is your problem with calling this somewhat "uncommercial"?

eh (fandango), Thursday, 12 October 2006 15:58 (seventeen years ago) link

Haha, thread's getting feisty.

Edward III (edward iii), Thursday, 12 October 2006 16:01 (seventeen years ago) link

Edward III I'm not saying this is unfocused, or agreeing with the RS review here... I'm not sure who your posts are aimed at now?

avant-garde is a catch-all term for people who are doing shit nobody else is doing. This, ok, I'm fine with I suppose. I'm not a semantics nazi. I just don't want her to get a snobby audience, which is the danger when slapping that term onto her stuff.

eh (fandango), Thursday, 12 October 2006 16:03 (seventeen years ago) link

I still need to listen to this some more anyway.

eh (fandango), Thursday, 12 October 2006 16:06 (seventeen years ago) link

(Just as an aside, there really isn't any such thing as "African time signatures." I know she likes kora playing, but I don't know how much it influences her playing rhythmically or otherwise.)

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 12 October 2006 16:08 (seventeen years ago) link

What is your problem with calling this somewhat "uncommercial"?

Because it's not, by definition. Also, it's an ambiguous term that tells you nothing about the quality of the music, as describing music in terms of its marketability is quite beside the point.

Never said it was as easy to market as anything, but the moment something is put out to be sold, it's commercial (in whatever degree) by nature.

And Tim Ellison, it's quite influenced by Kora playing. You should listen to a CD called "Kora Melodies From The Republic of The Gambia, West Africa" by Alhaji Bai Konte.

Turangalila (Salvador), Thursday, 12 October 2006 16:12 (seventeen years ago) link

Yeah, I'm not denying there's some influence there, though I think I remember an interview where she downplayed it or something.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 12 October 2006 16:13 (seventeen years ago) link

xpost - I disagree, but thanks for the explanation :) sorry to go off on one.

eh (fandango), Thursday, 12 October 2006 16:20 (seventeen years ago) link

I agree with a whole load of people. The appeal was in the boldness and starkness of the last album. The strings drown everything to mundanity.

FACEBRACE (FACEBRACE), Thursday, 12 October 2006 16:24 (seventeen years ago) link

I'm not sure who your posts are aimed at now?

Ah, it's just a blunderbuss of vitriol, feel free to ignore me. If reviewers are going to dismiss the album on grounds that it's meandering, it's a sign they haven't taken the time to digest it. Perhaps "avant-garde" was the wrong (loaded) term to use, but it takes a while to digest what she's doing here - that's just a fact, not snobbery.

There's also this anti-intellectual mode people slip into that gets me super-defensive - e.g. "I read Joyce's Ulysses, anybody could write that crap, the emperor's got no clothes, blah, blah." Okay, how about respecting the fact that people experience a depth in the work that you're not getting to? You don't have to appreciate it and you don't have to work to appreciate it, but some things are complex. There's plenty of music/art/literature I don't "get" but I don't blame the artist (or pretentious fans - yeah they're irritating but what does that have to do with anything?) for my own inability to get it. Momma had a name for people who trash what they can't understand - ignorant. Was she right, or just on some snobbery trip? (P.S. this has nothing to do with you personally, I'm just on a roll now....)

Regardless of all that, I guess what I'm saying is I'm not sure that Rolling Stone is the approriate bellweather of whether this album is any good or not.

Edward III (edward iii), Thursday, 12 October 2006 17:03 (seventeen years ago) link

there really isn't any such thing as "African time signatures."

There are odd time signatures that are peculiar to African Kora players, as she notes in this interview:

“I’ve spent time with figures transposed from the [African] Kora, where the right hand plays a four beat and the left plays a three, and in between where the two meters cross there is a really strange disorientation and disjunction that immediately upon hearing
I wanted to experiment more with...four against seven, four against nine, just playing with different spots rhythmically.”

Her downplaying it is a bit like The Rolling Stones downplaying the influence of the blues. But I understand her point, she has synthesized a bunch of different traditions and stressing the African influence is not completely accurate. She's not doing world music, aping some other culture's genre. But when you listen to "Bridges and Balloons" and then listen to something like Toumani Diabaté's New Ancient Strings, the affinity is profound.

The strings drown everything to mundanity.

Yeah, but I've come to terms with them over time. Still would love to hear the Albini solo masters, though.

Edward III (edward iii), Thursday, 12 October 2006 17:21 (seventeen years ago) link

They don't feel like they're "drowning" anything to me, nor do I hear them as mundane.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 12 October 2006 17:49 (seventeen years ago) link

(Edward, OK, I see what you're saying about that style of mixing lines w/ different beat groupings.)

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 12 October 2006 17:52 (seventeen years ago) link

Let's see. They mistimed the review's release by several weeks. The reviewer calls it an "EP." And it's consigned to the short-reviews ghetto. I'm guessing the star-maker machinery is not behind this album. But I am.

M. V. (M.V.), Thursday, 12 October 2006 19:53 (seventeen years ago) link

she's not aping african music, rather she explains how it inspired her in a very particular way. the whole gestalt is not remotely intended to sound "african."

i don't know what i think of this LP now. i think i overpraised it initially.

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Friday, 13 October 2006 01:23 (seventeen years ago) link

Let the backlash begin!

(not sure if you're responding to me when you say "she's not aping african music" - if you are, I must not have made myself very clear since we agree completely)

Edward III (edward iii), Friday, 13 October 2006 01:27 (seventeen years ago) link

They don't feel like they're "drowning" anything to me, nor do I hear them as mundane.
-- Tim Ellison (thefriendlyfriendlybubbl...), October 12th, 2006 2:49 PM.

At some point when I have a little time I'd like to comment further on this (and on the "small death" lyric). Duty calls, though.

Edward III (edward iii), Friday, 13 October 2006 11:59 (seventeen years ago) link

I'm just not going to read anything about this album, I've decided.

james brooks (j_brooks), Friday, 13 October 2006 20:19 (seventeen years ago) link

I'd rather read about it than listen to it again.

EZ Snappin (EZSnappin), Friday, 13 October 2006 20:36 (seventeen years ago) link

Well then, maybe she is avant garde! Her and Jamie Lidell :-P

http://www.thewire.co.uk/current/images/273cover.jpg

elsewhere on ILM Marcello calls this "bilge"....

I listened to this right through again the other day, It captivates me wonderfully for the first couple of tracks, all of it, the music, the lyricism, the play of the language & her rhythms but soon... fatigue sets in and it's just not as surprising afterwards. Still very nice, but not rapturous, and lacking a true emotional punch for me. I still don't like this as much as the first album really.

And am I the only person who thinks it sounds basically the same all the way through and that's not really a good thing?

Quite honestly I want her to drop the harp for a while (I find myself feeling her overall sound to be quite tart & unpleasant a lot of the time, more so than her vocals even, and I've already said I'm not amazed by the treacly strings here), and travel somewhere OUT of this pastoral prettiness zone next time... maybe new york? somewhere Urban? THAT would seem more "challenging" to me than this, maybe next album. I HOPE she puts what she's learned/extended upon here to more interesting uses in the future (maybe interspersed with shorter "normal" songs?), I just feel like she's playing up to her audience too much here. The formalities of this record look risky but I don't think the final creative product is, at least not quite as much as people are saying. It's lovely, idillyic and escapist sure, but it's also quite a lot of froth.

Nevertheless I'm glad she's made this record. It at least shows the doubters she's didn't just get lucky first time round. It's accomplished, it's dense and open, flows very naturally BUT I'm yet to be convinced it actually has depth and isn't merely a bit too clever for it's own good. Overrated? absolutely! but by no means worthless. I expect the real "backlash" will come sometime after the inevitable Pitchfork 9.9 (if they can bear to give anything a higher rating than The Hold Steady this year).

Moderation Request Line (fandango), Friday, 20 October 2006 00:32 (seventeen years ago) link

I also still can't seem to stick to this enough to work out if there's a larger, more concrete story arc running through the whole lp, I'd assumed there was one but I could be wrong. Fanfiction spoilers of what it could actually be would be weirdly appreciated here. I need some explaining on this one.

Moderation Request Line (fandango), Friday, 20 October 2006 00:38 (seventeen years ago) link

I don't know, perhaps I will come round this in another few months but compared to other "grower" records, the rewards I get coming back to this are so slight, feel so trivial and such comparitively hard work, and so rarely do I feel able to take this in one sitting... I just think "why bother?" I guess it's only because this one feels a bit different, deliberately harder to ingest and I don't want to give up too soon. I'll listen to the back half of the album separately again sometime. I do remember being faintly amazed by Cosima, yet even that feeling is from my first listen to this. The last one? I can barely remember, even though it seemed pleasurable at the time.

Moderation Request Line (fandango), Friday, 20 October 2006 01:16 (seventeen years ago) link

Listening to her voice is like having every drop of blood extracted through your big toe.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 20 October 2006 01:48 (seventeen years ago) link

"froth" - I disagree completely. I think the album is very substantive. and I think your use of the term "escapist" is needless given how human the themes of the record are.

also not sure why being able to take it at one sitting is a big issue. I suppose this is your listening preference. I tend to listen to a track of this at a time.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 20 October 2006 01:58 (seventeen years ago) link

Having just heard a song or two, I think the biggest problem in the disconnect btw. strings and song isn't VDP's arrangement but JO'R's lousy mix.

Colin Meeder (Mert), Friday, 20 October 2006 06:53 (seventeen years ago) link

Moderation Request Line OTM. Tim Ellison also OTM.

sean gramophone (Sean M), Friday, 20 October 2006 07:58 (seventeen years ago) link

Karen Dalton reissue (1971) on Light In the Attic, first track of which could have fooled me into thinking was Joanna Newsom

Dominique (dleone), Saturday, 21 October 2006 16:05 (seventeen years ago) link

Colin may be on to something here. I don't think the album sounds bad, but the harp definitely gets lost under all the strings, which is a bit disappointing since her harp playing is more interesting than VDP's string arrangements.

Matt Olken (Moodles), Saturday, 21 October 2006 21:06 (seventeen years ago) link

http://www.barbican.org.uk/music/event-detail.asp?ID=5170

toby (tsg20), Thursday, 2 November 2006 19:57 (seventeen years ago) link

that will be AMAZING.

jonathan - stl (jonathan - stl), Thursday, 2 November 2006 19:58 (seventeen years ago) link

Drowned in Sound just gave this a 10/10 which I find pretty ridiculous. I'ts a nice record and all, but I think it really could have benefitted from letting the instruments breathe a bit. I enjoy her voice for the most part, but 10 minutes straight of it, can really wear thin. I also dont' really see this album as "groundbreaking" as lots of critics do, which is strange, because music critics should be fully versed in music history and clearly this owes a lot to its ancestors.

zippezappy (doomed), Wednesday, 8 November 2006 19:23 (seventeen years ago) link

I think people would love this album if its pedigree wasn't so lofty.

Owen Pallett (Owen Pallett), Wednesday, 8 November 2006 20:23 (seventeen years ago) link

What are the supposedly obvious precedents for this really lengthy narrative song structure and style?

xp

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 8 November 2006 20:32 (seventeen years ago) link

gosh, that DiS review is unmitigated fanboy garbage. Perfect! Perfect! *fapfapfap*

I still find this an admirable, ambitious record, but also a flawed and problematic one. I doubt anyone else is going to nail how I feel about this one closer than the Stylus review. Which gives it a good grade, but reads as similarly conflicted w/r/t to my own feelings about Ys, even if they don't quite stretch to "enchantment".

new new wave of new wave new rave (fandango), Wednesday, 8 November 2006 20:39 (seventeen years ago) link

the rolling stone review is awful, but i don't want to blame the poor writer who has to give the album less than 150 words.

max (maxreax), Wednesday, 8 November 2006 21:16 (seventeen years ago) link

I just keep returning to "Cosmia".

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Wednesday, 8 November 2006 21:24 (seventeen years ago) link

yeah i think cosmia's the standout too, but the last 3 minutes of only skin are pretty great.

max (maxreax), Wednesday, 8 November 2006 21:36 (seventeen years ago) link

"Sawdust & Diamonds" is by far my fave, which tells me I don't really care for the orchestrations.

Mark (MarkR), Wednesday, 8 November 2006 21:38 (seventeen years ago) link

What are the supposedly obvious precedents for this really lengthy narrative song structure and style?

I've only listened to it once so far, but it did sort of remind me of the Phil Ochs song 'Crucifixion' in places. Obviously that's the Van Dyke Parks link in full effect.

NickB (NickB), Wednesday, 8 November 2006 21:46 (seventeen years ago) link

also Peter and the Wolf, but.... and yeah, "Cosmia" is the deepest cut for me too, tho "Sawdust and Diamonds"--especially the "long face" bit--is pretty gorgeous.

mike powell (mike powell), Wednesday, 8 November 2006 21:55 (seventeen years ago) link

I think "Cosmia" might be the shallowest cut! By far! Not a knock on the song at all; it just happens to be on an album with those other four tracks.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 8 November 2006 22:03 (seventeen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.