pretty sure i said the exact same thing in my head after reading half and skimming the rest.
xp
― circa1916, Wednesday, 2 December 2015 19:30 (eight years ago) link
missed that there was an "uproar" over her article ... and i'm still not sure i understand why anyone cared? what was the problem exactly? just that it was mean to mac?
― tylerw, Wednesday, 2 December 2015 19:33 (eight years ago) link
Both the reaction and her reaction to the reaction seem blown out of proportion. It was a mean article and not that funny. Culkin and the writer both escaped relatively unharmed and afaict few people noticed or remembered that it happened.
― on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Wednesday, 2 December 2015 19:36 (eight years ago) link
she was an unknown freelance writer w no power and now all these famous people were outing her as a bully in front of a huge audience.
― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 2 December 2015 19:36 (eight years ago) link
the sum impact of the whole thing is probably the article itself and her nerves for a week. i don't think she is saying anything more really.
― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 2 December 2015 19:37 (eight years ago) link
It only got worse. The next day, Patton Oswalt—comedian, professional troll, wildly outspoken opponent of Internet outrage—sent several tweets to his millions of followers criticizing my tone. “Way to topple the mighty,” one read.I couldn’t help but think that if I was a comedian myself, Patton Oswalt—someone who pretends to mock oppressed people (like the transgendered) in service of proving that nothing in comedy should be out of bounds—wouldn’t have been so disapproving; that my blog post would have fallen under the welcoming umbrella of free speech in comedy. Instead, I was a journalist trying to be funny and therefore not allowed to hurt anyone’s feelings, even those of millionaire celebrities and their well-compensated publicists. I wasn’t part of the protected comedy class, and so I wholly deserved the scorn he heaped upon my feeble attempts at mean-spirited humor. Or so it seemed.
I couldn’t help but think that if I was a comedian myself, Patton Oswalt—someone who pretends to mock oppressed people (like the transgendered) in service of proving that nothing in comedy should be out of bounds—wouldn’t have been so disapproving; that my blog post would have fallen under the welcoming umbrella of free speech in comedy. Instead, I was a journalist trying to be funny and therefore not allowed to hurt anyone’s feelings, even those of millionaire celebrities and their well-compensated publicists. I wasn’t part of the protected comedy class, and so I wholly deserved the scorn he heaped upon my feeble attempts at mean-spirited humor. Or so it seemed.
Civilians, journalists, famous comedians like Nikki Glaser, comedy fans: all came out against me, saying I was bitter, a failure, jealous, fat, a terrible journalist, a terrible person, a bitch, an asshole, a cunt, that I would rot in hell
― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 2 December 2015 19:39 (eight years ago) link
In large part it's just too long in relation to the interest/significance of the story, lots of mundane detail that could be left out.
― on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Wednesday, 2 December 2015 20:02 (eight years ago) link
otm
― Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Wednesday, 2 December 2015 21:32 (eight years ago) link
this was usurped on my facebook by a story about a guy who gave public enemy a lift in his car. so, not a lot of legs...
― scott seward, Wednesday, 2 December 2015 21:45 (eight years ago) link
patton oswalt is so fucking annoying. this diss by tim heidecker about those corny as fuck "twitter essays" still cracks me up:
@timheidecker(1/256) humor, which began in ancient times has always been an important part of society...
― flappy bird, Thursday, 3 December 2015 18:49 (eight years ago) link