https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6TFW1F6oY0&feature=related
― ratso piazzolla (James Redd and the Blecchs), Wednesday, 4 July 2012 01:58 (twelve years ago) link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6M8hrmGQOHk&feature=related
― ratso piazzolla (James Redd and the Blecchs), Wednesday, 4 July 2012 02:02 (twelve years ago) link
Think Dave Davies must have borrowed those glasses from Vivian Stanshall.
― ratso piazzolla (James Redd and the Blecchs), Saturday, 7 July 2012 12:20 (twelve years ago) link
Beatles Live at the Washington Coliseum, 1964https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5lfK2VPNx5s&feature=related
― What Kind Of EOY POLL Do You Look Like Now? (James Redd and the Blecchs), Sunday, 11 November 2012 19:59 (eleven years ago) link
ten years old today
― sleeve, Friday, 24 April 2015 14:37 (nine years ago) link
fascinating
https://www.theverge.com/2023/4/19/23689879/ai-drake-song-google-youtube-fair-use
If Google agrees with Universal that AI-generated music is an impermissible derivative work based on the unauthorized copying of training data, and that YouTube should pull down songs that labels flag for sounding like their artists, it undercuts its own fair use argument for Bard and every other generative AI product it makes — it undercuts the future of the company itself.
If Google disagrees with Universal and says AI-generated music should stay up because merely training an AI with existing works is fair use, it protects its own AI efforts and the future of the company, but probably triggers a bunch of future lawsuits from Universal and potentially other labels, and certainly risks losing access to Universal’s music on YouTube, which puts YouTube at risk.
― Perverted By Linguiça (sleeve), Wednesday, 26 April 2023 03:06 (one year ago) link