― Lord Custos Omega (Lord Custos Omega), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 03:35 (twenty-three years ago)
― bob zemko (bob), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 03:38 (twenty-three years ago)
― Honda (Honda), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 03:41 (twenty-three years ago)
― Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 04:23 (twenty-three years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 04:25 (twenty-three years ago)
Rephrasing the Question(s):MC Paul Barman: Classic or Dud, Search and Destroy?Mike Skinner: Classic or Dud, Search and Destroy?
― Lord Custos Omega (Lord Custos Omega), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 04:35 (twenty-three years ago)
― Mark (MarkR), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 06:20 (twenty-three years ago)
― Nordicskillz (Nordicskillz), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 11:06 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 12:15 (twenty-three years ago)
up until i heard the new MCPB, i was with him. at some point he reached self-satisfaction saturation and stopped talking about...anything sensical. "i've got a very goth towel/a terry cloth cowl"?! not once, but TWICE on an album?
― your null fame (yournullfame), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 14:33 (twenty-three years ago)
I don't know, PB's album is funny the first time, if you're very drunk, as I was. After that, you hear him singing "Paulellujah" and think 'what did I like about this again?"
Skinner, on the other hand, I can't get enough of. I'm not sure what the big difference is, but I think it has to do with Skinner not being a total tool.
So, for once, I'm actually gonna take a side instead of say "well, they both have their merits" and all that bullsnot, and totally side with Skinner.
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 14:42 (twenty-three years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 14:53 (twenty-three years ago)