Kelley Polar - Love Songs of The Hanging Gardens (Environ CD05)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (944 of them)
what i was after with my pitchfork comment was that kompakt might be more familiar to the average reader than say, klein and mbo. reading the review again, i see that you're going for something else, phil. i must have my italo goggles on. i have been playing around mixing aguayo and polar without much success actually, but the similarities are indeed there.

tricky (disco stu), Monday, 5 December 2005 03:50 (eighteen years ago) link

aguayo is much more of blank slate than polar i think. meaning that it's much easier to traditionally mix and blend the former while the latter is much more song-y. tracks vs. songs i guess. not that are you really lost? doesn't work as an album.

tricky (disco stu), Monday, 5 December 2005 03:53 (eighteen years ago) link

i like big butts and i cannot lie

cutty (mcutt), Monday, 5 December 2005 04:04 (eighteen years ago) link

i hate the way genre words are endlessly used in music criticism like no other criticism

-- justsaying (jus...), December 5th, 2005.

I posted my frustration with ILMers about this exact issue on the Richie Hawtin thread, but you have to understand that this is I Love Music, and therefore identifying genres and picking apart the music as it applies to such is part of a valid discussion.

That said, it is annoying that the tendency here with posts discussing dance/electronic music, which contain enough absurd esoteric genres (folktronica, microhouse, etc.) to drive one batty, is to dismiss the content of an album in favor of academic muscle flexing intent on proving that the author's argument is superior, whether or not it's correct.

But it's still fair game in this arena. If you want to know about what an album sounds like exclusively, check allmusic or amazon or one of the many dance record store sites that offer up snapshot reviews. Or jump in the fite with a good argument.

Or just trust everyone here (these people know better than most) - it's a fantastic record, regardless of what genre it falls under...

jsoulja (jsoulja), Monday, 5 December 2005 05:34 (eighteen years ago) link

i don't get it.

vahid (vahid), Monday, 5 December 2005 07:03 (eighteen years ago) link

I think when people talk about IDM these days, they're talking about more "experimental" electronica, music that more often then not, tries to distant itself from pop or the dancefloor in a way the first wave of artists didn't.

I know when I talk about IDM I'm thinking way more about early Warp stuff than anything else, because that's where all my reference points (stuff I've listened to enough to internalize) lie. I stopped buying when it got boring, and a lot of other people did too - more people understand IDM in terms of the Richard D James album than in terms of Chocolate Strawberry Fuckstick or whatever Venetian Snares' new one is called.

People tend to anchor to the golden age of any genre. When people talk about "classical music" in generalities, would you assume they're talking about something more like Beethoven or more like Philip Glass? When you say "punk", do more people think of Rancid or the Ramones?

Lukas (lukas), Monday, 5 December 2005 07:07 (eighteen years ago) link

That said, it is annoying that the tendency here with posts discussing dance/electronic music, which contain enough absurd esoteric genres (folktronica, microhouse, etc.) to drive one batty, is to dismiss the content of an album in favor of academic muscle flexing intent on proving that the author's argument is superior, whether or not it's correct.

i don't get it.
-- vahid (vfoz...), December 5th, 2005

=

I, being among said culprits of this exact tendency in the last several 200+ post dance threads will now attempt to mask guilt and throw subtle wink/nudge to my accomplices by inserting dismissive comment.

Get that, smart-ass.

jsoulja (jsoulja), Monday, 5 December 2005 09:51 (eighteen years ago) link

People tend to anchor to the golden age of any genre. When people talk about "classical music" in generalities, would you assume they're talking about something more like Beethoven or more like Philip Glass? When you say "punk", do more people think of Rancid or the Ramones?

but the golden age of IDM as you talk about it lasted about 6 albums worth. I go with whatever the largest amount of people agree on. The difference between Rancid and Ramones, sonically, isn't really enough, your analogy would work better if you asked "when people think of punk, do they think of Television or do they think of Blink-182" and unfortunately, the answer is Blink-182. You can even replace Television with the Voidoids and it still works.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:10 (eighteen years ago) link

If you want to know about what an album sounds like exclusively, check allmusic or amazon or one of the many dance record store sites that offer up snapshot reviews.

Not really. Odd dichotomy here: pure sound description vs. genre classification. Still leaves plenty of other stuff to talk about, in my opinion.

Of course I'm fine with hearing about genre. And hey, I like retro-disco too. One would just imagine that, with a 500 post thread, the album must have touched some nerve. I guess the nerve it touched was the classificatory one. What this says about dance music right now I won't dare to speculate.

justsaying, Monday, 5 December 2005 19:02 (eighteen years ago) link

it says more about ILM and dorks who like to riff on dance music then it does about dance music. i think of this thread as a continuation of conversations that have been scattered across dance music threads on ILM for the past few months. aside from that, classification is very important because it can lead to discrimination (both positive and negative).

tricky (disco stu), Monday, 5 December 2005 19:41 (eighteen years ago) link

Guardian review from John Burgess:

"In a year when electronic dance artists such as Jamie Lidell and Roisin Murphy have made a good fist at innovative pop, along comes Croatian-born Kelley Polar to steal their thunder."!

+ omg "nefarious rave rumble"!!

(um, & anyone have any suggestions on what I could stick on a mixtape between "Here In The Night" & Pulp's "Seductive Barry"?)

etc, Tuesday, 6 December 2005 23:32 (eighteen years ago) link

two weeks pass...
Croatian-born, huh?

Naive Teen Idol (Naive Teen Idol), Thursday, 22 December 2005 05:32 (eighteen years ago) link

got the album sampler 12" in the mail, but don't have turntable access at the moment, blah. KP website sez a 2nd 12" will be released in early 2006 . . .

etc, Thursday, 22 December 2005 05:41 (eighteen years ago) link

This album is so minty fresh.

Have any videos been released?

fizzcaraldo (Justin M), Sunday, 25 December 2005 23:45 (eighteen years ago) link

didn't really like it first and got sucked up into the hype vagina

but now I love it

cozen (Cozen), Sunday, 25 December 2005 23:53 (eighteen years ago) link

i really like it but still can't listen to all of it in one go.

jed_ (jed), Monday, 26 December 2005 00:35 (eighteen years ago) link

"matter into energy" is still probably my favorite track of the year. i still REALLY like the album as a whole, too, especially the 2nd, less disco-influenced, half. which is weird, cause i'm not really into IDM at all anymore.

;-)

vahid (vahid), Monday, 26 December 2005 00:56 (eighteen years ago) link

listened to the album going to sleep last night (have been listening to it mainly at the bookstore) & "vocalise (from here to polarity)" sounded waaay IDM, all robotic dolphins &c. so er yes vahid. though I still can't quite reconcile "songs"/vocals with something being IDM.
it's one of the few single-artist albums from this year I'm able to sit through in one go.
the unabashed geeky romanticism of this is really comforting at the moment.

etc, Monday, 26 December 2005 01:26 (eighteen years ago) link

I don't get the IDM reference much. To me, this album is like the Gaucho of 00s dance music.

fizzcaraldo (Justin M), Monday, 26 December 2005 02:57 (eighteen years ago) link

I just can't get over how refreshing it is. It's like taking a shower.. or being gently consumed by friendly blue and green tic tacs. So fresh so clean

fizzcaraldo (Justin M), Monday, 26 December 2005 03:00 (eighteen years ago) link

Ha. I really like the new title for this thread!

Mika, Tuesday, 27 December 2005 01:40 (eighteen years ago) link

it's f***ing rude to retitle the thread when KP is actually posting, joining in the conversation. Can a mod change it back?

http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d148/jonwilliamspwn/JonWilliams.jpg

ha, Tuesday, 27 December 2005 14:44 (eighteen years ago) link

naw

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 14:46 (eighteen years ago) link

hey! i put more work into this thread than KP did!

vahid (vahid), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 15:34 (eighteen years ago) link

She works hard for the money
So hard for it honey
She works hard for the money
So you better treat her right

jsoulja (jsoulja), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 15:46 (eighteen years ago) link

it's f***ing rude to retitle the thread when KP is actually posting, joining in the conversation. Can a mod change it back?

-- ha (idon...), December 27th, 2005.

i disagree

Designer of Vahid's Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat, Tuesday, 27 December 2005 15:52 (eighteen years ago) link

When did KP post here? Am I blind?

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 16:17 (eighteen years ago) link

i am kelley polar

u saved me (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 16:30 (eighteen years ago) link

http://www.unicef.org/why/images/about_020206.jpg
"I am Kelley Polar."

u saved me (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 16:31 (eighteen years ago) link

http://www.soschildrensvillages.org.uk/sos-children-charity/sponsored-child-china.jpg
"I am Kelley Polar."

u saved me (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 16:31 (eighteen years ago) link

http://www.blog.speculist.com/archives/neanderthal%20child.JPG
"I am Kelley Polar."

u saved me (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 16:32 (eighteen years ago) link

yay! bought this just before christmas. Matter Into Energy, vahid is right - it's beautiful!

Carl Handwriting (dog latin), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 16:33 (eighteen years ago) link

Maybe Kelley Polar would post again if he thought the thread wasn't about a coat now. I still think the title should be switched back.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 16:38 (eighteen years ago) link

So that's Saul Williams, Gold Chains, the guy from Jurrasic 5, Fred Falke, Marrisa Marchant, and Kelley Polar.

u saved me (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 16:44 (eighteen years ago) link

don't forget Richard X. And Chamillionaire.

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 16:46 (eighteen years ago) link

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/29/Spartacus.jpg/180px-Spartacus.jpg

I AM KELLEY POLAR

telephone thing, Tuesday, 27 December 2005 16:48 (eighteen years ago) link

not a coat. an Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat

blunt (blunt), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 19:31 (eighteen years ago) link

I AM KELLEY POLAR

vahid (vahid), Wednesday, 28 December 2005 10:20 (eighteen years ago) link

Ha ha!

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Wednesday, 28 December 2005 10:50 (eighteen years ago) link

Just heard this album of severely underproduced pop drama.

blunt (blunt), Thursday, 29 December 2005 14:00 (eighteen years ago) link

if you think it's underproduced i can only guess that you heard a different album.

no offense intended to vahid but will someone please change this thread back to it's orig title? who the hell changed it anyway?

jed_ (jed), Thursday, 29 December 2005 14:04 (eighteen years ago) link

It's way too underproduced and camp for it's own good. I'll stick with (few) Metro Area 12" material, which is colder but more effective.

blunt (blunt), Thursday, 29 December 2005 14:11 (eighteen years ago) link

more effective but not as affecting?

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Thursday, 29 December 2005 14:17 (eighteen years ago) link

"Turangulia" (or however you spell it) is the one I keep going back to - so quietly sexy and seductive!

I have a music crit friend Darren here in Melbourne who subscribes to the "deep house forever/death to the false electro/german-house idols" pov; I'm quite keen to get his opinion on this album.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Thursday, 29 December 2005 14:53 (eighteen years ago) link

So it's really becoming a shared POV ? 06 = year of the mucho-awaited backlash then..

xpost - yeah, just as Scritti's C&P'85 was way too OVERproduced and camp for it's own good. The music/production remained its saving grace however, whereas here I'm left imagining a version of this with less lyrical abandon and lush chamber orchestra arrangements instead.

blunt (blunt), Thursday, 29 December 2005 15:33 (eighteen years ago) link

No he's always been a deep house forever death to the false [x] idols kinda guy, though I don't mean to imply that he's closeminded or static or something 'cos he's not.

If there is an electro-house backlash I don't think it will result in a return to deep house (too recently the hipster music of choice, at least in Australia), I suspect it'll all go detroit techno or something. But we'll see. Anyway I'm wandering off-topic now so please ignore...

Kelley Polar! I will say of this album that nothing grabs me quite as much as "The Rhythm Touch" did.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Thursday, 29 December 2005 15:45 (eighteen years ago) link

Forgot to say something nice, I like Matter Into Energy (but the grating vaguely panned hihat sUx0rZ)

blunt (blunt), Thursday, 29 December 2005 15:52 (eighteen years ago) link

the scritti analogy is a good one. blunt, why do you say underproduced?

my pick on this album is "in time", but it only really works if you've heard the preceding songs...and it's the last song. "ashamed of myself" is also awesome like a disco matias aguayo with a breathy chic vocal section. and cowbells!

tricky (disco stu), Thursday, 29 December 2005 16:58 (eighteen years ago) link

no offense intended to vahid but will someone please change this thread back to it's orig title?

-- jed_ (colin_o_har...), December 29th, 2005 6:04 AM. (jed)

if this happens I AM QUITTING ILX FOREVER

vahid (vahid), Thursday, 29 December 2005 17:00 (eighteen years ago) link

(change it, quick!!)

vahid (vahid), Thursday, 29 December 2005 17:00 (eighteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.