[b] directed by Robert Zemeckis using the same motion-capture effects employed in Polar Express. <\B>
I'm with Tracey Jordan in my views on this.
― my opinionation (Hamildan), Monday, 14 September 2009 11:34 (fifteen years ago) link
The success of the mono box is hilarious. Years of encouraging everyone to switch to a multi-channel system and the big audiophile hit of the year is in 1.0.
― Michael Jones, Monday, 14 September 2009 12:27 (fifteen years ago) link
Weird. Fopp Bristol had a pile of the Mono boxsets (I saw 6 at least), but no Stereo ones.Thought the Mono was limited and sold out ?
― mark e, Monday, 14 September 2009 13:22 (fifteen years ago) link
fopp cambridge also had monos, on saturday, and no stereos.
― history mayne, Monday, 14 September 2009 13:26 (fifteen years ago) link
How much is Fopp charging?
― Ismael Klata, Monday, 14 September 2009 13:26 (fifteen years ago) link
£200
― history mayne, Monday, 14 September 2009 13:29 (fifteen years ago) link
Gah! It's the same everywhere. I am reaching the horrible conclusion that I'm going to have to acquire both, and justify it to myself by giving one away as a Christmas present.
― Ismael Klata, Monday, 14 September 2009 13:36 (fifteen years ago) link
The only way to buy the mono ones is to buy the box, whereas the rest may be bought individually. Plus the mono box is limited edition while the stereo box is supposed to remain a catalogue item.
No wonder the mono box is currently more sought after.
― Tied Up In Geir (Geir Hongro), Monday, 14 September 2009 13:46 (fifteen years ago) link
This means it is unlikely to be cheaper secondhand too.
They had mono box sets in HMV Oxford with elaborate anti-theft devices. A lot of people were manhandling them.
I d'led some mono wmas and it sounded pretty crap to me, so I ditched them.
― PJ Miller, Monday, 14 September 2009 14:05 (fifteen years ago) link
directed by Robert Zemeckis using the same motion-capture effects employed in Polar Express.
considering Zemeckis used new effects for Beowulf cos he thought Polar Express sucked, this is pretty heartening guys - obviously he's going for an authentic retro vibe
― Young Scott Young (sic), Monday, 14 September 2009 14:16 (fifteen years ago) link
Is there anything more rockist than preferring to listen to the Beatles albums in an outdated audio format because "That is the way the artists intended them back then"?
― Tied Up In Geir (Geir Hongro), Monday, 14 September 2009 14:28 (fifteen years ago) link
I thought people were just saying that the mono versions sound better?
― Ismael Klata, Monday, 14 September 2009 14:30 (fifteen years ago) link
I fail to see how this (Yellow Submarine redo) can be a good idea at all (but that's my attitude to EVERY remake.)
― Random trolling, brutal snubs, darted zings & decisive bans (Myonga Vön Bontee), Monday, 14 September 2009 14:30 (fifteen years ago) link
outdated audio format
indeed. lol at compact discs. i'm d/ling it myself.
― history mayne, Monday, 14 September 2009 14:31 (fifteen years ago) link
Yeah, I would really HATE to have sit through a beautifully restored Yellow Submarine rendered in three dimensions and projected onto a screen several storeys high. Especially if they're going to use this newfangled remastered soundtrack.
They'll probably end up forcing free handjobs and hot chocolate on everybody, too.
What a bunch of jerks.
― Hadrian VIII, Monday, 14 September 2009 15:52 (fifteen years ago) link
Yes, but with the creepy dead-eyed CGI characters from his other projects? No thanks.
― Size-zero-brigade-embrace-token-chubby-chops (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 14 September 2009 16:02 (fifteen years ago) link
geir the shit sounds better
― President Emeritus, Fancy Chord Club (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, 14 September 2009 16:20 (fifteen years ago) link
Well, surely, I know there are those who think Pavement (or Sex Pistols) sound better because they don't play well too. It is all subjetive, of course....
― Tied Up In Geir (Geir Hongro), Monday, 14 September 2009 16:33 (fifteen years ago) link
YOU'RE subjective!
― President Emeritus, Fancy Chord Club (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, 14 September 2009 16:37 (fifteen years ago) link
It being in mono doesn't affect the notes played, Geir.
― Sickamous (Scik Mouthy), Monday, 14 September 2009 16:55 (fifteen years ago) link
also you consistently confuse a style of playback and audio fidelity
― President Emeritus, Fancy Chord Club (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, 14 September 2009 16:57 (fifteen years ago) link
Placings of the albums in this week's Top 40: http://www.theofficialcharts.com/top40_albums.php
5. Sgt Pepper6. Abbey Road9. Revolver10. Rubber Soul21. White Album24. Beatles in Stereo29. Help31. Past Masters33. Magical Mystery Tour37. Hard Day’s Night38. Please Please Me49. Let it Be51. With the Beatles56. For Sale57. Beatles in Mono
― DavidM, Monday, 14 September 2009 17:17 (fifteen years ago) link
89. Yellow Submarine
― DavidM, Monday, 14 September 2009 17:18 (fifteen years ago) link
and Beatles' 1 at 54
― DavidM, Monday, 14 September 2009 17:20 (fifteen years ago) link
Beatles in Stereo is the box set?
― both HOOSlarious and truthful (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Monday, 14 September 2009 17:27 (fifteen years ago) link
yeah
― history mayne, Monday, 14 September 2009 17:30 (fifteen years ago) link
huh? i have no idea what you mean by this, Geir. but you def. miss the point of the mono- in some cases they are wildly different (esp. SPLHCB) and arguably superior mixes
― outdoor_miner, Monday, 14 September 2009 17:44 (fifteen years ago) link
It's really just about very good mix vs. so-so mix, and the mono one happens to be the very good one. Didn't have to be that way, but it is, so there you go...
― dlp9001, Monday, 14 September 2009 17:56 (fifteen years ago) link
Massive challops but Abbey Road kind of sucks (other than George & Come Together).
― Like BANG! Bust 'em in the wang like it aint no thang (a hoy hoy), Monday, 14 September 2009 18:14 (fifteen years ago) link
100% wrong
― Mr. Que, Monday, 14 September 2009 18:16 (fifteen years ago) link
totally wrong
― thomp, Monday, 14 September 2009 18:21 (fifteen years ago) link
"Restored" is one thing, "remade" another
― Random trolling, brutal snubs, darted zings & decisive bans (Myonga Vön Bontee), Monday, 14 September 2009 18:24 (fifteen years ago) link
It's just like an hour of the frog song. oh and i want you (she's so heavy) which is just boring and long. and actually, when i said 'except george' i forgot Something, which is also balls. And so ends my Beatles challops.
― Like BANG! Bust 'em in the wang like it aint no thang (a hoy hoy), Monday, 14 September 2009 18:25 (fifteen years ago) link
one for the rong thread
― thomp, Monday, 14 September 2009 18:28 (fifteen years ago) link
xpost. You've never listened to it, have you?
― everything, Monday, 14 September 2009 19:49 (fifteen years ago) link
I feel like "The End" is their prettiest moment tbh
― both HOOSlarious and truthful (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Monday, 14 September 2009 20:35 (fifteen years ago) link
i want HOOSi want HOOS so baaaaaad
he's so. . . HEAVYYYYYYYY
― Mr. Que, Monday, 14 September 2009 20:36 (fifteen years ago) link
Geir especially misses the point of the mono mixes when he states that we "naturally" hear in stereo, therefore all mixes should be done in stereo. I can't speak for Geir, but I've never witnessed a musical performance in which I could only hear the singers' voices in my left ear and could only hear their instruments in my right ear. It's the height of un-naturalness to hear music this way.
I located a torrent of 320mbps MP3 rips of the mono mixes, and I have to say that even at this lossy bitrate I'm mightily impressed. Rubber Soul regains a lot of muscle.
― Mario Brosephs (Pancakes Hackman), Monday, 14 September 2009 20:52 (fifteen years ago) link
ok, i listened to abbey road again and my 'it's just an album of the fucking frog song innit?' was clouded by the quick hits of maxwells silver hammer and octy's garden usually making me turn it off and making me forget I never really liked the medley either. Polytheme Pam is a jam though.
― Like BANG! Bust 'em in the wang like it aint no thang (a hoy hoy), Monday, 14 September 2009 20:58 (fifteen years ago) link
I've been listening to various takes of 'The End' today, and trying to play along to the unwinding on the air drums - the slowing-down bit is really, really hard to do.
― Ismael Klata, Monday, 14 September 2009 20:58 (fifteen years ago) link
xpost But Octopus's Garden is great! Some of George's best-ever guitar work!
― Mario Brosephs (Pancakes Hackman), Monday, 14 September 2009 21:02 (fifteen years ago) link
Ha, I did actually find OG a bit charming this time around. Other than hearing it in passing at a friends house the other day, it was the first time I'd listened to Abbey Road in about 5 years and it's not as bad as I remember it. Still most probably my least favourite album though (never heard YS though).
― Like BANG! Bust 'em in the wang like it aint no thang (a hoy hoy), Monday, 14 September 2009 21:05 (fifteen years ago) link
Just sat through the Beatles TV prog that was on recently.
Now, Alice wants to remix them.
What this means, I have no idea. But she has worked out she needs to talk to somebody who has access to the music...
― Mark G, Monday, 14 September 2009 21:07 (fifteen years ago) link
So in the challops department, I acquired some of the stereo remasters last week (MP3/320) and did A/B listens with some of the '87 CDs, and acquired some of the mono ones today (MP3/192) and listened back and forth between all three, and am not hearing enough to make me care to pursue it further. I guess my ears are just not evolved.
― Hugh Manatee (WmC), Monday, 14 September 2009 21:24 (fifteen years ago) link
I dug out "Help" soundtrack from the Capitol box, and boy there's some weird stereo "echo" on "Ticket to Ride", like it's playing on someone's transistor from down a tunnel. Stereo *and* mono versions.
Say it ain't so, someone!
― Mark G, Monday, 14 September 2009 21:28 (fifteen years ago) link
does anyone think these remasters are lacking a bit in the bass department? It seems like they went for an almost classical clarity on things, which means that while I can hear everything, the overall wallop is a little underwhelming. Abbey Road suffers the least from this to my ears, but the White Album seems awfully top heavy, and I was a bit disappointed in both the Rubber Soul and Revolver discs (which also seemed to de-emphasize the drums!). I haven't compared w/my old CDs yet, and I'm hoping I'm wrong about this.
― Dominique, Monday, 14 September 2009 22:55 (fifteen years ago) link
really? i feel like everything I've read has made a big deal about the bass! haven't heard 'em myself yet, so I don't know ...
― tylerw, Monday, 14 September 2009 22:56 (fifteen years ago) link
320 bitrate of a mono mix is a really reall high bitrate since the left and right channels are the same. That's practically lossless.
― akm, Monday, 14 September 2009 22:57 (fifteen years ago) link
there is almost no compression on these, so they are not going to sound bass-heavy compared to some other remasters. I can see how this could be bothersome depending on your playback system. I lost my good earbuds and have had to listen to mp3s of these through the stock apple ones and they're really treble-y, but the cds on my stereo at home through good speakers sound very well rounded, no bass issues at all. the beatles aren't meant to have booty shaking bass.
― akm, Monday, 14 September 2009 22:59 (fifteen years ago) link
I dug out "Help" soundtrack from the Capitol box, and boy there's some weird stereo "echo" on "Ticket to Ride", like it's playing on someone's transistor from down a tunnel. Stereo *and* mono versions.Say it ain't so, someone!
As with all Capitol Beatles albums up until Rubber Soul, Help! was "Dexterized." The process (adding assloads of reverb, and making shitty "duophonic" mixes) refers to Capitol's Beatles-hating A&R man, Dave Dexter. He reportedly assembled the Help! soundtrack in a single evening.
― Matt Weston, Monday, 14 September 2009 23:34 (fifteen years ago) link