I have had it up to here waiting for the Beatles catalogue to be remastered

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (6062 of them)

There are still folk out there who insist that digitisation of any sort destroys music

On a slightly different note, I also have a problem understanding those synth purists who claim that a modern generated analog synth, or a softsynth, doesn't sounds as "warm" as the old analog synths. I mean, I am a bit analog fan, but I just cannot hear the difference at all. Except old analogue synths go sour.

Geir Hongro, Sunday, 12 April 2009 22:08 (fifteen years ago) link

I can't believe I'm saying this, but I essentially agree with Geir here. It may be an oversimplification to say the record companies were just throwing everything on CD without any thought two decades ago, but there was a LOT of crappy jobs. Miles Davis' catalog, for one, was completely disrespected when his albums were first released on CD. It took years before decent-sounding reissues came out.

Jazzbo, Sunday, 12 April 2009 22:09 (fifteen years ago) link

With Miles Davis, are you talking about the Columbia Jazz Masterpiece deals?

Mark, Sunday, 12 April 2009 22:30 (fifteen years ago) link

Speaking of this, what I do have more problems with is if one album is being remastered at the best technology (24 bit and all). And then 2 years later, the same album is being re-released again in a "Deluxe" edition, completely with a second disc mostly consisting of demo and/or live versions of the same songs that are already on the album. Now that is pointless!

The exception is when people such as Pet Shop Boys fill that second disc with great b-sides and great extended/alternative mixes, adding non-album singles from the same era. Those 2 CDs work. Also the Donna Summer "Hot Girls" with lots of 12 inch mixes behind does. But I am never interested in hearing demo/live.

Geir Hongro, Sunday, 12 April 2009 22:39 (fifteen years ago) link

Interestingly, Amazon.co.uk is listing the remasters as being £8.99 each, or £15.99 for the doubles.

Sickamous Mouthall (Scik Mouthy), Monday, 13 April 2009 21:13 (fifteen years ago) link

the rudy van gelder series of jazz remasters are really amazing sounding CDs, kind of blue is one of them

wassup rockers? (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, 13 April 2009 21:14 (fifteen years ago) link

Kind of Blue isn't an RVG (it sounds good tho). RVG just does the Blue Note and Prestige reissues. Watch out bringing those up -- some audiophile nuts loathe them for some reason. They sound great to me, for the most part.

tylerw, Monday, 13 April 2009 21:18 (fifteen years ago) link

With Miles Davis, are you talking about the Columbia Jazz Masterpiece deals?
I believe so.
I have the 1992 Columbia Mastersound Gold CD of Kind of Blue, and it sounds great.

Jazzbo, Tuesday, 14 April 2009 13:05 (fifteen years ago) link

The original Miles CDs not only were poorly mastered (Columbia routinely overdid the noise reduction, often completely obscuring things like quiet cymbals), but in at least one instance (Miles Ahead) alternate takes were used for the CD in place of the master takes.

Sara Sara Sara, Tuesday, 14 April 2009 16:27 (fifteen years ago) link

i think there were some pitch issues that were resolved in the remasters on kind of blue, like originally some tracks were slightly sharp or flat

wassup rockers? (M@tt He1ges0n), Tuesday, 14 April 2009 16:29 (fifteen years ago) link

never mind about the beatles catalogue - what about kraftwerk !?
i mean they are all done and dusted, with a special promo box of them all even appearing on ebay from time to time.
what on earth is holding up the proper full release of those !
and yes, the latest reissue of 'kind of blue' does indeed resolve the speed issue.

mark e, Tuesday, 14 April 2009 16:39 (fifteen years ago) link

what on earth is holding up the proper full release of those !

The remastering job accidentally removed all the brushed snares, confusing the sound for static and hiss.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 14 April 2009 17:24 (fifteen years ago) link

never mind about the beatles catalogue - what about kraftwerk !?

According to the guy in an indie store in Oslo specializing in synthpop/EBM, the were so dissatisfied with the remasters they chose not to release them. I believe they are available for download though.

Geir Hongro, Tuesday, 14 April 2009 18:56 (fifteen years ago) link

i have basically put up my whole collection, all the albums plus Past Masters, on Amazon. i will get an average of five dollars a CD and have already sold most of it, that's $80 towards these new box sets.

Bee OK, Wednesday, 15 April 2009 05:04 (fifteen years ago) link

one month passes...

does this whole Beatles remastered catalogue/ ROCK BAND thing deserve it's own thread? i think it does, but anyway
here's ROCK BAND's trailer. i know nothing about computer games =
http://www.beatles.com/core/home/

piscesx, Tuesday, 2 June 2009 04:32 (fifteen years ago) link

"mild lyrics"
"tobacco reference"

Batsman (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Tuesday, 2 June 2009 05:06 (fifteen years ago) link

where's the tobacco reference? i couldn't see it.

piscesx, Tuesday, 2 June 2009 05:11 (fifteen years ago) link

the abbey road cover

Henry Frog (Frogman Henry), Tuesday, 2 June 2009 05:42 (fifteen years ago) link

"on the way upstairs I had a smoke"

NotEnough, Tuesday, 2 June 2009 05:43 (fifteen years ago) link

Here's hoping the Beatles edition of "Rock Band" does the same wonders to the musical taste of the kids that Guitar Hero did a few years ago. If they can discover Iron Maiden and AC/DC in retrospect, they should also be able to discover The Beatles.

Geir Hongro, Tuesday, 2 June 2009 08:15 (fifteen years ago) link

that trailer is dead exciting, and i'm about as over music games as i am the beatles at this point. also tempted by a remastered white album. but including the documentaries as qt files? really??

Norwegian Wood Smash (stevie), Tuesday, 2 June 2009 08:28 (fifteen years ago) link

ach, they'll all get dragged off and made available someplace, no bother.

Mark G, Tuesday, 2 June 2009 13:33 (fifteen years ago) link

watched the trailer: meh. as an exercise in deep Beatles fetishism, it's interesting, but it's not making me run out and buy an x-box-a-ma-whatsis.

tylerw, Tuesday, 2 June 2009 14:17 (fifteen years ago) link

That looks pretty damn cool! Taxman!!

As for remastered White Album: seek out the German Direct Metal Master pressing of the White Album via the usual sites. It's a late 70s pressing done right before the switch to digital, with the master cut directly into metal rather than lacquered and electoplated. It sounds AMAZING and I doubt Apple could get even close to the sound quality.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 2 June 2009 15:39 (fifteen years ago) link

oh, like i need another version of the white album ... (jk, scouring the internet now! :D)

tylerw, Tuesday, 2 June 2009 15:50 (fifteen years ago) link

found it -- oh, internet, me luv u. (and man, upthread i was dissing beatles fetishism. pot calling kettle black i guess.)

tylerw, Tuesday, 2 June 2009 15:59 (fifteen years ago) link

The acoustic guitars and vocals in particular are amazing. Drums are crisp as hell. It's stunning how much additional sound you get from this.

Supposedly it's just a really good needledrop on a super hi-fi system. Its funny cos above in this thread I was all anti-remastering and now I'm saying check this out. The truth is this is 30 year old technology here.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 2 June 2009 16:07 (fifteen years ago) link

I don't own an Xbox or Playstation or whatever, but if I did, "Rock Band" would already have been in my stock of games and probably used a lot. And I would definitely be looking forward to the Beatles one.
(Which I do anyways, because I hope it will do wonders for the kids' musical taste)

Geir Hongro, Tuesday, 2 June 2009 20:47 (fifteen years ago) link

Beatles game looks great! cannot wait to do harmonies with my kids. We'll be well on our way to being the next Carter family.

dulce est desipere in loco (Euler), Tuesday, 2 June 2009 20:55 (fifteen years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YsdS00GI58

San Andreas is what you need, Geir.

Ismael Klata, Tuesday, 2 June 2009 21:18 (fifteen years ago) link

lolz game looks great. kinda wish there was a "Yoko" function that would allow you to break up the band/mess up other players

Kool G Lapp (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 2 June 2009 21:28 (fifteen years ago) link

also maybe a Pete Best function where you have to sit in the other room while your friends are having fun.

tylerw, Tuesday, 2 June 2009 21:33 (fifteen years ago) link

How about a Stu Sutcliffe function, also known as the Sid Vicious function?

Geir Hongro, Tuesday, 2 June 2009 21:39 (fifteen years ago) link

There's a Doug Sandon function, where your girlfriend comes in and makes you go to work instead of messing around playing computer games.

Mark G, Tuesday, 2 June 2009 22:46 (fifteen years ago) link

who's doug sandon?

piscesx, Tuesday, 2 June 2009 23:24 (fifteen years ago) link

Beg pardon, Colin Hanton was 'who' I meant.

Mark G, Wednesday, 3 June 2009 07:01 (fifteen years ago) link

wrt the 96 vs 48 vs 41 thing: you don't just get the added acoustic range above 20khz (which no one can hear) there's also something that happens when tracks are bounced down from 96 (or 48) to 41 - you lose a bit of detail, numbers are squashed and crunched and tail ends of long digital strings are rounded up or down, adding digital artifacts and noises and what not. i don't have audiophile gear but i have decent studio gear (pro tools, genelec speakers, spl thousand dollar volume knob, etc) and there are differences to be heard between 41kHz and 48kHz and 96kHz . especially when you bounce them down to cd.

also, fuck vynil. shit gets all dusty and scratchy and sounds like ass if you play it more than a few times or leave it on your record player overnight, and i'm glad they switched to cd.

messiahwannabe, Wednesday, 3 June 2009 15:37 (fifteen years ago) link

As for remastered White Album: seek out the German Direct Metal Master pressing of the White Album via the usual sites.
Got a link? I found it here in six parts, but I couldn't join the files because I couldn't find the password.
Help!

Jazzbo, Wednesday, 3 June 2009 16:51 (fifteen years ago) link

^^^ that's where I got it from yesterday. It's noticably better than any other version I've heard, but the last second of Savoy Truffle is cut off.

nate woolls, Wednesday, 3 June 2009 18:07 (fifteen years ago) link

The entire package seems interesting. Almost like I need to get myself a gaming console.

But, as for the remasters: Quicktime? Why? :)

Geir Hongro, Tuesday, 9 June 2009 20:48 (fifteen years ago) link

because the video portions are only like 10 minutes long, I think. If you get the box set you'll get them all strung together on DVD. I don't anticipate them being very interesting though. It would have made more sense to put together a DVD of the promo videos (if these are all included I'll be shocked)

akm, Tuesday, 9 June 2009 21:01 (fifteen years ago) link

beatles rock band is a lot of fun, they did a nice job with the presentation too.

i would never want a book's autograph (M@tt He1ges0n), Tuesday, 9 June 2009 21:27 (fifteen years ago) link

Have you already played it?

Darin, Tuesday, 9 June 2009 23:41 (fifteen years ago) link

Holy cra-cra-crap that animation thing is cool. I really like that shot of them 'sitting in an English garden'.

Makes me kinda wish they just went ahead and made a Beatles anime.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 9 June 2009 23:42 (fifteen years ago) link

What, like Yellow Submarine...?

Sickamous Mouthall (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 10 June 2009 06:35 (fifteen years ago) link

I don't anticipate them being very interesting though.

Surely, in the case of The Beatles, so much is said, so much is written, that there is likely to be anything much about the proccess behind the albums that isn't already covered. If not before, at least the "Anthology" series should take care of most of the facts that the world would need to know. So I agree there.

Geir Hongro, Wednesday, 10 June 2009 10:26 (fifteen years ago) link

I just saw the Beatles at Shea Stadium at a big screen theater last week. It was followed by the live footage from one of their last shows in Japan.

Seeing John just freak out and start speaking in tongues to 50,000 people who can't hear or understand him is still pretty affecting. And so are the performances. I'm guessing they did a lot of studio patchwork on these after the fact? The vocals sound awfully good considering the circumstances...

Nate Carson, Wednesday, 10 June 2009 10:51 (fifteen years ago) link

Ah, thank you Wikipedia.

"The film is not a completely candid concert film, however, as overdubs were recorded by the Beatles in London in January 1966 to cover audio problems throughout the concert recording."

Nate Carson, Wednesday, 10 June 2009 10:52 (fifteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.