Joan of Arc - C/D?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
This band has some terrible wanky boring, unlistenable crap. But I contend that How Memory Works is a damn fine album.

Jonathan Williams (ex machina), Friday, 1 November 2002 14:52 (twenty-one years ago) link

I saw them once and found them to be a total dud. I don't think I've listened to an entire album, though, so who knows. Maybe there's something to 'em.

^Diego^ (dhadis), Friday, 1 November 2002 16:44 (twenty-one years ago) link

previously on ilm

gareth (gareth), Friday, 1 November 2002 16:55 (twenty-one years ago) link

TFD (stands for Total Fuckin' Dud).

hstencil, Friday, 1 November 2002 17:29 (twenty-one years ago) link

ZZZZZZZZZ

brg30 (brg30), Friday, 1 November 2002 17:33 (twenty-one years ago) link

So Dud they've gone right past Classic and back to Dud again.

Nick Mirov (nick), Friday, 1 November 2002 18:42 (twenty-one years ago) link

I thought the first album was pretty good if listened to all the way through in a sitting. Didn't like Memory. Hate Pitchfork.

Aaron A., Friday, 1 November 2002 19:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

The stuff I've heard by him is pretty but nothing to crow about. The rampant pretentiousness alone (despite the assurances of a friend that it's actually a parody of pretentiousness) makes it all fairly dud.

wl (wl), Friday, 1 November 2002 19:20 (twenty-one years ago) link

one year passes...
Two records from 2003, "So Much Staying Alive and Lovelessness" and "In Rape Fantasy and Terror Sex We Trust" are quite enjoyable though demanding light-dark counterparts. Joan of Arc are pretentious and while funny, the art posturing of the music, lyrics, packaging and inerview sound bites are not gestures toward a parody of anything but the moves are pretty damn interesting nonetheless. If you give them time and are inclined to enjoy such things, Kinsella and co. effectively satisfy the Brechtian goals of the Godard films they've been known to reference; their work draws attention to the form of language, music, and media.
"Terror Sex" straddles this odd tightrope between falling completely apart and sounding all tight together. Mike Kinsella's drums always come in at this odd delay past when you'd expect them to. In its deliberate offness, you think about what together sounds like. It's a neat effect. Annoying and embarrassing when I first heard it but rewarding and revealing upon each successive listen.
"Happy 2001 and 1984," track 2 on "Terror Sex" is probably the most audacious post-Patriot act Bush Administration protest song to come out and yes it's something you might be a little bit embarrassed to write and sing yourself. The ghostly brat, high whiny background vocals are a nice weapon utlized here and elsewhere by Joan of Arc. Another of the tiny ticks and pops they supply that you can't really get from other artists currently.
You might argue that JOA have nothing to say and that's difficult to argue since their efforts (musical,lyrical) seem geared towards the overarching statement "we have nothing to say, and we're saying it" but that becomes the point then doesn't it? Their efforts in saying nothing are thoughtful, varied, surprising, and disturbingly relevant to current American culture and I can't wait to see what they come up with next. You should all not wait along with me.

theodore fogelsanger, Saturday, 6 March 2004 19:57 (twenty years ago) link

I wrote the most negative review I've ever written of anything about their album The Gap, for Magnet. A year later, they interviewed the frontman, and read the review back to him, asking what he thought. He was pretty cool about it.

Phil Freeman (Phil Freeman), Saturday, 6 March 2004 22:37 (twenty years ago) link

I read somewhere that Tim Kinsella said that he's only listened to The Gap once since completion, after the first pressing. He apparently thinks they took Pro Tools editing too far. I've only heard a few songs from it but "Black Pants Make Cat Hairs Disappear," "Knife Fights Every Night," and "Me and America (The united Colors of the Gap)" are all neat songs. I guess my cleares statement on JOA is that hey use pretentiousness, art project gestures, in the way a brechtian would use melodramatic excess.. They don't really get much credit for being as interesting as they are.

theodore fogelsanger, Thursday, 11 March 2004 05:15 (twenty years ago) link

Saw them live at some point and they were god-awful. they had an anti-Iraq war song that was so bad, I might change my party affiliation and vote for Bush just to spite Tim Kinsella. It would make my dad happy, tho.

dieblucasdie (dieblucasdie), Thursday, 11 March 2004 05:47 (twenty years ago) link

We played with them once and they were kind of assholes.

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Thursday, 11 March 2004 06:09 (twenty years ago) link

They aren't assholes, they were being ironic. They were trying to make you question the asshole dialectic.

christhamrin (christhamrin), Thursday, 11 March 2004 08:04 (twenty years ago) link

His brother Mike makes much better music as American Football or Owen.

Chris 'The Velvet Bingo' V (Chris V), Thursday, 11 March 2004 13:37 (twenty years ago) link

eight years pass...

listening to "the gap" for the first time in probably 10 years, used to be pretty into this album. it's like 50 percent terrible crap and 50 percent beautiful

^ literally as i was typing this, he sang "with your asshole scabbed oveeeerrrr..."

congratulations (n/a), Monday, 17 September 2012 17:45 (eleven years ago) link

that 50/50 ratio pretty much describes most of the Joan of Arc stuff, i used to ride so hard for this stuff at one point. Basically everything from A Portable Mode of... through So Much Staying Alive.... Kept picking up like every other album after that, but really never got into them as much as that initial run.

heated debate over derpy hooves (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 17 September 2012 17:48 (eleven years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.