fred you're just getting relentlessly misunderstood in this thread and it's so hard for me to say why, does it have something to do with the clarity of your ideas / how much or little they have to do with reality
― flamenco drop (BradNelson), 1. maj 2018 19:39 (one minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
English as a Second Language, I know. But the will to go 'omg, how dare you, YOU'RE the bigot!' whenever something is criticized is strong, as also shown with Simon insinuating that I think only black women would like Janelle Monae because I said Pitchfork should diversify their editorial staff.
― Frederik B, Tuesday, 1 May 2018 17:45 (six years ago) link
look from a strictly literal perspective it's true that the writers don't pick the score... but then again, writers can't actually finally decide on *anything* anywhere. editors publish stories... at the end of the day they can make the stories say whatever they want. this dynamic has existed for the entire history of journalism essentialy. it doesn't take some giant stretch of your imagination to apply it to the process of assigning a decimal score to an album.
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 1 May 2018 17:46 (six years ago) link
i'm just happy they didn't dig up Brent DiCrescenzo for this review. i liked it!
― omar little, Tuesday, 1 May 2018 17:46 (six years ago) link
isn't that making an assumption that we all think about journalism as much as journalists do? xpost
― Van Horn Street, Tuesday, 1 May 2018 17:48 (six years ago) link
English as a Second Language, I know.
this is *not* what i meant, i'm so sorry. (lol i guess you got me there)
― flamenco drop (BradNelson), Tuesday, 1 May 2018 17:49 (six years ago) link
where your thinking falls apart is assuming she's not a well-known writer that the editors probably know -- know personally, I'm pretty sure -- and whose work they admire
― aloha darkness my old friend (katherine), Tuesday, 1 May 2018 17:50 (six years ago) link
This is just a special situation, because 'Dirty Computer' might be the biggest pop-album ever explicitly about being a black queer woman. And there's a disconnect between the text and the score/bnm, we noticed it, the writer has pointed it out. And it's a disconnect between input from a black woman, and input from a very white/male editorial staff. Call it a coincidence, whatever, but it looks bad. This is not good, this might be normal procedure everywhere, but then that's an indictment of editorial practices everywhere. Every newsroom in the world needs to be diversified, frankly.
Again, katherine, I'm not assuming that, and no matter what, it has no impact on what I'm saying.
― Frederik B, Tuesday, 1 May 2018 17:53 (six years ago) link
― flamenco drop (BradNelson), 1. maj 2018 19:49 (four minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Lol, no, I really mean that I'm aware I struggle more than the rest of you to get my point across because I speak the language less perfectly.
― Frederik B, Tuesday, 1 May 2018 17:54 (six years ago) link
your exact words are "they wanted an outside (black, female) perspective"
― aloha darkness my old friend (katherine), Tuesday, 1 May 2018 17:55 (six years ago) link
Pitchfork should remove all bylines and just credit reviews to "A. Whiteman" or "A. Blacklady" from now on.
― grawlix (unperson), Tuesday, 1 May 2018 17:55 (six years ago) link
This is just a special situation, because 'Dirty Computer' might be the biggest pop-album ever explicitly about being a black queer woman. And there's a disconnect between the text and the score/bnm, we noticed it, the writer has pointed it out. And it's a disconnect between input from a black woman, and input from a very white/male editorial staff. Call it a coincidence, whatever, but it looks bad. This is not good, this might be normal procedure everywhere, but then that's an indictment of editorial practices everywhere. Every newsroom in the world needs to be diversified, frankly.Again, katherine, I'm not assuming that, and no matter what, it has no impact on what I'm saying.― Frederik B, Tuesday, May 1, 2018 1:53 PM (forty-nine seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― Frederik B, Tuesday, May 1, 2018 1:53 PM (forty-nine seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Grace Jones reading this Fredrick B post
http://s3.amazonaws.com/quietus_production/images/articles/15230/grace-jones-nightclubbing_1399904420_crop_560x550.0.jpg
― we æt so many shimripl (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 1 May 2018 17:58 (six years ago) link
― aloha darkness my old friend (katherine), 1. maj 2018 19:55 (two minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Oh, jfc, this is incredible. I wrote:
Rahawa Haile has no other bylines on Pitchfork, so it seems like the site specifically wanted an outside (black, female) perspective on the album. To then not let her decide the score makes the whole thing seem pretty suspect. A lack of trust in her judgment apart from her identity.
― Frederik B, 1. maj 2018 18:42 (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
I've already once explained:
I wrote 'it seems like', I was specifically criticizing the appearance that pitchfork has created.
― Frederik B, 1. maj 2018 19:11 (forty-six minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
And then you're quoting me out of context, when I've specifically pointed out that context. I mean, I know I speak English as a second language, but you're clearly not reading what I write in good faith. How much clearer could I write that the 'IT SEEMS LIKE' part was important?
― Frederik B, Tuesday, 1 May 2018 18:06 (six years ago) link
Hey, speaking of reading in good faith, maybe you shouldn’t yell at people about “bullshit fake outrage” even if you think they’re misreading you.
― JoeStork, Tuesday, 1 May 2018 18:09 (six years ago) link
to be specific -- and I apologize if this is a wording issue, but it doesn't seem to be -- you seem to be implying here that the only reason a black woman would be commissioned to write for a website for the first time is because she is "an outside perspective" to them and not because she is a colleague of editors who know her and/or her work. I know this is a thing that happens elsewhere in journalism, but it is a very weird and suspect accusation to make about a writer who is both well-known in general and in music writing communities specifically, and who just finished a major, time-consuming project.
(also imagine this post being written while drowning in the deluge of irony of being frustrated about being misinterpreted, yet being perfectly certain of others' "bullshit fake outrage") -- I guess
― aloha darkness my old friend (katherine), Tuesday, 1 May 2018 18:10 (six years ago) link
post got cut off, supposed to be "I guess xp"
― aloha darkness my old friend (katherine), Tuesday, 1 May 2018 18:13 (six years ago) link
i don't think this will be fully solved until katherine posts that she knows Rahawa four or five more times
― we æt so many shimripl (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 1 May 2018 18:13 (six years ago) link
I'd like to point out it's a good review she wrote.
― Van Horn Street, Tuesday, 1 May 2018 18:13 (six years ago) link
xpost i mean, you're RIGHT, obviously, but it's still funny
― we æt so many shimripl (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 1 May 2018 18:14 (six years ago) link
I was actually talking about Jeremy there but thanks
― aloha darkness my old friend (katherine), Tuesday, 1 May 2018 18:14 (six years ago) link
unless suddenly I am the reviews editor of Pitchfork, which would be news to me
― aloha darkness my old friend (katherine), Tuesday, 1 May 2018 18:15 (six years ago) link
You continue to misinterpret me after I've explained it like ten times. It's pretty hard not to think it's deliberate. No, I'm not saying that pitchfork only hired her because she is a black woman, I'm saying they've created the appearance that they've only hired her because she is a black woman. The disconnect between her text and their score makes it seem as if they don't trust her reviewing skills, MAKING IT SEEM that they only hired her because she is a black woman.
― Frederik B, Tuesday, 1 May 2018 18:15 (six years ago) link
Just spitballing here, if hiring a WOC is bad because it makes Pitchfork look like they tokenizing WOC, the alternative should be ... what exactly?
― we æt so many shimripl (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 1 May 2018 18:17 (six years ago) link
Just pointing out that I've already answered that upthread.
― Frederik B, Tuesday, 1 May 2018 18:19 (six years ago) link
I'm sorry, English is my first language I'm still learning how to speak Huge Dumbass
― we æt so many shimripl (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 1 May 2018 18:20 (six years ago) link
they've created the appearance that they've only hired her because she is a black woman
citation needed that anyone at all, anywhere, thinks this
― Simon H., Tuesday, 1 May 2018 18:20 (six years ago) link
i would think pitchfork changing its policy for one specific writer to avoid the appearance of what fred is talking about would be more demeaning/condescending/tokenizing than exactly what happened, which is she said she wasn't responsible for the final score/BNM status, something I've said publicly in the past about my own pieces there
but yes i agree they should hire more black people
― Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Tuesday, 1 May 2018 18:24 (six years ago) link
to be specific -- and I apologize if this is a wording issue, but it doesn't seem to be -- you seem to be implying here that the only reason a black woman would be commissioned to write for a website for the first time is because she is "an outside perspective" to them and not because she is a colleague of editors who know her and/or her work.
― aloha darkness my old friend (katherine), Tuesday, May 1, 2018 2:10 PM (eight minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
i think it doesn't take that much to imagine that a bunch of clueless white editors could hire a WOC writer just to score woke points for the marketing team. it happens, it happened, and it will happen again. maybe it's not the specific case of Rahawa, not everyone is buddy buddy with lots of music journalism to know the specifics of her career and her relationships with publications, but making an assumption that sometimes some privileged white males hire WOC for the wrong reasons, is grounded in some realities. It happens all the time in the film industry, for example.
― Van Horn Street, Tuesday, 1 May 2018 18:25 (six years ago) link
yes, I already said I realize that is a thing that happens, frequently, in journalism, but it's shitty to make that one's default assumption
― aloha darkness my old friend (katherine), Tuesday, 1 May 2018 18:28 (six years ago) link
― we æt so many shimripl (Whiney G. Weingarten), 1. maj 2018 20:20 (five minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Yeah, this was definitely so cryptically written: The solution isn't to not criticizing that hiring, it's to diversify the editorial process.
― Frederik B, Tuesday, 1 May 2018 18:28 (six years ago) link
gotcha
xpost
― Van Horn Street, Tuesday, 1 May 2018 18:28 (six years ago) link
I guess there is a grammar error in there, but still.
― Frederik B, Tuesday, 1 May 2018 18:29 (six years ago) link
i think it doesn't take that much to imagine that a bunch of clueless white editors could hire a WOC writer just to score woke points for the marketing team.
You really think the **marketing team** of the place that considers "millennial males" it's core gives a fuck about "woke points"? It would probably be MORE profitable if Pitchfork catered to the Very Online White Male and the many sponsors that don't want to deal with music that might have an f-word
― we æt so many shimripl (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 1 May 2018 18:34 (six years ago) link
I don't know that sponsors have any problems with Danes.
― Simon H., Tuesday, 1 May 2018 18:36 (six years ago) link
xp see: everyone on reddit
― lowercase (eric), Tuesday, 1 May 2018 18:36 (six years ago) link
― Frederik B, Tuesday, May 1, 2018 2:15 PM (twenty minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
could it be that this appearance is a cognitive distortion of your very own self
― flappy bird, Tuesday, 1 May 2018 18:39 (six years ago) link
Conde Nast, the company that owns Pitchfork, also owns Reddit, hub of racism communities, MRAs, paedos and creepshottters. The leap in logic to thinking Pitchfork would get a WOC to review anything because of "marketing" is more cynical than any reality
― we æt so many shimripl (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 1 May 2018 18:39 (six years ago) link
― we æt so many shimripl (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, May 1, 2018 2:34 PM (three minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
It happens for TV series and advertising that care to sell stuff to the regular hipster, I don't think it's that much a stretch to think if Pitchfork were vile they could do that. But thank god I used the word 'could' to talk about a hypothetical, this way I'm certain no paid writer for a national magazine would ever confuse it with an actual factual statement.
― Van Horn Street, Tuesday, 1 May 2018 18:40 (six years ago) link
Plus, I did not mention pitchfork per se, but whatever Whiney, Whiney away.
― Van Horn Street, Tuesday, 1 May 2018 18:41 (six years ago) link
this desk has created the appearance that it is a pillow, which is why I keep hitting my head against it
― aloha darkness my old friend (katherine), Tuesday, 1 May 2018 18:42 (six years ago) link
I personally think Pitchfork should go back to catering to Gen Xers and our alt rock. That's real music, not this crappy synth stuff. Barf out!!!
― kornrulez6969, Tuesday, 1 May 2018 18:42 (six years ago) link
also, generally in journalism, if someone is a cynical and poorly intentioned editor just looking to hire someone for "woke points" they generally will hire young and/or new writers for things like op-eds, not established writers for reviews of prestige albums
― aloha darkness my old friend (katherine), Tuesday, 1 May 2018 18:43 (six years ago) link
VHS, why would I imagine you were talking about Pitchfork in the Pitchfork thread?
― we æt so many shimripl (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 1 May 2018 18:44 (six years ago) link
― we æt so many shimripl (Whiney G. Weingarten), 1. maj 2018 20:34 (seven minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
I know you're kidding, Whiney, but literally the only non-positive review on Metacritic, a mixed one from the Guardian, is by a white man complaining that the album is too commercial and impersonal. White men are really, really into seeming 'woke'. And yes, I notice the irony.
― Frederik B, Tuesday, 1 May 2018 18:46 (six years ago) link
― aloha darkness my old friend (katherine), 1. maj 2018 20:42 (three minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Holy fuck that you keep on doing this.
― Frederik B, Tuesday, 1 May 2018 18:47 (six years ago) link
White men are really, really into seeming 'woke'. And yes, I notice the irony.
why are you still posting
― flappy bird, Tuesday, 1 May 2018 18:50 (six years ago) link
lol
― aloha darkness my old friend (katherine), Tuesday, 1 May 2018 18:50 (six years ago) link
― we æt so many shimripl (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, May 1, 2018 2:44 PM (six minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
if you had followed the conversation instead of trying to pwn people on a message board, etc
― Van Horn Street, Tuesday, 1 May 2018 18:51 (six years ago) link
I mean, in all honesty I'm not that surprised, I've seen you do this exact same thing before if someone criticizes pitchfork, katherine, but I honestly still didn't think you would sink so low.
― Frederik B, Tuesday, 1 May 2018 18:52 (six years ago) link
lmao what
― aloha darkness my old friend (katherine), Tuesday, 1 May 2018 18:52 (six years ago) link
― aloha darkness my old friend (katherine), Tuesday, May 1, 2018 2:43 PM (eight minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
i'll keep that in mind when I read reviews in the future.
― Van Horn Street, Tuesday, 1 May 2018 18:54 (six years ago) link