Put on your tinfoil hats, folks. This is going to be a rough ride.
(courtesy
Everything2.com)
No human artists have appeared in the Top 40 music chart for the past 5 years(idea) by fondue (7.6 hr) (print) ? 2 C!s Mon Jan 29 2001 at 23:04:26It's true. By the end of the 1980's, the major record labels had every element of the pop "formula" filed away in their archives. After reaching a covert agreement with the recording artists unions, there began a systematic decommissioning of human acts from the singles chart. It takes teams of highly trained engineers to perfect the illusion that the bands in the modern Top 40 are real.
They have many tools at their disposal : sampling, session musicians (now more or less phased out), genetic algorithms, statistical analysis of sales figures matched to characteristics of the waveforms of tens of thousands of songs. Live appearances are generally staged in an aircraft hangar with the artists and crowd digitally manipulated to suit the executives' aims (for instance the addition of Pepsi logos to every available surface, and the erasing of unsightly audience members).
Some acts are a kind of "in-joke" between the (now retired) artists and the engineers. For instance Sean "Puffy" Combes (a heavily tweaked version of the MC Hammer model, incorporating procedural texturing to render his ridiculous fur coats) was designed to amuse Sting. Jennifer Lopez was put together by Pixar. Ronan Keating (a kind of replicant built from the DNA of Terry Wogan, with the mind of a gibbon) was an early experiment in boyband cell division (as explained by RalphyK here). Countless other "musicians" are built by picking and mixing elements of past performers and adding new, media-friendly twists.
More information about this Illuminati plot will be posted as I find it...
This is obviously the rantings of a madman...but how long before a truly virtual popstar could be pulled off? The Japanese have at least one completely virtual Idoru. And between Milli Vanilli and the film S1m0ne we can see how it can be successfully implimented?
Any thoughts?
― Lord Custos Omega (Lord Custos Omega), Monday, 23 December 2002 21:49 (twenty-three years ago)
If this were true, we'd have better pop music.
We don't, therefore it can't be
― phil jones (interstar), Monday, 23 December 2002 21:58 (twenty-three years ago)
reads almost like a short pop-rewrite of Viktor Pelevin's 'Generation P'
― t\'\'t (t\'\'t), Monday, 23 December 2002 22:55 (twenty-three years ago)
Kraftwerk made the same point and are more fun to listen to than this was to read.
― Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 23 December 2002 23:01 (twenty-three years ago)