Kirk DeGeorgio vs Simon Reynolds FITE!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
WHAM! Simon Reynolds sideswipes at Kirk DeGeorgio (scroll down to the stuff about Soulboys)

OOF! Kirk strikes back!

THUNK! Simon comes back fighting!

(Included cos it's entertaining and also cos the whole debate touches on some stuff that's been relevant to ILM's semi-civil warz too)

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 29 October 2002 13:03 (twenty-three years ago)

PLUS BLISSBLOG.

Anonymous Ilxor: "I was reading on Simon Reynolds' blog the other day..."

Tim Finney: "Simon Reynolds' blog

!!! DETAILS"

david h (david h), Tuesday, 29 October 2002 13:06 (twenty-three years ago)

hahahahah! going to print this off and read this over lunch. i got an email over kirk the googler last year in regard to me commenting on his rebellious jukebox in the wire on 1471, his response:

"get it right, gilles peterson hangs round with ME"

fantastic!

gareth (gareth), Tuesday, 29 October 2002 13:07 (twenty-three years ago)

read the article now, and kirk makes a better first of it than i thought he would but he's definitely got the wrong end of the stick again.

not as bad as the wire article where he couldnt see what great records reinforced were making till they got 'jazzy' (ie, when they began to lose the greatness), this also doesnt exactly fit in with his "right place right time" credentials (the fact that kirk brings up 'hardcore' is laughable, unless he likes it now, now its safely away from suburban proles?)

and since when is discos lineage into house and techno downplayed? all we ever hear about is the loft and paradise garage and studio 54. still, i'm glad that kirks a disco fan (at least thats something we can agree on!!)

i'm certainly confused by all the jesus and mary chain fatboy slim bit, who cares about that! never seen this linked in, and dont see the relevance.

but simon is also wrong, in this:

it’s only your white connoisseur-custodian types, with their velvet-glove approach of fidelity and sickly reverence, who have hang-ups about brutalism and “bastardisation”.

derrick may was only one of many who slated the uk hardcore scene 1992 as a bastardization. 16 year old me could not agree with this then, and i cannot agree with mays comments to this day. and i remember some posse of mills, hawtin and someone else turning up to a jungle event in late93/early94 and being surprised by how good it was. well thanks for your patronage fellas! of course, they werent the only ones.

gareth (gareth), Tuesday, 29 October 2002 13:27 (twenty-three years ago)

oh, and kirks list of diverse artists is seriously rockist!

gareth (gareth), Tuesday, 29 October 2002 13:29 (twenty-three years ago)

B-b-but I said FITE! three days before you did, Tom!

Gareth it's possible it was Kirk's gf who degoogled and landed on 1471 -- he notes in his rebuttal that she was looking for press packet info for 21st Century SOUL a while back. I always figured it was the curator at the OPART hall of fame who did the degoogling.

Andy K (Andy K), Tuesday, 29 October 2002 13:31 (twenty-three years ago)

btw, heres a great article on Kirk

gareth (gareth), Tuesday, 29 October 2002 13:34 (twenty-three years ago)

That's the funniest thing I've seen for a while.

Roger Fascist (Roger Fascist), Tuesday, 29 October 2002 13:54 (twenty-three years ago)

Just to briefly hijack the thread - Andy K, in my Metro Area review for Uncut I did mention D-Train (and Sharon Redd, Vicki D, etc., in my as yet unpublished Church of Me director's cut) but I'm not sure whether the reference will make it to print. A damned good album, though.

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 29 October 2002 14:25 (twenty-three years ago)

Yeah Marcello, perhaps the dreaded word count limits have a lot to do with my perception of who knows what. Gareth, I did recall seeing lots of talk about the Loft, Paradise Garage, and Studio 54 when all those reissues were coming out (Nuphonic's Mancuso comps, Strut's Levan bonanza, Kenny Carpenter's Studio 54 thing). Aside from the flag wavers who treat it as nothing more than gospel (totally sidestepping the fact that disco, boogie, and electronic-based R&B '70s-'80s is some of the funnest and most cathartic music out there), there doesn't seem to be many journalists who have much knowledge about it. Degiorgio's got a point, but when people such as himself and T. Farley take such a dry, joyless approach to all of that, it's no wonder younger people don't want to pick up on it.

Andy K (Andy K), Tuesday, 29 October 2002 14:39 (twenty-three years ago)

i suppose this is another evolution vs revolution or schism vs continuity type thing (i'm more in the evolution thing, gradual steps, but then many mini-revolutions perpetually rising and falling)

what is interesting is that many of the continuity "it wasnt a shock when house broke big in 87/88 because i was playing stuff blah blah" types viewed rave (in its 91/92) incarnation as a schism, as a break, but something to be shunned, something juvenile and bastardized. since many of the rave people went on to become big time players in jungle, the continuity types have had to reel those comments back in a little

(ie, if its all traced back to hancock et al, then why were you saying the opposite when hackney hardcore and criminal minds records were being released??????????????)

gareth (gareth), Tuesday, 29 October 2002 14:52 (twenty-three years ago)

Did anyone see this?:

http://getretarded.topcities.com/gr5/page26.html

Oh the irony! and all that

Keith McD (Keith McD), Wednesday, 30 October 2002 09:51 (twenty-three years ago)

For those who can't be bothered reading it:

Kirk hates Throbbing Gristle cuz they're white and got no soul or whatever.

But Kirk sampled Throbbing Gristle without realising it.

Ho ho ho!

Keith McD (Keith McD), Wednesday, 30 October 2002 10:14 (twenty-three years ago)

This *FITE* is rather like two maiden aunts arguing about who should pour the tea.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 30 October 2002 10:30 (twenty-three years ago)

Both of them are doing a wonderful job of myopically viewing the whole debate and selectively reading the other's argument.

someone dedicated to loving black music so well, so meticulously, so exhaustively, so exhaustingly, that it makes up for the failure to have been born black in the first place.

Since when were Aphex Twin and the Black Dog black, anyway?

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 30 October 2002 11:31 (twenty-three years ago)

"Since when were Aphex Twin and the Black Dog black, anyway?"

Actually I don't think this totally vitiates Simon's argument - considering the context that Aphex Twin and Black Dog first appeared in, they may as well have been awarded honorary black status, or at the very least honorary Detroit status.

eg. according to hardcore-phobes Black Dog was the other "secret influence", along with Carl Craig's "Bug in the Bassbin", that kickstarted jungle - a rather weak attempt at getting around the conundrum that Gareth cited earlier. Now admittedly I can see *some* links between early Black Dog and jungle, but it's like saying that butterflies are the cause of tornadoes.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Wednesday, 30 October 2002 12:50 (twenty-three years ago)

everyone negates how 'indirect' these influences are...Black Dog's influence of jungle is as tenuous as 808 State's - we know Roni Size, Doc Scott, S.U.A.D., A Guy Called Gerald, 4 Hero and the like were into that shit but no more than they were ragga and hip hop

luminaries like Derrick May had a massive INDIRECT influence on me - in that i loved techno from the start but i didnt know/care/realise who/what Derrick May and 'strings of life' were until 1995 when i started reading dance magazines like Muzik on a monhtly basis and they really pushed the heritage and anal retention angles much further than any dance mag had before

blueski, Wednesday, 30 October 2002 13:59 (twenty-three years ago)

Actually I don't think this totally vitiates Simon's argument - considering the context that Aphex Twin and Black Dog first appeared in, they may as well have been awarded honorary black status, or at the very least honorary Detroit status.

The more I think about it, actually, the more uncomfortable I am with separating music into "white" and "black" music - especially when it comes to techno and most of what sprouted off from it... this is (grits teeth before uttering the word) urban music, and urban culture is SHARED, and in terms of most of the influences and much of the fanbase and the people making the music, techno is as much white music as it is black music to me. I suspect Reynolds himself would agree, which is why this also bothers me:

I'm sure Kirk was so SC he’s never once picked up NME in his entire life (just Echoes and Blues & Soul, ‘course). But when he tells us how as a youngster he liked “disco, soul, jazz funk, rap, electro” and didn’t like “punk, ska, new wave or indie”, he does remind me of the soulcialist creed that only black music was valid (plus a smattering of music made by whites in utter obeisance to “black” values).

I don't refute the allegation that such Soulboys exist, but surely it's possible just NOT TO LIKE the sound of punk, ska, new wave or indie (why is ska lumped in with 'white' music in Reynold's mind anyway, it seems to me to have as much to do with "black" music influences as "white" influences, if not more so?) without being labelled some kind of inverse racist? Punk, new wave and indie aren't really sonically THAT dissimilar to each other, after all.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 30 October 2002 14:49 (twenty-three years ago)

Who the fuck is Kirk DeGeorgio, anyway?

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 30 October 2002 14:50 (twenty-three years ago)

And the more I think about this argument the more I feel that this epitomises the thing I dislike the most about Reynold's writing from time to time, which is his tendency to shoehorn people, music and other things into little compartmentalised theoretical boxes and keep them there. This is why I think DeGeorgio is in some ways justified in taking offence, and why I find Reynolds' "aah, see, he's classic soulboy through and through!" reply so inadequate.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 30 October 2002 15:01 (twenty-three years ago)

Reynolds original article was insightful but also too cynical, bloody-minded and pessimistic too often i thought.

blueski, Wednesday, 30 October 2002 16:13 (twenty-three years ago)

I think one of the problems is that "soulboy" as a recognisable style tribe pretty much died out in the late 80s. It's a problem for Simon cos it leads to him refighting battles he was probably fighting back in the Monitor days against an 'enemy' that may well not even exist; and it's a problem for Kirk because if he is trying to apply soulboy values (and disses) to the new era he's likely to find himself adrift.

Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 30 October 2002 16:41 (twenty-three years ago)

well presumably this is why the whole tussle is about 'influence'

gareth (gareth), Wednesday, 30 October 2002 16:43 (twenty-three years ago)

Why does the colour of the (straw man) connosieur - custodian types matter so much to SR?

The other thing I have to say about this is that when SR lays into '"mod" ...as a perennial space in the sociocultural field of possibilities', he's right in identifying a thing but he's ridiculously wide of the mark in everything he says about it. But that's likely because it means a lot to me and he's hated it for ever.

Tim (Tim), Wednesday, 30 October 2002 16:57 (twenty-three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.