I got this in May and I liked it well enough but it was maybe a bit neat and mid-tempo and coffee-table and things. Whereas now it sounds twinkly and snowscape-y and almost-kind-of-Vespertine-y, but perhaps warmer-bonfire-pre-Christmas-autumn-winter, rather than post-Christmas-new-year-snow-bleak-clean. The twinkliness is what keeps me coming back to it, fantastical music-box sounds are buried under every track and it pulsates and sighs and things. I like it a lot more now, btw.
So, yes.
― alexfack, Friday, 1 November 2002 23:50 (twenty-one years ago) link
two months pass...
The title track is a classic, all exhaustion-pipes beats, eletro-filters and icy euro delivery.
the rest is what Death In Vegas should have come up with ages ago. IMO, one of the few chill-out-ish album sustaining repeated attentive listens. While the song-writing is often only average, some of the sounds and the overall sonic textures is excellent.
The whole thing definitely relies a lot on pre-conceived ideas of 'cool', in a bleak-industrial-Berlin kinda way, but it's solid enough to live up to them.
Not essential by any means, but one of the better electronic song-y efforts of the year
― Fabrice Terrac (Fabfunk), Thursday, 9 January 2003 13:29 (twenty-one years ago) link
I traded back a bunch of CDs recently, and this was the one I had the hardest time deciding to let go of. I gave it one last chance, listening to it in the car on the way to Amoeba. I wanted to like it, it builds up some attractively moody textures, as Fabrice says. But I guess the programming seems a bit lazy to me: once those textures are set up they don't really sustain my interest, or evolve in interesting ways, or become the foundation for a well-written song in some more conventional sense.
Plus too many tracks in the second half of the disc use this really piercing glockenspiel-ish sound that's up really high in the mix (boosted so high it even clips). If my ears are going to bleed, I want it to be for something more interesting than this.
I decided I actually liked the preceding release, Afterglow, a bit better for its superior songwriting, even though I see why folks complain it's bland. Anyway, I traded them both back and I don't miss them.
― Paul in Santa Cruz (Paul in Santa Cruz), Thursday, 9 January 2003 17:18 (twenty-one years ago) link
There's something missing about this album. What I really don't understand is if Keith Tenniswood produced the music, what in god's name did Dot do apart from sing a few looped vocals and strum the odd guitar? "I Think I Love You" is the only track that really stood out for me but otherwise it's pretty mediocre.
― dog latin (dog latin), Thursday, 9 January 2003 18:04 (twenty-one years ago) link