SIMON REYNOLDS DISCUSSES CURRENT DANCE MUSIC IN TODAY'S NY TIMES

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1037 of them)
With all due respect to my fellow Alaskans, if Anchorage can have a decent, competent electronic dance record store with great selection (Decibel Records to be exact), I'm sure such a thing can exist pretty much anywhere in the U.S.

donut christ (donut), Monday, 24 January 2005 06:27 (nineteen years ago) link

i'm wondering if ronan can enlighten us on why "dance" didn't take off in the us in 97 but did in 89 and in any case never came close to approaching disco or hip-hop's (neither of which are dance music cuz a couple of english rockcritics say so)(o and one irish dude) success.

j blount (papa la bas), Monday, 24 January 2005 06:28 (nineteen years ago) link

I don't think most teenagers own turntables though.

(and yes, I know about downloading. That's how I, a guy who lives in the suburbs, keep up with dance music.)

Mike O. (Mike Ouderkirk), Monday, 24 January 2005 06:39 (nineteen years ago) link

record stores sell cds these days too. I was stoked that this particular Iowa City store had the first Dettinger CD on Kompakt, since i couldn't find it in Chicago.

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 24 January 2005 06:40 (nineteen years ago) link

in fact i'm gonna put that one on as soon as this tony williams one finishes.

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 24 January 2005 06:42 (nineteen years ago) link

A couple of forms of dance music that's still yet to be reacknowledged by the dance music crit section is Industrial/EBM and New Beat.

Really? This probably depends on which crowd you move with because from day 1 this has been acknowledged as a big influence on house/rave/whatever. This was on a personal level where those who dived into rave circa 91 were all metalheads en EBM fans (and it was SR actually who made this connection early on, somewhere at the end of Blissed Out innit?) And the last few years it has been undeniable (again see DJ Hell's EBM mixcd or any Black Strobe rmx or Tiefschwarz DJ-set.)

this is no doubt heresy but I always liked the way Revolting Cocks sampled Phuture's 'The Creator' more that the original. :)

Omar (Omar), Monday, 24 January 2005 08:25 (nineteen years ago) link

Well, all I know is, growing up in college radio, industrial/EBM was rarely "cool", and everyone else listened to Sub Pop or Matador or what have you. I think Gerard used to make Wax Trax! jokes all the time in interviews.. or at least cut the label down... (oddly enough, Matador would later release a Praga Khan record that would out-Wax-Trax! Wax Trax! fodder). Again, not that any record label is immune to satire.

Brian Lustmord made up a Wax Trax! parody band called T.G.T. (The Genetic Terrorists) that actually got signed to Wax Trax! They got a couple of singles and an album out of it. The video to "Revo" is phenomenally stupid and hilarious. Best label signing story ever.

donut christ (donut), Monday, 24 January 2005 08:33 (nineteen years ago) link

But I digress.. I think my main point is that the electronic dance music that is popular today has a LOT more in common with the Industral/EBM/New Beat of the late 80s than the early rave music of the time.. yet, no article that mentions the state of dance music today ever mentions this very obvious fact.. it's like dance music writers are still GUILTY about liking Front 242 or something.

donut christ (donut), Monday, 24 January 2005 08:35 (nineteen years ago) link

I mean.. Black Strobe! Jesus christ.. they're SOOPER Wax Trax 2004!

donut christ (donut), Monday, 24 January 2005 08:35 (nineteen years ago) link

Mad Mike, Robert Hood and Jeff Mills were big New Beat and EBM fans. You can trace some kind of epiphany there in Mad Mike's case, because he was making party house before he met Mills - then suddenly, in the time it takes for a tourist to say 'Belgium is the worst country in the world' their music went all hard, cold and sexy.

BTW I don't know whether we should be talking about techno and house being 'the European idea of dance music'. It probably owes more to Chicago. In turn, Chicago owes house to US disco. House could even be electronic disco, no more and no less.

Periodically someone comes in and points out that all music people dance to is dance music. This is a point worth reiterating again and again. The kind of music that isn't hitting in the USA any more is just one particular kind of dance music - UK post rave electronic dance music - a strain within a strain within a genre. It's a big world, the world of electronic dance music; and the charts are currently full of different strains of the stuff. The majority of the top 40 at any time is 80% electronic music which people dance to. For better or worse, the battle has been won.

thee music mole, Monday, 24 January 2005 08:44 (nineteen years ago) link

yet, no article that mentions the state of dance music today ever mentions this very obvious fact.. it's like dance music writers are still GUILTY about liking Front 242 or something

Front 242 strongly influenced the darkwave/EBM-trance style which still remains popular, much of which is quite embarassing. So do dance music writers distance themselves from Industrial moreso because they don't like what it's become today, as opposed to feeling guilty about liking Front 242 in 1987?

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Monday, 24 January 2005 08:50 (nineteen years ago) link

Well, many critics praise Tiga, who's probably worse than even the most haphazard attempt to make fun of a typical Wax Trax! band today, so I don't think it's "EBM guilt" as much as just not being around for it the first time.

donut christ (donut), Monday, 24 January 2005 08:58 (nineteen years ago) link

Sadly, Front 242 were never cool with the writers I used to read back then, and nor was Gary Numan or DAF and definitely not Nitzer Ebb. They ragged them constantly. They liked the limper stuff - Depeche Mode, New Order etc. When the Detroit bunch picked up on the former artists, it raised a few eyebrows. But they were right, along with Kraftwerk, that stuff was the cream.

thee music mole, Monday, 24 January 2005 09:04 (nineteen years ago) link

I think it's just that critics, at least in the U.S. and U.K., didn't really dive into electronic dance music until the early days of rave.. just after industrial, "summer of 1989" acid house, or what have you. It was no longer just a bunch of 12"s and a bunch of DJs at clubs anymore. It was now attached to an escape into some utopia/freedom for a day or two in the odd remote location. I mean, that is quite significant, and a novelty for its time, compared to what dance music brought with it previously.

I know I'm generalizing horribly about the "most critics in the US and the UK" thing, but it's the only rational explanation for the absence of perspective of dance music in the 80s and before in print today, aside from what critics have learned from interviewing today's artists, many of which were into dance music early on, or what have you.

donut christ (donut), Monday, 24 January 2005 09:10 (nineteen years ago) link

in the time it takes for a tourist to say 'Belgium is the worst country in the world' their music went all hard, cold and sexy.

The problem is that the public (here at least in Belgium) equated New Beat with the Confettis. It was dark and sexy but it was also not to be taken seriously at all.

stevie nixed (stevie nixed), Monday, 24 January 2005 09:33 (nineteen years ago) link

i wonder how different this thread would be if the word rave had been used instead of dance. the whole 'everything is dance music' is a red herring, i think, surely everyone knows what type of music simon is talking about?

(i wouldnt want to use rave as a descriptive here either, as i consider it a 87-94 term, before the formalization of club culture - though that is uk specific)

is dance/house/techno/rave/trance (please, people you know what im talking about, dont semantic me again!) as popular in australia as before? the impression i get is that there hasnt been an equivalent decline in australia as in uk/us

charltonlido (gareth), Monday, 24 January 2005 10:39 (nineteen years ago) link

"It could not be more obvious that rock is on the very brink of going completely electronic, same as happened to funk and disco."

um where is this happening?

ppp, Monday, 24 January 2005 11:06 (nineteen years ago) link

Another weird aside here is to mention Asia.

Last time i was in Vietnam, I went to a club that was playing like 100% new beat type stuff that I'd never heard before and assume was homegrown...

Japan has millions of its own weird microgenres, like that stuff that sounds like happy hardcore with japa-rapping over the top.

Philippines, Malaysia and Shanghai are all about hip hop, following the US lead.

But, apparently, head out to Chengdu or any other place out in the sticks in china and its hard house all the way. As is the case in Indonesia.

No rhyme or reason as far as I can tell...

Jacob (Jacob), Monday, 24 January 2005 11:09 (nineteen years ago) link

I just want to say--and this is very, very important--that I agree with [x] and totally disagree with [y]. And why has nobody mentioned skrank yet?

Momus (Momus), Monday, 24 January 2005 11:25 (nineteen years ago) link

I think Scott is correct about hip-hop's dominance leaving 'no room' for dance in the US. In the UK in the 90s, hip-hop really wasn't that big at all, certainly not compared to how it is now, partly because dance music was everywhere and had different subgenres that appealed to both white and black audiences.

So dance music/superclub culture was totally dominant throughout the 90s, right up until the big chart trance boom in 1999 (which might, in retrospect, have been partly responsibly for its commercial demise). Hardcore, house, drum and bass, trance and then garage were all big things (even if dnb never really spawned any big chart hits, if you exclude Incredible), you heard them booming out of car stereos across London. In 2004 you just don't, you either hear hip-hop, dancehall or grime in their place. To an extent the rise in hip-hop's popularity here has coincided with its incorporation of some of the sonic elements of dance music, and its now squeezing out dance music itself as a commercial force.

Why has no one mentioned geography here? The relative proximity of British cities to one another was a big factor. People used to drive from Bristol to Manchester to go clubbing for a weekend, or out into the country for a rave, or whatever, or out of the country and into London to go dancing. As more people did that, the more the local provincial clubs opened up their own house or dnb nights.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 24 January 2005 13:25 (nineteen years ago) link

In the UK in the 90s, hip-hop really wasn't that big at all
it's true but rap inflitrated the UK charts in many different ways and the sources of impact were more varied...fluid? because house and rave music and jungle sampled rap lines and the same breaks, and the UK takes on it in pop terms ranged from that to Massive Attack to Stereo MCs and beyond.

but it's an interesting parallel - that US rap took a while to peak here just as dance music (as WE know it) has in the States

Stevem On X (blueski), Monday, 24 January 2005 13:33 (nineteen years ago) link

I think it's interesting that Ronan dissociates hip-hop from dance music quite so harshly. One knows what he means, but from a Reynolds fan it's strange: 'Energy Flash' argues that hip-hop technique is a major 'unspoken thing' in early uk house, 90-93 ardkore, and big beat which Reynolds surprisingly argues is a kind of apotheosis of dance circa 1998. And more recently of course he's written about the effect of ecstasy/dance music as it is spoke on eg Timbaland. I disagree with Matt about hip-hop in the UK. It's never had big club presence, but it's been big on stereos, as big as dnb and garage certainly.

Miles Finch, Monday, 24 January 2005 13:34 (nineteen years ago) link

it's always seemed perfectly reasonable to distinguish hip-hop from dance music in the UK - partly because the two were both such huge movements in their own right regardless of the big overlap, and also because i suppose one was dominated by blacks and the other whites.

Stevem On X (blueski), Monday, 24 January 2005 13:36 (nineteen years ago) link

another thing to consider is that Cypress Hill having a top 20 hit in 1994 is actually the equivalent of them having a top 5 hit today in sales terms, so it was big 10-15 years ago but in a different way - more fanaticism rather than what we see now - a more casual love of a more casual hip-hop (casual in that it's traded much to become this all-powerful pop form we know today)

Stevem On X (blueski), Monday, 24 January 2005 13:39 (nineteen years ago) link

whats this 'hip hop was never big in the UK'? yes it was, maybe not in the pop charts and mainstream (though even NWA and PE and fugess and the like all hat top 40 hits), but in 'urban' areas, and in the black community, hip hop was one of, if not the main music of choice, next to R&B.

ppp, Monday, 24 January 2005 13:41 (nineteen years ago) link

I hate the term "dance music" used in the narrow genre sense as much as the next guy, but why are people ignoring the fact that that's the sense in which Reynolds is using it?

RS £aRue (rockist_scientist), Monday, 24 January 2005 13:45 (nineteen years ago) link

Sometimes the same word or the same phrase is used in different senses by different groups of people!

RS £aRue (rockist_scientist), Monday, 24 January 2005 13:46 (nineteen years ago) link

i think the description of The Big Four is misleading too - at the time (1997) I personally thought of it being a Big Five comprised of Prodigy, the Chems, Underworld, Leftfield and Orbital. That was your top tier. Daft Punk were something else, Le Grande Une even. But that was just how I called it.

Stevem On X (blueski), Monday, 24 January 2005 13:51 (nineteen years ago) link

(if not Leftfield THEN Cook, given his relative success in the States)

Stevem On X (blueski), Monday, 24 January 2005 13:52 (nineteen years ago) link

"i'm wondering if ronan can enlighten us on why "dance" didn't take off in the us in 97 but did in 89 and in any case never came close to approaching disco or hip-hop's (neither of which are dance music cuz a couple of english rockcritics say so)(o and one irish dude) success".

erm once again we're back to the same pig headedness.

saying "dance music did take off in the US, hiphop IS dance music" is nothing more than an obstacle which prevents discussion of the subject of the above article and of electronic dance music.

the "us equivalent of dance music" is never going to be similar to the European one, it's not enough to simply say "it's all electronic dance music", is ambition so meagre in that respect that we actually consider it all part of the exact same scene and about the same vibe.

hiphop and house/techno are so different, in so many ways, and I maintain that the refusal to even discuss the success or failure of house and techno etc without trying to instantly kill discussion by saying you can dance to anything, that that refusal is telling in itself.

there's an arrogance there.

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 24 January 2005 13:53 (nineteen years ago) link

as regards new beat and ebm as influences, I think anyone living in Europe is well aware of the reverence with which their treated and the sheer trendiness to be honest. began with the Glimmer Twins I guess, I'd say new beat is fast gaining on italo in the revivalism stakes.

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 24 January 2005 13:56 (nineteen years ago) link

i agree with Ronan - there are massive fundamental aesthetic differences between DANCE MUSIC and hip-hop which require a distinction to be made. house, techno, jungle, trance all ended up sort of equal among themselves in scale, scope and popularity and sort of shared the same goal as well (to challenge and debase the status quo? provide alternative to alternatives?) - THIS is why they all fall under the same DANCE MUSIC catch-all despite the differences musically. Hip-Hop is it's own world with different rules and causes. That they both make people want to dance, as funny as it may seem, is irrelevant to the argument.

Stevem On X (blueski), Monday, 24 January 2005 13:59 (nineteen years ago) link

(tho i'm not really sure what 'new beat' is, again...)

Stevem On X (blueski), Monday, 24 January 2005 14:00 (nineteen years ago) link

Sorry ppp, I should have added the caveat that I was talking about mainstream/pop chart success here, since that's what we're talking about wrt to America and dance music. Its fairly evident that house did better in that department than hip-hop, although Stevem's Cypress Hill point is very pertinent.

Where does grime fit in here? Obviously it has little mainstream profile even here yet, Dizzee aside, but its origins are in hip-hop and dancehall as much as they are in garage and jungle.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 24 January 2005 14:03 (nineteen years ago) link

Oh god except looking here shows that Puffy had a bigger-selling single than any 90s dance artist. Arse.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 24 January 2005 14:07 (nineteen years ago) link

New Beat: Legend has it that at first instead of being played at 45, some dj played it at 33 rpm. It was started at the Boccacio - if I can trust my dad, it was the son of the guy who started Popcorn (sort of Northern Soul mecca in Belgium). It was always below 100 bpm: very slow and heavy. I quite liked it at the time. Heavily ridiculed later on because of bands like the Confettis which was the disney version of what New Beat was s'posed to be. One of the main guys behind it was in Poesie Noire and invented the Sherman filterbank.

stevie nixed (stevie nixed), Monday, 24 January 2005 14:08 (nineteen years ago) link

i think things are promising for grime in the UK commercially, more than they were for jungle and more than they have been for 'trad' hip-hop. in contrast i don't expect any major inroads to be made in the US and the amout of referencing of Dizzee over there will, i expect, amount to LESS than what the Chems or Fatboy enjoyed. but i could be proven wrong here...

why did Simon Reynolds not mention Dirty Vegas? ;)

upthread i mentioned Carter having a big hit in the States. this is based on something i read years ago which claimed that 'The Only Living Boy In New Cross' was in the Billboard top 10! but it seems i have my wires crossed...

Stevem On X (blueski), Monday, 24 January 2005 14:10 (nineteen years ago) link

i guess the fact that rnb semi-absorbed hip-hop is the reason why i think hip-hop has been huge in the uk -- in the guise, sometimes, of rnb. hip hop is not just cypress hill, dre, snoop, eminem, who were all huge -- it's also mary j blige, kind of.

Miles Finch, Monday, 24 January 2005 14:10 (nineteen years ago) link

Oh god except looking here shows that Puffy had a bigger-selling single than any 90s dance artist. Arse.

But that track falls somewhat outside the typical hip-hop boundaries surely, as with 'Hey Ya!'

Stevem On X (blueski), Monday, 24 January 2005 14:12 (nineteen years ago) link

began with the Glimmer Twins I guess,

You're saying Mo & Benoelie started New Beat? Or brought it back with their compilations? I'm confused now. They now play at the Culture Club - or used to, as I don't go there much more. My husband loathes'em. *shrug* Not surprisingly as he sees them in the same style as 2ManyDJs. :-)

I love when this list suddenly starts bickering about what dance music is. Trying so hard to prove Simon R wrong.

stevie nixed (stevie nixed), Monday, 24 January 2005 14:13 (nineteen years ago) link

you either have to update your perception of what hip-hop IS (not just WAS) to include artists like Mary J AND tracks like 'Hey Ya!' or you stick resolutely to the definition as to what it initially amounted to. same with DANCE MUSIC and it's components really. but i think when you look at the American and British charts and how they are dominated by tracks featuring different elements of hip-hop, i tend to lean towards the latter thinking - and that hip-hop as term may even be out-of-date because it's assimilated so much, strengthening yet diluting in the process.

Stevem On X (blueski), Monday, 24 January 2005 14:15 (nineteen years ago) link

brought it back with the comps, to a certain extent, at least I know alot of people of my generation and the electroclash types would have bought Serie Noire 1 and 2 having never heard New Beat before.

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 24 January 2005 14:16 (nineteen years ago) link

you either have to update your perception of what hip-hop IS

applies to Grime also of course

xpost

Stevem On X (blueski), Monday, 24 January 2005 14:16 (nineteen years ago) link

far as i know, reynolds doesnt actually think grime is dance music, per se. but if thats true, then the orb et al shouldnt be lumped in as dance either.

either way, i cant see grime busting the top 10/40 open wide like rave/hardcore did, barring a few odd hits here and there. this year might see it happen though - kano's new single is sure to hit the top 40, even if its more of a standard hip hop/rock track then grime.

xpost - mary j isnt hip hop.

ppp, Monday, 24 January 2005 14:19 (nineteen years ago) link

'original' hip-hop being made up of big samples makes the 'define hip-hop' issue 'difficult'. i think saying 'hey ya' is 'not hip-hop' is a bit like saying chemical bros circa 'setting sun' were 'not dance' -- ie kind of arguable, but...

Miles Finch, Monday, 24 January 2005 14:20 (nineteen years ago) link

i think the description of The Big Four is misleading too - at the time (1997) I personally thought of it being a Big Five comprised of Prodigy, the Chems, Underworld, Leftfield and Orbital. That was your top tier. Daft Punk were something else, Le Grande Une even. But that was just how I called it.

Commercially, though, Fatboy had more US success than Leftfield and Orbital combined.

The Good Dr. Bill (The Good Dr. Bill), Monday, 24 January 2005 14:21 (nineteen years ago) link

but how IS hey ya hip hop, other than a hip hop artist made it?

ppp, Monday, 24 January 2005 14:24 (nineteen years ago) link

i dunno, but historically hip-hop has contained many things: raps, instrumentals, sample-based, non-sample-based.

Miles Finch, Monday, 24 January 2005 14:27 (nineteen years ago) link

angie stone used to be in sequence as a rapper, now she makes neo soul. shes not saying she still makes hip hop.

ppp, Monday, 24 January 2005 14:30 (nineteen years ago) link

Uh, there's rapping? (xp)

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 24 January 2005 14:33 (nineteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.