My followers are 94% real.
― Humorist (horse) (誤訳侮辱), Wednesday, 10 December 2014 17:11 (nine years ago) link
yeah idk about "paid for" there. I have 33k fake followers and nobody in my camp paid for that because lol be serious
― The Complainte of Ray Tabano, Wednesday, 10 December 2014 17:12 (nine years ago) link
but are the bennies real?
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 10 December 2014 17:12 (nine years ago) link
the realest
yeah looking at some co-workers most media ppl w/decent-ish followings are gonna run between 80-95 percent real....
as two somewhat applicable comparisons, jessica hopper is 94 percent real and whiney is 84 percent real....i'm 84 as well, lots of it you can't control obviously who spam accounts' algorhythms decide to follow
but yeah ott's 6% real rating is pretty drastically low to the point where there's gotta be something up
― you say tomato/i say imago (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 10 December 2014 17:17 (nine years ago) link
ray how many total do you have?
just under 100k
― The Complainte of Ray Tabano, Wednesday, 10 December 2014 17:20 (nine years ago) link
well yr still running 75 percent-ish real then....i feel like you hit certain levels and more bots start to attach themselves, i noticed that around 5K...so i'd imagine if you're closing in at 100k there's gonna be more bot activity....
but ott is running 650-ish real and 10K+ fake i don't see why that many bots would randomly decide to attach to it, or at least i don't see any evidence that it happens often
― you say tomato/i say imago (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 10 December 2014 17:22 (nine years ago) link
maybe bots just like him. they crave the authenticity they can never achieve
― The Complainte of Ray Tabano, Wednesday, 10 December 2014 17:29 (nine years ago) link
botts be hott for ott
― sosmix klopp (NickB), Wednesday, 10 December 2014 17:32 (nine years ago) link
maybe he name-drops brands a lot more than most
― da croupier, Wednesday, 10 December 2014 17:32 (nine years ago) link
ottbotgate
― Brio2, Wednesday, 10 December 2014 17:36 (nine years ago) link
I like that answer, still <1000 real followers and 10k fake is pretty weird
OTTOH for him to get caught buying followers would be so rich it's hard for me to imagine him risking it
― The Complainte of Ray Tabano, Wednesday, 10 December 2014 17:37 (nine years ago) link
for every sensitive nerdlinger who shakes their head when ott at-replys a pitchfork scribe about bacardi for the 80th time, eight bots just see the word Bacardi, and assumes he's on the street team.
― da croupier, Wednesday, 10 December 2014 17:40 (nine years ago) link
OTTOH
lol
― gr8080, Wednesday, 10 December 2014 17:41 (nine years ago) link
I don't even think you'd need to "buy" followers to corral that number at this point, just (knowingly or unknowingly) get their attention
― da croupier, Wednesday, 10 December 2014 17:43 (nine years ago) link
can we just turn this thread into a twitteraudit thread, because I'm finding that way more interesting than ott-talk (Ray's Ott puns notwithstanding)
― the farakhan of gg (DJP), Wednesday, 10 December 2014 17:44 (nine years ago) link
(sorry, nottwithstanding)
maybe he's just really deep undercover blowing the lid off the whole corporate marketing takeover of indie rock and he has to buy bots to fit in, like when Rust Cohle had to do meth in True Detective
― Brio2, Wednesday, 10 December 2014 17:47 (nine years ago) link
loooollllllllllll
― just a couple of assholes having breakfast (slothroprhymes), Wednesday, 10 December 2014 17:49 (nine years ago) link
love from a bot don't startle wry ott
― da croupier, Wednesday, 10 December 2014 17:50 (nine years ago) link
Doesn't Ott work in IT? Paid or not, he's figured out how to manipulate the system. Either way he's rallying to almost no one.
― Position Position, Wednesday, 10 December 2014 17:53 (nine years ago) link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U3RjtmOeDhA
― gr8080, Wednesday, 10 December 2014 17:53 (nine years ago) link
There are over 1700 posts in this thread. I wonder how many would be here if you removed all "bennies" references.
― sctttnnnt (pgwp), Wednesday, 10 December 2014 18:46 (nine years ago) link
4 or 5
― Evan, Wednesday, 10 December 2014 18:46 (nine years ago) link
Why does the perennial WGW "this is what ILX is" argument follow up with a description of himself and only himself
― fgti, Thursday, 11 December 2014 00:29 (nine years ago) link
Ott-watchers take note he is in the midst of launching into a harrowing first person account of the first time he saw Boogie Nights:
https://twitter.com/shallowrewards
― Badmotorfinger Debate Club (MFB), Thursday, 11 December 2014 00:43 (nine years ago) link
zing-centric,
check
belly-button-gazing,
check, though less than some, who's not guilty on this count
nit-picky,
two checks
narc-of-small-diff music,
check check check
corny-indie-fuxx-hating
need I say check
think goon tie merits an otm from you here my man
― The Complainte of Ray Tabano, Thursday, 11 December 2014 00:44 (nine years ago) link
caught up on Ott's twitter feed, he's been on quite a run lately. telling a female writer he's almost ready to file his libel suit against her, defending the Pomplamoose guy's essay, taking great satisfaction in the downfall of Wondering Sound.
― some dude, Monday, 15 December 2014 03:51 (nine years ago) link
ok, i'll bite, why the hell is he threatening a libel suit on twitter
― call all destroyer, Monday, 15 December 2014 04:01 (nine years ago) link
It's that DIY spirit
― Evan, Monday, 15 December 2014 04:07 (nine years ago) link
Ott also started a fight with one of the human cocaine baggies from DIIV, apparently dude's misogyny is bad because he looks old (?)
― cucked by steely dan (Andre Gunder Frank 3000), Monday, 15 December 2014 04:23 (nine years ago) link
ott saying that DIIV's singer is actually 10 years older than they say he is is my fav ott conspiracy
― J0rdan S., Monday, 15 December 2014 05:15 (nine years ago) link
threatening someone during the holidays, over twitter, publicly, that "you're about to have really, really bad new year" is slimy as fuck
― katherine, Monday, 15 December 2014 05:17 (nine years ago) link
not that there's a great time to do this, mind you (even if it's just a libel suit, which anyone who knows the remotest amount of media law knows is pretty toothless), but still
― katherine, Monday, 15 December 2014 05:20 (nine years ago) link
all his recent DIIV tweets are 9.0 classics
― J0rdan S., Monday, 15 December 2014 05:25 (nine years ago) link
i can't believe this thread is 11 years old.
i heard a long-ass time ago that grimes/james bought ott a bunch of fake followers as a joke. true or false, i still remember his count exploding overnight
― soyrev, Monday, 15 December 2014 12:52 (nine years ago) link
Lmao can you do that??
I'm gonna do that right now
― 龜, Monday, 15 December 2014 12:52 (nine years ago) link
*Dips into my bennies and extracts $20 which I use to buy Ott 10,000 fake twitter followers*
― 龜, Monday, 15 December 2014 12:53 (nine years ago) link
i can't believe this thread is 11 years old.i heard a long-ass time ago that grimes/james bought ott a bunch of fake followers as a joke. true or false, i still remember his count exploding overnight --soyrev
i heard a long-ass time ago that grimes/james bought ott a bunch of fake followers as a joke. true or false, i still remember his count exploding overnight --soyrev
quite a bit of discussion of ott's follow count being 94 percent fake upthread, as determined via twitteraudit, so yea that combined with this tidbit adds up
― just a couple of assholes having breakfast (slothroprhymes), Monday, 15 December 2014 13:10 (nine years ago) link
yeah i meant to be replying to that, hah sorry :B
― soyrev, Monday, 15 December 2014 13:24 (nine years ago) link
also, why is he threatening lindsay zoladz with a label suit? cld not find any explanation lol
― just a couple of assholes having breakfast (slothroprhymes), Monday, 15 December 2014 13:25 (nine years ago) link
haha wow. is he friendly w/ Grimes or is she on his enemies list? Murgatroid pointed out to me recently that Ott refers to his daughter as "Baby Grimes" repeatedly in tweets which just seems so odd and creepy.
― some dude, Monday, 15 December 2014 13:28 (nine years ago) link
Hahah that is so http://www.theonion.com/articles/cool-dad-raising-daughter-on-media-that-will-put-h,26132/
― 龜, Monday, 15 December 2014 13:31 (nine years ago) link
SD I would guess that she's too hyped by pitchfork to not(t) be on his enemies list.
― just a couple of assholes having breakfast (slothroprhymes), Monday, 15 December 2014 13:35 (nine years ago) link
Wait what did the DIIV dude do? I can't keep up
― you say tomato/i say imago (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Monday, 15 December 2014 13:47 (nine years ago) link
Wait what did the DIIV dude do? I can't keep up --you say tomato/i say imago (upper mississippi sh@kedown)
some member of the band (not heroin-casualty zach cole himself) went on a tear of misogynist and sexist bullshit via 4chan
― just a couple of assholes having breakfast (slothroprhymes), Monday, 15 December 2014 13:50 (nine years ago) link
correction to above redundancy: misogynist and racist (and anti-Semitic! and homophobic) bullshit
― just a couple of assholes having breakfast (slothroprhymes), Monday, 15 December 2014 13:53 (nine years ago) link
grimes has tweeted anti pitchfork things, inc. "fuck pitchfork" and "pitchfork sucks"
He doesn't "hate people hyped by pitchfork", that's like really stupid thing to say, you clearly know nothing of the Ott
― Raccoon Tanuki, Monday, 15 December 2014 16:51 (nine years ago) link
WE HAVE SOCK SLIPPAGE ATTENTION WE HAVE SOCK SLIPPAGE
― just a couple of assholes having breakfast (slothroprhymes), Monday, 15 December 2014 16:54 (nine years ago) link