Just encountered the best Bowie lyric ever (from Tin Machine's 'Crack City'): "They're just a bunch of assholes/With buttholes for their brains"
― Professor Bworlph (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 19 January 2016 17:27 (eight years ago) link
That 5 years doc was decent, p boring critics imo but wow Alomar, Dennis Davis and Fripp were great. Some cool footage too. Bowie's career arc is pretty perfect up until Let's Dance, then you get a pretty big ellipse of 30 years but I guess that's the way artist stories go - Dylan's narrative is def strongest circa 61-67 too.
― niels, Tuesday, 19 January 2016 18:24 (eight years ago) link
god this smokes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2syGy1TjXq0
BBC versions of the Ziggy tracks are mostly better than the originals imo
― Number None, Tuesday, 19 January 2016 19:41 (eight years ago) link
Wrestling with the Tin Machine albums for the first time ever. The second one is going down muuuuuuch more smoothly than the first did. To the extent that I'll make an early call (still only about halfway through listening) that it's Bowie's best since Let's Dance. The production and arrangements have been tightened up and Gabrels is laying off the WHEEELDLYDEEEEDLYDEEEEEE to an admirable extent. There may be some decent songs on the first album but it's really hard to hear them under the 'David Bowie and some random bar band' soundscape.
― Meat Sheet (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 19 January 2016 20:04 (eight years ago) link
Bowie at the Beeb is probably the best double disc set I ever bought for ~5 eur
― niels, Tuesday, 19 January 2016 20:18 (eight years ago) link
bowie at the beeb is getting a vinyl pressing soon
― nomar, Tuesday, 19 January 2016 20:22 (eight years ago) link
Oh wait here's a Tin Machine song with someone else on vocals and it suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuucks so oh well I guess.
― Meat Sheet (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 19 January 2016 20:26 (eight years ago) link
But seriously David. You were so close to having a uniformly good album for the first time in forever. You couldn't have asked this maudlin doofus to sequester his pair of doofy songs to an unrelated single?
― Meat Sheet (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 19 January 2016 20:46 (eight years ago) link
You should hear his brother.
― Blecchstar Linus Must Comp (James Redd and the Blecchs), Tuesday, 19 January 2016 20:53 (eight years ago) link
Bowie at the Beeb is so great. I love that version of "Eight Line Poem"
― Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Tuesday, 19 January 2016 20:55 (eight years ago) link
I'd previously thought "Real Cool World" was a pretty meh and perfunctory song, but heard in the context of his previous decade's work, it's a real breath of fresh air.
― Meat Sheet (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 19 January 2016 21:00 (eight years ago) link
It sounds pretty good.
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 19 January 2016 21:23 (eight years ago) link
Absolutely starved of new Bowie in 2012 I finally picked up Tin Machine II and thought it was surprisingly good, but that may have been desperation on my part. Those Sales-sang songs are comically bad, of course. You Belong In Rock 'N Roll was always decent and Shopping For Girls is pretty good, but....blah.
― PaulTMA, Tuesday, 19 January 2016 22:39 (eight years ago) link
"Goodbye Mr Ed" is a Good Song.
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 19 January 2016 22:41 (eight years ago) link
The first time I saw him was a Tin Machine show in 1992, the academy on like 43rd st . Anyone else see 'em?
― veronica moser, Wednesday, 20 January 2016 01:42 (eight years ago) link
Hope they give the Bowie at the Beeb Reissue a nicer cover.
― in twelve parts (lamonti), Wednesday, 20 January 2016 06:47 (eight years ago) link
Meanwhile..
http://www.clickhole.com/article/7-musicians-talk-about-how-david-bowie-impacted-th-3816
― Mark G, Wednesday, 20 January 2016 09:56 (eight years ago) link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-ZtpYfNq74
― The Return of the Thin White Pope (Tom D.), Wednesday, 20 January 2016 10:38 (eight years ago) link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIy12hhhCm0
― The Return of the Thin White Pope (Tom D.), Wednesday, 20 January 2016 10:41 (eight years ago) link
The true mystery of Bowie is Never Let Me Down. Pretty much all the other missteps can be explained away. Tonight was a slapdash attempt to cash in on the Let's Dance phenomenon; a case can be made for Tin Machine (although I'm not going to make it); the try-hard 90s albums are OK in their way... but Never Let Me Down is dreadful, just dreadful, despite the fact that he spent a lot of time on it and promoted the hell out of it. At the time he said it was getting back to what he was doing with Scary Monsters! But I defy any Bowie fan to listen to the Glass Spiders monologue without cringing. Getting it so wrong and so right is really Bowie's strange alchemy...
― Zelda Zonk, Wednesday, 20 January 2016 10:56 (eight years ago) link
I think the consensus we've seen so far is a preference for NLMD over Tonight. I certainly do.
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 20 January 2016 11:39 (eight years ago) link
I saw your name in the acknowledgements of the book version of Pushing Ahead of the Dame. Wondering if I should go ahead and spring for that book or just stick to reading on the web.
― Starman Jones said it's 2 legit 2 quit (James Redd and the Blecchs), Wednesday, 20 January 2016 11:42 (eight years ago) link
You and Ned. Perhaps some other or former ILXors as well.
ok bowie at the beeb is fucking amazing
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 20 January 2016 12:27 (eight years ago) link
Can't stop spoonerizing that as Bieber at the Bowie
― from the perspective of a gay man, i will post them now (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 20 January 2016 13:55 (eight years ago) link
I listened to Tonight and Hours back to back a couple of days ago. Not something to be repeated often.
Tonight is definitely worse due to Bowie's sheer lack of engagement, though Hours is a distressing listen due the truly excruciating production which is about as bad as anyone could muster in 1999. Disgusting pan pipe synths, real drums that wind up sounding like the worst early Fruity Loops samples, everything a big treble-y, soulless mess, yet one he was clearly invested in. There are no pointless cover versions either, unlike the obviously superior Heathen and Reality. I'm not even convinced that the songwriting is even that bad, but outside of Thursday's Child, New Angels Of Promise and the OK Seven, it's genuinely quite difficult to tell. In short, Tonight is a lazy disgrace but '...hours' is a sad rake-in-the-face misstep, forgotten by most.
― PaulTMA, Wednesday, 20 January 2016 14:08 (eight years ago) link
From a sonic perspective, I think the number one reason why Bowie's work isn't as strong post-1980 is that he became way too concerned with keeping up with the times. Up through Scary Monsters, he was mostly ahead of the curve and laying his own foundation (with the glaring exception of '1984'). I'm listening to Black Tie, White Noise just now, which seems to be heading in the right direction (AKA very far away from his '80s work) but sounds very much like an album released in 1993.
― Meat Sheet (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 20 January 2016 14:57 (eight years ago) link
hours is second worst album, and a strange misstep after TBOS, Outside, and Earthling.
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 20 January 2016 14:58 (eight years ago) link
Number two reason(?): two solid decades without Tony Visconti.
― Meat Sheet (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 20 January 2016 15:09 (eight years ago) link
Get it. Thing is that they're two different experiences -- the book revises/polishes/updates a variety of the entries; the original web posts have the photos, the video/audio links, the comments.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 20 January 2016 15:15 (eight years ago) link
As for 'hours...' I always assumed it was his watery VH1 'adult' album, for a watery audience. But I don't know if he ever pulled a Pee-Wee "I *meant* to do that" answer.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 20 January 2016 15:16 (eight years ago) link
Well, having one of the songs lyrics written as a competition, isn't.
― Mark G, Wednesday, 20 January 2016 15:21 (eight years ago) link
it's so weird seeing a lot of people hate on "Hours" i thought it was awesome and kind of current. haven't listened to it since it came out tho. i remember the Pixies cover was really cool.
― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 20 January 2016 15:30 (eight years ago) link
You're thinking of Heathen, not Hours.
― Just noise and screaming and no musical value at all. (Colonel Poo), Wednesday, 20 January 2016 15:46 (eight years ago) link
doh
― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 20 January 2016 15:56 (eight years ago) link
'...hours' is a sad rake-in-the-face misstep,
Imagining Bowie stepping on a rake - like something from a Laurel & Hardy movie - has given me the only piece of entertainment I think I've ever got out of '...hours'.I agree with Old Lunch that the 90s albums are very much of their time, almost to the month. This is 1993, this is 1996...
― bored at work (snoball), Wednesday, 20 January 2016 18:38 (eight years ago) link
Buddha of Suburbia is a fine album for someone who isn't David Bowie but I'm starting to feel like I'm judging him unfairly at this point in his career. By which I mean that it just dawned on me that the span of time from Let's Dance through BoS is roughly equivalent to that between Man Who Sold The World and Scary Monsters. These are clearly completely different and separate phases of an artist's career, and it seems almost like he totally abandoned that earlier phase at a point. His '80s and early-'90s work certainly doesn't seem to be at all informed by what he did in the '70s so it seems wrong to keep using that as my qualitative yardstick as he spans time.
― Meat Sheet (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 20 January 2016 18:50 (eight years ago) link
Hours was his 'new' album at the point I got into Bowie as a teenager so I have nostalgic affection for it, of course this is only enhanced by the 'horribly dated 2 weeks after it was released' aspect of the sound and the visual design. I guess I also like the way it attempts to combine being a "watery VH1 'adult' album" with these grasps at up-to-the-minute modishness, aging pop artists normally try for one or the other?
― soref, Wednesday, 20 January 2016 18:51 (eight years ago) link
seems like pretty much any artist who started in the 60s sucked by the 80s, even Leonard Cohen had his "Jazz Police"
― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 20 January 2016 18:52 (eight years ago) link
that's not really true
― HYPERLINK TO RAP GENIUS (BradNelson), Wednesday, 20 January 2016 18:54 (eight years ago) link
two examples i can think of off the top of my head: aretha franklin and van morrison, both of whom released some of their best songs/albums in the '80s
tom waits is almost an exception, if he would have started just a few years earlier
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 20 January 2016 18:55 (eight years ago) link
George Clinton
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 20 January 2016 18:55 (eight years ago) link
buddha of suburbia fucking rules btw
― HYPERLINK TO RAP GENIUS (BradNelson), Wednesday, 20 January 2016 18:56 (eight years ago) link
would say this should be a separate thread but I suspect there already is one
xp
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 20 January 2016 18:57 (eight years ago) link
Paul Simon, Neil Young, Merle Haggard, Willie Nelson, George Jones, Doc Watson, Captain Beefheart all released great stuff in the 80s
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 20 January 2016 19:01 (eight years ago) link
Leonard Cohenmany Dylan songsLou Reed's best albums
all in the '80s
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 20 January 2016 19:16 (eight years ago) link
Jazz Police is great and I'm Your Man is Len's masterpiece.
― Poor.Old.Tired.Horse. (Stew), Wednesday, 20 January 2016 19:18 (eight years ago) link
agreed
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 20 January 2016 19:19 (eight years ago) link
lots of weird people did fine in the 80's. robert wyatt. people like robert wyatt.
― scott seward, Wednesday, 20 January 2016 19:20 (eight years ago) link