― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Monday, 5 January 2004 03:27 (twenty years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 5 January 2004 03:33 (twenty years ago) link
I see how all of these aspects of top 40 pop are attractive, but doesn't the music for which which cool sounds/beats/melodies is the icing on the cake have a special appeal? Doesn't it set itself above the overproduced stuff you hear on pop radio?
― adam michel (adam michel), Monday, 5 January 2004 04:01 (twenty years ago) link
― jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 5 January 2004 04:11 (twenty years ago) link
― jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 5 January 2004 04:12 (twenty years ago) link
― adam michel (adam michel), Monday, 5 January 2004 04:17 (twenty years ago) link
― jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 5 January 2004 04:20 (twenty years ago) link
― adam michel (adam michel), Monday, 5 January 2004 04:26 (twenty years ago) link
― scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 5 January 2004 04:28 (twenty years ago) link
― adam michel (adam michel), Monday, 5 January 2004 04:33 (twenty years ago) link
― Darrens8====D (DarrenK), Monday, 5 January 2004 04:50 (twenty years ago) link
― Darrens8====D (DarrenK), Monday, 5 January 2004 04:57 (twenty years ago) link
― adam michel (adam michel), Monday, 5 January 2004 05:01 (twenty years ago) link
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Monday, 5 January 2004 05:03 (twenty years ago) link
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Monday, 5 January 2004 05:05 (twenty years ago) link
― Broheems (diamond), Monday, 5 January 2004 05:06 (twenty years ago) link
― Broheems (diamond), Monday, 5 January 2004 05:08 (twenty years ago) link
― Broheems (diamond), Monday, 5 January 2004 05:09 (twenty years ago) link
― Darrens8====D (DarrenK), Monday, 5 January 2004 05:19 (twenty years ago) link
We're always welcoming new members to our viper enthusiast club, so feel free to join in the fun! Not all of us own vipers but it does'nt hurt to dream!
― Arthur M. Martinez, Friday, 30 January 2004 13:58 (twenty years ago) link
― jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 2 September 2004 21:49 (nineteen years ago) link
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Thursday, 12 May 2005 17:37 (nineteen years ago) link
― jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 12 May 2005 17:38 (nineteen years ago) link
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Thursday, 12 May 2005 17:39 (nineteen years ago) link
― Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Thursday, 12 May 2005 17:40 (nineteen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 12 May 2005 17:48 (nineteen years ago) link
― d'ngullberry (noisemeltdown), Thursday, 12 May 2005 17:50 (nineteen years ago) link
― Aja. (Gear!), Thursday, 12 May 2005 17:50 (nineteen years ago) link
I mean here's a guy who clearly is infuriated that despite his championing of rebellion, the 'real,' etc. he discovers he's considered a conservative laughingstock by others. His kneejerk reaction is to assume that the reason he's not considered hip is that these "oh so clever" people who have chosen Being Hip over Being Honest, and creates a plausible profile of the thought process of this hipster. It's way more thoughtful and challenging than anything else I've read of his.
― miccio (miccio), Thursday, 12 May 2005 17:51 (nineteen years ago) link
― Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Thursday, 12 May 2005 17:54 (nineteen years ago) link
― jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 12 May 2005 17:56 (nineteen years ago) link
― miccio (miccio), Thursday, 12 May 2005 18:00 (nineteen years ago) link
― miccio (miccio), Thursday, 12 May 2005 18:01 (nineteen years ago) link
― KeefW (kmw), Thursday, 12 May 2005 18:01 (nineteen years ago) link
― Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Thursday, 12 May 2005 18:01 (nineteen years ago) link
― miccio (miccio), Thursday, 12 May 2005 18:03 (nineteen years ago) link
― KeefW (kmw), Thursday, 12 May 2005 18:04 (nineteen years ago) link
― Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Thursday, 12 May 2005 18:05 (nineteen years ago) link
― miccio (miccio), Thursday, 12 May 2005 18:05 (nineteen years ago) link
:-( (Regardless, it is not by me.)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 12 May 2005 18:23 (nineteen years ago) link
― Bobby Peru (Bobby Peru), Thursday, 12 May 2005 18:24 (nineteen years ago) link
― KeefW (kmw), Thursday, 12 May 2005 18:25 (nineteen years ago) link
― d'ngullberry (noisemeltdown), Thursday, 12 May 2005 18:28 (nineteen years ago) link
(although, thanks to Wang for leading me here)
― Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Thursday, 12 May 2005 18:29 (nineteen years ago) link
Bingo.
What the hell is the point of this fucking post? The person who wrote it saw some hipsters at the mall and was jealous because he was all alone and he just wants to hang out with them SO FUCK THOSE GUYS, FAKE UPPER MIDDLE CLASS TRUST FUND PHONIES. So? What's the point?
― Dred Furst, Thursday, 12 May 2005 18:35 (nineteen years ago) link
― A Viking of Some Note (Andrew Thames), Thursday, 12 May 2005 18:43 (nineteen years ago) link
I don't see why jealousy has to be the only reason. It certainly isn't for me; it's just a bit annoying a generally held opinion (at least one that seems to appear organically) is that there has to be some concensus on how one should think and to then constantly change the goalpoasts to prove how on 'ahead' of the game you are. I see this all the time.
In some sense there is perhaps no point in any post like this or any discussion around it, at least from my point of view. The 'coolest', most 'leftfield' thing anyone can manage in my point of view is to have their own brain inside their head, and that's about the size of it. But it's a laff isn't it?
Either way, in my opinion, the poster does describe well a situation that does exist with .
― KeefW (kmw), Thursday, 12 May 2005 18:44 (nineteen years ago) link