Is electroclash the acid jazz of the naughty aughties?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Compare: acid jazz = an update of 60s/Blue Note jazz funk w/rapping, sampling technology, drum machines. Explicitly pretentious, arty, and urban. Never generated any serious hit singles ("Cantaloop" is a novelty tune) or major breakout personalities/performers. Critics wet their pants over it. Completely forgotten and regarded as a dead-end just a few years later.

electroclash = update of early 80s/late 70s postpunk and no wave w/rapping, samplers, drum machines, computers. Deliberately arty, pretentious, and urban (even when it's trying to be funny or sexy). No hit singles or celebrity personalities. Critics wet their pants over it.

I'm sure there's more parallels, but I have only a passing knowledge of "electroclash" (ie, sitting through an abominable Crack: We Are Rock show, a cursory listen to two Adult CDs, and a smattering of other random things people have played for me like Peaches, Ladytron, etc.) so it's hard for me to take this much farther...

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 24 October 2002 23:36 (twenty-three years ago)

Very interesting point, although I'd (personally) hesitate in lumping Crack:WAR as "electroclash" necessarily... I think they're far more bizarre sounding than your stereotypical "electroclash" Fischerspooner/Adult./Ladytron revivalists (like comparing Melt Banana and Lifhouse as "modern rock" peers).

But it's funny, when I was in London 1995-6, the kids were ALL about Acid Jazz and I REALLY didn't get it then, I'd love to hear some of that stuff now just to check it out... for kicks, y'know?

gygax!, Thursday, 24 October 2002 23:58 (twenty-three years ago)

Could someone please explain to me where exactly critics are "wetting their pants" over electro, beyond just saying "oh this odd thing is going on so we should write something about it?"

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 25 October 2002 00:50 (twenty-three years ago)

Yeah electroclash seems to be a sign of modern music criticism where the backlash hits *first* and then you wait for the hype to arrive.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Friday, 25 October 2002 04:07 (twenty-three years ago)

cf the strokes.

or maybe this is ilm music criticism which for all the "you guys love everything" stuff is actually v. dubious about new product.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 25 October 2002 04:18 (twenty-three years ago)

I can't see that much similarity - it depends (as these things do) what you include, I suppose. I wouldn't call slick muso shite like Brand New Heavies or Galliano "explicitly pretentious" or "arty" - they used to nestle next to Simply Red in many old men's collections. Man, I hated those records.

Maybe both introduced a coolness into clubland at odds with E-led messiness, but Electroclash seems much more hedonistic than the Acid Jazz dudes. They chased the cool in (their idea of) the Miles Davis sense - feel and bohemian charm - where Electroclash goes for a brasher, seedier decadence. Plus Electroclash people don't seem to give a shit if it doesn't last another season, while Acid Jazzers wanted to spread a vague message of "positivity" by rewriting "Songs in the Key of Life" eternally.

And maybe there's less of a conflict in reanimating explicitly synthetic sounds than organically textured ones? Acid Jazz was always too reverent to its source material and seemed destined to regress into "authentic" musicianly values - it was never going to better the Herbie Hancock breaks it aped or sampled, just prolong and appreciate them in a chin-stroking fashion. Electroclash's lifeblood is hard-edged machine music they can actually *do something with* - they can enhance the stridency of old synth records with post-rave production finesse.

Leo Lonergan (Leo), Friday, 25 October 2002 08:48 (twenty-three years ago)

If acid jazz ever released something as fantastic and forward-looking as Miss Kittin's Berling Is Burning mix then I want to hear it.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Friday, 25 October 2002 09:29 (twenty-three years ago)

"No hit singles

Apart from 'Emerge', 'Silver Screen Shower Scene', 'Sunglasses After Dark' and 'Set It Off'. Though it depends on yr def of 'hit single'. if it means appearing on TOTPs then they win.

I still maintain that *proper* electroclash is just posh house and DFA et al is something altogether different.

NEas eans, Friday, 25 October 2002 09:31 (twenty-three years ago)

No hit singles
and add to that:

Tok Tok - Missy Queen's Gonna Die & Day of Mine
Golden Boy & Miss Kittin - Rippin Kittin
JCA - Begin To Wonder
Ladytron - Playgirl
Zombie Nation - Kernkraft 400

Siegbran (eofor), Friday, 25 October 2002 10:22 (twenty-three years ago)

the definition of 'hit single' must have changed since last time i checked.

michael wells (michael w.), Friday, 25 October 2002 10:30 (twenty-three years ago)

In the US (ie, where I'm writing this from) none of the songs listed have even appeared anywhere on mainstream radio. So I don't think they qualify as "hit singles" - at least not over here. I have a hard time understanding how British radio works exactly, so forgive me...

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 25 October 2002 15:14 (twenty-three years ago)

Could someone please explain to me where exactly critics are "wetting their pants" over electro, beyond just saying "oh this odd thing is going on so we should write something about it?"

Vice Magazine! seriously though.

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Friday, 25 October 2002 15:37 (twenty-three years ago)

well, there's those two recently posted articles in the NYT, the local press (the SF Weekly, Guardian, etc.) are cranking out reviews and show reports about this tuff on a regular basis. I saw a gushing bit about the Yeah Yeah Yeahs and the Rapture in Rolling Stone - obviously some kind of cultural/critical zeitgeist has developed trumpeting this stuff.

And I wouldn't say Vice is a critical bastion of anything, but electroclash is *certainly* their scene and central to all the style-bullshit they propagate...

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 25 October 2002 15:45 (twenty-three years ago)

I should also point out that given the number of pro critics/writers around here and the general pants-wetting consensus about electroclash, ILM itself serves as a fairly good critical barometer.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 25 October 2002 15:47 (twenty-three years ago)

I've yet to actually hear them, but I've never seen the Yeah Yeah Yeahs referred to as an electroclash band. Aren't they a fairly conventional (in terms of instrumentation) rock band?

hstencil, Friday, 25 October 2002 15:51 (twenty-three years ago)

yeah, I may be off in including them. Someone more knowledgeable school me please! But the Rapture (at least the last time I checked) also have a fairly conventional intstrumental setup and I've definitely seen them lumped in with this scene, so I don't know if the instrumentation alone disqualifies the YYYs... But this is all beside the point!!! I'm more interested in whether the larger genre-similarity analogy holds up, and less interested in quibbling over specific bands (unless something can be gleaned from drawing a direct comparison between two bands of either genre - contrasting, say, Ladytron with the Brand New Heavies as historical revisionists/revivalists...?)

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 25 October 2002 15:59 (twenty-three years ago)

but Ladytron abhor the term electroclash and whatever it may represent, so they claim

blueski, Friday, 25 October 2002 16:01 (twenty-three years ago)

the rapture and yyys are 'brooklyn/williamsburg indie/post-punk scene', along with radio 4, ect ect. electroclash is big with same brooklyn/williamsburg hipsters, hence the confusion. i think.

Dave M. (rotten03), Friday, 25 October 2002 16:06 (twenty-three years ago)

Dave M is on point.

acid jazz and electro-wave are the opposite and here's why: acid jazzers insisted on clothes that were too big for them. electroclashers insist on clothes that are too SMALL.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 25 October 2002 17:58 (twenty-three years ago)

I have a hard time understanding how British radio works exactly, so forgive me

Actually, this is based upon the Dutch and German charts. I don't really follow the UK charts that well, and the US charts are a complete mystery to me...

Siegbran (eofor), Friday, 25 October 2002 18:03 (twenty-three years ago)

first off, i'd have to agree with shakey that vice is certainly not a"critical bastion of anything", they wet their pants 2ice a month over anything moderatly trendy and relatively unheard of.

secondly, i think these similarities between acid jazz and electroclash exist simply because that is just the nature of music these days. in a few years we'll be hearing all about some other thing that's a revival of whatever mixed with modern technology and no real "breakout personalities/performers" due to mainstream indiference. then - pffft.

so i guess yer on to something.

dyson (dyson), Saturday, 26 October 2002 00:26 (twenty-three years ago)

I am thinking at this point that since I have heard of electroclash, the immediate reaction of NYC scenester type would be to roll eyes & be disgusted b/c someone has heard of it. Et alors, what now?

daria g, Saturday, 26 October 2002 02:53 (twenty-three years ago)

no, they're rolling their eyes becuase it's EXTREMELY BAD MUSIC. (not that that means anything re: the Yeah Yeah Yeahs f'rinst, but still)

M Matos (M Matos), Saturday, 26 October 2002 05:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Mr. Matos, does your ire extend to all electroclash or merely the American scene specifically? Because the Euro equivalent seems a lot more open-ended, sonically adventurous etc. etc.

eg. have you heard Sascha Funke's "When Will I Be Famous?", the Ellen Alien remix of Golden Boy's "Rippin Kittin" etc.?

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Saturday, 26 October 2002 11:40 (twenty-three years ago)

or "seventeen" by ladyton?

dyson (dyson), Saturday, 26 October 2002 18:14 (twenty-three years ago)

Using electro as some sort of referendum on the likeability of some vague cadre of "Williamsburg hipsters" with their theoretical mullets strikes me as a really shitty thing to do -- not only because these acts are appearing on Top of the Pops, but because it amounts to appointing Larry Tee God-of-Everything and letting him define a whole big thing that he's actually quite bad at.

Most of the dismissive arguments I see about why electro is stupid and irrelevant seem like they could equally be applied to punk having been stupid and irrelevant.

nabisco (nabisco), Saturday, 26 October 2002 18:26 (twenty-three years ago)

to punk having been stupid

Restart the reclamation wars! Wasn't a whole point of the rhetoric around punk to be willfully stupid?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 26 October 2002 20:45 (twenty-three years ago)

Tim, the small handful of parties/shows I've been to (in particular the Electroclash II opening night a couple weeks back, nite before I went to Boston) have been very vibeless and self-congratulatory, but apart from the American Gigolo comp most of what I've heard hasn't been very interesting simply as music. I do like the Golden Boy/Miss Kittin record a lot more than I thought I would, and Felix da Housecat. I don't know either Sascha Funke or the Allien remix yet, though I suspect both would be excellent. (I'm a BIG fan of Weiss.Mix and have high hopes for the other Bpitchcontrol stuff I'm probably going to take a chance on as a result.)

For the record, my favorite recent electro track is about 4 years old now: Les Rythmes Digitales' remix of Deejay Punk-Roc's "My Beatbox."

M Matos (M Matos), Saturday, 26 October 2002 23:57 (twenty-three years ago)

my point, I guess, being that this stuff does NOT have a very high success ratio, at least from what I've heard (and I've heard plenty)

M Matos (M Matos), Saturday, 26 October 2002 23:58 (twenty-three years ago)

" ...being that this stuff does NOT have a very high success ratio..."

Michaelangelo-Being that commercial sucess and critical success are mutually exclusive do you mean either or both? Do you think that a band or a genre can be sucessful if it makes big in the United States? Because it seems to me that this stuff is doing well commercially in Europe so why call it a failure?

Micheline Gros-Jean (Micheline), Sunday, 27 October 2002 09:56 (twenty-three years ago)

being that this stuff does NOT have a very high success ratio

Which is can be said of jungle, trance, uk garage, hardcore, techno, hardstyle and house as well. The fun of DJing and buying comps & 12"s is filtering the bucketload of crap for the gems.

Siegbran (eofor), Sunday, 27 October 2002 12:08 (twenty-three years ago)

"Do you think that a band or a genre can be sucessful if it makes big in the United States?"
Whoa! The question above should be read "... if it's big in the U.S.?"

Micheline Gros-Jean (Micheline), Sunday, 27 October 2002 18:41 (twenty-three years ago)

Admittedly though the best hyped dance genres tend to justify their hype by having high wheat-to-chaff ratios - think hardcore/jungle 92-94, garage 98-01, microhouse 99-now. There isn't a more powerful attractant for a scene than knowing that more likely than not any track from it you'll hear is going to be great.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 27 October 2002 22:48 (twenty-three years ago)

Considering that the electro(clash) movement has been in full swing for three years now (four if you consider Space Invaders Are Smoking Grass the kickoff track), it isn't surprising that the wheat/chaff ratio is rather low anno 2002.

Siegbran (eofor), Sunday, 27 October 2002 23:25 (twenty-three years ago)

But Siegbran, the electroclash movement is being billed now as the stronger resurgence of an initially somewhat abortive movement - much like speed garage of 96/97 transforming into 2-step garage in 98 and surging back into the mainstream in 99/00.

01/02-model electroclash focuses on different artists and seems to have a different focus to the original formulation.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Monday, 28 October 2002 04:41 (twenty-three years ago)

(Can I just butt in that I non-sarcastically love discussions of dance music because of the scale of the time frames: "Yeah, that reminds me of that stuff that was big during the first week of November in 98, which I think was a really big influence even as far as the following January, not to mention the whole retro rivival that went on in mid-December.")

(To me this is like one of those charming little differences you note when you're a tourist.)

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 28 October 2002 07:18 (twenty-three years ago)

That nu-electro version of 80s nu electro hit Fade To Grey is tremendous, Mr Dave Clarke played it last night.

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 28 October 2002 07:35 (twenty-three years ago)

Being that commercial sucess and critical success are mutually exclusive do you mean either or both? Do you think that a band or a genre can be sucessful if it's big in the U.S.?

no, I mean as music, or critically (by my estimation, at least, though I am a critic so I guess that term therefore applies)

Admittedly though the best hyped dance genres tend to justify their hype by having high wheat-to-chaff ratios - think hardcore/jungle 92-94, garage 98-01, microhouse 99-now.

spot on. I'll be a little more macro here and say that most electro has historically never been all that interesting/good--I can think of dozens of great hardcore/jungle tracks and relatively few great early-'80s electro ones outside of the usual suspects (Bambaataa, Baker/Robie productions, "Al-Naafiysh (The Soul)," a few others). so I'm not that surprised it's about the same now.

Can I just butt in that I non-sarcastically love discussions of dance music because of the scale of the time frames: "Yeah, that reminds me of that stuff that was big during the first week of November in 98, which I think was a really big influence even as far as the following January, not to mention the whole retro rivival that went on in mid-December.")

historically, this doesn't seem all that much different than, say, Swinging London circa '64-7, or peak Motown; the main difference is that home/bedroom recording makes it easier to bang trax out faster (as opposed to writing, arranging, rehearsing, recording, overdubbing a song w/a band, producer, session musicians), and that overall communications have gotten faster and faster. when you account for that difference it lines right up. (and you're right, it is exciting, and fun--that's one reason I love this stuff so much!)

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 28 October 2002 07:36 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm majorly with you on the Deejay Punk Rock remix, and in fairness to Jacques Lu Cont, he's been doing "this electro stuff" for ages. I've got to say though, I find it the most perfect bite size techno fix(and I mean TECHNO the genre). Songs like Hand to Phone are just quirky techno to me, with catchier machines. But at the same time there's a certain arrogance and a pretentiousness which is similar to that of the best rock songs, I sound like the blurb for Futurism 2 now! But I also feel it's about time dance music got a scene that CAN be arrogant and up its own ass because christ knows self doubt in dance music is a total pain in the face. Critics writing "we're finished" articles and fans constantly checking to see are they having fun still? Still? Still? THANK GOD!!!!!!!! Dance music is a scene which is as self conscious as hell, it needs electro right now, more than ever.

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 28 October 2002 07:59 (twenty-three years ago)

you know, Ronan, despite my cavils, you're probably right--the dance scene does need electro for many of the reasons you say. I just wish the music were better ;-)

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 28 October 2002 08:25 (twenty-three years ago)

Heh, I'm still only barely discovering the irritating things about dance fans, having left rock music long ago....

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 28 October 2002 08:31 (twenty-three years ago)

the electroclash movement is being billed now as the stronger resurgence of an initially somewhat abortive movement

But...but...that's just marketing talk!

Siegbran (eofor), Monday, 28 October 2002 10:42 (twenty-three years ago)

and in fairness to Jacques Lu Cont, he's been doing "this electro stuff" for ages

i still think DMX Krew is far better at this stuff you know!

gareth (gareth), Monday, 28 October 2002 11:38 (twenty-three years ago)

and, also, are Dopplerefekt electroclash? they're very good anyway...

gareth (gareth), Monday, 28 October 2002 11:40 (twenty-three years ago)

isnt there a big difference between electro clash and...err, electro?
i had the idea that anything with an explicit art (performance stuff), and was especially from the states. the rest to me is electro pop. to be honest electroclash is such a loaded term, a bit like 'trip hop', t would be better for it to be used to describ music you dont like...

ambrose (ambrose), Tuesday, 29 October 2002 16:47 (twenty-three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.