― Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Saturday, 27 December 2003 14:33 (twenty years ago) link
― Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Saturday, 27 December 2003 14:53 (twenty years ago) link
― george gosset (gegoss), Sunday, 28 December 2003 14:16 (twenty years ago) link
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Monday, 29 December 2003 21:46 (twenty years ago) link
― Rockist Scientist, Saturday, 13 March 2004 14:50 (twenty years ago) link
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 7 March 2005 22:39 (nineteen years ago) link
― Don't Ever Antagonize The Horny (AaronHz), Monday, 7 March 2005 22:42 (nineteen years ago) link
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 7 March 2005 22:46 (nineteen years ago) link
That would be "In Every Dream Home A Heartache", off For Your Pleasure. -- Patrick (cal...@...), June 5th, 2001 12:00 AM. (link)
...it's actually about an inflatable doll, but I assume that's the song you're talking about. -- Patrick (cal...@...), June 5th, 2001 12:00 AM. (link)
Great response but I think the song in question is Beauty Queen off For Your Pleasure as well though. It has those great shaky keyboards which are all over that album and the second verse is:
oooh the way you lookmakes my starry eyes shiverthen I look awaytoo much for one day
That album really delivers what its title promises.
― alex in mainhattan (alex63), Friday, 13 May 2005 16:29 (nineteen years ago) link
― Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Friday, 13 May 2005 16:35 (nineteen years ago) link
― Daniel Peterson (polkaholic), Friday, 13 May 2005 16:42 (nineteen years ago) link
"CHIC-KA!"
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 13 May 2005 16:44 (nineteen years ago) link
― Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Friday, 13 May 2005 16:47 (nineteen years ago) link
― peter smith (plsmith), Friday, 13 May 2005 16:52 (nineteen years ago) link
i don't think so. bogus man is groovy and far out like hell. what a jam. i think i prefer it to most miles davis. grey lagoons is slightly weaker but that mouth harp solo (is that eno with his tapes?) is absolutely gorgeous. for your pleasure finally rounds up this album nicely. the keyboards reverb like they have drunk about a million gallons. otherworldly. as if it had all been a blurred dream.
― alex in mainhattan (alex63), Friday, 13 May 2005 17:08 (nineteen years ago) link
― Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Friday, 13 May 2005 17:09 (nineteen years ago) link
I'm with you, alex -- perfect.
― Naive Teen Idol (Naive Teen Idol), Sunday, 15 May 2005 02:13 (nineteen years ago) link
― The Silent Disco of Glastonbury (Bimble...), Sunday, 15 May 2005 03:21 (nineteen years ago) link
― Naive Teen Idol (Naive Teen Idol), Sunday, 15 May 2005 03:50 (nineteen years ago) link
― Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 15 May 2005 12:37 (nineteen years ago) link
― Miranda Leigh (Miranda Leigh), Sunday, 9 April 2006 02:21 (eighteen years ago) link
― Naive Teen Idol (Naive Teen Idol), Sunday, 9 April 2006 03:50 (eighteen years ago) link
― Patrick South (Patrick South), Sunday, 9 April 2006 04:03 (eighteen years ago) link
― latebloomer: someone's been drinking my youth! (latebloomer), Sunday, 9 April 2006 04:15 (eighteen years ago) link
― Harrison Barr (Petar), Sunday, 9 April 2006 05:00 (eighteen years ago) link
― Porcupine Kiss, Novacaine Lips (Bimble...), Sunday, 9 April 2006 07:11 (eighteen years ago) link
― haitch (haitch), Sunday, 9 April 2006 08:53 (eighteen years ago) link
― splates (splates), Sunday, 9 April 2006 09:32 (eighteen years ago) link
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 9 April 2006 12:39 (eighteen years ago) link
"Your application's FAILED!"
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 9 April 2006 12:54 (eighteen years ago) link
― Patrick South (Patrick South), Sunday, 9 April 2006 15:14 (eighteen years ago) link
― stet (stet), Sunday, 9 April 2006 16:22 (eighteen years ago) link
Does anyone know if the original "rock" version of Angel Eyes appears on CD anywhere?
― someone let this mitya out! (mitya), Monday, 10 April 2006 01:50 (eighteen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 10 April 2006 02:44 (eighteen years ago) link
― bham (bham), Monday, 10 April 2006 08:25 (eighteen years ago) link
Thanks for calling my attention to the box set. I just I sort of ignored it when it came out because I felt like I already had everything. Just listened to Sultanesque for the first time!
― someone let this mitya out! (mitya), Monday, 10 April 2006 15:21 (eighteen years ago) link
― js (honestengine), Monday, 10 April 2006 15:54 (eighteen years ago) link
Words fail.
― rogermexico (rogermexico), Monday, 10 April 2006 15:58 (eighteen years ago) link
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 10 April 2006 16:59 (eighteen years ago) link
― Naive Teen Idol (Naive Teen Idol), Monday, 10 April 2006 17:05 (eighteen years ago) link
― someone let this mitya out! (mitya), Monday, 10 April 2006 23:25 (eighteen years ago) link
I need to hear "Whirlwind," but I can't because I'm at work. Maybe I could sneak into another space and listen.
― Rockist Scientist, Tuesday, 5 June 2007 19:21 (seventeen years ago) link
I can't sing it for you, so here's the lyrics:
May Day Cut down to size again What then When less is more my friend I'll change Let me start again Disguise It's too weird to explain Why I'll Always call your name Adieu; with you I could be anything That I want to be Whirlwind Wildfire and driving rain Wheels spin Bowl me over hurricane Whirlwind Crack your cheeks and blow Me Far So far How far Is Shangri-la from here And is it this way? There she blows Tear me down tornado Whirlpool Drag me to the deeps below Whirlwind Will a wildcat strike be tame? Earthquake Shake me to my feet again It's crosswords go you near A fatal clue I fear This case is closed Elementally, my dear. Beware Whirlwind
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 5 June 2007 19:40 (seventeen years ago) link
I always find it extremely difficult to rank Roxy albums after Siren (my favorite). I used to put Stranded at #8--I know that sounds crazy, but it never held together as an album for me--and now I'm thinking that it deserves to take 4th place. I think it just requires more patience than some of their other stuff.
I suppose it's difficult because they were constantly refining their sound, which makes it hard to compare something like Flesh + Blood to, say, Country Life. Also, there's just this incredible depth to their sound; how much you enjoy a particular song really depends on your level of attentiveness, or the mood you're in, I think. While a lot of the rocker singles don't require much more than passive listening, others are slow and meditative and obviously way less immediate. For instance, it took me a while to accept the fact that "Amazona" can sit next to "Psalm." And then, for me, there's this whole thing of increasingly funky and accomplished (though it was funky and accomplished from album 1) bass playing going on that I eat right up, and that weighs in perhaps too heavily on my opinion of a particular album. If you gave me the bass tracks to the Siren LP, I could be kept busy for weeks learninng them them.
Anyway, my list right now would look something like this:
1. Siren 2. Country Life 3. Manifesto 4. Stranded 5. For Your Pleasure 6. Roxy Music 7. Flesh + Blood 8. Avalon
...and that just felt painful and wrong. I really LIKE Avalon, it just isn't quite as musically impressive or deep as their other work. It also hurts to have Flesh + Blood so low. I mean how epic and mystical are those guitar chords on the title track? I rate Manifesto so highly not necessarily for the quality of songwriting (second half has a couple of unmemorable tracks), but for the sound and atmosphere, which is almost tailor-made to my tastes (and which seemed to influence Japan, one of my favorites), and because it's got some excellent bass playing from the late Alan Spenner (mainly on "Manifesto" and "Stronger Through the Years"). I mean some of that is simply Bernard Edwards-level stuff.
I couldn't tell you the number of times I've listened through Roxy's catalog in an effort to decide on my definitive ranking. I always fail!
Is anybody here able to painlessly rank their catalog?
― Patrick South, Monday, 21 January 2008 07:08 (sixteen years ago) link
Some of the things in this thread have put me in mind of no-one so much as Happy Mondays. Let's compare and contrast:
1. Band-as-gang. One charismatic leader, various faceless goons. I'm not really sure how many members there were in either band, but despite this or maybe because of this the gang element seems stronger. It's hard to imagine Gaz Whelan's ego getting in the way of the package, for example. 2. The politics. Very upwardly mobile, Roxy, but the Mondays were pretty Thatcherite in their own way, were they not? In the same way as New Labour were toryish. Not that this is a bad thing, I'd hazard, more that it reflects an aspirational and individualistic strand of British working-class culture that many people would prefer to pretend didn't exist. 3. Aesthetics. Obviously Roxy rule here. There's something about the Mondays, though, that I think could be called art-school if only they paid more attention to looks. I'm on shaky ground here, and it may just be the Factory sleeves and all that, but more than most bands the Mondays seemed to be a package, what with club culture, the lyrics, the sense of their being a movement. 4. 'John Peel observed they were one of few bands whom it was impossible to guess their influences'. I've never really thought about this with Roxy - I guess I see them as growing directly out of 50s rock n' roll without the big ideas of the 60s bands. The Mondays are more difficult - how on earth did they end up sounding like that? 5. Legacy. Not much, really. They never really get revived or reappraised, unlike some of their contemporaries (I'm thinking Led Zep here, though that's not quite right is it? Who were Roxy's contemporaries?). Also, no or very few cover versions, mostly because neither are really classic songwriting, it'd be hard to play their stuff on an acoustic guitar. A Mondays cover is pretty much unimaginable to me.
So how about it? A particular strand of British culture - individualistic, arty, awkward - personified in these two bands. Are there any others like them? Or am I just talking rubbish?
― Ismael Klata, Monday, 21 January 2008 20:37 (sixteen years ago) link
1. I don't know, I think Phil Manzanera and Andy Mackay had pretty distinctive, trashy styles.
2. Roxy and politics is an odd one, don't think you could shoehorn them into either a left or right wing perspective. Besides, Ferry's aristo poses were a totally different proposition from The Mondays loadsamoney schtick. Thatcher's 80s? Young people have liked having a bit of cash to flash since since forever. See: mods.
3. You could say that about almost any successfully marketed band ever. Although Facytory's Peter Saville did do a couple of sleeves for Roxy.
4. Monday's early stuff sounds like trying to play funk and getting it "wrong".
5.I'd say loads of shitty "baggy" influenced dance/indie crossover stuff over the years from Northside to Regular Fries to The Twang (sorry to bring these up) wears a big Mondays influence on its sleeve. You get to be in a slightly noodly, trippy band without looking too middle class: I guess that's the attraction.
Roxy's contemporaries were the other more artsy glam acts like Bowie and Bolan, Eno after he left too, obvs.
Overall, I don't really see the comparison at all, sorry.
― Bodrick III, Monday, 21 January 2008 21:04 (sixteen years ago) link
Batshit post of the day goes to Ismael Klata.
― rogermexico., Monday, 21 January 2008 21:38 (sixteen years ago) link
There are few bands I hate more than the Happy Mondays, and I find it painful to read about them in an Roxy thread. Their music is amateurish and dirty, their "aesthetic" just plain bad--and having nothing at all to do with Roxy's. I think there's a reason that they don't have much of a legacy. And they ruined the 24 Hour Party People movie in my eyes.
Did you happen to be listening to them when you clicked on this thread?
― Patrick South, Monday, 21 January 2008 23:31 (sixteen years ago) link
Sorry for ruining your thread. I stand by my argument though, both bands can sound like a car crash (in a good way) and I can't imagine a band like this emerging anywhere else (INXS are maybe the closest). I'd also be tempted to bring Simple Minds into this as having a similar attitude to these two.
As regards aesthetics, while Roxy obviously produced something more refined, you'd never confuse it with posh - posh gets you Radiohead or Coldplay or James Blunt, not this kind of playfulness. The playfulness and lack of reverence is the quality that they share. The word I needed last night is 'vulgar'.
― Ismael Klata, Tuesday, 22 January 2008 09:52 (sixteen years ago) link
Ismael, could you compare and contrast, say, Deee-lite and Rush?
― rogermexico., Tuesday, 22 January 2008 21:51 (sixteen years ago) link