THOUGHTS?
― Jonathan Williams (ex machina), Monday, 16 December 2002 22:58 (twenty-three years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 16 December 2002 23:13 (twenty-three years ago)
― ddd, Monday, 16 December 2002 23:37 (twenty-three years ago)
― Chris P (Chris P), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 00:22 (twenty-three years ago)
but if something's priced X, then someone gets to buy it for X... even if it's really supposed to be less than X. ... that's fair business. you have to stand by your display in a physical store. it's the business's fault.
how is that ripping anyone off?m.
― msp, Tuesday, 17 December 2002 04:33 (twenty-three years ago)
― original bgm, Tuesday, 17 December 2002 05:44 (twenty-three years ago)
― phil jones (interstar), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 15:06 (twenty-three years ago)
― Jonathan Williams (ex machina), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 15:13 (twenty-three years ago)
It usually helps to cite actual legal code (if you cand find it.) Don't say you're going to complain to the better business bureau because they don't fucking care .. tell them you're going to complain to the attorney general (in whatever state they're operating.)
― dave225 (Dave225), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 15:28 (twenty-three years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 17:19 (twenty-three years ago)
I could totally be wrong here, but I don't think you have to stand by a misprinted price sticker in a physical store. If there is such a law, then it is a stupid law; you should have to inform the customer of the proper price and let the customer decide whether to buy it or not.
If you had an ad in the paper with a ludicrous price used to draw people in then I wouldn't be surprised to find that you would have to stick to that price, but that seems more like a truth-in-advertising situation rather than a simple mislabelling.
It's not as if Sam Goody were advertising their low low price. Although I've heard some people argue that it was intentionally mispriced to get some word-of-mouth advertising and drive people to the site. But, really, anyone who saw the price and thought that it wasn't a misprint and that they actually intended to sell the box set at that price is an idiot. It was clearly a mistake.
― Chris P (Chris P), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 18:20 (twenty-three years ago)
It's a huge wives' tale that they have to stick to the mislabelled price. As long as they don't try to keep your money and force you to pay the difference, they've done nothing illegal.
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 18:25 (twenty-three years ago)
― dave225 (Dave225), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 18:28 (twenty-three years ago)
― Horace Mann, Tuesday, 17 December 2002 18:57 (twenty-three years ago)