New Joanna Newsom Album "Ys" Due Nov 14

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (699 of them)
Well then, maybe she is avant garde! Her and Jamie Lidell :-P

http://www.thewire.co.uk/current/images/273cover.jpg

elsewhere on ILM Marcello calls this "bilge"....

I listened to this right through again the other day, It captivates me wonderfully for the first couple of tracks, all of it, the music, the lyricism, the play of the language & her rhythms but soon... fatigue sets in and it's just not as surprising afterwards. Still very nice, but not rapturous, and lacking a true emotional punch for me. I still don't like this as much as the first album really.

And am I the only person who thinks it sounds basically the same all the way through and that's not really a good thing?

Quite honestly I want her to drop the harp for a while (I find myself feeling her overall sound to be quite tart & unpleasant a lot of the time, more so than her vocals even, and I've already said I'm not amazed by the treacly strings here), and travel somewhere OUT of this pastoral prettiness zone next time... maybe new york? somewhere Urban? THAT would seem more "challenging" to me than this, maybe next album. I HOPE she puts what she's learned/extended upon here to more interesting uses in the future (maybe interspersed with shorter "normal" songs?), I just feel like she's playing up to her audience too much here. The formalities of this record look risky but I don't think the final creative product is, at least not quite as much as people are saying. It's lovely, idillyic and escapist sure, but it's also quite a lot of froth.

Nevertheless I'm glad she's made this record. It at least shows the doubters she's didn't just get lucky first time round. It's accomplished, it's dense and open, flows very naturally BUT I'm yet to be convinced it actually has depth and isn't merely a bit too clever for it's own good. Overrated? absolutely! but by no means worthless. I expect the real "backlash" will come sometime after the inevitable Pitchfork 9.9 (if they can bear to give anything a higher rating than The Hold Steady this year).

Moderation Request Line (fandango), Friday, 20 October 2006 00:32 (seventeen years ago) link

I also still can't seem to stick to this enough to work out if there's a larger, more concrete story arc running through the whole lp, I'd assumed there was one but I could be wrong. Fanfiction spoilers of what it could actually be would be weirdly appreciated here. I need some explaining on this one.

Moderation Request Line (fandango), Friday, 20 October 2006 00:38 (seventeen years ago) link

I don't know, perhaps I will come round this in another few months but compared to other "grower" records, the rewards I get coming back to this are so slight, feel so trivial and such comparitively hard work, and so rarely do I feel able to take this in one sitting... I just think "why bother?" I guess it's only because this one feels a bit different, deliberately harder to ingest and I don't want to give up too soon. I'll listen to the back half of the album separately again sometime. I do remember being faintly amazed by Cosima, yet even that feeling is from my first listen to this. The last one? I can barely remember, even though it seemed pleasurable at the time.

Moderation Request Line (fandango), Friday, 20 October 2006 01:16 (seventeen years ago) link

Listening to her voice is like having every drop of blood extracted through your big toe.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 20 October 2006 01:48 (seventeen years ago) link

"froth" - I disagree completely. I think the album is very substantive. and I think your use of the term "escapist" is needless given how human the themes of the record are.

also not sure why being able to take it at one sitting is a big issue. I suppose this is your listening preference. I tend to listen to a track of this at a time.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 20 October 2006 01:58 (seventeen years ago) link

Having just heard a song or two, I think the biggest problem in the disconnect btw. strings and song isn't VDP's arrangement but JO'R's lousy mix.

Colin Meeder (Mert), Friday, 20 October 2006 06:53 (seventeen years ago) link

Moderation Request Line OTM. Tim Ellison also OTM.

sean gramophone (Sean M), Friday, 20 October 2006 07:58 (seventeen years ago) link

Karen Dalton reissue (1971) on Light In the Attic, first track of which could have fooled me into thinking was Joanna Newsom

Dominique (dleone), Saturday, 21 October 2006 16:05 (seventeen years ago) link

Colin may be on to something here. I don't think the album sounds bad, but the harp definitely gets lost under all the strings, which is a bit disappointing since her harp playing is more interesting than VDP's string arrangements.

Matt Olken (Moodles), Saturday, 21 October 2006 21:06 (seventeen years ago) link

http://www.barbican.org.uk/music/event-detail.asp?ID=5170

toby (tsg20), Thursday, 2 November 2006 19:57 (seventeen years ago) link

that will be AMAZING.

jonathan - stl (jonathan - stl), Thursday, 2 November 2006 19:58 (seventeen years ago) link

Drowned in Sound just gave this a 10/10 which I find pretty ridiculous. I'ts a nice record and all, but I think it really could have benefitted from letting the instruments breathe a bit. I enjoy her voice for the most part, but 10 minutes straight of it, can really wear thin. I also dont' really see this album as "groundbreaking" as lots of critics do, which is strange, because music critics should be fully versed in music history and clearly this owes a lot to its ancestors.

zippezappy (doomed), Wednesday, 8 November 2006 19:23 (seventeen years ago) link

I think people would love this album if its pedigree wasn't so lofty.

Owen Pallett (Owen Pallett), Wednesday, 8 November 2006 20:23 (seventeen years ago) link

What are the supposedly obvious precedents for this really lengthy narrative song structure and style?

xp

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 8 November 2006 20:32 (seventeen years ago) link

gosh, that DiS review is unmitigated fanboy garbage. Perfect! Perfect! *fapfapfap*

I still find this an admirable, ambitious record, but also a flawed and problematic one. I doubt anyone else is going to nail how I feel about this one closer than the Stylus review. Which gives it a good grade, but reads as similarly conflicted w/r/t to my own feelings about Ys, even if they don't quite stretch to "enchantment".

new new wave of new wave new rave (fandango), Wednesday, 8 November 2006 20:39 (seventeen years ago) link

the rolling stone review is awful, but i don't want to blame the poor writer who has to give the album less than 150 words.

max (maxreax), Wednesday, 8 November 2006 21:16 (seventeen years ago) link

I just keep returning to "Cosmia".

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Wednesday, 8 November 2006 21:24 (seventeen years ago) link

yeah i think cosmia's the standout too, but the last 3 minutes of only skin are pretty great.

max (maxreax), Wednesday, 8 November 2006 21:36 (seventeen years ago) link

"Sawdust & Diamonds" is by far my fave, which tells me I don't really care for the orchestrations.

Mark (MarkR), Wednesday, 8 November 2006 21:38 (seventeen years ago) link

What are the supposedly obvious precedents for this really lengthy narrative song structure and style?

I've only listened to it once so far, but it did sort of remind me of the Phil Ochs song 'Crucifixion' in places. Obviously that's the Van Dyke Parks link in full effect.

NickB (NickB), Wednesday, 8 November 2006 21:46 (seventeen years ago) link

also Peter and the Wolf, but.... and yeah, "Cosmia" is the deepest cut for me too, tho "Sawdust and Diamonds"--especially the "long face" bit--is pretty gorgeous.

mike powell (mike powell), Wednesday, 8 November 2006 21:55 (seventeen years ago) link

I think "Cosmia" might be the shallowest cut! By far! Not a knock on the song at all; it just happens to be on an album with those other four tracks.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 8 November 2006 22:03 (seventeen years ago) link

oops, I think I meant it like "the first cut is the deepest" not like "that girl, she's deep," which are close enough, but pretty different when it comes to knives.

mike powell (mike powell), Wednesday, 8 November 2006 22:13 (seventeen years ago) link

the fact that nobody here is saying the whole album is good, is testament to the fact that it's overbloated

zippezappy (doomed), Wednesday, 8 November 2006 23:10 (seventeen years ago) link

I agree with the Peter and the Wolf call, it seems as though the strings & other additional bits and pieces are doing some kind of interpretation of the lyrics. And the 'long face' verse too, my gosh

badg (badg), Wednesday, 8 November 2006 23:20 (seventeen years ago) link

I definitely think the whole album is good.

xp

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 8 November 2006 23:22 (seventeen years ago) link

I haven't read this thread, but Joanna Newsome sounds like Ms. Kitty from Mr. Rogers' Land of Make Believe.

J (Jay), Thursday, 9 November 2006 00:25 (seventeen years ago) link

you say that like it's a bad thing

Marmot (marmotwolof), Thursday, 9 November 2006 00:32 (seventeen years ago) link

another tally for those somehow qualified to critique her music
but don't know how to spell her name.
--not a defensive remark, this just seems to be the trend.

and on the "bad thing" remark, yesterday i had someone add the 'e'
and try to insult her by saying she sounds like lisa simpson--yeah, why IS that bad?

mox twelve (Mox twleve), Thursday, 9 November 2006 04:46 (seventeen years ago) link

But Lisa Simpson's album sucked! All that sax!

Raw Patrick (Raw Patrick), Thursday, 9 November 2006 09:43 (seventeen years ago) link

and on the "bad thing" remark, yesterday i had someone add the 'e'

ts for misspellings designed to infuriate sub-editors: joanna newsome v missy elliot

(the missy misspelling is far out in front because it has been going on for a DECADE now and shows no sign of slowing down EVEN THOUGH SHE SPELLS HER NAME CORRECTLY ON ALL HER SLEEVES)

i really really want to hear ys but i am not convinced that i'll like it and so am unwilling to spend money on it

The Lex (The Lex), Thursday, 9 November 2006 10:35 (seventeen years ago) link

I definitely think the whole album is good.

Nedpoleon (NedBeauman), Thursday, 9 November 2006 11:22 (seventeen years ago) link

i really really want to hear ys but i am not convinced that i'll like it and so am unwilling to spend money on it

No one who's heard it here has spent any money on it, it's not out yet!

Marmot (marmotwolof), Thursday, 9 November 2006 16:09 (seventeen years ago) link

it is in the shops. i saw it yesterday.

The Lex (The Lex), Thursday, 9 November 2006 16:10 (seventeen years ago) link

Came out on the 7th here in the UK I think.

NickB (NickB), Thursday, 9 November 2006 16:30 (seventeen years ago) link

Ah ok, Amazon US still has it as 11/14. Anyway you've got around 300 posts of people who heard it without paying for it.

Marmot (marmotwolof), Thursday, 9 November 2006 16:51 (seventeen years ago) link

another tally for those somehow qualified to critique her music
but don't know how to spell her name.

Dude, what kind of stick is stuck in your ass? Of COURSE people are qualified to critique her music without spelling her name correctly! What the hell does the spelling of her name have to do with her music? Moreover, my critique offered NO OPINION WHATSOEVER about whether her music was good or bad--I just said she sounded like Miss Kitty. And she does. That is all.

Touchy-ass fanboys. Sheesh.

J (Jay), Thursday, 9 November 2006 18:43 (seventeen years ago) link

Petridis loved it! He said she had been likened to MARGE Simpson ... didn't he?

the pinefox (the pinefox), Thursday, 9 November 2006 19:05 (seventeen years ago) link

http://arts.guardian.co.uk/critic/review/0,,1937687,00.html

the pinefox (the pinefox), Thursday, 9 November 2006 19:07 (seventeen years ago) link

ha, her name is misspelled in body of the Guardian article even though they managed to really nail it in the header.

mike powell (mike powell), Thursday, 9 November 2006 19:16 (seventeen years ago) link

though the inconsistency seems charming compared to the lines that follow, where the album's title is first described as "literally unspeakable" and then given a phoenetic spelling.

mike powell (mike powell), Thursday, 9 November 2006 19:18 (seventeen years ago) link

'Its title is literally unspeakable - apparently, you're meant to pronounce it "ees".'

Oh, I had no idea about that. I've totally been reading it as 'wise' - thought it might have been some sort of concept album about Ernie.

NickB (NickB), Thursday, 9 November 2006 20:43 (seventeen years ago) link

I only knew how to pronounce it because of the videogames.

Marmot (marmotwolof), Thursday, 9 November 2006 20:45 (seventeen years ago) link

according to the wire interview, its the name of a fabled irish island city

bb (bbrz), Thursday, 9 November 2006 20:50 (seventeen years ago) link

French.

jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 9 November 2006 20:57 (seventeen years ago) link

yeah:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ys

Marmot (marmotwolof), Thursday, 9 November 2006 21:01 (seventeen years ago) link

"breton mythology"

yep

bb (bbrz), Thursday, 9 November 2006 21:09 (seventeen years ago) link

I guess that sounds classier than just going "I had a Turbografx as kid."

Marmot (marmotwolof), Thursday, 9 November 2006 21:14 (seventeen years ago) link

Devendra Banhart "Bonk's Revenge"

Marmot (marmotwolof), Thursday, 9 November 2006 21:15 (seventeen years ago) link

Touchy-ass fanboysgirls. Sheesh.

beep. I hit the wrong button.

(>>>>"not a defensive remark")

My apologies, son.

Of COURSE people are qualified to critique her music without spelling her name correctly! What the hell does the spelling of her name have to do with her music?

Wellll
--and this observation is far removed your own neutral remark--
there does seem to be an arguable correlation between the banal critiques of her vocal doses and that spare e.

mox twelve (Mox twleve), Thursday, 9 November 2006 21:16 (seventeen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.