ILM is kinda sucking these days (boring and meta ignore not safe for work)

I also think that, while there's been quite a lot of music this year that I like, there's not been THAT much for people to get excited about on a wider, cultural scale - the things I like this year are more solipsistic than ever before, perhaps - Elbow, Spiritualized, etc. I'd have loved people to get excited by The Do, and though people would, but it didn't happen.

Very true. There have been a few threads this year devoted to a new disc or a new act that led to a long discussion that broke off into interesting directions, e.g., the thread about No Age's Nouns. But it's been few-and-far-between in that regard.

But I don't think this is necessarily an indication that something's gone wrong (although, as I said above, I don't think poll threads are good for conversation). When I look at "upcoming releases" calendars, I see lots of highly-anticipated discs that might be, as Nick puts it, "cultural items" on the horizon (maybe within niche communities, but "cultural items" nonetheless). I'd guess that some of those discs will lead to threads with the kind of deeper discussion that we've seen on ILX in the (relatively recent) past.

although dude you were responsible for that shoddy "12 perfect songs" p-fork dick-suck so in a way you are responsible for ILM being crap

We need more bold, proactive posting about musical theory and critical analysis. My two cents. Well, two more.

Louis:

Given that M@rk's Resonant Frequency column is all about musical theory and critical analysis, these two posts are in conflict. I think you missed the point of the poll (as did most). It could have turned into an interesting discussion -- which song(s) that M@rk named were perfect? which weren't so perfect? what other songs are "perfect" to each of us? and what makes a perfect song?

The poll itself isn't the point of the thread; I was aiming more so to discuss the theory behind it.

We need more bold, proactive posting about musical theory and critical analysis.

Musical theory? Such as?

xpost, to Louis - I mean, if you're gonna target the lack of critical/theoretical discussion on ILM, the better target would have been my own recent "Music That Enhances Sex" poll, quite obviously.

I agree ILM has been especially boring lately. And I'm tired of these threads with blanks in them i.e. ____is the new____ or _____ is so ______ they make ______ look like _____. I just don't find that kind of thing inspiring at all. Come to think of it, it's kinda like Mad Libs, but far, far less entertaining.

I kinda like sleeve's idea that polls could be on a separate board, too.

I Poll Everything

i like the rolling threads. better than starting a thread on some random jazz album that'll get 0 - 5 posts and fade away.

It's sweet that people liked the Ashlee thread, but you realize that it was populated by people who stopped coming here because they got trolled out, right?

Shame

i like the rolling threads. better than starting a thread on some random jazz album that'll get 0 - 5 posts and fade away.

i already answered this - keep up! if you start a thread and it gets five responses there is something wrong with the way you asked the question.

and in that case - is it really worth talking about at all?

thats bs, plenty of great albums worth talking about w/ perfectly fine questions that dont get more than 5 posts bcuz the thread starter is not tim finney

i'm just an old lump of coal, but i'm gonna be tim finney someday.

Let us decide to ask a few interestingly posed questions about especially new and exciting albums/artists/etc. that we would normally keep to one of the rolling threads (in my case, the only one I read is Rolling Metal) and see what happens.

i'm trying to think of some provocative, interesting way i could get people to care about the new Brian Blade album or some brass band shit, but i'm coming up empty.

tits.jpg

guys i'm going to post more to ILM now so don't worry

Jordan, I've been about to check out that Brian Blade album for the past few days based on your flakking.

Tracer learned his lesson when he started that Go-go thread.

I think you missed the point of the poll (as did most). It could have turned into an interesting discussion -- which song(s) that M@rk named were perfect? which weren't so perfect? what other songs are "perfect" to each of us? and what makes a perfect song?

The only remotely interesting part of this is the final sentence, and I personally regard the idea of a "perfect" song to be a red herring because there are so many variables in music. Still, we could have had that discussion WITHOUT appealing to such a crass and blatant authority as a popular indie website, or starting a poll whose options would almost certainly occlude any proactive theoretical debate. I don't think the idea of creating a "perfect" song is at all interesting, sorry. It's a big, booming, subjective point of pseudo-critical wankery, the enemy of theoretical innovation or fun.

so consensus is:

-no big crossover albums
-rolling balkanization
-not enough discussion on poll threads

#2 can be helped by maybe starting independent threads for stuff Rolling dudes think might have broader appeal?

-- BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, June 5, 2008 1:59 PM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Link

Let us decide to ask a few interestingly posed questions about especially new and exciting albums/artists/etc. that we would normally keep to one of the rolling threads (in my case, the only one I read is Rolling Metal) and see what happens.

-- roxymuzak, Thursday, June 5, 2008 4:46 PM (40 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

great minds

otm

There's too many threads.

I would much rather look at board that had few threads about noteworthy albums than sifting through "BEST ALBUM WITH A DOG ON THE COVER POLL"

New Music on ILM #1: Five O'Clock Heroes feat. Agyness Deyn - "Who"

rolling balkanization

I'm pro the continued separation of ILM into tribes which have and want nothing to do with each other.

I would much rather look at board that had few threads about noteworthy albums than sifting through "BEST ALBUM WITH A DOG ON THE COVER POLL"

-- Whiney G. Weingarten, Thursday, June 5, 2008 12:46 PM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

these are why rolling threads are the best, i guess they just get daunting after a while

I'm pro the continued separation of ILM into tribes which have and want nothing to do with each other.

This is shit for the many people who dearly like a lot of different musical styles.

And it's great for people who long ago got tired of the standard belittling and values/taste warring that's standard practice here.

Ride it out dude. Pay the haters no mind and they will magically stop affecting you. I say this as someone who learned the increasingly easy way.

likewise

This is shit for the many people who dearly like a lot of different musical styles.

-- Just got offed, Thursday, June 5, 2008 5:55 PM (15 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

rock, prog-rock, and post-rock?

He makes a good point, though. Ringtone is my home, but no way I can keep up with Metal & Dance too.

Balkanization is never the answer, people. Look at the Balkans.

I hate when threads you like just disappear, whatever happened to rolling teenpop. So good.

jordan.xls

I'm just waiting for Tombot to lock the rejected jbr screenames thread and then it's adios.

i don't follow all the rolling threads obv. but it's nice that they're there. i've stopped in the country thread to ask about something before.

honestly, i can't believe that there's a better forum than ilm as far musical breadth goes.

we could have had that discussion WITHOUT appealing to such a crass and blatant authority as a popular indie website,

you're making a lot of assumptions there buddy. i didn't appeal to anything, i simply linked to a column which i found interesting as a starting point for debate. and sorry if you're too cool for that "popular indie website" -- M@rk writes one of the best music columns on the web there, and even if you don't care for the "perfect songs" issue, you'd do yourself a favor to check out the 50+ chapters he's already written.

i've stopped in the country thread to ask about something before

I really like when people do this, especially when they're not one of the six or seven people who usually post on that thread (who tend to agree with each other too much anyway). Don't think anybody has ever been "shouted down" or lol'ed out or anything.

Yeah, Pitchfork has gotten really quite good, it's big enough that it can be alarmingly retarded and great at the same time. The poptimist column is consistently great and the piece about Blackout is one of my favourite pieces of music writing that managed to nail what I love about that record, make me look at things about it in a different way and just be a really great piece of writing in general. And I learned about cheveu there.

the opeth review on pitchfork was pretty good. except for the part where he dismissively sped through their back catalogue. and how may times do you really need to fucking mention mastodon in a review of a band that bears no relation to them whatsoever. i mean, come on.

Because Mastodon is the only metal band there is. The other is of course Pig Destroyer.

Yeah, Pitchfork has gotten really quite good, it's big enough that it can be alarmingly retarded and great at the same time. The poptimist column is consistently great and

this ^^

like any site, it has its high and low points. there are at least 5 or 6 writers there i think are very good, though, and check out their reviews regularly. not to mention the great columns (Resonant Frequency, Poptimist, sometimes Puritan Blister too) and the generally well-thought out interviews (PJ Harvey a couple months ago was a huge highlight). i'd be hard pressed to name a website with more consistent, high quality music writing in 2008.

of course, it has its low points as well. see lately: the Spiritualized and Black Angels reviews, both of which i think relied verrrrry heavily on sweeping generalizations (Spiritualized) and cliches about "drug music" (Black Angels).

It's like anywhere, you kinda need to get to know the site and you don't even need to try to ignore all the rubbish (Exclusive, The Gossip on tour with CSS!!!) because you don't even notice it. Yeah, Resonant Freq is quite good often too.

I miss Stylus, that one I liked.

Resonant Frequency is one of the best columns about music being written today.

Stylus was excellent. i got a shoutout in the year-end Bluffer's Guide too! thanks guys!

Exclusive, The Gossip on tour with CSS!!!

major LOLZ

does ott still write for pitchfork? that guy is a stinker. peeyoooo!

okay, it seems i only have myself to blame. i've been busy with other stuff and haven't been able to singlehandedly keep ilm entertaining. i apologize. for the lack of random picture threads. the lack of long spazzy thread titles. i'm sorry for everything.

ilm just needs a little more bite is all. a little more tang. some zazz. we'll be up and running in no time.

just a little too toothless these days. no i don't want flambe wars and all that no no no just a little more...grit. a good thread to sink my teeth into for fun and profit. that no age thread was pretty entertaining! considering i've barely heard the band. and that's the kind of thread i like. it can be "about" anything and go anywhere.

when ile would hold their semi-annual let's diss ilm fest on some metathread people would always say that they never came here cuz it was so "scary" and "intimidating". ha! they wouldn't say that now i'll bet. buncha pussycats on here. and that can be nice sometimes. (thinking back to when i first started hanging out here and blount and jess would rip someone to shreds and send them home crying without blinking an eye)

WTF? Stylus Magazine is no more???? (x-post)