HAIM

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (2077 of them)

chunklet would've made fun of haim but there's a 65% chance it would have been funny about it

call all destroyer, Saturday, 5 October 2013 15:04 (ten years ago) link

xp To what 'in crowd' are you referring, exactly? Potbellied guys who like Captain Beefheart and The Fall or the young, articulate pop apologists on this thread?

This

How fortunate that so many rock critics have discovered the latent love for pop music that always laid deep within, just at a time when it’s been proven that you will not get work if your music criticism does not attract the requisite number of hits in web 2.0.

may be cynical as fuck but it's also pretty otm

also 65% otm too

Jimmywine Dyspeptic, Saturday, 5 October 2013 15:07 (ten years ago) link

presumptuous as fuck IMO.

Neanderthal, Saturday, 5 October 2013 15:11 (ten years ago) link

I'm not going to continue ranting

Neanderthal, Saturday, 5 October 2013 15:19 (ten years ago) link

Wtf is this "objectively terrible " bs?

the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 5 October 2013 15:21 (ten years ago) link

this thread and the creativity and artistry one might as well merge if we're going to head down that rabbit hole!

Neanderthal, Saturday, 5 October 2013 15:30 (ten years ago) link

btw I liked The New Radicals

Neanderthal, Saturday, 5 October 2013 15:30 (ten years ago) link

xp To what 'in crowd' are you referring, exactly? Potbellied guys who like Captain Beefheart and The Fall or the young, articulate pop apologists on this thread?

the former, of course. my people, the middle-aged, postpunk chunklet readers of the world. the rug rats have their own code, in which rick astley probably stands for something very different.

pervilege as a meme (contenderizer), Saturday, 5 October 2013 15:33 (ten years ago) link

lol at the idea that writing pop criticism gets you any more web traffic than writing criticism about any other music does

max, Saturday, 5 October 2013 15:39 (ten years ago) link

seriously

spin's haim feature got crushed traffic-wise by our stream of the melt banana album

J0rdan S., Saturday, 5 October 2013 15:54 (ten years ago) link

also lol @ getting so up in arms about CHUNKLET, oh no who could ever "take a swipe" at it

whiney if i'm not mistaken also likes chunklet and has contributed to some chunklet projects and normally when you say that something is "sub-" something else, it's not a swipe at the publication but the person

J0rdan S., Saturday, 5 October 2013 15:56 (ten years ago) link

If there's two thinks I like, it's subs and Chunklet.

smangerz (Whiney G. Weingarten), Saturday, 5 October 2013 16:39 (ten years ago) link

I've written for Chunklet and love Henry, obviously. But "punk rock über alles" as a their default doesn't exactly gel with my worldview.

smangerz (Whiney G. Weingarten), Saturday, 5 October 2013 16:41 (ten years ago) link

This thread is sub-Miley and currently over-Albini, but both of those will change with my post.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 5 October 2013 16:56 (ten years ago) link

this thread and the creativity and artistry one might as well merge if we're going to head down that rabbit hole!

― Neanderthal, Saturday, October 5, 2013 11:30 AM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I've purposely avoided that thread because I already feel like Chaplin railing against the talkies here and I'd just as soon not be one more of those guys.

Jimmywine Dyspeptic, Saturday, 5 October 2013 17:39 (ten years ago) link

Chaplin later made a couple of awful talkies so

the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 5 October 2013 17:41 (ten years ago) link

don't feel Chaplin as much as you're telling us "hate more stuff".

Neanderthal, Saturday, 5 October 2013 17:47 (ten years ago) link

"spin's haim feature got crushed traffic-wise by our stream of the melt banana album"

to be fair comparing a feature and an album stream is like comparing apples to the NYT front pge

katherine, Saturday, 5 October 2013 18:04 (ten years ago) link

great thread.

ᶓ͠סּᴥ͠סּᶔ ᶓͼ᷆ₓͼ᷇ᶔ (gr8080), Saturday, 5 October 2013 19:43 (ten years ago) link

recently i have explained to younger folk just how unfashionable Fleetwood Mac were in the late 80s/90s and had funny looks. people can't believe they were ever not hugely popular/cool or whatever but even i was surprised to watch this. i never considered them to be 'punchline of a sketch/ butt-of-a-joke' unpopular

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9iwNicTDcA

and i mean yeah you can say 'oh so some shit 80s comedy outfit didn't like them so what?' but there it is.

piscesx, Saturday, 5 October 2013 22:38 (ten years ago) link

very pertinent post

ᶓ͠סּᴥ͠סּᶔ ᶓͼ᷆ₓͼ᷇ᶔ (gr8080), Sunday, 6 October 2013 01:02 (ten years ago) link

You're assuming anyone paid attention to chatter. In the nineties the Rumours singles got as much airplay as they do now, and so did "Gypsy" and the Tango singles (particularly "Everywhere").

Hmm. I discovered Rumours and Tusk in the mid nineties and while I didn't read longform articles defending them I didn't need to! The first was already accepted as a classic, the second as a problematic one.

where's the fleetwood mac here

brimstead, Sunday, 6 October 2013 02:17 (ten years ago) link

i heard the "oh well" cover

brimstead, Sunday, 6 October 2013 02:17 (ten years ago) link

oh well

There are bands out there who bear far more resemblance to Mac than Haim do. It's not a baseless reference, but it's also a reach.

Johnny Fever, Sunday, 6 October 2013 02:24 (ten years ago) link

The only song on this album that sounds like Fleetwood Mac to me is "Honey & I"

The Reverend, Sunday, 6 October 2013 02:34 (ten years ago) link

yup

call all destroyer, Sunday, 6 October 2013 02:36 (ten years ago) link

I dunno I'm still hearing a lot of Mac in it, especially in the guitar. I think a lot of the vague allusion to Fleetwood Mac-style rhythms comes from the very rhythmic palm-muted melodic lines that are all over this album and to my ears very Lindsey B.

opie dead eyed piece of shit (Merdeyeux), Sunday, 6 October 2013 03:01 (ten years ago) link

Eh I hear it in the fussy percussion/arrangements, but the palm muted rhythmic guitar stuff is a staple of '80s pop in general.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 6 October 2013 03:27 (ten years ago) link

i was trying to decide if the guitars reminded me specifically of lb and ended up thinking that they don't.

i guess the closest you could get is that there are a lot of minimal and carefully inserted guitar parts, which was common on the mac's poppier songs

call all destroyer, Sunday, 6 October 2013 03:29 (ten years ago) link

xp I don't know about the US but in the UK Fleetwood Mac had very little hip cachet in the late 80s or 90s. Mick Fleetwood was best known as the Munster-like guy who did the Brit Awards with Sam Fox. At that time most people would rather have jacked.

Deafening silence (DL), Sunday, 6 October 2013 08:28 (ten years ago) link

I think it's a tiny bit more complicated than that, they weren't mainstream cool at all but the balearic-heads were into them. Those arthur baker remixes of 'big love' and 'family man' in particular.

But I don't hear much Mac in HAIM either tbh.

ewar woowar (or something), Sunday, 6 October 2013 09:28 (ten years ago) link

Fleetwood Mac's biggest wave of resurgence in the US in the 90s was the Clinton campaign -- they were the soundtrack of cooler-than-usual-but-not-really-that-cool baby boomers.

marky markers & the blinky bunch (some dude), Sunday, 6 October 2013 13:25 (ten years ago) link

I thought The Dance did it...? A month before the performance my local New Times publication wrote a consideration of their career, even reminding people that Matthew Sweet recognized the brilliance of Tusk by hiring Richard Dashut to produce Altered Beast.

Mick Fleetwood plays on that record, too. I don't think Dashut's presence had anything to do with Sweet's specific love of "Tusk," though.

It's a little too tidy to say "The Dance" renewed interest in Fleetwood Mac, because "The Dance" was their reunion/tour, so duh, of course there was renewed interest, since the formerly broken up band was suddenly touring again. I will say this: there was little to no hipster interest in "Say You Will," and that album is weird and awesome. I similarly sense little to no hipster interest in Lindsey solo, and in many ways that seems of even more interest to hipsters, since it's so strange and relatively not mainstream. So maybe it's the vague idea of Fleetwood Mac that is cool - like the girls at outdoor festivals who wear face paint and vaguely Native American headgear - because I'm willing to bet plenty that there is barely a tiny fraction of, say, Vampire Weekend's fanbase that has ever played a single Mac song of their own volition. Musicians and bands into Mac, that's another matter, but that's already a much smaller pool.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 6 October 2013 13:41 (ten years ago) link

yeah the NT reporter's angle was "See? Even Matthew Sweet likes the Mac!"

well he would

pervilege as a meme (contenderizer), Sunday, 6 October 2013 13:47 (ten years ago) link

as someone who grew up not listening to his parents music, in fact whose parents didnt listen to any western music at all, let me break it down for you: HAIM rules, fleetwood mac have some okay songs and some terrible songs, tango in the night is a middling album. HTH

乒乓, Sunday, 6 October 2013 13:48 (ten years ago) link

Fleetwood Mac has put out so many albums in so many modes that I'd be amazed if someone couldn't fill at least an album's worth of awesome.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 6 October 2013 13:59 (ten years ago) link

or five

pervilege as a meme (contenderizer), Sunday, 6 October 2013 14:06 (ten years ago) link

Seriously, though, per the band's cachet, as such, I think what The Dance" did and beyond is to at least make the band acceptable as more than just yuppie product, differentiating it from other '70s "corporate" rock a la the Eagles or ELO or whomever. It's not that Fleetwood Mac is hip or cool so much as not uncool, which is something. Also, the band's back catalog works as a sort of insurance - if you hate the '75 era and beyond, there's all that other stuff that came before, which not only shows the band paid its dues but also provides hours of hardly overplayed stuff to delve into. And then even further there's all of the '80s Nicks stuff, which is a different sort of touchstone, plus the Lindsey solo stuff, which is more obscure. Lots of open avenues for exploration. This was never a band whose "Greatest Hits" was going to be its biggest seller, or the standard album is everyone's collection.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 6 October 2013 14:08 (ten years ago) link

Also the variety: there are ballads and rockers, some with female singers, some with male, some duets, all equally good but most very different. Plus, the band can play.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 6 October 2013 14:11 (ten years ago) link

yeah but HAIM. they've eclipsed all those things in one album, apparently.

marky markers & the blinky bunch (some dude), Sunday, 6 October 2013 14:23 (ten years ago) link

So maybe it's the vague idea of Fleetwood Mac that is cool - like the girls at outdoor festivals who wear face paint and vaguely Native American headgear - because I'm willing to bet plenty that there is barely a tiny fraction of, say, Vampire Weekend's fanbase that has ever played a single Mac song of their own volition.

Well there is this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HcYT8TzUarI

MarkoP, Sunday, 6 October 2013 14:30 (ten years ago) link

Everett True says:
October 6, 2013 at 8:58 am
Dismissing the idea of a ‘hivemind’ whilst invoking I Love Music seems a little bit contradictory to me.

To deny that some form of “collective conciousness” often occurs wherever like-minded folk congregate (on places such as message boards, say) seems somewhat disingenuous to me, also. Or perhaps it’s more of a “collective subconsciousness”?

The fact that Dorian felt safe enough to call Scott’s review “sexist” – when it quite clearly is anything but – after seeing it linked from the self-congratulatory, smugger-than-thou ILM message boards is telling. (And also helps explain to me why such an intelligent writer as Dorian saw fit to use such an inappropriate insult in the first place.) I suspect that if he’d chanced across it on his own, his views would have been different. Maybe they wouldn’t have been, though. As he points out above, Scott’s writing is (sometimes) filled with attention-seeking vitriol, (sometimes) directed at other journalists – and it is hard NOT to rise to bait like that.

Who knows? Context, context, context.

scott seward, Sunday, 6 October 2013 14:35 (ten years ago) link

congratulations, you guys!

scott seward, Sunday, 6 October 2013 14:35 (ten years ago) link

because I'm willing to bet plenty that there is barely a tiny fraction of, say, Vampire Weekend's fanbase that has ever played a single Mac song of their own volition.

hahaha WHAT

call all destroyer, Sunday, 6 October 2013 14:42 (ten years ago) link

i mean there a million really specific genealogies you can trace out--i think the balearic angle is an impt one--but the big picture is just that mac is cool now because they werent cool before and thats how cool works

max, Sunday, 6 October 2013 14:43 (ten years ago) link

xpost I know VW covered the Mac, and I know people were into it, and I bet a good number of VW fans claim to love Fleetwood Mac, and I bet a tiny, tiny fraction of them actually play FM, any more than they play, say, Steely Dan or Chic or any African music, for that matter. Which is fine, obviously, but it's a more casual kind of part-of-the-culture fandom to say you like something even if you don't actively listen to it. Do I like Chuck Berry? No, I LOVE Chuck Berry. But it's not often I play any of the many Chuck Berry comps I own.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 6 October 2013 14:45 (ten years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.