So... Amnesiac

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
To my joy I found this lying on my doormat this very morning and I think I'm enjoying it so far. I don't recall seeing this album come up so far but if it has forgive me. I realise Radiohead albums are fast becoming a contentious (and perhaps slightly done-to-death) subject, but: I'd like to hear what you kids make of this. Better than Kid A? A step in the wrong direction? Best thing they've done? Or jut average?

Dog Latin, Tuesday, 5 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I've been trying and failing to write about this bloody album for weeks now. My plan tonight is to get drunk and just write a vicious unedited splurge (maybe I can divide the 'sessions' for my review into an 'experimental' article and a 'straightforward' one, ho ho).

My first impressions I remember quite clearly were that it was a good modern pop album.

Tom, Tuesday, 5 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Why was it lying onyoru doorstep? Youshould be so lucky...I get sweet fa!

Mike Hanley, Tuesday, 5 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Mike: I ordered it online - see!

Dog Latin, Tuesday, 5 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Disagree: It sounds like umm...if you have the flu and you are hearing Al Jolson songs in your head during a hallucintory state. Clearly, it is crap.

ty@hotmail.com, Tuesday, 5 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

if you have the flu and you are hearing Al Jolson songs in your head during a hallucintory state

I haven't heard it yet, but what a fantastic description! It almost makes me want to buy it.

But til I actually hear anything off it, I will keep my distance. I can't help but regard them w/a little suspicion.

Nicole, Tuesday, 5 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Can't wait to hear it when they've completed it.

tarden, Tuesday, 5 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I have bearshared a few tracks. I like pyramid song, its got many layers or interest. But some tracks I think are not even from the album. They sound liek Catherine Wheel

Mike Hanley, Tuesday, 5 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Based on my one listening last week, a very enjoyable album, though much more fragmented than _Kid A_. Nice to have clear studio versions of songs they've been doing live for a while now, to be sure. Another winner from that lot, in sum (and since Thom Y. appears to only sing on about half the tracks, indulge in the instrumentals if you like). I should also state clearly that I'm one of those apparently rare people who actually likes "Amnesiac/Morning Bell" as much as the original.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 5 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

And the backlash always comes...

Personally (while I've only heard it via Napster), it sounds to me just like A Radiohead Album. Not an album where they're trying to find their footing (Pablo Honey, The Bends), not an album where they're trying to "push the envelope" (OK Computer, Kid A). Just a regular ol', relaxed, big- fuckin'-deal Radiohead album. The closest they've come to A Radiohead Album since The Bends (which I like, despite their tendency to hit the U2 Bombast pedal too often), except that the "weirdness" that typifies their later work comes more naturally in this context. (See "Pyramid Song" for the most obvious example.)

If you're expecting profundity or Big Statements or something to change the world...well, don't hold your breath. If you want (as Tom puts it, and I'm paraphrase) a good album with good songs, buy Amnesiac. It's as simple as that.

David Raposa, Tuesday, 5 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Sorry, that was a cheap shot. Do I see a pattern developing (career- wise if not sonically) - Kid A = Low, Amnesiac = Heroes? ("Career suicide" album using fragmentation as a motif, then expanding on said fragmentation)

tarden, Tuesday, 5 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

it's the goodest album i'd ever hearded.

if you don't agree you are wrong.

harri, Tuesday, 5 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

It's going to be very difficult for someone else to claim that it isn't the best album you've ever heard, Harri. :)

My take: The first few listens of "Pyramid Song" failed to make an impression, then suddenly it clicked and became one of the most gorgeous songs in the world. Expand that to the album, where the only song I immediately embraced was "Pull/Pulk Revolving Doors" and you've got it; initially off-putting music that suddenly becomes intensely intimate and wonderful the instant you turn your back.

Dan Perry, Tuesday, 5 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Fairly nice really, is that "Amnesiac", so it is.

Dave, Tuesday, 5 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

You betrayed us. You lied to us. You said you’d be going back to guitars. Everything back to normal. That’s what you told us. You lied.

Back to tunes. That’s what you said. OK Computer 2. At least we thought that’s what you said. That’s how it read. That’s how it came across. But you lied. You betrayed us.

No tunes. No guitars. Nothing you can whistle and strum on your tennis racket to. You’re here because of us. I was 16 when OK Computer came out. How could you do this to us? Not give us what we expect? What we demand? As fans?

It’s crap. No tunes. Moaning about nine revolutions. And warm guns in the road. You should’ve held on to Pete Best. I was 14 when A Hard Day’s Night came out.

Pseudo-avant garde. Pretend kindergarten minimalism/maximal noise blockade. How can anyone familiar with Cardew’s Great Learning fall for this conservative manifesto donning the colours of radicalism? Compared with the meisterwerks of Mille Plateaux – with which you should be thoroughly familiar, otherwise we will cancel your subscription as you are unworthy – it grasps but cannot grip. Ornette in ’72. Miles also ahead. Thomas Koner’s big freeze. This is as nothing in comparison. I was 19 when Dancing In Your Head came out.

I’m a hypocrite. I bang on about Abbey Road and Blonde on Blonde pushing the envelope. Someone’s doing it now. But I can’t stand it. Sid didn’t die for Yorke. So I’m going to slate it. Lose 70% of the readership. But I can’t help it. It was all over after ’68. That’s what the demographics say. Me and my army. Get your knives out if you want. I was 15 when Revolver came out. Minus Zero have some great Pearls Before Swine ESP CDs in stock (Italian 1995 gatefold reissue).

I’m 22. It confuses me. I can’t have a barbecue with this in the background. Humphrey Lyttelton? Whom are they kidding? We want to listen to things which are real and cosy and comforting. Travis. Muse. Coldplay. They’ve seized the baton. And the tunes. Not to mention the guitars. That’s what it’s all about. I was 12 when Nevermind came out.

This is completely boring self-pitying crap. You can do better than this. Where are all the jokes? The pisstakes? Jools Holland? Now that was funny. Now you’re just whingeing. Middle-class overgrown student angst. Who gives a fuck what you think about it? Remember what you’re good at. I was 31 when Writing On The Wall came out.

I’m not what you think. Much of the time I’m scared. Much of the time I feel as though I am living for nothing. How can you live without certainty and yet not be paralysed by fear? But at least I’m honest. And it moves me. More than Missy. Easier than Elbow. Doubt is there, there’s no doubt. It exists and it has to be listened to. Don’t forget. I was happy when it came out.

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 5 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

LP token winner!!

mark s, Tuesday, 5 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

You've probably got about 10 different magazines and individual journalists and styles of journalism in there, Marcello. Great, naturally.

Robin Carmody, Tuesday, 5 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

but what do you think, marcello?

fred solinger, Tuesday, 5 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Radio who?

Shaun Kemp, Tuesday, 5 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

killed the dvd star....

ty@hotmail.com, Tuesday, 5 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I think that Marcello has probably summed up the entire "sell-out/no sell-out" hypothesis in a couple of words - lest not the entire history of pop music.

I have had this album a day now and fuck it - I like it. After reading Marcello's post - who gives a shit what journos, students, punks, prog-rockers, sixties revivalists, nu-metallers, Britpop nostalgists, Warpheads and Indiekids think? This album may not be the best album ever made, nor the best album Radiohead ever made, but it is still a good album - and as mentioned earlier, it sounds, for once, like Radiohead being Radiohead - as they want to be.

Sorry for the amount of hyphens and length of that last sentence - i've just been down the pub and linguistic syntax isn't my stronogest point right now.

Dog LAtin, Tuesday, 5 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

"It is still a good album" isn't an objective fact, you know...

Marcello is my new personal hero though, and that is an objective fact.

Ally, Tuesday, 5 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Why are people surprised that Amnesiac sounds like Kid A when they were recorded at the same time? It seems pretty clear thats the reason it doesn't sound like such a dramatic departure as did OKC compared to the Bends or Kid A compared to OKC.

I have listened to it once all the way through and it kicked my ass. Tracks 3 and 5 I like the best.

bnw, Tuesday, 5 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I think some of that reaction in the press, at least, may be down to the fact that some people were still really really anticipating (for some reason - didn't they get enough warning?) a "back to guitars" record.

Read some more disappointed-fannish-type reviews tonight, very sadly humorous and also perfectly illustrative of what I'm guessing lots of fans' reactions to the album have been / will be like. Mumblings about another-rubbish-electronic-"song", etc.

Josh, Wednesday, 6 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Well, among the hardcore fans (whom I spend most of my time among), it's being touted as their best. There are a few dissenters, always. But actually most of the dissenters are Kid A lovers who don't feel that the album flows well. And then a very few "Where the fuck are the guitars? Those traitors!" fans.
Me, while I know I love the album, I'm not sure where I'd rank it in relation to their other albums yet. It most surely has some of the best work they've ever done on it.

Melissa W, Wednesday, 6 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Actually the complaint is more along the lines of "Where are the melodies? Why don't Radiohead rock out anymore?" Because quite clearly there's quite a bit of guitar on Amnesiac...
Other complaints include: "ruining" Life in a Glasshouse, "half- formed Aphex Twin filler/drivel," and "I don't like this jazz nonsense."
Oh well.

Melissa W, Wednesday, 6 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I really think Like Spinning Plates, Life in a Glasshouse, Pyramid Song, and Dollars & Cents are among their best ever songs. You and Whose Army?, Packt Like Sardines in a Crushd Tin Box, Pull/Pulk Revolving Doors, and I Might Be Wrong are fantastic as well. Knives Out and The Morning Bell/Amnesiac are just kind of "eh," while Hunting Bears is a pleasant enough interlude that is effective in the album sequence. That's my opinion so far. So, their best? Maybe. A step in the right direction? With songs like Like Spinning Plates, definitely. It's a bit of a mess, but a glorious mess.

Melissa W, Wednesday, 6 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I really really like "Life in a Glasshouse"! And "Dollars and Cents" might be my new favorite Radiohead song. I listened to it for the first time a couple of hours ago, and was very pleased, but I'm actually listening to in headphones as I write, and it is making a much stronger impact on me. I'm trying not to read reviews and get too swept up in hype--I think I burned myself on Kid A too fast (almost before it even came out), but like Josh said, the release date for this one really crept up on me. I've been listening to and exploring so much other stuff that I've had no time to anticipate Amnesiac. And I'm very glad of that. By the way, I also love this version of Morning Bell--byoootiful textures, more webby, less propulsive. Better? Who cares, it's damned cool. I must say, I'm really dreading the whole "Radiohead are saving Rock" baloney; who gives a shit? If you like the album, listen to it and let it tickle your cochlea, and stop designing crusades to join. I'd be hard- pressed to call Amnesiac "rock" anyway, although I'm not sure exactly what I mean by that yet.

Clarke B., Wednesday, 6 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

reading all the above, i sort of wish i actually cared about radiohead one way or the other. how anyone can either love or hate this band i just don't know...

marcello's post rocked though.

gareth, Wednesday, 6 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Dammit, BF played two sides of it, then squirrelled it away somewhere behind a stack of Pulp singles. Dammit, there was one song it I really liked, as well. Going to go dig it out and listen to it and tell you what it was in a moment.

I do have to say, I'm glad it wasn't a "oh well, we'll give the fans what they really want" concession after all. Kind of makes me have a bit more respect for them after all. If you want to make unlistenable noise, by all means make unlistenable noise if that's what you want to do! Anyway...

masonic boom, Wednesday, 6 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I wish they'd hung on and made it a double. Both albums individually don't really flow for me, and there's far too much filler to make them consistently good (although, of course, no-one agrees on what the filler is).

However, I sequenced the two as a double yesterday, mixing and matching tracks from both records, and it works brilliantly. Going in prepared for the 90-minute long haul, rather than a 40-minute quick fix, makes me much more able to treat each track as 'just another Radiohead track' rather than tablets of stone and actually improves every track for me.

John Davey, Wednesday, 6 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Just curious, how did you sequence this double album? What tracks did you include?

Melissa W, Wednesday, 6 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Ok, I've listened to it once and am on my second try. First impression: WHOEVER INVENTED THE 10" VINYL FORMAT IS A FUCKING SADIST!!! OK, that is the BF's fault for being a DJ vinyl slob, but honestly! The PROBLEM with vinyl is that you have to get up halfway through the record to turn it over. When you stick it on two 10"s then you end up having to get up THREE times to listen to the whole album all the way through.

This may be why my first complaint is that the album has no damned flow. It seems to be a bunch of disconnected outtakes stuck together. Which is, I guess, exactly what it is.

So far, the only song that has really grabbed me is "I Might Be Wrong" which is really odd cause it's the alt.country song and you know how I feel about alt.country being one of the evils of the universe. I *like* the few bleepy bits, I think they make the album hang together more, and be more sonically interesting. Otherwise, it just seems like a bunch of maudlin ballads strung together. Pyramid Song is almost unlistenable except for that bit at the end where the strings come in.

OK, I probably should give this more of a chance on a different format, but you know what? The new Appliance album just dropped on *our* doormat this morning, and I'd much rather listen to that. The apparent single, "Gentle Cycle Revolution" sounds a bit like Spiritualized. Ooooh, nice. And bits of New Order and stuff in there, makes me a much happier girl than Tom Yorke whinging.

masonic boom, Wednesday, 6 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Surely "I Might Be Wrong" is the indie-dance song, and "Hunting Bears" the alt.country one?

Tom, Wednesday, 6 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I meant, erm, vinyl SNOB, not vinyl slob. Mwah hah hah. Whoops, Freudian slip there.

masonic boom, Wednesday, 6 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Side two, song two. Damn this 10" vinyl. I guess it could sort of be indie dance (which is probably why I like it) but it's got slide guitar and swampy sort of feel. Paul called it alt.country, and he's the afficianado, so who am I to disagree?

masonic boom, Wednesday, 6 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Incidentally the title of this thread keeps making me think "Miss E....So Amnesiac", reconciling Mr Penman's two opposites in a cosmic union that plainly should (not) be.

Tom, Wednesday, 6 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Into my fourth listen and I'm far from convinced (more a 'Kid A'than a Radiohead fan). The giddy, woozy strings on the end of Pyramid Song don't make up for Thom's whining vocals. Pulk/Pull Revolving Doors is excellent, but hardly groundbreaking. The Faux-Jazz of 'Life in a Glass Hour' is just a bad pastiche surely, and being continually told 'why don't you quiet down' or 'I'm a reasonable man get of my case' remind me too much of a surely, disgruntled elderly relative you'd rather avoid. I'm intrigued by Tom's observation that its a good 'pop' record, rather than some great shock of the new, but so far so ..disappointing.

Stevo, Wednesday, 6 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

If I had to review something, I *wouldn't* be reading an evolving thread about it from a lot of people I knew and liked. Have you written it, Tom, or are you planning a Marcello, or are you just not easily swayed and/or bugged? If I think about who's going to read something, I sometimes get in a total panic.

Of course, you may just not like us.

mark s, Wednesday, 6 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I don't 'have' to review it in any professional sense so if the review doesn't happen, it doesn't happen. I dont read other people's stuff when I'm actually doing the writing but I don't mind doing it before - if somebody is really close to my opinions then that sometimes spikes the review, yeah.

The thing about web publishing is that you know pretty much exactly who's going to read a piece, unless that piece suddenly gets wider distribution.

Tom, Wednesday, 6 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

And of course I like you all enormously.

Tom, Wednesday, 6 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

We like you too, Tom! We really like you! (TM) Sally Fields

I forgot to mention that "Pulk/Pull Revolving Doors" is one of the best hip-hop tracks to come out this year.

Dan Perry, Wednesday, 6 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I've barely listened to the mp3 tracks from _Amnesiac_ that I do have - for some reason Radiohead never sound any better than ok on computer - but I was listening to _Kid A_ today and it struck me that yes, it really is a really good record. It's a very intimate close-up sort of album - feels like my head is in a glass box and someone is smearing vaseline on the outside of the panes. Not life-changing by any stretch of the imagination, but what rock records are these days?

But then I got my hands on _Rooty_ and all thoughts or cares about Radiohead promptly disappeared from my head. Yay for the Jaxx.

Tim, Wednesday, 6 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I actually got that over the weekend as well, Tim, and I thought the first couple of songs were great, as did Brian, but after that it seemed to waffle a bit.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 6 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Well _Remedy_ seemed the same way as well for quite a while (I remember that initially my enjoyment began to wane significantly after "Always Be There", despite the fact that "Same Old Show" is

Tim, Wednesday, 6 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

...obviously brilliant to me now. And "S.F.M." is the new object of my obsession - that *rhythm*, ye gods that RHYTHM! (sorry about the stretching over two posts).

Tim, Wednesday, 6 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Amnesiac: the first record I've bought while drunk and the first record I've listened to for the first time while slightly-less drunk at 1 am and the first record I've listened to in its entirety since being 19. Also, an exceptional album and quite the best thing Radiohead have ever done. I must remember that that I liked "OKC" and "Kid A" initially, too and then grew to become pretty much ambivalent about both of them, but they didn't sound *this* good. Also, it holds up during this morning's " morning-after" listening. "Life in a Glasshouse" recasts Mr. Yorke as the down-on- his-luck everyman while delivering Radiohead's first clear-as-glass political comment: "We're hungry for lynching again/What a strange mistake to make/ You should have turned the other cheek". I'm not sure what to make of the reinterpretation of "Morning Bell", though..I think it might have been more interesting if they'd have chopped it up and squashed its head more than they did. Everything else is wonderful. And I think RH have even learned a little *restraint*. I agree with Tom's earlier comments that Kid A seems willfully difficult and awkward by comparison. Also, why should it matter if "Pulk/Pull.." or any other track isn't *Groundbreaking*? I don't mind if Radiohead aren't the first do this, as long as they're doing it well. C'mon , it's a Pop record!

Mitch Lastnamewithheld, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Something else.. "Amnesiac" arrived on Tuesday and Timothy McVeigh's televised execution is scheduled for Monday. Normally I'd say the further Radiohead stray from obvious politics, the better- but in the light of this event, it certainly makes the themes of the album seem that much more poignant. From the desperation and cruelty of Knives Out ("Look into my eyes/ I'm not coming back" and "Cut him up") to the political challenges of "You and whose army?" and the aformentioned Life in a Glasshouse's call for privacy and pacifism ("but someone's listening", "We're hungry for lynching"), Radiohead seem to have something significant to say. Or am I reading too much into this? Could I be doing the same thing using choice quotes from any number of albums?

Mitch Lastnamewithheld, Friday, 8 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I think that's very possible, Mitch, very possible.

Josh, Friday, 8 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Josh- excuse my, how shall I put this, "Duh"-ness, put it's late here and I'm not sure if you mean it's possible that I might be somewhat correct about RH's intentions or it's possible that I'm taking the whole thing a bit too far. Save me the embarrasment and just use the words "former" or "latter".

Mitch Lastnamewithheld, Friday, 8 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

FWIW, I was thinking something similar, but I think it's pure coincidence that the album containing the (allegedly) anti-Blair "You And Whose Army?" has come out in the week of the UK election: the release date was probably set back when the election was still scheduled for May 3rd.

Robin Carmody, Friday, 8 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Latter.

Josh, Friday, 8 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

The new Appliance single is anus dust.

Dave, Saturday, 9 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Have heard nothing from Radiohead for years. Last night saw them live on TV. I imagine I can't have been the only one. I didn't like it: no surprise, I suppose. Did anyone else, and if so, why?

Other thing: I could swear that a few months ago, Radiohead were Tom E's betes noirs - he hated them about as much as he loves Britney Spears. And now he likes them - doesn't he? What's going on? This seems like a total volte-face - has it ever been remarked upon?

the pinefox, Sunday, 10 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

volte-faces rule

gareth, Sunday, 10 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Tom E...So Amnesiac!

i mean that i suddenly forgot radiohead were shit. pyramid song did the same for me. maybe i'll buy the tape and put it up next to my cassette of the bends.

ethan, Sunday, 10 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

In fact Tom has himself remarked much upon this, pinefox. See for example single reviews on NYLPM passim.

Josh, Sunday, 10 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

And I volte-faced in the same direction after hearing Kid A.

Robin Carmody, Sunday, 10 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

After my first listen to the actual album... Ned's right, Amnesiac doesn't flow nearly as well as Kid A, which ultimately might be the deciding factor in regards to which is the better album. And because of that, it feels more alienating than Kid A, despite the guitar numbers, because everything juts out at the listener at odd angles rather than mutating smoothly.

As for the songs themselves, there's a quite a bit of nice work on display. I never really distinguished between the use of the guitars and non-guitars, so I tend to judge on the basis of the sound of the music, which at times is really full and enveloping ("Pakt Like Sardines..." and "Morning Bell/Amnesiac" particularly) while at others is a bit thin and reedy - which doesn't hinder the perception of this as a bit of an outtakes album. Whatever, dunno what I'll eventually think of the whole thing a week or so.

I do find it interesting how the criticisms of the album often seem to use opposing arguments - on one hand saying "you promised us a rock song album and we *need* another one" while on the other saying "we don't *need* more stuff with a Warp/Mille Plateux bent"... As if there's an endless glut of IDM-rock in the world and a sorrowful dearth of guitar rock.

Certainly I reckon that the current place Radiohead are at is more singular and almost "necessary" (as in if they weren't working in this area than someone else would have to) than either their Bends or OK Computer incarnations, despite the ease with which we can point to their current influences. I can to that to any artist, and if it was all that was necessary to discredit them then Tanya's job would be too easy. If nothing else, Radiohead get my vote because there's a certain fan I know who's smug anticipation of a Travis-like return will have been replaced by a look of decidedly un-smug consternation.

Tim, Sunday, 10 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

A bit of self-celebration: Ryan Schreiber ends his rather dull review of Amnesiac with "Now if you'll pardon me, I have to go untie DiCrescenzo." When I wrote that silly parody of Brent's Kid A review that was posted on FT a while ago (I was anonymous then) I gave the next Radiohead album the title "Untied". I'm a quasi-prophet, then? Perhaps not.

Mitch Lastnamewithheld, Monday, 11 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

OK, I've been listening to the album for a couple of weeks now (We finally got a promo of the CD format, so I don't have to keep flipping the damned vinyl.) and I have some more impressions...

1) It still doesn't flow, it still doesn't have that sense of continuity. OK Computer had flow, that was part of what made it a great album for me. What this album sounds like, in fact what it probably *is* is a B-sides compilation. Any other band, when they record too many songs for a single album, usually throw the less strong but still releaseable material onto B-sides of singles. (IIRC, many of the OK Computer B-sides made it onto the startlingly brilliant "Airbag EP" in the States.) Radiohead didn't do singles for Kid A, yet they still wanted to release the extra material, hence Amnesiac.

2) Have spent a lot of time in the past few months thinking that Kid A was a less than stellar, rather average and ordinary album. This weekend, while waiting for soundcheck, the engineer was testing the sound system by playing some records. She put on something which slowly grabbed me, and had me thinking "wow, this is a really interesting record, I wonder what it is, some neat stuff going on here..." for a few songs before realising that it was Kid A. Heard out of the expected context of "we're going to listen to the Radiohead album now", and heard through a really good professional sound system, it suddenly seemed magical

3) I still think the new Appliance album is fantastic. Funny, because everyone has been telling me that it's not as good as the old one. Dug the old one out, and it was fairly average post-rock with bits of electronic bits added on almost as afterthought. The new album is much more cohesively mixed, guitar-and-electonics-based dronerock/post-rock rather than a band adopting an "IDM" (whee, I learn a new phrase every week on ILM) sound as an added gimmick. So there.

masonic boom, Monday, 18 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

This album is certainly best listened to through a good set of 'cans', otherwise the layered sounds on many of the tracks just disappears into the ether, and the magic inevitably fades somewhat. Now this makes the album a bit of a solitary listen, but isn't this what Radiohead are all about? I mean, you're not going to get the album and phone all your mates to come round with crates of Stella and howl at the moon, now are you? This isn't your average, life- affirming, rock 'n' roll saviour music a la Oasis (good as that may be), this is something to really get your teeth into, something to love. I must admit, my liking for this album isn't helping my love life, what with me wanting to nip under the influence of 'Packt Like Sardines In a Crushd Tin Box' just ONE more time before we retire to bed, but the album is well worthy of my love. As far as Kid A comparisons go as has doubtlessly been pointed out upon this very bulletin-thingy, the songs come from the same sessions so what d'ya'll expect? Anyway, at least they sound original, inspiring and above all different. There can be nothing worse than a band trying to copy themselves in the vain hope they can recapture former glories by re-hashing the past. The only way is onward and upward, as The 'Head (d'oh!)have proved before, and will again. Oh...before I forget, the lines 'I'm a reasonable man/Get off my case' are perhaps the most beautiful I've heard for a long, long time. Don't ask me why, they kind of make me feel incredibly sad, but defiant whenever I hear (or think) of them. Feel free to lambast my sorry ass, as I'm sure you all will.

, Wednesday, 20 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I have now been listening to Amnesiac for nearly a week straight and goshdarnit, if the thing hasn't *grown* on me. More than grown on me, it's almost like it's permeated my brain like a vine. I keep taking it out the CD player and putting other things in, then taking them out again and replacing them with Amnesiac. Good Radiohead albums take over your life as well as your stereo. Yup.

It flows better on CD, that is for certain. (I blame 10" vinyl for my initial complaints.) I think it is some of Thom's best vocal work for ages... I don't care if I can't make out the lyrics, as I said in that there other thread, it's the *tone* and expressiveness of his voice that intrigues me. Kid A's vocals were buried, treated and half hearted. These are fully out there, even if it does sometimes come across as whinging.

And oh, the textures. I've even grown to like Pyramid Song for the way those strings appear. I can't even tell you which song is which, or which is my favourite, because the album has become one long song. My only complaint is still the cod jazz at the end, that has *not* grown on me.

This is better than Kid A. Their B-sides are usually better than the singles anyway... "Meeting In The Aisle", "Palo Alto", "How Can You Be Sure", etc.

masonic boom, Friday, 22 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Kate- try listening to 'Life in a Glasshouse' LOUD. Like Josh sez, it helps.

Mitch Lastnamewithheld, Friday, 22 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

And be drunk too, Kate. I can't empirically justify this at the moment but it seems like it ought to be a good drunk song.

Contrary to Kate, the songs seem really distinct to me. Perhaps the middle 3 get a little blended together, but for the most part I had them sorted apart in my head pretty well right off.

Josh, Friday, 22 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

ten years pass...

Dear Radiohead fans: time's up, please bring your copies of Amnesiac back to the library today or face a fine.

http://sleevage.com/radiohead-amnesiac/

(If only they'd been able to see into the future to realise that National Library Day was at the weekend, not today.)

White Chocolate Cheesecake, Monday, 6 February 2012 10:14 (twelve years ago) link

Oh I have that one!

It's alright, no-one put down that they wanted it next.

Mark G, Monday, 6 February 2012 11:00 (twelve years ago) link

It's similar to the one for "Piper at the gates of Dawn" which had a copy of "Fart Enjoy" by Syd enclosed.

Mark G, Monday, 6 February 2012 11:02 (twelve years ago) link

I have a completely different one! It says 30th May on it but I think that's the radio embargo date. Oddly I was just listening to this yesterday. It's the one I listen to the least, for deeply personal reasons. It's always better than I remember it bcuz of that.

White Chocolate Cheesecake, Monday, 6 February 2012 11:13 (twelve years ago) link

The only one I 'love' is KidA.

The rest, I 'like' or even (sigh) Respect...

But K, I hear that opening arpegio and go "yes....!"

Mark G, Monday, 6 February 2012 11:26 (twelve years ago) link

(K being short for "KidA" obviously, that reads somewhat unclear there)

Mark G, Monday, 6 February 2012 11:27 (twelve years ago) link

Some albums become so entangled with the memories of yr life that listening to them again is like opening a snapshot of a scenario from yr own life. It's strange, I never think of RH as one of my "favourite" bands at all, but it's that way that specific albums became so entwined with certain periods of my life (bcuz that album was maybe the go-to comfort food while in that trauma or transitional period) that they've become entwined with the tentacles of mine own memory. It's not a question of love or even like, as, this thing has become a part of me.

Wish I'd picked a better band to be that collective subconscious thing, but oh well.

White Chocolate Cheesecake, Monday, 6 February 2012 11:36 (twelve years ago) link

Well, is it like how the 'Beatles' were ever-present during the 60s?

For all that there were loads of bands and 'listeners' that did not like them, everything was based on the deviation from that 'normality'..

Massive generalisation, of course, but.

Mark G, Monday, 6 February 2012 11:47 (twelve years ago) link

Funny, I just saw the entry for "Treefingers" on Wiki:

The ambient track "Treefingers" contains no melody and is completely instrumental. Ed O'Brien pointed out in an interview that no synthesizers were used to make the song, and that it was all recorded on a guitar, after which it was cut and paste onto a sampler.

.. which was pretty much how I recorded the track I supplied for the ILX one-minute compilation, which was recorded about 10 years before KidA.

Mark G, Monday, 6 February 2012 12:01 (twelve years ago) link

one year passes...

Listening to this for the first time in probably a decade. What a killer album! Still far and away my favorite by them. "Knives Out" is the best kind of cloudy dour British anti-surf rock. Really looking forward to the last two tracks.

Fetchboy, Friday, 14 June 2013 05:18 (ten years ago) link

My least favourite between Ok Computer and In Rainbows, though I haven't given it as much attention as some of the others. Pyramid Song is incredible obviously, as is Dollars and Cents.

I wish to incorporate disco into my small business (chap), Friday, 14 June 2013 09:55 (ten years ago) link

one year passes...

I love Kid A and all their guitar albums (minus Pablo Honey), so why did it take me over a decade to like this?.. Why am I such a jerk?

Dreamland, Sunday, 29 June 2014 08:08 (nine years ago) link

I forgot all about this album.

StanM, Sunday, 29 June 2014 09:04 (nine years ago) link

I see what you did there.

Dreamland, Friday, 4 July 2014 01:59 (nine years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.