electroclash = update of early 80s/late 70s postpunk and no wave w/rapping, samplers, drum machines, computers. Deliberately arty, pretentious, and urban (even when it's trying to be funny or sexy). No hit singles or celebrity personalities. Critics wet their pants over it.
I'm sure there's more parallels, but I have only a passing knowledge of "electroclash" (ie, sitting through an abominable Crack: We Are Rock show, a cursory listen to two Adult CDs, and a smattering of other random things people have played for me like Peaches, Ladytron, etc.) so it's hard for me to take this much farther...
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 24 October 2002 23:36 (twenty-three years ago)
But it's funny, when I was in London 1995-6, the kids were ALL about Acid Jazz and I REALLY didn't get it then, I'd love to hear some of that stuff now just to check it out... for kicks, y'know?
― gygax!, Thursday, 24 October 2002 23:58 (twenty-three years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 25 October 2002 00:50 (twenty-three years ago)
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Friday, 25 October 2002 04:07 (twenty-three years ago)
or maybe this is ilm music criticism which for all the "you guys love everything" stuff is actually v. dubious about new product.
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 25 October 2002 04:18 (twenty-three years ago)
Maybe both introduced a coolness into clubland at odds with E-led messiness, but Electroclash seems much more hedonistic than the Acid Jazz dudes. They chased the cool in (their idea of) the Miles Davis sense - feel and bohemian charm - where Electroclash goes for a brasher, seedier decadence. Plus Electroclash people don't seem to give a shit if it doesn't last another season, while Acid Jazzers wanted to spread a vague message of "positivity" by rewriting "Songs in the Key of Life" eternally.
And maybe there's less of a conflict in reanimating explicitly synthetic sounds than organically textured ones? Acid Jazz was always too reverent to its source material and seemed destined to regress into "authentic" musicianly values - it was never going to better the Herbie Hancock breaks it aped or sampled, just prolong and appreciate them in a chin-stroking fashion. Electroclash's lifeblood is hard-edged machine music they can actually *do something with* - they can enhance the stridency of old synth records with post-rave production finesse.
― Leo Lonergan (Leo), Friday, 25 October 2002 08:48 (twenty-three years ago)
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Friday, 25 October 2002 09:29 (twenty-three years ago)
Apart from 'Emerge', 'Silver Screen Shower Scene', 'Sunglasses After Dark' and 'Set It Off'. Though it depends on yr def of 'hit single'. if it means appearing on TOTPs then they win.
I still maintain that *proper* electroclash is just posh house and DFA et al is something altogether different.
― NEas eans, Friday, 25 October 2002 09:31 (twenty-three years ago)
Tok Tok - Missy Queen's Gonna Die & Day of MineGolden Boy & Miss Kittin - Rippin KittinJCA - Begin To WonderLadytron - PlaygirlZombie Nation - Kernkraft 400
― Siegbran (eofor), Friday, 25 October 2002 10:22 (twenty-three years ago)
― michael wells (michael w.), Friday, 25 October 2002 10:30 (twenty-three years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 25 October 2002 15:14 (twenty-three years ago)
Vice Magazine! seriously though.
― Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Friday, 25 October 2002 15:37 (twenty-three years ago)
And I wouldn't say Vice is a critical bastion of anything, but electroclash is *certainly* their scene and central to all the style-bullshit they propagate...
― Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 25 October 2002 15:45 (twenty-three years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 25 October 2002 15:47 (twenty-three years ago)
― hstencil, Friday, 25 October 2002 15:51 (twenty-three years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 25 October 2002 15:59 (twenty-three years ago)
― blueski, Friday, 25 October 2002 16:01 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dave M. (rotten03), Friday, 25 October 2002 16:06 (twenty-three years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 25 October 2002 17:58 (twenty-three years ago)
Actually, this is based upon the Dutch and German charts. I don't really follow the UK charts that well, and the US charts are a complete mystery to me...
― Siegbran (eofor), Friday, 25 October 2002 18:03 (twenty-three years ago)
secondly, i think these similarities between acid jazz and electroclash exist simply because that is just the nature of music these days. in a few years we'll be hearing all about some other thing that's a revival of whatever mixed with modern technology and no real "breakout personalities/performers" due to mainstream indiference. then - pffft.
so i guess yer on to something.
― dyson (dyson), Saturday, 26 October 2002 00:26 (twenty-three years ago)
― daria g, Saturday, 26 October 2002 02:53 (twenty-three years ago)
― M Matos (M Matos), Saturday, 26 October 2002 05:00 (twenty-three years ago)
eg. have you heard Sascha Funke's "When Will I Be Famous?", the Ellen Alien remix of Golden Boy's "Rippin Kittin" etc.?
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Saturday, 26 October 2002 11:40 (twenty-three years ago)
― dyson (dyson), Saturday, 26 October 2002 18:14 (twenty-three years ago)
Most of the dismissive arguments I see about why electro is stupid and irrelevant seem like they could equally be applied to punk having been stupid and irrelevant.
― nabisco (nabisco), Saturday, 26 October 2002 18:26 (twenty-three years ago)
Restart the reclamation wars! Wasn't a whole point of the rhetoric around punk to be willfully stupid?
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 26 October 2002 20:45 (twenty-three years ago)
For the record, my favorite recent electro track is about 4 years old now: Les Rythmes Digitales' remix of Deejay Punk-Roc's "My Beatbox."
― M Matos (M Matos), Saturday, 26 October 2002 23:57 (twenty-three years ago)
― M Matos (M Matos), Saturday, 26 October 2002 23:58 (twenty-three years ago)
Michaelangelo-Being that commercial sucess and critical success are mutually exclusive do you mean either or both? Do you think that a band or a genre can be sucessful if it makes big in the United States? Because it seems to me that this stuff is doing well commercially in Europe so why call it a failure?
― Micheline Gros-Jean (Micheline), Sunday, 27 October 2002 09:56 (twenty-three years ago)
Which is can be said of jungle, trance, uk garage, hardcore, techno, hardstyle and house as well. The fun of DJing and buying comps & 12"s is filtering the bucketload of crap for the gems.
― Siegbran (eofor), Sunday, 27 October 2002 12:08 (twenty-three years ago)
― Micheline Gros-Jean (Micheline), Sunday, 27 October 2002 18:41 (twenty-three years ago)
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 27 October 2002 22:48 (twenty-three years ago)
― Siegbran (eofor), Sunday, 27 October 2002 23:25 (twenty-three years ago)
01/02-model electroclash focuses on different artists and seems to have a different focus to the original formulation.
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Monday, 28 October 2002 04:41 (twenty-three years ago)
(To me this is like one of those charming little differences you note when you're a tourist.)
― nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 28 October 2002 07:18 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 28 October 2002 07:35 (twenty-three years ago)
no, I mean as music, or critically (by my estimation, at least, though I am a critic so I guess that term therefore applies)
Admittedly though the best hyped dance genres tend to justify their hype by having high wheat-to-chaff ratios - think hardcore/jungle 92-94, garage 98-01, microhouse 99-now.
spot on. I'll be a little more macro here and say that most electro has historically never been all that interesting/good--I can think of dozens of great hardcore/jungle tracks and relatively few great early-'80s electro ones outside of the usual suspects (Bambaataa, Baker/Robie productions, "Al-Naafiysh (The Soul)," a few others). so I'm not that surprised it's about the same now.
Can I just butt in that I non-sarcastically love discussions of dance music because of the scale of the time frames: "Yeah, that reminds me of that stuff that was big during the first week of November in 98, which I think was a really big influence even as far as the following January, not to mention the whole retro rivival that went on in mid-December.")
historically, this doesn't seem all that much different than, say, Swinging London circa '64-7, or peak Motown; the main difference is that home/bedroom recording makes it easier to bang trax out faster (as opposed to writing, arranging, rehearsing, recording, overdubbing a song w/a band, producer, session musicians), and that overall communications have gotten faster and faster. when you account for that difference it lines right up. (and you're right, it is exciting, and fun--that's one reason I love this stuff so much!)
― M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 28 October 2002 07:36 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 28 October 2002 07:59 (twenty-three years ago)
― M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 28 October 2002 08:25 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 28 October 2002 08:31 (twenty-three years ago)
But...but...that's just marketing talk!
― Siegbran (eofor), Monday, 28 October 2002 10:42 (twenty-three years ago)
i still think DMX Krew is far better at this stuff you know!
― gareth (gareth), Monday, 28 October 2002 11:38 (twenty-three years ago)
― gareth (gareth), Monday, 28 October 2002 11:40 (twenty-three years ago)
― ambrose (ambrose), Tuesday, 29 October 2002 16:47 (twenty-three years ago)