Underworld vs. Orbital

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
The two groups that got me into techno (for lack of a better term). Very different of course, Underworld with the Hyde vox and less trance-y, maybe more experimental, Orbital with the samples and more anthems perhaps. Or maybe I'm generalizing too much.

I'm going to go with Underworld, based on the fact that their four post-reinvention albums are wonderful to varying degrees and they don't have a single song in their catalog that annoys me, whereas Orbital has a handful. And Second Toughest in the Infants is my favorite album from the '90s.

Riot Gear! (Gear!), Saturday, 30 October 2004 03:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Strikes me that Underworld have more personality. I do like Orbital (I think Snivilisation was fucking brilliant), but they can be...well....a bit cold.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Saturday, 30 October 2004 03:13 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm so over both of these groups but if i had to choose ... underworld.

tk, Saturday, 30 October 2004 03:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Like tk, I'm sort've no longer following either of them anymore. Beaucoup Fish really chilled my enthusiasm for Underworld....though I still often play Second Toughest... and Everything, Everything and Dubbasshamanahamnahamanahamana.... somewhat regularly.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Saturday, 30 October 2004 03:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Underworld with the Hyde vox and less trance-y, maybe more experimental, Orbital with the samples and more anthems perhaps.

I would say it's the opposite. A huge portion of Underworld's material is straight 4/4 techno. "Beaucoup Fish" is particularly homogeneous. Orbital changed styles far more drastically from album to album -- "Snivilisation" was relentlessly experimental and was completely unlike anything else around at the time.

I do agree, however, that Orbital came up with some annoying songs, mainly toward the end of their career. But the Brown/Snivilisation/In Sides triumvirate is arguably the finest three album sequence EVER by any band.

I love them both, but Orbital are my clear pick.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Saturday, 30 October 2004 03:29 (twenty-one years ago)

i dont like either but the acoustic version of born slippy maeks me think id rather have a beer or ten with underworld.

:|, Saturday, 30 October 2004 03:29 (twenty-one years ago)

i think that underworld are the clear winner. i never go back to orbital, but i always go back to underworld.

they are better live too

todd swiss (eliti), Saturday, 30 October 2004 04:40 (twenty-one years ago)

Two of my favourites, but I love Everything Everything better than anything by Orbital, and I get days when I want to play all that I have by Underworld (though with all the albums, plus about ten bootlegs and a dozen singles, plus odd other tracks and remixes, I don't generally succeed). This does feel much like TS Stones vs Who/Kinks or some such, where I want to insist that my second choice are still a fucking great act.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 30 October 2004 09:54 (twenty-one years ago)

hmmm...this is hard. i would say overall Underworld, but that would ignore Orbital's The Brown Album being one of my favorite albums EVER.

i tend to like individual Underworld tracks more than their albums as a whole.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Saturday, 30 October 2004 13:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Underworld, when they were good, had one song. But it was a fantastic song.

Orbital, when they were good, had lots of fantastic songs.

So, Orbital.

noodle vague (noodle vague), Saturday, 30 October 2004 13:18 (twenty-one years ago)

Two of my favorite groups (dance or otherwise), but you just can't fuck with Orbital.

The Good Dr. Bill (Andrew Unterberger), Saturday, 30 October 2004 13:50 (twenty-one years ago)

Loved 'em both, but I have to pick underworld.

Though I have to recognize Orbital for providing one of the great eargasms of my musical youth on one of the first albums I ever purchased (In Sides -> Out There Somewhere?)

sleep (sleep), Saturday, 30 October 2004 14:16 (twenty-one years ago)

And that mp3 above is hilarious.

sleep (sleep), Saturday, 30 October 2004 14:56 (twenty-one years ago)

God, what IS this, "pit Roxy's favorite musical acts against one another week"?

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Saturday, 30 October 2004 15:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Underworld, when they were good, had one song. But it was a fantastic song.
Orbital, when they were good, had lots of fantastic songs.

So, Orbital.

what?????? Underworld are a thousand times better than Orbital.

Ronan (Ronan), Sunday, 31 October 2004 04:20 (twenty-one years ago)

because they are a total one-off.

Ronan (Ronan), Sunday, 31 October 2004 04:20 (twenty-one years ago)

One song?! One song?! One song?!

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Sunday, 31 October 2004 05:22 (twenty-one years ago)

Stagger
Jumbo

for example.


wtf

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Sunday, 31 October 2004 05:23 (twenty-one years ago)

He means they had only one *type* of song, doesn't he? (whereas Orbital had many types of songs in many diverse styles). I said more or less the same thing in my post earlier.
Of course, more diverse != better. But it is a significant factor, at least for me.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Sunday, 31 October 2004 05:27 (twenty-one years ago)

So not true, they have two distinct songs!

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Sunday, 31 October 2004 05:29 (twenty-one years ago)

1) the brooder (e.g. Confusion the Waitress, River of Bass)
2) the 4/4 pounder (e.g. 93.5 % of their entire output)

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Sunday, 31 October 2004 05:30 (twenty-one years ago)

...and we're on the same page.


(maybe one more category, the "wtf.")

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Sunday, 31 October 2004 05:33 (twenty-one years ago)

3) wtf (e.g. Blueski)

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Sunday, 31 October 2004 05:45 (twenty-one years ago)

3) wtf (e.g. Blueski, BRUCE LEE.)

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Sunday, 31 October 2004 05:57 (twenty-one years ago)

lots and lots of new UW in '05...

Scott Warner (thream), Sunday, 31 October 2004 06:37 (twenty-one years ago)

Multiple x-posts

Yeah, of course the point I was making was that Underworld had less tricks than Orbital, not less actual individual songs. Will try to avoid metaphor in future for the folks at the back.

And I can see why Ronan would obviously prefer Underworld, but I don't think either of them necessarily appeal to the techno part of my brain. I probably like Orbital especially because they appeal to my prog-rock sensibilities.

But on the other hand, I first heard "Out There Somewhere?" whilst E'd off my face. And "Born Slippy" ended up being me and Mrs Vague's first slow dance at our wedding (true.) So it's not like I'm saying Search one and Destroy t'other.

noodle vague (noodle vague), Sunday, 31 October 2004 07:20 (twenty-one years ago)

How does one SLOW dance to "Born Slippy"?

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Sunday, 31 October 2004 07:36 (twenty-one years ago)

In my case, drunk and very fucking badly.

noodle vague (noodle vague), Sunday, 31 October 2004 07:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Orbital by a mile. I can't stand Karl Hyde.

Matos W.K. (M Matos), Sunday, 31 October 2004 07:55 (twenty-one years ago)

Underworld are good. Orbital are outstanding. I can't believe so many people are coming down on the Underworld side.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Sunday, 31 October 2004 08:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Me either! Underworld are amazing live, yes, but that doesn't make Second Toughest... any less of an irritating snoozefest.

CLEARLY Orbital.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Sunday, 31 October 2004 13:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Gotta go with Orbital here too. Love a couple of Underworld songs, but I found a few of their later albums just plain dull...can't remember a thing about Beaucoup Fish, myself. Never had that problem with Orbital...no matter how much I like or don't like an Orbital album, there's always something on it that's just stunning...even the new blue album.

Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Sunday, 31 October 2004 14:03 (twenty-one years ago)

Underworld for "Big Mouth" alone!

Mr. Snrub, Sunday, 31 October 2004 14:10 (twenty-one years ago)

I only like one UW track that I've heard.

This thread should be an Orbital rout(e).

Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Sunday, 31 October 2004 15:40 (twenty-one years ago)

(haha Beaucuop Fish is the best of the Underworld studio albums; sometimes on this board I feel like the little boy pointing at the naked emperor and shouting "BUT HIS ASS IS ALL OUT THERE IN FRONT OF GOD AND EVERYBODY")

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Sunday, 31 October 2004 18:46 (twenty-one years ago)

haha Beaucuop Fish is the best of the Underworld studio albums

If by "best" you mean "best at boring me to sleep," then yes....it's the best Underworld album.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Sunday, 31 October 2004 20:29 (twenty-one years ago)

PERRY I"LL KICK YR TAIL FOR HERESY EMPERORS NEW CLOTHES MY ASS! PLUS UNDERWORLD HAS NO "WHEN THE LAUGH TRACK STARTS ETC" SAMPLE! WINNER UNDERWORLD

Riot Gear! (Gear!), Sunday, 31 October 2004 20:35 (twenty-one years ago)

Beaucoup Fish is Underworld's best album by far, yes. I don't understand how people can find it more boring than Second Toughest - which is much more of a snoozefest.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 31 October 2004 21:27 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm going with orbital. Underworld are good, but it takes an iron will to listen to one of their albums in a single sitting. Their tunes seem to last for several days.

Wooden (Wooden), Sunday, 31 October 2004 21:55 (twenty-one years ago)

They aren't long enough! As I said, I've often listened to all of their albums and much more one after another!

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 31 October 2004 22:06 (twenty-one years ago)

"Their tunes seem to last for several days."

Yes, this is part of what makes their good tracks great.

I do prefer Orbital though.

- ha x-post.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 31 October 2004 22:06 (twenty-one years ago)

Second Toughest is sooo much worse than Beaucoup Fish it's ridiculous. I phoned Derrick May and he agreed.

RickyT (RickyT), Sunday, 31 October 2004 23:54 (twenty-one years ago)

Second Toughest a snoozefest? It's the only cd in history I have ever worn out.

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Monday, 1 November 2004 00:40 (twenty-one years ago)

OTMFM Roxy

Riot Gear! (Gear!), Monday, 1 November 2004 00:41 (twenty-one years ago)

DubNoBass... is their best album, unless you count that Godlike 2-CD Greatest Hits comp they put out last year.

100 Days Off is soooo much worse than [insert name of any other Underworld album] it's ridiculous. Except for "Two Months Off" which KICKS FUCKING ASS AND DON'T LET ANYBODY TELL YOU OTHERWISE!!

Mr. Snrub, Monday, 1 November 2004 03:50 (twenty-one years ago)

orbital, but thanks for that mp3!

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Monday, 1 November 2004 04:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Underworld

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Monday, 1 November 2004 11:07 (twenty-one years ago)

Orbital, unsurprisingly. Underworld always seemed a bit clumsy and I never find myself wanting to listen to them. They released a load of stuff I liked but, Two Months Off and Cowgirl aside, nothing I ever loved. 100 Days Off = rub.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 1 November 2004 11:34 (twenty-one years ago)

care to explain yourself, stevem?

orbital for me too. matt dc OTM. i do like a lot of underworld stuff, but when the desert island beckons, it's the orbital stuff i'd grab first. although 'rez' is one of my all-time fave tracks EVER. i have it on a junior boys own pink vinyl promo, and when i showed it to karl and rick (interviewed them once many moons ago) they freaked, since they didn't even have one of their own...

Rob Bolton (Rob Bolton), Monday, 1 November 2004 11:51 (twenty-one years ago)

In Sides and Second Toughest are my two entry points into electronic music, give or take a few earlier oneoffs. This is really fucking difficult. I think Orbital just about shade it

DJ Mencap0))), Monday, 1 November 2004 11:57 (twenty-one years ago)

"In Sides" means I am going for Orbital here. Underworld certainly had their moments too though.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Wednesday, 10 November 2004 20:29 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm going to have to go with Underworld. Count me in for loving "A Hundred Days Off". I can understand people calling it as monochrone as it's cover, but I *love* the murky, moody production. It's the album I come back to the most lately.

Now Orbital has been great - Brown/Snivil/In Sides is an awesome trilogy - but they haven't been up to snuff lately. I didn't like a single track on Middle of Nowhere, and only enjoyed a couple of tracks from the last few albums.

I have to say I'm not a big fan of Orbital's sound/production. They obviously have a soft spot for the pastoral/ethereal side of dance music, and lately their tunes have comes across as fluff to me.

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Wednesday, 10 November 2004 21:22 (twenty-one years ago)

I think one of the things that draws me back to Beaucoup Fish most frequently of all the Underworld albums is that it's really such an unusual proposition. I love Dubnobass... to death and totally understand why it's the favourite of many listeners, but I think if you described Underworld to someone who hadn't heard them before but knew dance music, they would imagine Dubnobass... and be spot on! Of all their albums it most closely lives up to the idea of Underworld as being Massive Attack with the hip hop basis replaced by dance music. Second Toughest... is a more inscrutable and enigmatic album (and the proper ballad moments are their best ever in that vein) but again it follows in the same general vein apart from some surface level stylistic modification (the occasional breakbeat etc.).

Whereas Beacoup Fish I think really plays around with one's assumption as to what Underworld are by just being so brutally uncompromising and tracky so frequently, and because Karl is so often very aggressive. Like, I find the first four tracks to be a totally emotional suite, but not emotional in the sense that the group inject "rock" emotion into a dance setting - the ebb and flow of intensity is much closer to a DJ set. And I perversely enjoy the fact that the slower tracks are just really odd and unwelcoming - it's like the group want to avoid people finding any sort of "relief" in them. Instead, the slow tracks are the uncomfortably, unsettling moments and the hard-edged tracks are the heart and soul of the album.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Saturday, 13 November 2004 04:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Underworld as being Massive Attack with the hip hop basis replaced by dance music

I think they have more of a sense of unity from song to song than Massive. Even though you have your brooders and your wtfs in with the big anthemic ones, things flow and make a solid piece. Love Massive, but they don't do that like Underworld (IMO, obv).

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Saturday, 13 November 2004 04:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes, but perhaps that is an effect of them being more dance music? Also I was thinking about Protection specifically as a Massive Attack comparison, which I think does establish a fairly coherent mood (it's more difficult for MA because they use multiple vocalists obv).

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Saturday, 13 November 2004 04:23 (twenty-one years ago)

I guess I sort of meant that on the basis of Dubnobass... and Second Toughest... you could argue that Underworld did to house & techno what Massive Attack did to hip hop. This holds true for Beaucoup Fish but in different and unpredictable ways - eg the focus is even more strongly on Karl, but the music feels less like "album dance" than before. On the first two albums Karl's presence and the physicality of the music were mostly in an inverse relationship.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Saturday, 13 November 2004 04:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Karl Hyde is an incredibly good dance vocalist, and certainly presents an amazingly British dance idea of the same, as opposed to the US dance vocalist Robert Owens archetype, the idea of vocals in British dance music has never really succeeded.

Ronan (Ronan), Saturday, 13 November 2004 04:31 (twenty-one years ago)

I can see what you're saying. xpost

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Saturday, 13 November 2004 04:32 (twenty-one years ago)

Tim Finney with your help I'll actually give this one another try!!

I've totally failed to love it even a little on previous attempts.

latetotheparty (latetotheparty), Saturday, 13 November 2004 05:28 (twenty-one years ago)

Great post, Tim. Ronan is right - I think Karl is undervalued as a vocalist and as a lyricist, at which I think he's great.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 13 November 2004 10:44 (twenty-one years ago)

I think he's an effective vocalist, but his lyrics are meh at best. This might be another reason I prefer BF to the other albums. To me, his vocals work best as an instrument, a carrier of the rhythm of the song, rather than as words. This is most apparent on their trackier pieces, where his voice merges into the groove and push it along much more. And as Tim points out, BF is easily the trackiest of the first three records.

RickyT (RickyT), Saturday, 13 November 2004 11:19 (twenty-one years ago)

In general I agree with you, RT, but then you get something like "Pearl's Girl" where the surreal rush of images in the lyrics are as important to the success of the track as the overlapping breakbeats and the swooping filter on the triplet synth drone and the multiply-inverted superchord floating over the top.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Saturday, 13 November 2004 18:56 (twenty-one years ago)

Dirty Epic aside, I've never really been tempted to listen that closely to Karl's lyrics at all, they are purely a rhythmic instrument to me, albeit one that is less anchored by the rest of the groove, they can skit back and forward and add a lot of variety even when the track itself is fairly minimal and/or repetitive. Cowgirl, as mentioned above, is the best example of this, as is Moaner, the way his vocals grow in intensity as the track builds up.

Orbital tracks, on the other hand, use vocals purely as a melodic, harmonic or textural device - one of the many dodgy things about Illuminate was that it felt so WRONG for Orbital to be using male vocalists singing proper words.

I generally dislike male vocalists in dance music, mind - Black Strobe's weakest tracks are those with that dreadful guy singing over the top.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Saturday, 13 November 2004 19:12 (twenty-one years ago)

What I think Hyde is doing is using the words not just as rhythmic devices (which is something they end up being as well), but he's using the images conjured up by the words he uses to create an almost visual lyrical sense. I hear the words, and the quick little catchphrases and individual words create a music video in your head, practically. Instead of the traditional spinning of a tale you'll find in many lyrics, Hyde's sort of relying on the associations each person brings to the songs. One reason I think Underworld is very much an "urban" band is that their words create the audio equivalent of driving through a city late at night, where everywhere you go there's words on storefronts, buses, parks, subway stations, etc. They all blend together into one cohesive whole after awhile. I think that's what Underworld's lyrics do, against all odds.

Riot Gear! (Gear!), Saturday, 13 November 2004 19:26 (twenty-one years ago)

The moment that "Push Upstairs" began to work for me was when I focused on two key moments in it:

1) The introduction of that madhouse siren synth during the second iteration of the chorus.

2) "THESE ARE MY INTENTIONS."

The song builds directly into both of those moments and can't come off without them.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Saturday, 13 November 2004 19:38 (twenty-one years ago)

@Riot Gear: It's important to take into consideration, with regards to Karl Hyde's lyrics, that Rick Smith takes the vocals and edits them as he sees fit to accomodate the music. What you hear on album is not always what Mr. Hyde sang in the studio.

Rick Smith is a huge Steve Reich fan so the end of Little Speaker (praised above) can be directly attributed to Mr. Smith's Reich obsession. In fact, there are loads of instances of this Reich-ian repetition in Underworlds tunes.

Underworld are better than Orbital.
Dubno is better than Green Album
STITI is equal to or greater than Brown Album
In Sides/Snivilisation are better than Beaucoup Fish (my least fav. UW album)
AHDO is better than anything Orbital has released in the last 4 years.

UW's recent Peel Session is better than Orbital's recent Peel Session.

Darren Emerson is a terrible, mainstream Tech-House DJ who deserves to rot in "SuperClubs", forever followed by (ex Underworld) on the flyers.

It's simple, set up two playlists on your iPod, one filled with your favorite moments from each band, it's essential that you include the killer remixes Underworld have done (most of their mixes from 92-94) and Orbitals greatest in another playlist (this one is easy because Orbital have never turned out a good remix!)...select a playlist, get on your bike and pedal. Whoever's list makes you want to bike longer, wins. Underworld for me. Tested and true.

biznotic, Saturday, 13 November 2004 20:42 (twenty-one years ago)

Gear captures my feeling about Hyde's lyrics very well there - that sketching of an urban mood. I don't think anyone else has ever used lyrics quite the way he does, and I find it hugely effective.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 13 November 2004 20:50 (twenty-one years ago)

Gear very OTM up there

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Saturday, 13 November 2004 21:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Darren Emerson tech-house??????????????????????

Ronan (Ronan), Saturday, 13 November 2004 22:14 (twenty-one years ago)

perhaps you should go to a "super club"

Ronan (Ronan), Saturday, 13 November 2004 22:14 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.discogs.com/release/226581


what do you call what he plays? it's generic TechHouse to my ears. I have been to several of the huge cheesy clubs in the UK and i don't care to go back...Fabric excluded. I've personally wasted 30bucks on watching Emerson mix (two seperate events) and was disgusted by his obvious track selection. Listen to the recent Underworld hosted John Peel Show to see where the creativity in the band lies..here's a hint, it wasn't with Emerson.

biznotic, Saturday, 13 November 2004 22:22 (twenty-one years ago)

I disagree with discogs too. underwater is just house, mainstream, kinda boring.

Ronan (Ronan), Saturday, 13 November 2004 22:25 (twenty-one years ago)

i heard Darren Emerson play some great tech-house, on the radio, a few years back

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Monday, 15 November 2004 12:00 (twenty-one years ago)

dunno about recent stuff but his Cream Separates mix from the late 90s mix still sounds great from time to time

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Monday, 15 November 2004 12:01 (twenty-one years ago)

his GU mixes are good too.

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 15 November 2004 21:20 (twenty-one years ago)

two months pass...
Revive!

What is this "acoustic version of Born Slippy" that :| mentioned at the top of the thread? I tried the link, but unfortunately it's expired.

Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Monday, 7 February 2005 11:10 (twenty-one years ago)

i would really like to get the acoustic version too so i can finally mix it with Tons Of Tones 'Sheherazade (Reprise)'

Alienus Quam Reproba (blueski), Monday, 7 February 2005 11:17 (twenty-one years ago)

THESE ARE MY INTENTIONS and after thaaaaaaaaat I know nothing at all

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 7 February 2005 15:38 (twenty-one years ago)

three years pass...

tougher pick now imo

omar little, Friday, 13 June 2008 18:29 (eighteen years ago)

still Orbital for me; Underworld made it easier by falling the fuck off with their most recent album

HI DERE, Friday, 13 June 2008 18:43 (eighteen years ago)

ha! Orbital fell the fuck off like three albums ago, dan
best of underworld >>>> best of orbital

El Tomboto, Friday, 13 June 2008 18:56 (eighteen years ago)

I mean if I had to throw out everything by one or the other it's absolutely no contest

El Tomboto, Friday, 13 June 2008 18:58 (eighteen years ago)

juanita/kiteless/to dream of love vs out there somewhere

Just got offed, Friday, 13 June 2008 18:58 (eighteen years ago)

Underworld.

More human.Superior tunes on the whole. Better live.

Love them both though.

So much that I haven't bought the last Underworld. Read too many 6s,3 stars etc.
Maybe I should make my own mind up

Fer Ark, Friday, 13 June 2008 19:09 (eighteen years ago)

Oblivion With Bells, live discs available through LiveHereNow, internet radio broadcasts with live jams of loads of old tunes = Underworld all the way. new album is great. Peach Tree + Loads of Birds are great b-sides. plenty of amazing music coming from Lemonworld studios still.

brotherlovesdub, Friday, 13 June 2008 19:12 (eighteen years ago)

orbital because 1) better 2) no shitty 'stream-of-consciousness' lyrical bs.

banriquit, Friday, 13 June 2008 19:18 (eighteen years ago)

two years pass...

wow, just found this thread and it's a tough choice indeed.

I have to pick Underworld because they're my favorite band ever, but Orbital IMO were the only electronic act that came close to them; stuff like Chemical Bros. and Aphex were good too but these two stood above everyone, mainly because everything they do goes down so smooth

frogbs, Thursday, 14 April 2011 15:29 (fifteen years ago)

This would be a lot harder choice if Orbital's Live in Glastonbury album was anywhere near Everything, Everything!! I really anticipated great things there but it's all audience boots which sucks hard

frogbs, Thursday, 14 April 2011 15:35 (fifteen years ago)

seriously tough choice but I find myself coming back to underworld a whole lot more than orbital.

allmypulp, Thursday, 14 April 2011 15:48 (fifteen years ago)

What would settle this for me would be if someone could point me to a collection of Underworld just-the-vocals mixes.

Sugar box. sugar boy.
Riding in. sugar box.
Sugar boy.
Handheld candle.
Sugar boy.
Your rails.
You're thin.
Your thin paper wings.
Your thin paper wings.
In the wind.
Dangling.
Your sun.
Fly high.
Your window shattered in the wind.
Your coca cola sign rattling.

Remember "spoken word" albums?

kkvgz, Thursday, 14 April 2011 16:14 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah, the vocals ultimately are what put this over the top for me. There are some good Orbital vocal tracks like "Halycon", but UW just had an ace up their sleeve and that's Hyde. Really one of the best vocalists not just in that scene but in any kind of music. Even when he was in Freur he was pretty good.

frogbs, Thursday, 14 April 2011 18:20 (fifteen years ago)

I'm trying to think of beloved Orbital tracks with male vocals; I think the closest you get are the samples on "Satan"

fat fat fat fat Usher (DJP), Thursday, 14 April 2011 18:21 (fifteen years ago)

Oh frogbs, I'm sorry dude, I wasn't serious. I mean, I can't stand Underworld's vocals, even though everything else is sublime.

kkvgz, Thursday, 14 April 2011 18:23 (fifteen years ago)

lol I had no idea! I love the way "Juanita" is sung. You almost never hear someone point to the vocals as a weak point!

frogbs, Thursday, 14 April 2011 18:27 (fifteen years ago)

xxp: remember "Illuminate"?

"Fiie-wurrks, in the buu, yonnn der maa ee-yooo now shoow me where the reea-liii is"

frogbs, Thursday, 14 April 2011 18:28 (fifteen years ago)

Naw, 'sdifferent strokes and all, but it frustrates me. Not enough to keep me from listening to Underworld, but it seems like an odd fit - you make such beautiful instrumental music, why do you want to talk too?

kkvgz, Thursday, 14 April 2011 18:32 (fifteen years ago)

Considering I've never encountered who had anything positive to say about "Illuminate", I'm not really counting that one; I think I'm the only Orbital fan alive who doesn't hate it.

fat fat fat fat Usher (DJP), Thursday, 14 April 2011 18:33 (fifteen years ago)

I kind of like it!! It's really dumb but kind of funny and better than most of the stuff on that album.

I did have another listen to "Satan" yesterday...can't believe that track is 20 years old!! So many great beats; such a "heads up" style of production

frogbs, Thursday, 14 April 2011 18:41 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, their early singles are nonstop O_O

I listen to "Chime" and am just blown away, it still sounds like it came from the future.

fat fat fat fat Usher (DJP), Thursday, 14 April 2011 18:42 (fifteen years ago)

I don't really like the original mix of it anymore; the "Live Style" mix on their latest comp speeds it up a bit and kind of rearranges the beats, IMO that's the one that really gets me.

Just kinda goin through all their albums now since I'm writing a review page on them. I forgot how "album oriented" the Brown album was; I don't even know if I like the singles outside of the context of the album so much. The way it flows from one track to the next is so perfect.

frogbs, Thursday, 14 April 2011 18:47 (fifteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.