I have had it up to here waiting for the Beatles catalogue to be remastered

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (6062 of them)

Oh man Ob La Di Ob La Da is fucking great.

Sickamous (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 10 September 2009 15:52 (fifteen years ago) link

I just cannot get over how much these remasters are making me love songs I'd grown tired of long ago, "Ticket To Ride" being today's revelation. On the other side of the coin, wow, "Act Naturally". I'd almost completely forgotten about this song, but I'm loving it now.

Size-zero-brigade-embrace-token-chubby-chops (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 10 September 2009 16:15 (fifteen years ago) link

act naturally pales in comparison to buck owens though IMO

but yeah compared the Abbey Road CD to my orig. Apple pressing...

honestly -- and I almost NEVER say this -- i think it's totally comparable in terms of sonics....like the remasters sound GREAt...and, with the lack of surface noise and some high end crackle being the tie breaker....I would actually prefer to listen to the new CD instead of my vinyl....

i can't think of the last time i said that.

rap telekenisis or some equally retarded nerd shit (M@tt He1ges0n), Thursday, 10 September 2009 16:24 (fifteen years ago) link

Never been much of a Beatles fan, and only ever had Abbey Road on vinyl about 9 years ago, but Here Comes the Sun is absolutely amazing on these things. Probably just not remembering it that well, but there's a lot more going on than I remember.

The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Thursday, 10 September 2009 16:26 (fifteen years ago) link

yeah, i think people just equate "Here Comes the Sun" with the twinkly acoustic guitar riff at the beginning, but it gets pretty intricate/arranged as it goes on.

tylerw, Thursday, 10 September 2009 16:27 (fifteen years ago) link

was just trying to convince my wife to buy the box set for an anniversary present. "For both of us!" (She is--horror of horrors--not that big a Beatles fan). If not for me, than for our newborn daughter. ;)

tylerw, Thursday, 10 September 2009 16:29 (fifteen years ago) link

Ringo becomes the intended sacrifice of a scary cult

"scary" !

ha.
its a light weight family friendly comedy.
the restoration though makes the thing look like austin powers is about to appear at any minute, so extreme are the colours.
very enjoyable though.

mark e, Thursday, 10 September 2009 16:30 (fifteen years ago) link

The Beatles: The First US Visit
The Maysles brothers' film of The Beatles' first US tour in 1964, when Beatlemania ignited (R)

That film is so amazing.

Nate Carson, Thursday, 10 September 2009 16:45 (fifteen years ago) link

Struck by how "Cry Baby Cry" is missing part of that slightly underwater, damaged sound it has always had. It's still there, but it's not as muddy as it has always been before, because the vocals have been brought up so sharp in front of it. It's supposed to sound more far away than this. I won't be convinced that it's not.

That said, there's so little to bitch about here. I'm still deciding whether I prefer stereo or mono on some of these, but my mind is definitely made up on Help -- mono. So much better than the stereo mix. I anticipate this being a problem with the stereo mixes of a lot of this, that in mono they sound present and confident, and in stereo the instruments seem to be wandering around in an apartment that's just a bit too large for them. But honestly it may be judged track by track instead of album by album.

Anyway I'm thrilled with this.

or have I become completely absurd? (kenan), Thursday, 10 September 2009 16:47 (fifteen years ago) link

"Love Me Do" listened back to back in stereo and mono are totally different songs. In the mono version, the Beatles are your friends. In the stereo version, they've gone all Hollywood on you, and you wonder why they never call anymore.

or have I become completely absurd? (kenan), Thursday, 10 September 2009 16:50 (fifteen years ago) link

The Beatles: The First US Visit
The Maysles brothers' film of The Beatles' first US tour in 1964, when Beatlemania ignited (R)

That film is so amazing.

Absolutely. Saw it for the first time last Saturday and was blown away. For some reason the part that has stuck with me is when they are mid flight and Ringo is acting the fool for the attendant press, then it cuts to a subdued McCartney - who is such a ham throughout otherwise - and he says quietly "I'm not even in a laffin mood". That phrase has been in my head all week now.

Working my way through the remasters box still. My god, A Hard Day's Night is the jangliest, guitariest album ever. So super-shiny clean and breathless.

Struck by how "Cry Baby Cry" is missing part of that slightly underwater, damaged sound it has always had. The vocals have been brought up so sharp in front of it.

I noticed that too (on the mono version). I like it though tbh. I really like it. But yeah Lennon's voice is so close and in your ear.

DavidM, Thursday, 10 September 2009 17:16 (fifteen years ago) link

Guys, "Yer Blues." I mean, seriously. Jesus.

Mario Brosephs (Pancakes Hackman), Thursday, 10 September 2009 17:21 (fifteen years ago) link

xpost - Yeah David. I was particularly struck by Lennon scratching his nose with his middle finger at the camera. They just could not be bothered by the press or other idiots they had to talk to. The film captures so much.

Nate Carson, Thursday, 10 September 2009 17:54 (fifteen years ago) link

As usual, I am late to this party, but I think I am actually going to hold out & buy them on CD as a box (haven't decided on whether to go w/ stereo or mono yet), but this thread + Pitchfork reviews now has me totally psyched. Tom, Scott & Mark (if yr reading this), FANTASTIC job w/ the P*fork review series. It is rare that you ever encounter any new insight into the old-guard mythology of The Beatles, but you guys pulled it off beautifully.

Pullman/Paxton Revolving Bills (Pillbox), Thursday, 10 September 2009 18:06 (fifteen years ago) link

Kenan, re; the too big apartment - turn it up. Seriously. Crank that shit.

Sickamous (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 10 September 2009 18:14 (fifteen years ago) link

fuckin "Helter Skelter" holy shit

your an avid hot dog (Euler), Thursday, 10 September 2009 18:33 (fifteen years ago) link

if you have most of these albums on stereo/mono vinyl already would you still buy the cds?

titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Thursday, 10 September 2009 18:47 (fifteen years ago) link

"21:30–22:40 The Beatles: The First US Visit
The Maysles brothers' film of The Beatles' first US tour in 1964, when Beatlemania ignited (R)"

can someone tape that for me?

hope i can still get the mono boxed set by the time i've saved up enough money to buy the damn thing!

messiahwannabe, Thursday, 10 September 2009 18:52 (fifteen years ago) link

re the US film, i too saw that on saturday.
and noticed that in the second half John is hardly in it.
in fact only in the performance sections, never the off duty stuff do you see wheer the others are mucking about (hotel room stuff)
wonder what the back story is .. maybe the second film tonight will go into detail ..

mark e, Thursday, 10 September 2009 19:04 (fifteen years ago) link

As a Beatles collector of some 30 years standing, I had grown slightly jaded about all of this. I mean, yeas I was up for the remasters but

I got both boxes when they came out, primarily because I always knew I would and who the hell was I kidding to try and pretend otherwise? Anyway, I have just cherry picked tracks across both

Guilty_Boksen, Thursday, 10 September 2009 19:16 (fifteen years ago) link

Oops - hit submit to early. Where was I? Oh yes, I was up for the remasters but I was also tired and cynical.

And as I was saying, I got both boxes and cherry picked tracks mainly from all your suggestions upthread, playing them directly against the 87 versions. Every single one was infinitely better and, as has been mentioned, was nearly as warm as the vinyl versions.

So, I was fairly pleased, but not totally blown away, when I realised I hadn't listened to the 'new' Twist and Shout in mono. Holy cow! This is red hot and fucking gorgeous - this is the closest we are going to get to hearing them in full pelt at the Cavern or Hamburg. Astonishing stuff - I feel as though I've come back home and it's bloody good to be back. It's like discovering that your first love really was as beautiful as you remembered.

Guilty_Boksen, Thursday, 10 September 2009 19:23 (fifteen years ago) link

hey the mono version of Helter Skelter doesn't have the "I've got blisters on my fingers" part

peter in montreal, Thursday, 10 September 2009 20:05 (fifteen years ago) link

http://www.norwegianwood.org/beatles/disko/

full mono vs stereo differences site there. click on any album and away you go. for instance on Helter Skelter you get this =

Helter Skelter

basic recording- 9 Sep 1968
additional recording- 9,10 Sep 1968
master tape- 8 track
mono-mixed: 17 Sep 1968. edited.
stereo-mixed: 12 Oct 1968. edited.

The basic song runs about 3:10 to a pause shortly after Paul's distorted vocal, too close to the microphone. Mono then is edited into more of the same take, with sound effects noises, and fades at 3:36. Stereo is edited instead to a different part of the take, fading out and then back in again, with another edit, ending finally at 4:29 after Ringo shouts "I've got blisters on my fingers!".
Is the distorted vocal "Can you hear me speaking-- woo!" or "My baby is sleepi

piscesx, Thursday, 10 September 2009 20:38 (fifteen years ago) link

This film's great.

Ismael Klata, Thursday, 10 September 2009 21:10 (fifteen years ago) link

I loved George's solo on I Wanna Be Your Man.

nate woolls, Thursday, 10 September 2009 21:19 (fifteen years ago) link

I was watching George all the way through those performances, he's so expressive. I just loved seeing everyone's faces really, fans and all, I kind of wanted to know what happened to all those people - 100,000 follow-up films, please. What I'd really like to see too is footage of the moments before they exited the plane, I wonder what was going on in there. Jeez, I'm quite overwhelmed, it's just weird seeing people watching them for the first time on tv and reacting exactly the same way as I am forty five years later.

Ismael Klata, Thursday, 10 September 2009 21:51 (fifteen years ago) link

Long, Long, Long is killing me dead btw.

Like BANG! Bust 'em in the wang like it aint no thang (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 10 September 2009 23:40 (fifteen years ago) link

Yes! That & she's leaving home are so beautiful.

she started dancing to that (Finefinemusic), Thursday, 10 September 2009 23:47 (fifteen years ago) link

Remastering appears to have fixed what seemed to be a HUGE dB dropoff between "Helter Skelter" and "Long, Long, Long" so you don't have to crank it to hear the latter.

Mario Brosephs (Pancakes Hackman), Thursday, 10 September 2009 23:54 (fifteen years ago) link

re the US film, i too saw that on saturday.
and noticed that in the second half John is hardly in it.
in fact only in the performance sections, never the off duty stuff do you see wheer the others are mucking about (hotel room stuff)
wonder what the back story is .. maybe the second film tonight will go into detail ..

MAYSLES: "Well, essentially John was hip-deep in teenage trim every offtage moment."

Young Scott Young (sic), Friday, 11 September 2009 00:05 (fifteen years ago) link

"21:30–22:40 The Beatles: The First US Visit
The Maysles brothers' film of The Beatles' first US tour in 1964, when Beatlemania ignited (R)"

can someone tape that for me?

hope i can still get the mono boxed set by the time i've saved up enough money to buy the damn thing!

― messiahwannabe, Thursday, September 10, 2009 6:52 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark

YOUshouldseeitontheTUBE

iago g., Friday, 11 September 2009 00:21 (fifteen years ago) link

It would be great if people raving about their favorite bits could specify if they are listening to the mono or stereo, although i guess the default is stereo

iago g., Friday, 11 September 2009 00:23 (fifteen years ago) link

All my raving from now on will be regarding stereo flac downloads, as I cannot afford to buy it (and am not sure whether I would, considering I own all the proper studio albums on vinyl somewhere, and many of the other '87 CDs.)

Like BANG! Bust 'em in the wang like it aint no thang (a hoy hoy), Friday, 11 September 2009 00:37 (fifteen years ago) link

call me crazy, but i actually like to sometimes listen for myself to see if i agree with the various posters!

iago g., Friday, 11 September 2009 00:41 (fifteen years ago) link

All my raving is on the stereo versions, right or wrong. All I can say is that I've "grown up" on the '87 discs and I'm more used to hearing them this way. Works for me.

Size-zero-brigade-embrace-token-chubby-chops (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Friday, 11 September 2009 00:44 (fifteen years ago) link

yeah, this whole stereo v. mono thing is something i haven't reckoned with--i look forward to sitting down with the mono box and digging the vaunted "authenticity". when i read that blurb from some engineer or other saying that the mono of sgt pepper is the "real" one, i ran out and bought the whole damn box--i am a consumerist pushover

iago g., Friday, 11 September 2009 01:04 (fifteen years ago) link

Husband threatened leg breakage (mine) if I purchased the stereo box. (He knows my junkie ways and saw the need for edicts to be passed. Trust me, it's a wise course of action. I know myself too well). Bought Abbey Road, Rubber Soul & Sgt Pepper yesterday...told husband, who jokingly called me a junkie then revealed he was planning on getting me the stereo box for christmas. [*cries*] We've negotiated an arrangement wherein I buy 1 album a month. It's not ideal but it's something. I still am interested in this mono box though. Having never listened to them on vinyl (yes yes I know), I'm really interested in the compare/contrast now. And this thread has geeked me out something fierce!!!

Am completely obsessed with Abbey today. Yesterday it was Rubber Soul. But Abbey. DAMN. I know I'm repeating a thousand previous posts but it's like hearing it for the first time. And the side b medley just shines.

VegemiteGrrrl, Friday, 11 September 2009 02:04 (fifteen years ago) link

It's all about Magical Mystery Tour.

Sickamous (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 11 September 2009 05:21 (fifteen years ago) link

That's the next stop in my 1-album-a-month mystery tour....

VegemiteGrrrl, Friday, 11 September 2009 05:23 (fifteen years ago) link

I have to say that I think I prefer the Capitol stereo mixes of the really early stuff to these though, definitely. The balances are better and I like all that shitty reverb (those are the ones I grew up with). These stereo mixes really, really sound weird, with instruments gating in and out in the vocal channel, it's pretty obvious that these were intended mainly as balance mixes prior to doing them monos.

I finally located a stereo box and bought it, reluctantly, for way too much money. Hopefully my mono box will show up tomorrow.

akm, Friday, 11 September 2009 07:05 (fifteen years ago) link

I'm listening to both the stereo and mono albums. The mono albums aren't keeping my attention as well as the stereo ones are. I'm on headphones. Mono "It's All Too Much" was breathtaking though.

your an avid hot dog (Euler), Friday, 11 September 2009 07:37 (fifteen years ago) link

I've only bought stereo Abbey Road so far but holy shit the Moog!

Nate Carson, Friday, 11 September 2009 07:50 (fifteen years ago) link

I ripped them all in lossless in iTunes and sorted by track name and went through each song.

Please Please Me is entirely better in Mono, but from then on I've found it differs song from song and the further forward in time the better the Stereo mix. By the second album you have the Stereo mix of Roll Over Beethoven (from With The Beatles) being just awful, absolutely horrid, while the Mono is sublime, but oddly, I prefer the Stereo mix of You Really Got A Hold On Me. After the second album I've generally preferred the Stereo mixes, though it gets a little messy comparing Mono Masters with Past Masters. Help!, which might be my favourite Beatles album (yeah I know), is a bit weird, I like Act Naturally and Yesterday (maybe it's the intimacy of that song?) in Mono while basically the rest in Stereo.

Of course that's just me. Your mileage may vary.

Popture, Friday, 11 September 2009 10:47 (fifteen years ago) link

I'm definitely stanning for the stereo side of things, as Geir as that is.

Sickamous (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 11 September 2009 11:01 (fifteen years ago) link

I'm noticing (on the stereo remasters) that on some songs you can hear the limitations of their voices, in ways I couldn't on the 87 versions. E.g. on "A Hard Day's Night" I can hear enough separation between John and Paul that I can hear where John's voice gives; or on "I Should Have Known Better" where John's voice cracks. Were these hard edges, as it were, blurred over on the 87 version? Mind you I don't love them any less for their limitations.

your an avid hot dog (Euler), Friday, 11 September 2009 11:55 (fifteen years ago) link

Maybe my memory's playing tricks here, but I thought the 87 mixes showed up quite a lot of the mistakes you mentioned. Something like McCartney's failiure to reach the top note in his harmony on If I fell, for example.

But I think you're right about the seperation being more acute and therefore throwing the mistakes into even sharper relief. Personally, I think this gives them an even greater appeal - but I bought far too many bootlegs just to hear them louse things up, so maybe I'm not the best judge!

Guilty_Boksen, Friday, 11 September 2009 12:47 (fifteen years ago) link

Little fuck-ups are what gives colour and character to music; otherwise you end up with Coldplay.

Sickamous (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 11 September 2009 12:48 (fifteen years ago) link

Couldn't have put it better myself. Although I've often thought of Chris M4rtin as a little fuck up.

Guilty_Boksen, Friday, 11 September 2009 12:51 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah, I agree, the fuck ups don't take away from the music. I just hadn't noticed them as acutely until now.

your an avid hot dog (Euler), Friday, 11 September 2009 13:05 (fifteen years ago) link

sooo... does john sing 'baby you're a rich fag jew' then?

history mayne, Friday, 11 September 2009 13:51 (fifteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.