*
The older I get, the more I think that searching for completely pure motivation in yourself or in anyone else is a waste of time and energy.
― Rockist Scientist (rockistscientist), Sunday, 4 January 2004 16:42 (twenty years ago) link
― Rockist Scientist (rockistscientist), Sunday, 4 January 2004 16:47 (twenty years ago) link
How can people go on knowing that people are probably thinking things about them
― Ferrrrrrg (Ferg), Sunday, 4 January 2004 16:47 (twenty years ago) link
― stevem (blueski), Sunday, 4 January 2004 16:55 (twenty years ago) link
But since he's not one of my most favorite salsa singers, it doesn't mean too much.)
― Rockist Scientist (rockistscientist), Sunday, 4 January 2004 16:57 (twenty years ago) link
― gareth (gareth), Sunday, 4 January 2004 17:06 (twenty years ago) link
Here's my thought on the post: Undeniably, people gravitate toward certain kinds of music for reasons that aren't exclusively aesthetic. But does anyone really champion something that they don't genuinely like on some level? I mean, yeah, when I first started reading ILM, I was attracted to the social contrarianism (at least within my peer group) of listening to pop music. But as a listener, it also felt incredibly refreshing: I realized I loved all the cool sounds, the beats, the catchy melodies. And why not? Before I was 14, all I listened to was Top 40 and hip-hop radio; this kind of music has always been in my blood somehow.
And maybe some people do get into a genre of music because it seems like the "cool" thing to do, but once they really explore it, they'll find the specific artists that speak to them aesthetically and then it just turns into simple enjoyment. In the end, if I like both Justin Timberlake and Tortoise, it's not because they increase my hipster cred (even if I initially thought they were "cool") -- it's because they're both melodic and jazzy (in other words, essential aesthetic qualities that have always spoken to me).
― jaymc (jaymc), Sunday, 4 January 2004 17:32 (twenty years ago) link
― scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 4 January 2004 17:33 (twenty years ago) link
― scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 4 January 2004 17:34 (twenty years ago) link
― jaymc (jaymc), Sunday, 4 January 2004 17:47 (twenty years ago) link
I wish!
― Colin Beckett (Colin Beckett), Sunday, 4 January 2004 20:26 (twenty years ago) link
― M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 5 January 2004 02:41 (twenty years ago) link
― nate detritus (natedetritus), Monday, 5 January 2004 02:54 (twenty years ago) link
― M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 5 January 2004 02:55 (twenty years ago) link
― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Monday, 5 January 2004 02:59 (twenty years ago) link
(Thanks to Kish Kash these lyrics can be relevant again.)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 5 January 2004 03:02 (twenty years ago) link
― M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 5 January 2004 03:05 (twenty years ago) link
― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Monday, 5 January 2004 03:07 (twenty years ago) link
― M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 5 January 2004 03:08 (twenty years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 5 January 2004 03:08 (twenty years ago) link
― M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 5 January 2004 03:10 (twenty years ago) link
― nate detritus (natedetritus), Monday, 5 January 2004 03:11 (twenty years ago) link
― M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 5 January 2004 03:12 (twenty years ago) link
― nate detritus (natedetritus), Monday, 5 January 2004 03:13 (twenty years ago) link
― M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 5 January 2004 03:13 (twenty years ago) link
― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Monday, 5 January 2004 03:14 (twenty years ago) link
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Monday, 5 January 2004 03:14 (twenty years ago) link
― M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 5 January 2004 03:15 (twenty years ago) link
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Monday, 5 January 2004 03:19 (twenty years ago) link
― adam michel (adam michel), Monday, 5 January 2004 03:19 (twenty years ago) link
― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Monday, 5 January 2004 03:20 (twenty years ago) link
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Monday, 5 January 2004 03:21 (twenty years ago) link
― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Monday, 5 January 2004 03:22 (twenty years ago) link
― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Monday, 5 January 2004 03:27 (twenty years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 5 January 2004 03:33 (twenty years ago) link
I see how all of these aspects of top 40 pop are attractive, but doesn't the music for which which cool sounds/beats/melodies is the icing on the cake have a special appeal? Doesn't it set itself above the overproduced stuff you hear on pop radio?
― adam michel (adam michel), Monday, 5 January 2004 04:01 (twenty years ago) link
― jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 5 January 2004 04:11 (twenty years ago) link
― jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 5 January 2004 04:12 (twenty years ago) link
― adam michel (adam michel), Monday, 5 January 2004 04:17 (twenty years ago) link
― jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 5 January 2004 04:20 (twenty years ago) link
― adam michel (adam michel), Monday, 5 January 2004 04:26 (twenty years ago) link
― scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 5 January 2004 04:28 (twenty years ago) link
― adam michel (adam michel), Monday, 5 January 2004 04:33 (twenty years ago) link
― Darrens8====D (DarrenK), Monday, 5 January 2004 04:50 (twenty years ago) link
― Darrens8====D (DarrenK), Monday, 5 January 2004 04:57 (twenty years ago) link
― adam michel (adam michel), Monday, 5 January 2004 05:01 (twenty years ago) link
hating on things is way more fun than talking about how much you like things, cuz when you like something you're just being earnest and there's nothing funny about saying "hey man, this is a great record!" it's much funnier to talk about things that you don't like.
― one dis leads to another (ian), Wednesday, 16 May 2012 20:17 (twelve years ago) link
like, i don't like the kinks outside of a few songs. they're no troggs, that's for sure.
― one dis leads to another (ian), Wednesday, 16 May 2012 20:18 (twelve years ago) link
the first time i heard gymnopedie was indeed at the end of my dinner w andre
― good men like my father, or president truman (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 16 May 2012 20:19 (twelve years ago) link
I also do not like the kinks outside of their big hits. I find Village Green unlistenable.
― this guy's a gangsta? his real name's mittens. (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 16 May 2012 20:19 (twelve years ago) link
Also, no good music has ever come from the continent of Africa -- all these afro-punk-funk-rock compilers are kidding themselves.*
*j/k
― this guy's a gangsta? his real name's mittens. (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 16 May 2012 20:20 (twelve years ago) link
contrarianism /= hipsterism. the satie diss scans hipsterish because of the pretense of worldliness and expertise that it assumes in order to more effectively sneer at arrivistes who heard of satie through a movie or some such. the contemptuous sarcasm of "i hope they play gymnopédie no 1 at your funeral". it's an attack not on the music, but on a certain type of listener.
― The term or title antichrist, in Christian theology, refers to (contenderizer), Wednesday, 16 May 2012 20:26 (twelve years ago) link
Chain and the Gang track is so great. love that whole album. Ian is funny!
― Roger Barfing (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 16 May 2012 20:28 (twelve years ago) link
contrarianism /= hipsterism. the satie diss scans hipsterish because of the pretense of worldliness and expertise
True, but he also writes 'I still claim he invented Muzak,' which reads like an attack on the music.
― America's Mobile, Wednesday, 16 May 2012 21:34 (twelve years ago) link
I didn't know about Chain and the Gang until now. Got inspired to revisit Make-Up and NOU as a result.
― this guy's a gangsta? his real name's mittens. (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 16 May 2012 21:40 (twelve years ago) link
i think the attack on the music is where the hipsterism falls down, cuz that's a pretty tired thing to say about satie. ian is making a good go of it, but it still seems a bit challopy rather than the (illusion of) sincere takedown demanded.
― Merdeyeux, Wednesday, 16 May 2012 21:45 (twelve years ago) link
so is "the pit of vipers" hipsters or ilx?
― sarahell, Wednesday, 16 May 2012 21:50 (twelve years ago) link
accusing someone of contrarianism = "instead of accepting your statement and arguing against it I'm just going to pretend you don't even believe it yourself which is pretty much just an asshole move that will make the argument last longer and get progressively more meaningless"
― some dude, Tuesday, 7 October 2008 18:15 (3 years ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
quoted for truth
― Vermicious Knid A (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 16 May 2012 22:05 (twelve years ago) link