that is much better than the studio version I've heard.
I like spirit of eden (all the reasons for that are here) but just want to say that Hollis voice is meant to be listened to as part of a texture like james says. The lyric sheet in my copy has hollis' writing, which is a scribble, and that makes sense when you listen to the vocals.
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 09:45 (twenty years ago) link
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 09:47 (twenty years ago) link
oh jess is sensitive. oh yes he is.
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 09:49 (twenty years ago) link
Would I like Talk Talk? Some people whose opinions I value highly rate them, but then again, their name gets bandied about in the same context as some I loathe. The only thing I've heard is "It's My Life" which I always get mixed up with another 80s song, as I've not heard it in a decade.
― kate (kate), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 10:25 (twenty years ago) link
yeah! get yr 'with the programme' and get in touch with yr 'sensitive side' NOW!
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 10:27 (twenty years ago) link
Someone answer the question... Would I like Sounds of Eden? Maybe I should add it to my list of stupidly obvious records to buy.
― kate (kate), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 10:33 (twenty years ago) link
― Melissa W (Melissa W), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 10:34 (twenty years ago) link
― kate (kate), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 10:38 (twenty years ago) link
Hollis insistently referring to his music as ?art? to the NME, the wilful disconnection of image and music (illustrations, not photographs), the combo originality (within pop) of jazz prog folk pop (as pointed out above).
Boring story so far stuff: high sales of The Colour of Spring -> high budget for the making of Spirit of Eden -> disappeared for a coupla years -> came back with SoE (EMI erupting into fury: released a scurrilously edited ?I Believe in You? as a single at the behest of the band)! Also, an album so intricate, complex, arranged couldn?t be toured -> further discontent, rebellion!
Do Make Say Think, surely.
Ominous: intense: ghost: swells: pulses: whales: ebb, flow, overlap: lap: wax: wane: the Moon as unidentified unintended unifying image? No.
Hollis? voice: always had a non-specific urgency for me (?muted trumpet? muted) (I get a similar feeling from Johnny Marr?s guitar playing, a sense of felt regret and anticipated sorrow driving the playing, forward forward go on get there, but that?s perhaps a too idiosyncratic, personal-syncretic connection to be useful here)?
― Disingenuous Poster (Cozen), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 11:38 (twenty years ago) link
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 11:41 (twenty years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 12:20 (twenty years ago) link
― kate (kate), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 12:23 (twenty years ago) link
― anthony kyle monday (akmonday), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 13:35 (twenty years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 13:55 (twenty years ago) link
― Sean (Sean), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 14:14 (twenty years ago) link
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 14:15 (twenty years ago) link
― amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 14:23 (twenty years ago) link
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 14:41 (twenty years ago) link
― amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 15:14 (twenty years ago) link
Sure, it's "tasteful" music, but it's far, far more sparse than a lot of AOR fodder of a similar mood, not to mention less repetitive. Still, who cares if it resembles AOR fodder? I'm with Jess here; it could very well be a one-off for me. So what? I'm not worried about "missing out" on a whole world of goodness -- that kind of worrying will kill you. It's like with _Gaucho_ by the Dan -- I bow at its shiny feet, but I'm not about to go surfing through piles of late 70s/early 80s smooth jazz wibble just to make sure I'm not unknowingly avoiding something life-changing. Like SoE/LS, I'll just assume it achieves its particular mood through an interesting synthesis of things many of which on their own would not appeal to me.
― Clarke B., Wednesday, 11 June 2003 15:20 (twenty years ago) link
actually lee harris was involved in the making of hex in some way, although it's not exactly clear to me how (at the moment). i believe he and graham sutton have known each other since about 1991 (though don't quote me on that one).
as much as i love SoE and LS, i like Hex better. you never hear mark hollis and his kru breaking down into the philip glass/steve reich style video-you-were-shown-in-science-class music.
let me put forth a "nex-gen" of the SoE/LS/Hex continuum ... hood's cold house is a post-IDM take on the whole "muted" sound. hood publicly make clear their love of Bark Psychosis, and I believe Graham Sutton was initially asked to produce the record. while i don't think it's quite as aw-shit! as talk talk or BP, hood did good on that one.
― fields of salmon (fieldsofsalmon), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 16:02 (twenty years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 16:12 (twenty years ago) link
― fields of salmon (fieldsofsalmon), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 16:16 (twenty years ago) link
― jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 16:17 (twenty years ago) link
― Nicole (Nicole), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 16:25 (twenty years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 16:48 (twenty years ago) link
steely dan : lite jazz :: talk talk : ???
― amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 17:05 (twenty years ago) link
― jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 17:10 (twenty years ago) link
― Clarke B. (stolenbus), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 19:26 (twenty years ago) link
― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 19:39 (twenty years ago) link
Re Harris/BP connection: Harris is credited with "assistance" on Hex. Sutton also sampled his drums for the Boymerang tracks.
One thing I find significant in Hex's credits is Henry Binns' presence (another assistant). His other involvements? Tilt and Kid A. Since Kid A came out, I always heard a connection between the three records -- so discovering that tiny fact somehow made it seem all the more valid to me.
― Andy K (Andy K), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 19:55 (twenty years ago) link
but I'm SHOCKED there's so little discussion of Talk Talk by Talk Talk off of Talk Talk. That song is fucking genius.
ANTHONY & ALEX IN NYC IN UTTERLY VEHEMENT AGREEMENT SHOCKAH!
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 19:59 (twenty years ago) link
Ironically, this thread has way too much talk talk in it.
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 21:58 (twenty years ago) link
― Sean (Sean), Thursday, 12 June 2003 02:08 (twenty years ago) link
― Melissa W (Melissa W), Thursday, 12 June 2003 02:40 (twenty years ago) link
One thing that I think distinguishes Bark Psychosis (from both Talk Talk and Slint) and particularly BP on Hex is that they were on the verge of taking the sound somewhere else *again* - on "The Loom" and "Big Shot", there's a real sense of them making good on the bandied-about "lost generation" membership (eg. Disco Inferno, Insides). "Big Shot" in particular is a revelation, something between "Soon" and Spirit of Eden and Aphex Twin and microhouse, and it mixtures up all of those conflicting values really effectively, almost like a piece of sample collage rather a performed song.
If there's a potential limitation to Talk Talk it's that their increasing focus on organicism and looseness can seem like an affirmation of the pre-eminence of those values; BP sound much less tied to a specific aesthetic, and as such had the potential to go further - the percussive section in "The Loom" for example sounds like a tribute to Talk Talk's "Desire" framed through a familiarity of everything *else* that was happening in music.
It's a shame Sutton wasn't able to follow up Hex more speedily than it's evidently taken - a lot of potential contextual "disruptions" might have been possible over the past nine years.
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Thursday, 12 June 2003 02:55 (twenty years ago) link
Stripey to thread!
― Chris Barrus (Chris Barrus), Thursday, 12 June 2003 04:57 (twenty years ago) link
As usual, I'm being contentious but out of all of TT's records, it's LS that I listen to the most, certainly more than the other albums combined. One of the few albums that I can think of where the band's playing is completely together, but also sounding like it's just on the edge of splitting apart.
― Chris Barrus (Chris Barrus), Thursday, 12 June 2003 05:08 (twenty years ago) link
― Chris Barrus (Chris Barrus), Thursday, 12 June 2003 05:09 (twenty years ago) link
Brown's resume is utterly massive, but check out what other band he worked with...
Yup.. Bark Psychosis.
― Chris Barrus (Chris Barrus), Thursday, 12 June 2003 05:16 (twenty years ago) link
Spurred on by all this discussion, I dug out SoE, LS and MH and had a good long ironing session listening to all three. I didn't need to listen to Hex as I've learnt it note for note in my head over the years. Opinions? SoE is superb from end to end, and sounds natural, and lovely. LS is the least of the three, being too artificial, airless, and too much of its time, and the songs aren't as good as on the surrounding LPs, MH is nearly up there with SoE, only more natural (apart from those French voices on "A life" - why?). What I'd not done before was read the lyric sheets with all three - which made quite a difference actually. I'd not noticed the religious connotations before. Take the music away and some of the words would not be out of place in a church service.
Incidentally Nick, do you want a second CD of other BP stuff, the two Circa EPs and tracks from "Game Over"?
― Rob M (Rob M), Thursday, 12 June 2003 08:46 (twenty years ago) link
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 12 June 2003 09:26 (twenty years ago) link
*stumbles in*
Apologies for getting here so late. Thanks for the kind words about what I've said in the past about this band. :) Hopefully I'll be thoughtful/useful to this discussion, too, though lack of time to think this over is going to be a big obstacle, and my writing's probably going to sprawl messily as a result. Anyhow ...
Lack of ladies on the thread? Well, that's just alt.music demographics for you. We've been out-numbered on other lists too. It's odd though, I'd think that Talk Talk would appeal to more women, since it is very warm and textured and generally positive in vibe, and isn't too far from, say, the music of Japan or Roxy music, both of whom have huge female followings.
Would you like Talk Talk, Kate? I think you would, but I don't expect you'd want to listen to them every day. Not many fans do that. I don't either. Spirit of Eden and Laughing Stock aren't albums that you can just throw on the turntable any time you feel like it. And they can't easily be assessed in a record store listening booth, or on a tiny sound-file on a website. You're better off not listening at all. It would be like trying to decide how you felt about Chinese food in general after only having eaten two bites off of one dish! You can, however, get a pretty good sense of how Colour of Spring will sound if you listen to the little soundbites on those websites. So if you want to preview a Talk Talk album that way, choose that one instead. Like someone said : it is a nice transition album between pop and whatever it was that they became after pop.
Whoever compared them to fine wine had the right idea : something rare that should be savored, with your mind focused on it completely -- but also something that could would ruin you, or deaden you to the pleasant effects, if you tried to do it too often.)
As for Mark's voice. Well, if you can handle Bryan Ferry's (which it is often compared to, probably because they both prize texture over clarity) or David Sylvian's (who has a good voice, but deliberately sings "off" in an attempt to be more "interesting") then you shouldn't have any problem with Mark's voice. Since you come from a shoegazing background, Kate, you're already familiar with the concept of "voice as instrument" -- so if you don't like his voice, think of it as an instrument, and it might not bother you as much as it would if you thought of it as a voice!
Most people want you to play this loud, but my preferred way of listening to it is just after bedtime, with the headphones on, lights off, in bed, blankets pulled up, at a very low volume. That way, you give it your full attention, and your mind shifts into "sleep" mode faster. It has a way of embracing you if you do that, as opposed to assaulting you if you play it loud. I find "Spirit of Eden" to be very comforting. I often play it when I'm upset. The jarring moments echo my distress, but the lull that surrounds them then surrounds me too, and helps contain my feelings and makes me feel better. (It's almost like the feeling that you get when a good day follows three bad ones -- how in light of the bad days, the good one seems more hard-won, more profound).
About Bark Psychosis : I once compared Spirit of Eden with Hex and said that while Spirit had the feel of actual transcendence, Hex had the feel of a near-miss. But when I said "near miss" I didn't mean that the album was flawed, I meant that the mood of Hex was more unstable than Spirit of Eden's. If Spirit's course is a steady ascent into Heaven, Hex's course is more like a fumbling first flight. You can hear the band striving for lift-off in Bark's music -- the many tone changes, many rhythm changes, many mood changes -- a melodic scrambling around for the one thing that will get them airborne. (They do get airborne eventually, but only for a few moments. Moments I loved so much, that when I first heard them, I couldn't help rewinding the tape, playing those moments over and over again, instead of moving on to the next song). In some ways, that's what makes Hex the most listenable album of all those mentioned on this thread : it is a feeling that we all can relate to -- the striving and failing -- but with lyrics that are less blatant and music that is more melodic than most ofhter albums with "rise and fall" as their theme.
Graham sums the album's mood up well in the first song :
"you work so hard, but you don't know what it's like to feel so sure ..."
then, said almost as an afterthought, but repeated twice, with growing emphasis :
"it's gonna work out anyway.it's gonna work out anyway."
And I agree. It does. In spite of their floundering, it's a beautiful album.
So I'd actually recommend Bark Psychosis "Hex" first to you, Kate. Not only because it is more "human" than Talk Talk, but also because it is a bit more familiar in terms of sound, structure, themes and style. Also, you won't have any problems with the voice on this one : Graham sounds just like a dirty-dronerock boy -- probably because he _was_ one, up until a couple of years before recording this album. ;)
If you like Bark Psychosis, I think it will pave the way for you liking Talk Talk, too.
Ok, about Orang : if Talk Talk is an avoidance of noise, Orang is an avoidance of silence. You will not hear a more cluttered record -- let me rephrase that : you will not hear a more cluttered record that still holds together musically and melodically (stuff like Stockhausen is easily more cluttered, but nowhere near as pleasant to listen to). "Herd of Instinct" and "Fields and Waves" are musical collages, boh with strong emphasis on rhythm (Orang consisting of the two guys who were the rhythm section of Talk Talk, so it stands to follow). If you like Peter Gabriel's "Last Temptation" soundtrack, then you will probably adore "Herd of Instinct", since there are many parallels. In the same way that Gabriel immersed himself in the here-and-now to seek transcendence for that album, Orang do too. With Talk Talk, it's in the clouds. With Orang, it's deep down in the Earth. They sample freely from the folk music of just about every culture, and mix them all up into an "It's A Small World" approximation for the anti-Disneyland set. The first two songs of "Herd" rank among my all-time favorites. Whoever compared them to gamelan was on target. Though they don't have gamelan's frantic pace, they do share gamelan's love-affair with the clatter of cymbals, triangles, brushed drums and other tinny, rainy sounds. It's a sound you don't often hear in roCk music -- so it's like a tickle in the ear.
Sea and Cake sometimes manage that -- walking a line between Talk Talk and Orang. But that is a whole different subject and I've already worn everyone's patience out with such a big posting!
Hpe at least some of this made sense. Sorry for the length and lack of proof-reading!
― stripey, Saturday, 14 June 2003 00:53 (twenty years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 14 June 2003 01:13 (twenty years ago) link
― fields of salmon (fieldsofsalmon), Saturday, 14 June 2003 03:18 (twenty years ago) link
― keith (keithmcl), Saturday, 14 June 2003 03:35 (twenty years ago) link
this would be news to my wife, my kid, everyone in our apartment building and anyone passing by on the street below our windows.
― scott seward, Saturday, 14 June 2003 04:57 (twenty years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 14 June 2003 04:59 (twenty years ago) link
― scott seward, Saturday, 14 June 2003 05:17 (twenty years ago) link