Are white people who say "I don't like hip hop" yet listen to it when white people make it really saying "i don't like black people"?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (869 of them)
you really have a chip on your shoulder where he's concerned, huh

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 12 May 2006 19:14 (eighteen years ago) link

dear punis,
sm is a close friend of mine you closed minded bigot. raymond williams is too. sorry i can't write more now, but need to go wipe the doritos off my keyboard.

p.s. don't be offended that i'm judging you. you're a close personal friend too, so its okay.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 12 May 2006 19:57 (eighteen years ago) link

Doritos, huh? Now there's some unexpected variety.

punis (punis), Friday, 12 May 2006 20:15 (eighteen years ago) link

Yes, thinking about race is bad.

please tell me this was a thought that was completely unconnected to any previous post by any other person.

oops (Oops), Friday, 12 May 2006 21:01 (eighteen years ago) link

This hopping way back upthread and way back in time, but that Merritt / Cee-Lo thing is completely fascinating to me.

I mean, the thing that's central to the statement -- but isn't actually getting discussed in it -- is the big question of what constitutes "blackness." And the truth is that in this country, "blackness" has been constructed from lots of directions and is completely impure. It's constructed by lots of things: black people themselves, white racism and fetishization and stereotype, black reactions to (or appropriations of) white racism and fetishization and stereotype, and back and forth incessantly. It's a joke to think that anyone can really draw clear lines between what constitutes "black culture" and what constitutes "black stereotype." It'd be nice if it were easy, but it's not, and what goes for black people and white people both.

And the weird undertone to that Merritt statement is that he seems to be proposing a solution to this problem, and his solution seems to be that black people should become white. Right? I mean, calling Cee-Lo (of all people) a minstrel seems to indicate a desire to sweep this icky mixed-up problem away by having black people never enact any of the roles of "blackness," never at all, so that we don't have to think much about whether (for instance) a black man from Georgia saying "sho nuff" constitutes minstrelry or just the same cultural retro as a Texan saying "howdy." At the very least, Merritt's drawing his lines in a very odd place -- a place that kind of denies black people the opportunity to explore or examine the construct of "blackness," a place that errs on the side of condemning genuine black culture almost just on the off chance that there are shades of white racism and white stereotype somehow being enacted inside it.

Which I think is, yeah, a cop-out, and escapist, and dumb. I think I understand Merritt's discomfort. I think we've all experienced it at some point, though seriously, a ten-second Cee-Lo intro is a pretty fucking low bar to set for it; I dunno how Merritt manages to ride the subway if he's offended by such a tame level of performing "blackness". But having your solution to that discomfort be that black people should just become white -- "equal, just like me!" -- is deeply bullshitty.

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 12 May 2006 21:39 (eighteen years ago) link

And that's even allowing that the future of actual black people in this country (if not the future of "blackness," the construct) probably actually is to become approximately like white people, the same way this has happened with European immigrant groups who were once considered culturally different -- if all goes well, you know, the black middle class will continue to grow, black experience will more and more closely match white experience, and vast cultural gaps will cease to be supportable. (And then we'll have some even more vexed conversations to have about what constitutes "blackness," because what creates blackness will increasingly be not actual experience, but just the fact that people with dark skin are culturally allowed to perform blackness, and people with light skin are culturally not.)

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 12 May 2006 21:47 (eighteen years ago) link

"whiteness" isn't a static thing that devours all other cultures. those european immigrant groups added to and modified the dominant white culture which existed here when the arrived at ellis island (one small example: pasta is not considered an ethnic food). black americans have done the same thing, and, it could be argued, their modifiaction of "whiteness" is becoming more and more prominent every year.

oops (Oops), Friday, 12 May 2006 21:55 (eighteen years ago) link

nabisco I am not going to say "OTM" because I am not sure I completely agree with you yet, but that is definitely the most thought-provoking thing I've read so far in this thread.

bernard snow (sixteen sergeants), Friday, 12 May 2006 22:07 (eighteen years ago) link

new favorite phrase = "deeply bullshitty"

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 12 May 2006 22:10 (eighteen years ago) link

How is pasta not an ethnic food? Is America about hot dogs, apple pie and angel hair now?

milo z (mlp), Friday, 12 May 2006 22:20 (eighteen years ago) link

Yeah, have you been asleep? It's also about doppio machiattos

Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 12 May 2006 22:35 (eighteen years ago) link

I notice that no one seems to have addressed my question above, but I think it's relevant to what Nabisco is talking about:

Curious question: can someone explain the difference between Cee Lo Green's little skit at the beginning of that song and the ubiquitous mincing limp-wristed lisping schtick that probably 90%+ of gay men have used at one point or another? I seriously doubt the artifice of the latter bothers Merritt as much as the former.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 12 May 2006 22:36 (eighteen years ago) link

isn't what Merritt is perhaps saying is that if we're going to have gross playing to stereotypes in pop music, he'd rather listen to the "ditties" of minstrelry than the hip-hop or whatever that isn't melodic or whatever he is interested in. Like they are both bad, but if we're going to allow one, why not the older, more pleasing one (to his ears)as well. Which doesn't mean that's not problematic.......

timmy tannin (pompous), Friday, 12 May 2006 22:36 (eighteen years ago) link

for Alex:

(from Scott Thompson monologue "Buddy's Car: Race Relations)"

Scott: People make fun of me because I lisp. Really. Such alot of fuss over a few extra s's. They say that every different group has their own language. For example, fags say things like "Girl", and "Sister", and "What's her problem?". Another example, another example, foxy black mamas. They say things like "Girl", and "Sister", and "What's her problem?"...makes ya think. And straight men say things like "No", and "Too expensive", and "Touchdown", and "Scoooooore!". They're so together.

So let's recap, shall we? Blacks are inferior because they supposedly commit more crime and test lower on white people's I.Q. tests. I don't know about you, but if I was raised in the ghetto, I'd be out there ripping off whitey and forgetting the capital of Maine. And orientals aren't supposed to be as sexually driven as blacks or whites. Hmm, I guess all those tourists who flock to the flesh pots of Bangkok are there for the food. And blacks, because they apparently have larger than usual genitalia, are called stupider. And orientals, because they supposedly have smaller than usual genitalia, are called *smarter*, not cheated. And whites again have perfect weiners and buns. I guess we're just smart enough. Smart enough to stay out of trouble, but too dumb to run convenient stores.

I don't know what all the fuss is all about, we're all just here to find love. I just think the world would be a lot better place if the scientists could keep their slide rules in their pants. It reminds me of something that Yoko Ono once said to Malcolm X in a bistro in Rome. "Oh the food's terrible. But the waiter's hilarious."

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 12 May 2006 22:47 (eighteen years ago) link

so stephen merritt is the american geir

gear (gear), Friday, 12 May 2006 22:48 (eighteen years ago) link

more or less. altho I don't think Merritt goes so far as to claim that anything focusing on syncopation/rhythm is not "music".

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 12 May 2006 22:49 (eighteen years ago) link

you mean cappellini, right milo?

oops (Oops), Friday, 12 May 2006 22:50 (eighteen years ago) link

(also I think Geir actually is pretty racist in a weird "European cultur is superior" way - but that's cuz he himself has said a lot of questionable things on various threads. Merritt's being judged on the basis of a few aggressively decontextualized quotes, which I don't think is entirely fair, even if I do think his opinions are stupid).

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 12 May 2006 22:50 (eighteen years ago) link

Expanding upon what Alex said, Merritt's disgust with what he sees as Cee-Lo's blackfacery is a little bizarre because dude's always had fun with the stereotypes of gay men: the people in his songs are oh so frequently sexually irresponsible, shallow, aesthetically-inclined, depressive, unfufilled, and anti-social creatures.

Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Friday, 12 May 2006 22:51 (eighteen years ago) link

(To say nothing of the whole vampire thing.)

Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Friday, 12 May 2006 22:55 (eighteen years ago) link

Also, apart from registering his disgust at what see as racial self-parody, I don't think Merritt proposes or even suggests any kind of solution, including "asking people to be more white."

Also, I can see why it may be hard for Merritt to see Cee-Lo's schtick as drawing from a sense of pride (not that Merritt is warm to the concept of "pride" in music, though "smug" I think he gets) over one's Southernness (and Southern blackness) if he's almost completely insulated yourself from Southern hip-hop in the last five-ten years.

Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Friday, 12 May 2006 23:01 (eighteen years ago) link

Also:

Suggested title for the next Magnetic Fields album: Get Unhappy!!.

Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Friday, 12 May 2006 23:05 (eighteen years ago) link

And that's even allowing that the future of actual black people in this country (if not the future of "blackness," the construct) probably actually is to become approximately like white people, the same way this has happened with European immigrant groups who were once considered culturally different


I seem to be incapable of staying on-topic in this thread, but I just wanted to observe that historically in America, those European immigrant groups were allowed to assimilate into whiteness through the specter of blackness. anti-black racism made it possible to reconceive of non-Anglo European groups as acceptably white. in a way, I think this is still going on with non-white immigrant groups (cf. the racial commentary in Harold and Kumar Go to White Castle, where in that one scene Harold and Kumar escape from jail and the black dude doesn't even try and is totally resigned to his unjust imprisonment: i.e. East Asian and Indian immigrants can assimilate on the backs of African Americans: it's the American way!) all of which is probably an aside, but still seems relevant to your train of thought, nabisco, i.e. why Merritt's attempt to just sweep away the "problem" of blackness by erasing the performance of it is so wrongheaded.

horseshoe (horseshoe), Friday, 12 May 2006 23:15 (eighteen years ago) link

Part of the history of minstrelsy - not of blackface performers but of African-American performers - involves creating caricatures and buffoonery for a white audience, and a sense of play with language that is entertainment in its performance ("everything is satisfacshull"). From the article it seems like Merritt is reacting to the wordplay and the broadness of the performance. (Louis Armstrong takes the same wordplay and showmanship and transcends mistrelsy, though if you heard the banter without the musicianship, as Merritt did with Cee-Lo, it might be harder to notice.)

But Michael and Alex's point is fascinating. Based on the two concerts I've seen, Rufus Wainwright's between-song patter (again, without taking the musicianship into consideration) would be seem like a ridiculous stereotype if it was transcribed and performed in a Saturday Night Live sketch.

Eazy (Eazy), Friday, 12 May 2006 23:16 (eighteen years ago) link

Oops, you're absolutely right about how groups that aren't considered entirely "white" can bring something to the dominant culture -- but how would that happen, in this case, if people reacted to what they brought with the indifference (or distaste) that Merritt has here? You're absolutely right, but (to follow our joke example) wouldn't that make Merritt the guy who went around saying that he found pasta kinda distasteful?

And Michael, I think the "asking to be more white" is more of a logical inference or implication: if you happen to have a really high sensitivity to any instance of black people "performing blackness," then surely what you're asking for is that they do it less -- that they blend in with the dominant culture.

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 12 May 2006 23:20 (eighteen years ago) link

As far as comparison to performing gay stereotype, well, we come across the classic double-standard, which you may or may not want to describe as "racist." When someone like Merritt does it it's perceived as aesthetic, self-conscious, or camp; when someone like Cee-Lo does it he's less likely to be given credit for knowing exactly what he's doing.

(And it's true, in some cases, that black people perform blackness from a more earnest position, from a position of not being offered much opportunity to perform anything else, even from a position of embracing harmful stereotypes about themselves -- but really for the most part I'd say that black people in music, being black and knowing a whole lot about what that's like, are often way more savvy about the dynamics about it than most people want to give them credit for.)

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 12 May 2006 23:23 (eighteen years ago) link

(Actually, strike "harmful" from that parenthetical statement above: harmful as the stereotypes might generally be, the reason they're being embraced is because embracing them offers something valuable to the embracer.)

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 12 May 2006 23:24 (eighteen years ago) link

And Michael, I think the "asking to be more white" is more of a logical inference or implication: if you happen to have a really high sensitivity to any instance of black people "performing blackness," then surely what you're asking for is that they do it less -- that they blend in with the dominant culture.

It absolutely *is* inference one can make, but has Merritt made it yet, publically or no? (Though it's unconsciable if he has and blind and sad if he hasn't.)

Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Friday, 12 May 2006 23:27 (eighteen years ago) link

On the WFMU show today, Merritt called Louis Armstrong's "Zip-A-Dee-Doo-Dah" by far the best version of the two dozen or so played. One reason for this is that the performance takes a song written in a particular regional dialect and rhythm and gives it to a performer who wear the song comfortably. This may not be too different from, say, what Edie Falco does on The Sopranos, whose teleplays are all written by men.

I think Merritt's probably as smart and savvy as most of us are, and nothing in the interviews and articles I've read - or songs of his that I've heard - suggests that he has blind spots or holes in his musical knowledge that we boy detectives are going to spot easily. The only reason to assume he's unfamiliar with Dirty South hip-hop would be that he hasn't mentioned it in interviews and didn't recognize Cee-Lo.

Eazy (Eazy), Friday, 12 May 2006 23:29 (eighteen years ago) link

(Whereas Dionne Warwick's version of the same song had more of the histrionics of showtunes/jazz than of a particular dialect.)

Eazy (Eazy), Friday, 12 May 2006 23:45 (eighteen years ago) link

East Asian and Indian immigrants can assimilate on the backs of African Americans: it's the American way!

I see no proof of this and considering the brutal discrimination and massacres that occured against Chinese Americans in the late 19th century I think you have it wrong. (The American phrase, "not a Chinaman's chance..." immediately comes to mind. The Japanese anti-immigration laws as well.) This seems to be more of the same quasi-Marxist rhetoric that assumes that groups are only successful at the expense of other groups. ("I am poor because Jews are rich.", etc)

Cunga (Cunga), Saturday, 13 May 2006 02:32 (eighteen years ago) link

okay, I realize I expressed myself in really condensed fashion. the point I was making was that historically, immigrant groups that were at some point perceived as intractably "other" came to be manufactured as assimilable, in large part due to anti-black racism (Walter Benn Michaels has a book about how this played out in the American literary imagination in the 1920s: Our America.) this is largely a matter of perception, of white perception of groups of people in some way coded as not-fully-white. this is not to erase material discrimination that all these groups faced at some point in time, and often still face. My only point was that anti-black racism has often performed an imaginary nationalist project in America, of constructing as American those who aren't black. which is only relevant to this thread inasmuch as it illustrates how deep the obsession with a certain image of blackness runs in American culture. which is maybe so obvious it doesn't need to be pointed out. talking about how more recent immigrant groups may be assimilated or not is mostly speculation; I thought Harold and Kumar was an interesting, depressing take on that. (obviously there's class stuff at work, too.)

horseshoe (horseshoe), Saturday, 13 May 2006 02:55 (eighteen years ago) link

I mean, the fact that my post is based in part on a work of literary criticism shows that I'm talking about the cultural register of race, rather than the lived reality of it, which is obviously pretty complex.

horseshoe (horseshoe), Saturday, 13 May 2006 03:00 (eighteen years ago) link

I feel dirty for having read even the first hundred posts of the re-revival of this thread. Why do so many people in this thread think it productive to reduce issues of racism, sexism, and homophobia to petty one-liners, excuses to revisit personal beefs, excuses to joke around ironically, etc.? Is this really the best some of you can do?

polyphonic (polyphonic), Saturday, 13 May 2006 03:11 (eighteen years ago) link

Hmm, thread gets more thoughtful later on. And I see I am not nearly the first person to have grown intensely frustrated by it. Let's pretend that I wasn't here...

polyphonic (polyphonic), Saturday, 13 May 2006 03:22 (eighteen years ago) link

"And Michael, I think the "asking to be more white" is more of a logical inference or implication: if you happen to have a really high sensitivity to any instance of black people "performing blackness," then surely what you're asking for is that they do it less -- that they blend in with the dominant culture."

this is quite an overreach based on the Merritt quote in question, you're doing exactly what SFJ did, albeit with a lot more respect than his blindside kick

timmy tannin (pompous), Saturday, 13 May 2006 03:41 (eighteen years ago) link

Yes, thinking about race is bad.

please tell me this was a thought that was completely unconnected to any previous post by any other person.

I was being a bit reductive, but I don't buy this:
the only-too-apparent willingness of some computer jockies to overextend their intellectual capacities with regards to issues of race and society,
as being a particularly accurate representation of this thread, and I think it is basically arguing for people to NOT talk about things that they need to be talking about.

deej.. (deej..), Saturday, 13 May 2006 07:19 (eighteen years ago) link

If anything the problem is ppl underextending their intellectual capacities, getting all "its really quite simple/blacknwhite."

deej.. (deej..), Saturday, 13 May 2006 07:20 (eighteen years ago) link

If there's one thing I've learned talking about race w people, its that there's always more to talk about.

deej.. (deej..), Saturday, 13 May 2006 07:21 (eighteen years ago) link

meanwhile, there's this dubious contribution to the debate (if SM had actually said something along the lines of this piece, then the shit-storm might be justified)

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,1072-2177992,00.html

timmy tannin (pompous), Saturday, 13 May 2006 20:40 (eighteen years ago) link

Is there some kind of law that states that someone must write the article comparing rap music to minstrelsy every six months or so?

Sean Braud1s (Sean Braudis), Saturday, 13 May 2006 23:11 (eighteen years ago) link

What's particularly bad about the Cee-Lo incident is that Merritt wouldn't listen to more than a few seconds of the song before deciding to use it as evidence of minstrelsy. That kind of kneejerking is the sign of a real crank. He certainly picked the wrong artist to rant about. It's like if someone heard a few seconds of 'Jesus' by the Velvet Underground and started catting about Christian Rock and the religious right.

ramon fernandez (ramon fernandez), Saturday, 13 May 2006 23:22 (eighteen years ago) link

If anything the problem is ppl underextending their intellectual capacities

"overextending their intellectual capacities" does not mean "thinking too much." If you thought that, it was a serious misreading. Overextending one's intellectual capacities means performing laborious mental gymnastics to compensate for an argument that doesn't make any logical sense-- and of course, failing in these efforts to generate a convincing logical argument (i.e. "if your music collection doesn't include a satisfactory number of black artists, then you're racist."). My point in that post, which I thought was somewhat obvious, was that you can't jump to ridiculous conclusions about racism simply by formulating so-called intellectual responses informed by your own sets of cultural standards and baggage. True, we might live in a world where we're increasingly aware of multitudes of cultural viewpoints, but it doesn't preclude the idea that you might just fucking like certain kinds of music, and that doesn't make you a racist. To claim that it does is narrow-minded, self-righteous, and just plain wrong.

punis (punis), Sunday, 14 May 2006 00:08 (eighteen years ago) link

"And Michael, I think the "asking to be more white" is more of a logical inference or implication: if you happen to have a really high sensitivity to any instance of black people "performing blackness," then surely what you're asking for is that they do it less -- that they blend in with the dominant culture."

Exactly what makes West African (or African American) music more "black" than the way more melodically oriented East African or North African music?

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Sunday, 14 May 2006 00:49 (eighteen years ago) link

What's particularly bad about the Cee-Lo incident is that Merritt wouldn't listen to more than a few seconds of the song before deciding to use it as evidence of minstrelsy.

Did he shut it off? Or did he hear the spoken intro and start commenting on the intro? He wasn't generalizing about Cee-Lo as an artist - he was just responding to what the interviewer played for him. It sounds like Merritt's as riled about examples of minstrelsy as his critics are - he's just seeing it in a different place than them. (Again, it's not like he refuses to talk about these themes or puts his foot in his mouth when he does speak about them - he just has a different take on it than his critics.)

Eazy (Eazy), Sunday, 14 May 2006 02:18 (eighteen years ago) link

I wasn't in the room and the Salon writer could have given the thing a negative cant. True, he didn't say "This song sounds like a minstrel act." But it seems as though Merritt heard a black Southern voice and immediately began to rant about minstrelsy.

I don't know if Cee Lo's ever directly addressed minstrelsy or parodied it, but I'm pretty sure his take would be more interesting than Merritt's or The Frogs'.

ramon fernandez (ramon fernandez), Sunday, 14 May 2006 03:33 (eighteen years ago) link

It's like if someone heard a few seconds of 'Jesus' by the Velvet Underground and started catting about Christian Rock and the religious right.

Substitute a more recent song with a 'neutral'/positive mention of Jesus and I think a large number of ILXors would do exactly that.

I'm not sure using 'minstrel show' in one lyric or criticizing one Southern rap act as such constitutes a 'take' on minstrelsy.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 14 May 2006 04:47 (eighteen years ago) link

can someone explain the difference between Cee Lo Green's little skit at the beginning of that song and the ubiquitous mincing limp-wristed lisping schtick that probably 90%+ of gay men have used at one point or another?

Well, one right off the bat is 90%+ of gay men haven't recorded theirs. (When I do it, it's usually an expression of mockery toward the Chelsea Boy mentality, motivated by phenomena like gay crowds rushing to see the closeted-athlete drama Take Me Out on Broadway: "Ooooh, baseball -- ex-thotic!!!") I also can't think of many examples of homo-enacted swishery in the mass media that I've found funny aside from Scott Thompson's Buddy Cole character.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 14 May 2006 04:59 (eighteen years ago) link

Did he shut it off? Or did he hear the spoken intro and start commenting on the intro? He wasn't generalizing about Cee-Lo as an artist - he was just responding to what the interviewer played for him. It sounds like Merritt's as riled about examples of minstrelsy as his critics are - he's just seeing it in a different place than them. (Again, it's not like he refuses to talk about these themes or puts his foot in his mouth when he does speak about them - he just has a different take on it than his critics.)

-- Eazy (chicagoflaneu...), May 13th, 2006 11:18 PM

it sez he shut if off:

it was too much for Merritt, who stopped the song after a few seconds of this.

Alex in Baltimore (Alex in Baltimore), Sunday, 14 May 2006 05:39 (eighteen years ago) link

I'm not sure using 'minstrel show' in one lyric or criticizing one Southern rap act as such constitutes a 'take' on minstrelsy.

-- Dr Morbius (wjwe...), May 14th, 2006.

He seems to have more of a 'take' on it than people who don't go off on rants about te Chrsty Minstrels when they hear a snippet of a 'conscious' rap song.

Perhaps some people here, much like Mr. Merritt, aren't familiar with Cee Lo's music. He was obviously raised in the church and the
intro is closer to a preacher working his way into a sermon than anything from a minstrel show.

Merritt apparently has poor listening skills or is so far gone into his ideology that he can't recognize the difference between, say, D4L and an artist who basically agrees with him (albeit using language he can't.):

Cee Lo, from Goodie Mob's "Still Standing" LP:

"A nigga done read history but yet his eyes didn't see,
the only reason you a nigga is because somebody else wants you to be.

And when they call me a nigga to my face'
can't do nothin' but walk away,
but here it is niggas call other niggas "nigga" each and every day.

Shit, I could've hit the club as fresh as I could be,
but really, it's all for another nigga to see.
You know how a nigga get when he see another nigga's outfit.
Don't want nobody to have what he ain't got,
somebody get drunk, get mad, and get shot.
I'm sick of lyin'. I'm sick of glorifyin' dyin'.
I'm sick of not trying, shit I'm sick of being a nigga.

So many black men out here trying to be niggas.
Keeping it real to the point that they dying to be niggas.
When in actuality the fact is you ain't a nigga because you black,
you a nigga cause of how you act.
But you don't want me to tell you the truth, so I'ma lie to you,
make it sound fly to you."

ramon fernandez (ramon fernandez), Sunday, 14 May 2006 05:55 (eighteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.