― mmmmsalt (Graeme), Friday, 5 March 2004 21:37 (twenty years ago) link
― mmmmsalt (Graeme), Friday, 5 March 2004 21:42 (twenty years ago) link
2. Some early Wimp Factor 14 CD that came in a 5" x 8" manila folder with screen printing on it -- where the heck am I going to file that?
3. And, any CDs that come with no info on the spine or spines so thin it's impossible to print anything on them; they might as well be invisible on the shelves.
― Baked Bean Teeth (Baked Bean Teeth), Friday, 5 March 2004 21:57 (twenty years ago) link
― boldbury, Friday, 5 March 2004 22:03 (twenty years ago) link
but the absolute worst? the Technoise/Hyware 2CD on i. a stickered cardboard box (like something you'd use to ship an order of 4-7 CDs containing a pair of unsleeved discs and some cheap B&W cards sandwiched between large styrofoam blocks. what's the point? makes Aluminum Tunes seem practical.
― echoinggrove, Friday, 5 March 2004 22:09 (twenty years ago) link
Records that sabotage other records - C/D? yes, yes, and Vini Reilly to thread....
― echoinggrove, Friday, 5 March 2004 22:18 (twenty years ago) link
Mine has the same crack (although my cdplayer bravely ignores it :). Was the first one everybody bought right? After that all those cd's went into a plastic or paper cover and then into the bloody tin.
Most of those double-cd's that open outwards, I dunno what it is but those holders never actually hold the cd. I hate that.
I love digipacks though.
Never can make up my mind if the package of Faze Action's first album is cool or irritating (you know LP style inner sleeve). Also see Endtroducing right?
― Omar (Omar), Friday, 5 March 2004 22:19 (twenty years ago) link
My hubby got a noise CD that was packaged between two sheets of steel. He regretted this when we had our next fight, ouch
― Donna Brown (Donna Brown), Friday, 5 March 2004 22:21 (twenty years ago) link
― astroblaster (astroblaster), Saturday, 6 March 2004 00:24 (twenty years ago) link
― ddb, Saturday, 6 March 2004 03:51 (twenty years ago) link
― donut bitch (donut), Saturday, 6 March 2004 03:56 (twenty years ago) link
― ferg (Ferg), Saturday, 6 March 2004 04:43 (twenty years ago) link
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Saturday, 6 March 2004 04:55 (twenty years ago) link
― Roger in Mokum (Roger T), Saturday, 6 March 2004 09:11 (twenty years ago) link
Really? I didn't mind that one (esp. compared to those Chain Reaction tins). That cd still works perfectly.
― Omar (Omar), Saturday, 6 March 2004 09:25 (twenty years ago) link
― Roger in Mokum (Roger T), Saturday, 6 March 2004 09:47 (twenty years ago) link
― gareth (gareth), Saturday, 6 March 2004 10:03 (twenty years ago) link
― Hayden Nicholls (Pop the Weasel), Saturday, 6 March 2004 12:39 (twenty years ago) link
― Andy K (Andy K), Saturday, 6 March 2004 13:16 (twenty years ago) link
― radio morocco (radio morocco), Saturday, 6 March 2004 14:22 (twenty years ago) link
― strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Saturday, 6 March 2004 14:32 (twenty years ago) link
― marcg (marcg), Saturday, 6 March 2004 15:07 (twenty years ago) link
Any single-record vinyl release with a doublefold jacket, especially when there's just a crummy photo inside and nothing useful like lyrics -- did another tree have to die just to satiate your vanity?
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Saturday, 6 March 2004 15:08 (twenty years ago) link
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Saturday, 6 March 2004 15:11 (twenty years ago) link
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Saturday, 6 March 2004 15:13 (twenty years ago) link
― Roger in Mokum (Roger T), Saturday, 6 March 2004 15:17 (twenty years ago) link
― subgenius (subgenius), Saturday, 6 March 2004 15:27 (twenty years ago) link
Also, the original vinyl of Sticky Fingers could get honors in both "Worst Packaging Ever" and "Best Packaging Ever".
― Pleasant Plains (Pleasant Plains), Saturday, 6 March 2004 17:41 (twenty years ago) link
― lovebug starski, Saturday, 6 March 2004 18:37 (twenty years ago) link
I'm finally going to get one of these soon for my mp3 discs. I only just got around to cataloging the damn things so I knew what exactly I had (unsurprisingly, it was quite a lot).
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 6 March 2004 18:54 (twenty years ago) link
― morris pavilion (samjeff), Saturday, 6 March 2004 19:33 (twenty years ago) link
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Saturday, 6 March 2004 19:42 (twenty years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 6 March 2004 19:47 (twenty years ago) link
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Saturday, 6 March 2004 20:28 (twenty years ago) link
― maypang (maypang), Saturday, 6 March 2004 20:32 (twenty years ago) link
― Roger in Mokum (Roger T), Saturday, 6 March 2004 20:37 (twenty years ago) link
― maypang (maypang), Saturday, 6 March 2004 21:24 (twenty years ago) link
― Bjorn Kipling, Sunday, 7 March 2004 05:07 (twenty years ago) link
Worst - David Sylvian's Everything and Nothing comp. Four-panel digipak: disc 1, bonus disc 3 in very snug slide-in slipcase, artwork, disc 2. Getting bonus CD out means folding pack back on itself or digging around in slip panel with fingernails. Yes, it's ripped.
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Sunday, 7 March 2004 19:13 (twenty years ago) link
― donut bitch (donut), Sunday, 7 March 2004 19:17 (twenty years ago) link
― Roger in Mokum (Roger T), Sunday, 7 March 2004 19:21 (twenty years ago) link
Second most ambitiously worst packaging ever was a (drum roll) Flaming Lips single... again. This time, the "This Here Giraffe" part 2 CD-single.. the CD was cut into a star-shape.. so only top loading CD players can (maybe) play it. What makes it more frustrating is that the B-sides are one of the rare B-sides for the Lips that are GOOD! (Peel session versions of "Hit To Death" era songs)
― donut bitch (donut), Sunday, 7 March 2004 19:21 (twenty years ago) link
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Sunday, 7 March 2004 19:23 (twenty years ago) link
― scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 7 March 2004 19:25 (twenty years ago) link
My Spectrum gel-pack is still nice and gooey. Slayer put out a nice blood-gel pack once.
― scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 7 March 2004 19:27 (twenty years ago) link
― scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 7 March 2004 19:30 (twenty years ago) link
Now that I've finally got at the disc I feel more like playing Hüsker Dü than I do Múm.
― Snnap Dragon (snnap dragon), Tuesday, 13 April 2004 16:04 (twenty years ago) link
― Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Tuesday, 13 April 2004 16:13 (twenty years ago) link
― Mark (MarkR), Tuesday, 13 April 2004 16:20 (twenty years ago) link
― Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 13 April 2004 16:27 (twenty years ago) link
Regarding sleeves: Does the new Prince album contain any info on the contents anywhere at all?
I mean, nothing wrong about the hologram cover. It's great and brilliant, as opposed to the primitive hologram on the original "Diamonds And Pearls". But I would have preferred a sleeve giving someindication on what's inside.
― Geir Hongro, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 08:32 (seventeen years ago) link
what hologram cover ? the freebie MOS version was just a skinny cardboard cover with no detail on it at all.
― mark e, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 09:50 (seventeen years ago) link
Re: Prolapse - Backsaturday, I think I have the UK version and that's the same. My shelves are too big for normal CDs so things like that fit OK.
― Colonel Poo, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 10:10 (seventeen years ago) link
The boxset "The Man from Impanema" for Antonio Carlos Jobim is a three disc set, contains 60 pages with each disc nestled within a different section, is too tall AND wide to fit on any standard shelf, and to top it all off, it's friggin' spiral-bound.
It's lovely - I bought it for my wife in '99 or so. We just keep it on display, propped up on top of the shelves with the boxsets. It's still in good nick.
― Michael Jones, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 10:44 (seventeen years ago) link