New Basement Jaxx

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1132 of them)
(xpost)

mark p (Mark P), Wednesday, 22 October 2003 14:37 (twenty years ago) link

haha mark don't rush to give them too much credit: "indie kids like mainstream hip-hop now because it sounds like the electronic music they're already into." this is a paraphrase but basically delivered from on high.

i also love how brent d's "knowledge of jungle" is animals on wheels (?!) and pork recordings!!!

mohammed abba (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 22 October 2003 14:46 (twenty years ago) link

*Jaw drops*

Barima (Barima), Wednesday, 22 October 2003 14:47 (twenty years ago) link

"The sensation of autonomy (oddly coupled with anonymity) that characterises most of the Jaxx's vocals is a function of the increasing sense of autonomy of all the musical components"

tim, i don't follow the comments in your second paragraph upthread. although i agree it IS becoming increasingly difficulty to find the center of the groove i think this makes the parts less autonomous, not more. i would call the parts of a straight techno track autonomous - you could isolate out the kick, or the snares or the hats, and still have the essence of the rhythm. this is fairly obvious, it's what techno djs do all the time. on the other hand there's no way to seperate out the parts of the jaxx tracks - grab the vocals from "where's your head at" like the 2manydjs did for soulwax pt. 2 and they become just so many sound effects, whereas in the context of the original track the yelping vocal track, yes, "derives meaning from the interaction" of the rhythmic parts.

maybe i'm just niggling over a small difference in terminology but i do think it's salient, esp. w/ regards to the vocals. i think the "plug it in" acapella will prove to be a weaker dj tool than "rock your body" (although the more interesting question is whether that'll hold true for the instrumentals).

vahid (vahid), Wednesday, 22 October 2003 14:48 (twenty years ago) link

pork recordings = over 90 slight variations on the 2nd fila brazilia album.

vahid (vahid), Wednesday, 22 October 2003 14:49 (twenty years ago) link

Pork Recordings=dud. Haha, not really.

Barima (Barima), Wednesday, 22 October 2003 14:54 (twenty years ago) link

Not that I'd know.

Barima (Barima), Wednesday, 22 October 2003 14:54 (twenty years ago) link

ok i admit it i have four fila brazilia albums and two heights of abraham albums BUT THAT'S IT.

vahid (vahid), Wednesday, 22 October 2003 15:01 (twenty years ago) link

hey, that one pork compilation is decent but about as jungle as... animals on wheels.

maybe im being charitable, but i find it hard to believe that pitchfork would defile their home page with so many jay-z's, kylies and bubbas unless they were making SOME sort of concession to the pro-chart faction, no?

mark p (Mark P), Wednesday, 22 October 2003 15:03 (twenty years ago) link

who writes those blurbs.. ryan?

I think he writes them all now. Ott was writing some -- if not most or all of them -- when he was working in a Senior Editor position.

FWIW, Ryan does like this album - he wouldn't include it in 'best new music' otherwise - although he is obviously overly cautious about the site’s history here. (And, I'd also guess, who he feels is its audience). (The blurb is sort of like the indie online mag version of New Soldier Field, cramming How He Feels Now in alongside the site’s archived reviews/Doric columns, as if the old PFM reviewed were protected by some sort of historical landmark status and can’t be fucked with no matter how awkwardly they fit with his opinion of B. Jaxx now.)

scott pl. (scott pl.), Wednesday, 22 October 2003 15:09 (twenty years ago) link

oh i like fila brazillia but i've never heard anything else on Pork. i am also happy to prove that brent d wrong tho, thinking as i do that Basement Jaxx make the BEST dance music (not just good) and knowing as i do quite a bit about jungle. what a tool.

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 22 October 2003 15:12 (twenty years ago) link

*old PFM reviews*

scott pl. (scott pl.), Wednesday, 22 October 2003 15:12 (twenty years ago) link

Haha, Ryan is worried about continuity!

Ricardo (RickyT), Wednesday, 22 October 2003 15:12 (twenty years ago) link

covering pop music, hip-hop, R&B, and dance because the tiny market of indie rock fans now happens to be into it for the season is not a business model many venture capitalists would be comfy with, i think.

mohammed abba (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 22 October 2003 15:13 (twenty years ago) link

i could understand the criticism for 'Come With Us' as it was quite predictable and workmanlike tho there were some excellent patches. i think 'Kish Kash' is distinctly a better work, more consistent, dynamic and interesting. this sort of reminds me of how people will say they are bored of bootlegs now. why would you ever get bored of hearing a mash-up, as long as it was done well and put two or more things together in a cool way. i never will (tho there is the issue of saturation meaning i don't go out of my way to hear new ones anymore). likewise the kind of music Basement Jaxx make is something i will tire of later than anything else out there.

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 22 October 2003 15:16 (twenty years ago) link

Pitchfork makes money?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 22 October 2003 15:16 (twenty years ago) link

(The blurb is sort of like the indie online mag version of New Soldier Field, cramming How He Feels Now in alongside the site’s archived reviews/Doric columns, as if the old PFM reviewed were protected by some sort of historical landmark status and can’t be fucked with no matter how awkwardly they fit with his opinion of B. Jaxx now.)

but why not just go all the way and say "you know what, in light of x y and z, maybe it's time to reevaluate our stance on this"?

why treat archives hard and fast - like back issues of print magazines - when the one major advantage of your medium is that you CAN constantly update, revise, append?

mark p (Mark P), Wednesday, 22 October 2003 15:18 (twenty years ago) link

enough for ryan to not have a dayjob, ned.

mohammed abba (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 22 October 2003 15:19 (twenty years ago) link

This however reminds me of Mike Daddino's comment on how MTV likes to rewrite its own history regarding its coverage/support of hip-hop in the eighties. Personally I think you need to treat the archives as hard and fast and then just explain why you've changed your mind since then.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 22 October 2003 15:20 (twenty years ago) link

thatd be fine too

i don't think any of us want brent's review deleted!

mark p (Mark P), Wednesday, 22 October 2003 15:23 (twenty years ago) link

but why not just go all the way and say "you know what, in light of x y and z, maybe it's time to reevaluate our stance on this"?

I don't know why not - like I said up thread, it would great for him to say 'hey, we were wrong'!

scott pl. (scott pl.), Wednesday, 22 October 2003 16:06 (twenty years ago) link

"tim, i don't follow the comments in your second paragraph upthread. although i agree it IS becoming increasingly difficulty to find the center of the groove i think this makes the parts less autonomous, not more."

Okay let me kinda rephrase myself, 'cos when I said "autonomy" I sort of meant "taking a more active and independently differentiated role in deciding the nature of the groove" - by which I mean that you can't just listen to one aspect (a kickdrum) and use that to work out what another aspect (a snare pattern) is doing. Most dance music - and staple house/techno/trance especially - seems to possess a prevailing groove idea which all aspects of the music are subordinate to. Thus any component can stand in as the "center" of the groove because all components lead back to the same groove idea. With music like early jungle, 2-step or increasingly Basement Jaxx, there's a decentering effect where the prevailing groove idea can only be established by listening to the relationship between all the different components in the music - the groove idea is a dialogue, not a chorus line.

The "Plug it In" vocal *would* be weaker than other vocals as an acapella because it's like isolating a single comment from within a dialogue and expecting it to make sense on its own. Whereas a single voice singing a chorus can be transplanted to another song and still make sense, because it contains or alludes to the whole of the groove idea of the track from which it is taken (indeed you could say that the point of bootlegging vocals in dance music is to see how different groove ideas can speak to and against eachother).

I don't want to imply a value judgment though - obviously monolithically monological dance music can be and frequently is a great thing.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Thursday, 23 October 2003 01:19 (twenty years ago) link

i don't remember who said that kish kash was like an attempt to make an album of bootlegs without any pre-existing songs but i think you've nailed the science of it there, tim.

vahid (vahid), Thursday, 23 October 2003 14:23 (twenty years ago) link

Something from Radio 1's site leapt out at me re: 'Plug It In', my new favorite song.

"The former N*Sync star delivers the falsetto vocal although Siouxsie Sioux was the original choice."

Thought it interesting with the back and forth on Jaxx vocals we've had.

Barima (Barima), Thursday, 23 October 2003 14:38 (twenty years ago) link

Haha, very interesting indeed! JC was the better choice in the end.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 23 October 2003 14:40 (twenty years ago) link

strangely, yes

cinniblount (James Blount), Thursday, 23 October 2003 14:41 (twenty years ago) link

Just got this. Not completely bowled over on the first listen, but since with every relisten it gets more and more fantastic this is probably a good thing.

Can't see that anyone else has said this on this thread, so am I the only person who gets a wierd Supremes' 'where did our love go?' flashback in the verses of 'Good Luck'? Before that insanely uplifting chorus kicks in, and all forms of comparison just fly out of my head I'm so hyped-up. But where is the 'Living Room' love? It's adorable, sounds so sparse and lofi and stomps so cutely along: it's like Rendez-vu's cute cute cuuute little kid brother.

re 'Plug it in', Chasez' voice isn't all that recogniseable as him, I'd say. He's singing in a completely different style than he did in either 'nsync's records or what I've heard of his solo stuff (ie 'blowing me up (with her love)'). It's a lot more clipped, almost nasal at times, that strange light falsetto, not what I'd associate with him at all - although the laugh? That's so him. Adapting to the music he's working with, I'd guess, but the difference is pretty startling. To a mad 'nsync fangirl like me. ;)

And, on the basis of 'Right Here's the Spot', I now fancy Meshell N'dgeocello something rotten. gaaaaaaaaaaah.

cis (cis), Thursday, 23 October 2003 22:49 (twenty years ago) link

Cis is a wise woman! "Right Here's the Spot" is much goodness.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 23 October 2003 22:55 (twenty years ago) link

are you sure you are not transposing the supremes with gloria jones?

mohammed abba (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 23 October 2003 22:58 (twenty years ago) link

she knows you fancy her, she fancies you

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 23 October 2003 22:58 (twenty years ago) link

Oh, if only. *fans self*

...not to my knowledge, jess.

cis (cis), Thursday, 23 October 2003 23:14 (twenty years ago) link

"But where is the 'Living Room' love?"

I prefer 'Tonight'.

This album has turned me into a mentalist! When I was listening to it on a listening post in a store, I damn near started to dance (without wearing no seatbelt) whenever 'Right Here's The Spot', 'Lucky Star' and 'Plug Me In' (best breaks-rock tune EVAH) kicked off. So I forced myself to make my own way home.

One of the fun suprises about Jaxx records is seeing who did uncredited vocals. Ty (UK Big Dada rapper) is on Plug It In, but you'd never tell that without looking. But the credited stuff is great of course, and reading cis' posts, I'm a little more interested in seeing what Chasez is gonna hit us with next (and I know I preferred his singing to Justin's (albeit barely) in 'Pop'). Anyone heard his BT collabs?

Barima (Barima), Friday, 24 October 2003 08:24 (twenty years ago) link

Soulseek turned up nothing for JC when I tried a few weeks ago other than "Plug It In" and "Blowin' Me Up", both of which rule mightily. Has he done anything else solo? I saw him on the Tom Green Show (he was amazing at breath-holding) so presumably he's plugging something Stateside.

Nick H, Friday, 24 October 2003 11:50 (twenty years ago) link

His album is coming out soon. He did two tracks off of it on an MTV show (The Wade Robson Project) called "Some Girls Dance With Women" (pretty hot, need to hear it again) and "ADIDAS" (DIRTY POP ELECTROCLASH GENIUS).

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 24 October 2003 12:39 (twenty years ago) link

I saw this too, he was surprisingly good.

Nicolars (Nicole), Friday, 24 October 2003 12:56 (twenty years ago) link

YES.

Barima (Barima), Friday, 24 October 2003 14:12 (twenty years ago) link

From "Mullet Von Second Fiddle" (t/s Tara Reid vs Cameron Diaz) and "the second most unpleasant *NSync guy" to potential future ILM hero and the second coming of Jordan Knight.

Barima (Barima), Friday, 24 October 2003 14:14 (twenty years ago) link

The JC love begins here. And it did, actually (at least in terms of solo stuff.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 24 October 2003 14:32 (twenty years ago) link

OK, this fucker is out. I need Kish Kash vinyl pronto.

donut bitch (donut), Friday, 24 October 2003 14:38 (twenty years ago) link

Everyone's a 'Blowin' Me Up With Her Love' revisionist. Me, I liked its unofficial ILM title of "'Suck It' by JC Chasez".

DB, I'm picking mine up tomorrow, but I'm so damn tempted to buy the CD too.

Barima (Barima), Friday, 24 October 2003 14:41 (twenty years ago) link

Hey, I liked "Blowin Me Up (Like A Sex Doll)"!

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 24 October 2003 14:44 (twenty years ago) link

Cis, "Living Room" is my favorite track! I can barely get enough of it. Great bits of "Living Room:"
-duh, the guitar
-the insistent tictictictic percussion
-the buzzy little synth that comes in with the drums
-the, oh what are they, triangles or something, that back up the second verse
-the amazing "ahaaaaaaaaaaaaaa" (drums pounding) --> "ho!"

All in barely two and a half minutes.

rob geary (rgeary), Friday, 24 October 2003 15:56 (twenty years ago) link

Rob! you are clearly a wise soul. It's the ahaaaaaaaaaaa~!s that do it for me, I think, that wide-eyed straining for the note, and the drum ratatat that kicks in on the second "come in to my living room/let me take all your clothes off". Which is the greatest line EVER. For today.

I've got to stop listening to this record on the bus. I'm fighting a losing battle against dancing in my seat and scaring the poor unfortunates sitting next to me.

(am I just imagining the futurama-theme-tune squiggle in Lucky Star?)

cis (cis), Friday, 24 October 2003 22:57 (twenty years ago) link

OMG
OMG
I HAVE THE DOUBLE LP IN MY POSSESSION
(it cost $35)
I HAVE YET TO LISTEN TO IT
I AM HOLDING MY BREATH HERE PEOPLE

(I also bought the Rapture's Echoes on LP but I am a little cranky that the cover is in b/w. RIPOFF)

nate detritus (natedetritus), Friday, 24 October 2003 23:04 (twenty years ago) link

$35 for double vinyl? Jesus H, no wonder I went CD.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 24 October 2003 23:13 (twenty years ago) link

(a) It is a UK import
(b) EXTENDED VERSIONS!!!!!1

Of course, it could just be karma balancing out after I found a fine-condition French pressing of Boney M's Nightflight to Venus for $5.

nate detritus (natedetritus), Friday, 24 October 2003 23:27 (twenty years ago) link

(and a free Junior Senior 12x12 placard/poster)

nate detritus (natedetritus), Friday, 24 October 2003 23:31 (twenty years ago) link

extended versions?!

s1utsky (slutsky), Friday, 24 October 2003 23:38 (twenty years ago) link

Not all the songs, but some of 'em. "Lucky Star" and "Right Here's the Spot" have an extra 30-60 seconds for an intro. Makes 'em sound a bit less abrupt, which could be to their detriment depending on how used you are to the CD versions.

nate detritus (natedetritus), Saturday, 25 October 2003 00:51 (twenty years ago) link

New favorite bit! "Lucky Star," 2:50 in where Dizzee whispers "this better be my lucky star," then the boys cut and paste the "better be" bit a couple of times so really all you hear is the explosive "b" stutter a bunch of times, totally a capella for a split second. Then those guitars slam back in and chaos ensues

rob geary (rgeary), Saturday, 25 October 2003 06:17 (twenty years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.