OH NO! Jessica Callan doesn't like The Streets! OH NO!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
From today's Daily Mirror

"So The Streets is the king of the UK music scene after scooping four nominations for The Brit Awards.
Well, I'm going to do the unthinkable and put my hand up and say I think rapper Mike Skinner is over-rated, depressing and totally talentless.It's the classic case of the emperor's new clothes. Or in this case, the emperor's new shell suit. The kids who hang out at the local youth club on my road can rap better. And at least have a sense of humour.
Music critics have dubbed the Birmingham lad a UK garage poet. Oh, please! Mikey boy made his debut album in his bedroom in Brixton with stolen equipment and raps about 21st century street culture and cutting edge topics as smoking weed, gezers, his local cafe and being on the dole.
How controversial of him. Whoever dubbed him the English Eminem needs to have their ears syringed. The only thing they have in common is that they're both skinny, pale boys with concave chests. At least Eminem has a sense of humour in his videos and pokes fun at other music stars. Even Skinner's name-The Streets-is a load of pretentious drivel. Oh, how tough and hard you are. Not.
Mike may be a spokesman for a generation whose life revolves around cheap booze, drugs and crime but as far as I'm concerned good music is about escapism, galmour and something you can dance to. Or listening to someone whose voice doesn't drone on and on tunelessly. Harry Enfield's comic creation Kevin the Teenager can rap better than Skinner.
Why cant he just cheer up? The miserable sod is threatening not to show up to The Brits ceremony on February 20 as it isn't his type of scene. How ungrateful can you get? It's not as if he's expected to do more than get drunk, jeer at his contemporaries and grunt into the microphone when he wins an award. Not exactly difficult.
I'd much rather see Ms Dynamite walking off with an armful of gongs. She, too, has four nominations and beat The Streets to the Mercury Music Prize last year. And at least the Londoner-who has firm anti-drug views-is gracious enough to show up to awards cermonies"

Michael B, Thursday, 16 January 2003 20:50 (twenty-three years ago)

When people who pride themselves on being average get stuff printed, part 125266256

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 16 January 2003 20:54 (twenty-three years ago)

And at least the Londoner-who has firm anti-drug views-is gracious enough to show up to awards cermonies

I like the presumption that to have anti-drug views and to want to show up to awards ceremonies means you're worthy of music awards. It says so much.

I take it Ms. Callan is not highly regarded by many.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 16 January 2003 20:54 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh come on, it was in the Mirror, what were you expecting? Troilus and Cressida?

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Thursday, 16 January 2003 20:55 (twenty-three years ago)

and yet to correctly call it..

insectifly (insectifly), Thursday, 16 January 2003 20:57 (twenty-three years ago)

Dom when I look in the mirror, I don't expect to be disgusted.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 16 January 2003 21:00 (twenty-three years ago)

you'll be blinded by The Sun instead

stevem (blueski), Friday, 17 January 2003 00:18 (twenty-three years ago)

The kids who hang out at the local youth club on my road can rap better. And at least have a sense of humour.

cor, she's down with the kids and everything!

godammit that entire article is a fucking disgrace, what an utterly clueless idiot of a hack.

stevem (blueski), Friday, 17 January 2003 00:20 (twenty-three years ago)

Granted that 98% of this screed misses the point, and she spends too much time trying to think up clever ways to say he sucks rather than describing specifically what she doesn't like about him, but am I the only one who found that "emperor's new shell suit" line kinda funny - even just a little bit?

o. nate (onate), Friday, 17 January 2003 03:12 (twenty-three years ago)

sorry, "emperor's new shell suit" - not talkXoRs, barely walXors

t''t, Friday, 17 January 2003 03:24 (twenty-three years ago)

yeah this article is dumb 4real but im with her on ms dynamite, my girl is hot like orange fire!! i still dont get the streets

s trife (simon_tr), Friday, 17 January 2003 03:28 (twenty-three years ago)

i finally heard the streets, it's crap.

keith (keithmcl), Friday, 17 January 2003 05:42 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh My God, when I heard the Dr. Evil "Hard Knock Life" parody in austin powers 3 I just fell about. His rapping sounded exactly like Mike Skinner. This Jessica Callan person is so right, but it feels like she's stating the obvious; it seems like it should be clear to anyone how bad the streets are. Why isn't it?

Dan I., Friday, 17 January 2003 06:13 (twenty-three years ago)

Mikey boy made his debut album in his bedroom in Brixton with stolen equipment

oh my god what a fucking idiotic thing to say. still, the day i look to The Mirror for top tips on hot! new! tunes is the day i put a small ad in the classifieds saying "for sale - reputation; one careless owner".

Charlie (Charlie), Friday, 17 January 2003 06:36 (twenty-three years ago)

it seems like it should be clear to anyone how bad the streets are. Why isn't it?

One of life's great mysteries. Definitely the worst shit I heard all year.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Friday, 17 January 2003 07:01 (twenty-three years ago)

all the people who call the Streets crap had better figure out why or else no one will remember to think that the Streets are crap, because too many other people have made the opposite case with really good and interesting actual reasons, not least of whom Mike Skinner himself, on the album

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 17 January 2003 07:19 (twenty-three years ago)

wow--when I write about records without listening to them I get yelled at by my editors. guess things are different in England, huh?

M Matos (M Matos), Friday, 17 January 2003 07:31 (twenty-three years ago)

duh!

James Blount, Friday, 17 January 2003 08:28 (twenty-three years ago)

Okay, JC is one of the 3am Girls, which for you Americans, think of 3am as Page Six without ALL THOSE DIFFICULT BIG WORDS and about bad soap/boyband stars instead of socialites etc. She's on far too much money to worry about being out of her depth and if asked to find original pirate material, would expect to be bitten on arse by parrot carried by peg-legged man going ARRRRR!

And it's not just about being 'average', Ronan, it's worse. JC has a Fleet Street daddy - so handy for getting jobs these days. People also say that whenever a new 3am girl joins the Mirror (there are 3 of them at any given time, of which JC is the longest-serving) JC hounds them out using techniques familiar to anyone who's been to junior high. She was actually at one of the art openings I went to last night and I discovered something else about her, which is that she could put on the most expensive designer clothes it's possible to buy and no matter the effort or monety invested, clothes look like evil schmutter from H&M sale rail.

suzy (suzy), Friday, 17 January 2003 08:29 (twenty-three years ago)

I can't believe she claims to have a youth club on her road.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Friday, 17 January 2003 08:34 (twenty-three years ago)

i hope Skinner isnt at the Brits, but that seems unlikely unless he's this year's Craig David (loadsa nominations but doesnt win anything)...

stevem (blueski), Friday, 17 January 2003 11:24 (twenty-three years ago)

I like the Strebts album because it's funny, among other things. Ms Dynamite is great too - I'm so glad trife likes her.

Tom (Groke), Friday, 17 January 2003 11:27 (twenty-three years ago)

I'd like to get into some sneering, contemptuous scurrilousness re tabloid readers' ideas of 'glamour & escapism', but I'd better not.

dave q, Friday, 17 January 2003 11:29 (twenty-three years ago)

Yeah how is the Streets humourless? I mean Eminem IS funny at times but he's been way way way darker than Mike Skinner will ever be. This is not a value judgement, Skinner is Skinner and Eminem is Eminem, apples and oranges.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 17 January 2003 11:31 (twenty-three years ago)

Suzy, would this be the offspring of corpulent right-wing bore Paul Callan?

And meanwhile the rest of us omniscient scribblers remain financially handicapped by day jobs which drain our energy and enthusiasm, while dynasties of ignoramuses continue to spout stupidity (libellous stupidity at that, at one point, but I don't suppose the Mirror Group pension-robbing coffers are too worried about that) and make a fortune which they probably didn't even need. So much for "meritocracy."

Marcello Carlin, Friday, 17 January 2003 11:33 (twenty-three years ago)

Marcello OTM.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Friday, 17 January 2003 11:47 (twenty-three years ago)

ms dynamite = aflame talentwise, not so hott facewise. strap a bandana across her eyes and you got a ninja turtle. especially the teeth

she's pregnant you know

zemko (bob), Friday, 17 January 2003 11:47 (twenty-three years ago)

since when did the 3am girls become music critics?

michael wells (michael w.), Friday, 17 January 2003 11:48 (twenty-three years ago)

it was funny because it was typical.

doom-e, Friday, 17 January 2003 11:51 (twenty-three years ago)

Marcello OTM on the Callan family tree. EUWWWWWWWWWW.

I was talking to another freelance journalist last night who was on a press trip with all of 3am, who were naff in the extreme due to phenomenon she called 'wearing' of dinky little mobile phones (gratuitous texting etc. with latest model just to make sure the one person who didn't see first showing-off has in fact been brought up to speed).

Nepo-hacks don't annoy me if they're good or unobtrusive; problem is every fuckwit who has columned/edited a section of a newspaper EVER seems to have one kid who's a journalist. Often when these are women, they'll be from 'broadsheet' families and will be horrible I Want A Pony types that remind other sozzled Fleet Street guys of their own daughters (if they don't already know the girl as friend of their own kids). If you're not one of these, good luck getting a foothold. Papers get more and more complacent and conservative when glorified office workers start thinking of themselves in dynastic terms.

A good friend of mine - judge's daughter, blonde, boarding school, brought up with media folk for neighbours, stints on broadsheet diaries, great degree, incisive questioner, brilliant writer, Royal and political connections - walked away from journalism last year because she was never in over seven years of writing offered a real staff job despite generating sections for newspapers, getting big scoops etc. Everything you're 'supposed' to do or be to be considered successful, she did or was. Who got the jobs my friend ought to have had? Some raving nepo every time, and often my friend was moved off pages/beats etc. to make way for someone given her duties as part of their cushy new job.

suzy (suzy), Friday, 17 January 2003 12:53 (twenty-three years ago)

Mike Skinner's cadence is completely unengaging to me. The three Streets tracks I've heard that I liked ("All Got Our Runnins", "Weak Become Heroes", the Stanton Warriors remix of "Has It Come To This") were because of the backing tracks.

If I want to hear lazy-beat Brit-rap, give me Pitman ANY DAY.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 17 January 2003 14:38 (twenty-three years ago)

if you look today in the times they have a new pop writer from america. she writes an article that's just as bad (on the music scene in the states) as the one above. did you know hip-hop is for tots?

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 17 January 2003 14:44 (twenty-three years ago)

Julio, that's Gail O'Hara you're talking about. She used to have a zine called Chick Factor and is, as these things go, fairly sound.

suzy (suzy), Friday, 17 January 2003 15:26 (twenty-three years ago)

"Second, music for tots. Under this banner you'll find hip-hop..." I think is the sentence Julio is objecting to. Not even 'most' hip-hop, heh. The two hip-hop acts that get a mention later on come under "imaginative role models".

I have loads of respect for her as a zine editor and lots of my friends are her friends too and I'm sure her column will be good - this week's was a waste of time tho cos it goes against what ought to be the first rule of music writing - talk about the stuff you do listen to not the stuff you don't.

Tom (Groke), Friday, 17 January 2003 15:40 (twenty-three years ago)

The Mirror would be much better if it stopped pretending to be a newspaper.

The worst example of what Marcello and Suzy are talking about was when a teenage girl called Anna Stothard was given a column in the Observer to write about "teenage life". It was all utterly irrelevant to the lives of any teenager I've ever met, or have had any connection with, or will ever have any connection with me. IIRC, the Observer never deigned to mention that Anna Stothard was the daughter of one Peter Stothard, then editor of the Times.

robin carmody (robin carmody), Friday, 17 January 2003 15:44 (twenty-three years ago)

this is all profoundy typical of the Times' attitude to hip-hop, though. We're talking about the paper which as recently as 1999 forced David Sinclair to review albums by Redman and Method Man. This is a lot like sitting Eminem down at a desk and asking him to produce a 10,000-word essay on the quintessentially English cadences in the music of Ralph Vaughan Williams.

robin carmody (robin carmody), Friday, 17 January 2003 15:45 (twenty-three years ago)

(Eminem, I'll write it for you for $50K.)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 17 January 2003 15:46 (twenty-three years ago)

I think both the Irish Times and Irish Independent had a similar teenage style column, I used to read it to irritate myself, a habit I'm quite fond of.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 17 January 2003 15:47 (twenty-three years ago)

It was all utterly irrelevant to the lives of any teenager I've ever met,

haha...they overlooked the fact that just by being the daughter of a national broadsheet's editor and by being given your own column as a result, you cannot qualify as an 'ordinary teenager'

stevem (blueski), Friday, 17 January 2003 15:48 (twenty-three years ago)

all the people who call the Streets crap had better figure out why

Well, I don't think the Streets is crap, but I do find the notion that OPM is the best album of 2002 to be intensely dubious. Personally, I would probably give it something like three out of four stars.

What's good about it? Well, it sounds relatively fresh- we haven't heard anything exactly like it before. While not exactly unprecedented in the annals of white-boy rap, Skinner's cadence is unusual, and his choice of backing tracks at least bears the imprint of a distinct sensibility. Furthermore, for all his bluster, Skinner still comes across as self-deprecating and down-to-earth, a charming raconteur who is capable of training a skeptical eye on his own foibles. Last, but certainly not least in the eyes of his backers, he claims to represent a subculture that has been under-represented in popular music up till now: the life of the "geezer". It is perhaps this claim of "authenticity" that most gets the critics' juices flowing.

So what's not too like? Well, the music, for starters. Forced to stand on their own, his backing "beats" show themselves to be unremarkable, somewhat flat and amateurish, which is the reason that he always sounds better in remix. Second, the delivery - for all its quirky charm, his delivery is congenitally flat-footed and rubbery. Like a stopped clock that shows the correct time twice a day, he occasionally finds the beat, but more often he bobs and wobbles around it. Finally, with a few notable exceptions, his lyrics have a tendency to fall back on empty bragging - with little of the wit that can transform bragging into an art form in the best rappers.

So does he suck? No. But there is a lot of room for improvement, and annointing him as the new savior of pop or hip-hop or whatever won't do him any favors if, as is likely, his sophomore attempt falls prey to unrealistically raised expectations.

o. nate (onate), Friday, 17 January 2003 16:20 (twenty-three years ago)

Nate - the guy's just a baby, really - I love a fully-formed artiste as much as the next person but they don't happen that often and they don't happen at all in C21 without a retinue of 'people'.

Observer never deigned to mention that Anna Stothard was the daughter of one Peter Stothard, then editor of the Times.

No, they didn't. And she conforms to all I Want A Pony stereotypes: blonde, pretty, public school, access to social milieus even her dad doesn't have an entrée to, and on top of everything there's the sympathy vote because Daddy has/had cancer. However, she was at school with friend's little brother, was seen as arty/talented, and won every writing prize going while running school magazine. It's pretty clear there's a vocation there, no matter how angry-making that might make onlookers, and what 16-year-old who wants to be a writer is going to say no to a column in a REAL paper? Although when I tell you all she's got a deal for a novel I'm anticipating screams all the way from Darrrrrrrrrrrrrrset.

Please remember, whenever you see flagrant nepo-ing across papers that most editors are WHORES for chattering-classes contact and are keen to reduce degrees of separation between themselves and higher-ups whichever paper they work on. People with superior social connections are clearly going to get on because editors want them around so they can take credit for having someone at the same party as Aristo A or Schleb B (case in point - people who'd ignored me for ages workwise were very interested in anything I could 'give' them as a result of being at Larry Cl*rk's dinner/fight a few months ago). Thing is, like all forms of 'currency' it used to be considered vulgar to flaunt it and now it isn't.

suzy (suzy), Friday, 17 January 2003 17:13 (twenty-three years ago)

So what's not too like? Well, the music, for starters. Forced to stand on their own, his backing "beats" show themselves to be unremarkable, somewhat flat and amateurish, which is the reason that he always sounds better in remix. Second, the delivery - for all its quirky charm, his delivery is congenitally flat-footed and rubbery. Like a stopped clock that shows the correct time twice a day, he occasionally finds the beat, but more often he bobs and wobbles around it. Finally, with a few notable exceptions, his lyrics have a tendency to fall back on empty bragging - with little of the wit that can transform bragging into an art form in the best rappers.

all those flaws feel like advantages with The Streets sometimes...perhaps i'm just blinded by his spell too much, or maybe they just dont matter.

stevem (blueski), Friday, 17 January 2003 17:17 (twenty-three years ago)

''Julio, that's Gail O'Hara you're talking about. She used to have a zine called Chick Factor and is, as these things go, fairly sound.''

yes, that's it. I had a look at their section 2 just before i got out of the house.

''"Second, music for tots. Under this banner you'll find hip-hop..." I think is the sentence Julio is objecting to. Not even 'most' hip-hop, heh. The two hip-hop acts that get a mention later on come under "imaginative role models".''

I really objected to splitting US music to three categories.

''I have loads of respect for her as a zine editor and lots of my friends are her friends too and I'm sure her column will be good - this week's was a waste of time tho cos it goes against what ought to be the first rule of music writing - talk about the stuff you do listen to not the stuff you don't.''

yeah, I'll look at it I suppose. at least it should be better than david sinclair.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 17 January 2003 17:27 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh and Tom, the first rule of writing a music column for a newspaper is on your first outing, do pretty much what editor asks. I know that's happened here. Can't blame her for the Bush digs though - Americans in a British peer group like to reprazent for sanity.

suzy (suzy), Friday, 17 January 2003 18:38 (twenty-three years ago)

Suzy on this thread = amazing. I <3 Suzy.

Cozen (Cozen), Friday, 17 January 2003 19:03 (twenty-three years ago)

(you can hear muffled screams, Suzy, but nothing more.)

robin carmody (robin carmody), Friday, 17 January 2003 22:57 (twenty-three years ago)

chickfactor is still going.

I don't really care much for the streets but it doesn't offend me.

you're always going to get things like this from people who think they know something...worst example of someone who thinks they know something=b1lly sl04n on scottish news progs.

RJG (RJG), Friday, 17 January 2003 23:26 (twenty-three years ago)

The 3am girls all deserve to have their heads pissed on (and this isn't really because of the article)

naked as sin (naked as sin), Saturday, 18 January 2003 00:13 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh and Tom, the first rule of writing a music column for a newspaper is on your first outing, do pretty much what editor asks.

Hah yeah fair enough, doesn't make it a good column though. But benefit of the doubt and all that - and better G O'H doing it than some, as you put it, nepo.

Tom (Groke), Saturday, 18 January 2003 00:23 (twenty-three years ago)

I like the Strebts album because it's funny, among other things.

PLEASE tell me that "the Strebts" was just a typo. PLEASE!!

Evan (Evan), Saturday, 18 January 2003 00:36 (twenty-three years ago)

I would Evan but it would be a lie. Alan (I think) said Strebts first and I like it.

Tom (Groke), Saturday, 18 January 2003 00:42 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh. I thought it was kinda surprising because Streb is my surname. No matter.

Evan (Evan), Saturday, 18 January 2003 00:53 (twenty-three years ago)

It's just pissing about playing on "grebt" which is ILX slang for "great" but whose derivation is too sordid to recount again here - nothing to do w/your fine surname tho.

Tom (Groke), Saturday, 18 January 2003 00:56 (twenty-three years ago)

it is a fairly typical shitty tabloid column,but i have to admit she has a point about the name "the streets" being fairly pretentious,which i haven't seen elsewhere...
kind of calls into question his self-depreciating manner...

robin (robin), Saturday, 18 January 2003 01:40 (twenty-three years ago)

its no more 'pretentious' than Anti-Pop Consortium....or the 'egotistical' fashion of the majority of b-boy monikers

stevem (blueski), Saturday, 18 January 2003 01:51 (twenty-three years ago)

plus i wouldnt say Skinner was self-deprecating, just a bit more honest about things

stevem (blueski), Saturday, 18 January 2003 01:52 (twenty-three years ago)

well i don't really know anything about antipop consortium...
i mean i know a lot of hiphop is about going on about how fucking deadly you are and all,what i meant was more that the impression the album gives off is this kind of "i'm just a guy telling a few stories about being a "geezer""or whatever,which is why calling yourself the streets seems a bit incongruous...

robin (robin), Saturday, 18 January 2003 02:01 (twenty-three years ago)

Not egotistical at all. The LAST thing you'd expect a rapper to call himself is a transparent name like "The Streets," especially since rappers usually have boastful monikers like "Grandmaster Flash" or "King Ad Rock" or "Big Baby Jesus."

Evan (Evan), Saturday, 18 January 2003 02:16 (twenty-three years ago)

well he couldnt do that of course cos he's a weedy white-ass towny, heh. but when i first saw the press ads saying 'Has It Come To This?' by The Streets i didnt really think 'pretentious' - or maybe i did and secretly rubbed my hands gleefully. i think its a cool name...i enjoy it in its new context - its a punk band name really, but here it is describing the guy stood behind you in the queue in Mcdonalds with Wu Tang and MJ Cole blasting out of his headphones.

stevem (blueski), Saturday, 18 January 2003 03:48 (twenty-three years ago)

I do know a few people who think it's the worst name for a rap act since Young Black Teenagers

James Blount, Saturday, 18 January 2003 04:12 (twenty-three years ago)

Why do you guys keep referring to him as a "rap" or a "hip-hop" act? Whatever he is, he's neither of those things. He's some englishman doing some kind of talking thing over beats.

but it sure is hell ain't rap. I think the Wee Papa Girls had a better sense of rhythm. And in ten years he'll be just as forgotten as they are.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Saturday, 18 January 2003 07:49 (twenty-three years ago)

In ten years that delicious bacon sandwich I just ate will be forgotten, but it's still classic.

Ronan (Ronan), Saturday, 18 January 2003 10:46 (twenty-three years ago)

Unlike your bacon sandwich, though, The Streets never recorded "Has It Come To This?", which actually sounds like someone talking in their sleep.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Saturday, 18 January 2003 11:03 (twenty-three years ago)

what "bluster"?

i prefer the originals to the remixes: "better beats" in this context is like reshooting "only fools and horses" with delboy in a porsche (some kinda guy ritchie piffle i guess)

somnambulism is a pretty good rhythm to talk abt non-central london in (hackney or peckham or white city or tottenham)

(actually i haven't been in tottenham for more then ten years so scratch that)

mark s (mark s), Saturday, 18 January 2003 12:16 (twenty-three years ago)

Dom thinks my bacon sandwich recorded Has It Come To This

Ronan (Ronan), Saturday, 18 January 2003 12:20 (twenty-three years ago)

mike skinner is a milli vanilli style frontperson, who takes no part in the recording process. the bacon sandwich takes care of all that...

weasel diesel (K1l14n), Saturday, 18 January 2003 12:24 (twenty-three years ago)

Bacon sandwich and milk would be a dream collaboration.

Ronan (Ronan), Saturday, 18 January 2003 12:24 (twenty-three years ago)

what "bluster"?

Presumably, his I AM THE SECOND COMING propaganda of the first track, which is implicit in "Let's Push Things Forward" too. It's perhaps more gusto than bluster.

Cozen (Cozen), Saturday, 18 January 2003 12:45 (twenty-three years ago)

hata: "if he's so all about bigging himself up as the best ever, howcum he uses all these weedy amateurish beats and loops and sounds like he's scrawny and white and half-asleep?"
person who's actually been listening: "the answer is in the question DO YOU SEE!!??"

mark s (mark s), Saturday, 18 January 2003 13:07 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh... I don't disagree.

Cozen (Cozen), Saturday, 18 January 2003 13:17 (twenty-three years ago)

part of the appeal for me is exactly the same appeal i find in Pitman - the novelty and juxtaposition of it all

stevem (blueski), Saturday, 18 January 2003 13:18 (twenty-three years ago)

btw playing the streets in one room to see what ppl are talking abt AT THE SAME TIME AS recording ut in another room for julio = odd experience

mark s (mark s), Saturday, 18 January 2003 13:21 (twenty-three years ago)

I think Ronan's bacon sandwich analogy best sums it up.

Nicole (Nicole), Saturday, 18 January 2003 14:54 (twenty-three years ago)

It is good -- but one can make the Platonic argument that the 'real' bacon sandwich is out there and never forgotten, which makes the argument even better! Or at least more entertaining.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 18 January 2003 15:08 (twenty-three years ago)

''btw playing the streets in one room to see what ppl are talking abt AT THE SAME TIME AS recording ut in another room for julio = odd experience''

hehehe...I bet it is!

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Saturday, 18 January 2003 15:46 (twenty-three years ago)

Dear ILM,

The Streets rox u r all gay.

Your Pal,
http://members.aol.com/dubplatestyle/mase.jpg
Ma$e

Ma$e (dubplatestyle), Saturday, 18 January 2003 15:49 (twenty-three years ago)

i prefer the originals to the remixes: "better beats" in this context is like reshooting "only fools and horses" with delboy in a porsche (some kinda guy ritchie piffle i guess)

Is the idea here that Skinner's "authenticity" as a geezer is enhanced by having weak beats backing him, or that such a backing somehow suits him better? This sounds like the return of the "slacker rock" hypothesis, in which musical sloppiness is seen as a virtue because it is harnessed to a gestalt which is all about laziness. Don't get me wrong: I'm not one who believes that technical proficiency is the be-all and end-all of music. In fact, I have many favorite records that were made by people who could barely play their instruments. However, the thing that strikes me about those records is that, for all their crudity, they still manage to sound effective and original. To me, the beats on OPM are rarely the first and hardly the latter.

It's very easy to give something a superficial listen and say, "Oh, those beats sound kind of half-assed, and this guy is talking about having no ambition - what a concept!". That's very different from saying, "At first those beats sound kind of half-assed, but the more I listen, the more I realize how they really work well with the words, etc." The first is essentially the trademark of a novelty act. The second is the characteristic of an album that will have real staying power. The question is which camp the Streets will fall into. As you've guessed by now, I suspect it will be the first.

o. nate (onate), Saturday, 18 January 2003 16:17 (twenty-three years ago)

(I don't want to come down too hard on the Streets. If you get past the radio singles, a lot of his songs have pretty good lyrics. Maybe his delivery will improve and he'll get a good producer to help him out for his next album. But on the other hand, maybe he won't.)

o. nate (onate), Saturday, 18 January 2003 16:34 (twenty-three years ago)

i hadn't thought abt it lo-fi terms (where the reasoning is "yay emotional authenticity" or some such), probably more in terms of [v.early postpunk synth music for which no satisfactory term has ever been devised eg the normal or throbbing gristle circa 'united' blah blah]* terms, where the backline wz a supercheap and basic drum-machine, and the music wz very one-finger]

i like the extreme lowkeyness of the whole thing, it entirely suits skinner's deadpan sense of humour anyway (MS finds the character/s he plays hilarious in his/their self-importance, but he's also fond of their and on theirside, and in sync with some of their semi-articulate pride and dignity, even when it comes out in competely daft ways and claims) (and some of that daftness flips elsewhere anyway, bcz the character isn't totally skew-whiff abt the originality of his odd self: "i'm 45th generation Roman", what a fkn GREAT line)

i don't know what "maybe his delivery will improve" means: sounds like the kind of thing steve martin or woody allen were being told — by their so-called friends or inner demons — when they switched the Early Funny Stuff for grown-up "real acting", and Work Which Enters the Ages.

proof that the streets = rap: "i live on snacks/potatoes in packs"

*the fall w.yvonne paulette fits into this category obv, and i think demolishes most of the anti-streets argts (poss.not trife's, but he's just wrong anyway here)

mark s (mark s), Saturday, 18 January 2003 17:13 (twenty-three years ago)

I think I should say at this point that trying to build up my anti-Streets arguments has had the effect of making me like the Streets more than I did before. I'm not sure why this is - maybe because when I try to be careful and consider all the points pro and con, I have more of a tendency to give something the benefit of the doubt - whereas when I'm just kind of listening for the sake of enjoyment, it's much easier for me to just say "I don't like this" and move on. I think one thing that colored my opinion on the Streets from the beginning is that the first two songs I heard by them, "Let's Push Things Forward" and "Has it Come to This", are probably my least favorite of all the songs on OPM. However, as I went on to hear more tracks from the album, I realized that it does have a likeable sprawl and variety. Skinner's low-key charm is much more on display over the course of the album than it is on the singles, where he feels compelled to spend so much time saying how great he is. There's nothing wrong with a super-cheap drum machine backing, I'm just not particularly impressed with Skinner's version of it, but I do like other albums that have a similar sound, such as some of Kool Keith's recent albums.

o. nate (onate), Saturday, 18 January 2003 17:33 (twenty-three years ago)

''There's nothing wrong with a super-cheap drum machine backing, I'm just not particularly impressed with Skinner's version of it''

um, how many versions of this are there anyway?

(haven't heard a note from the streets BTW so feel free to ignore the q if its a stoopid one).

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Saturday, 18 January 2003 17:37 (twenty-three years ago)

dont negate that Skinner uses typical garage-weight percussion - light snappy snares, micro-hats and subtle compressed bassdrums are standard in the genre (tho obviously there's the heavier end now occupied by Dizzy Rascal and the like)...

stevem (blueski), Saturday, 18 January 2003 17:44 (twenty-three years ago)

um, how many versions of this are there anyway?

There are an infinite number of ways of programming a cheap-drum machine.

o. nate (onate), Saturday, 18 January 2003 17:47 (twenty-three years ago)

haha the one my band wz using in 1982 only had eight!!

mark s (mark s), Saturday, 18 January 2003 17:58 (twenty-three years ago)

steve beat me too it, but the notion that skinner lacks production skills (as if he couldn't be achieving what he sets out to do, every time) strikes me as fairly bizarre. compared to the, uh, functional minimalism of the average (recent) garage rap track (dizzy rascal, wiley, even some sticky, etc.), skinner sounds like fucking premier.

jess (dubplatestyle), Saturday, 18 January 2003 18:04 (twenty-three years ago)

Well, of course, I overstate how bad his production skills are. No doubt they're better than anything I could do with a drum machine. But the real question is how do they compare to the best of what else is out there. For me, something like Kool Keith's Spankmaster is much more fun to listen to and a better example of what it's possible to do with a lo-budget drum-machine aesthetic. Yet, that album got almost zero hype when it came out a couple of years ago.

o. nate (onate), Saturday, 18 January 2003 18:10 (twenty-three years ago)

Skinner's beats are no more minimal than Tim/Neptunes stuff - but he's not trying to make hits like them as such...i still think its a bit mad comparing him to so much hip hop stuff tho - there is a difference in what they do

stevem (blueski), Saturday, 18 January 2003 18:22 (twenty-three years ago)

If nu-garridge = punk then the streets = the talking heads.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Saturday, 18 January 2003 18:24 (twenty-three years ago)

Okay, I'm only gonna ask this ONCE

HTF does one dance to The Streets?

Tom Millar (Millar), Saturday, 18 January 2003 18:30 (twenty-three years ago)

You start by putting your hand on your partners face and then follow the step guide on the inside of the album, the dance culminates when both dancers drink 3 shots of brandy and collapse.

Ronan (Ronan), Saturday, 18 January 2003 18:47 (twenty-three years ago)

Just one little point to throw out here, for what it's worth: Streets beetz translate well to a live setting - bass, keys/sampler, drums - I think the rough-hewnness of it leaves it loose enough to have room for gradations and changes in phrasing. The songs on the CD feel like sketches, quickly made, with only the important lines drawn in. When they played at Merc Lounge the singer did like Real Notes for "common sense, simple common sense", dread rasta style, sort of menacing; it opened up this new area in the song that could include back-to-basics roots reggae morality on top ov/layered onto the smart-alecky kid who thinks he's got it all figured out (you only hear the latter on the CD). It's very "rock n roll" that way I think, at least the way I think of rock n roll, where each song is more like a format or template or a fake-book, roomy enough for a live crew to see what they can find in it. "rock n roll" may be an outdated term to use for this type of phenomenon though.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Saturday, 18 January 2003 20:14 (twenty-three years ago)

HTF does one dance to anything?

(NOTE: I still don't particularly like The Streets.)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Saturday, 18 January 2003 20:20 (twenty-three years ago)

some of us do it dinosaur style (wat up jess!) *mimes flimsy arm action*

(NOTE: what I said about the looseness of the beats shouldn't be read as an apology for them! like mark s i prefer the originals to any of the remixes i've heard. they just WORK for me, most of the time, though on first listening i was thrown a bit by something, maybe the thing that's throwing the hatas)

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Saturday, 18 January 2003 20:33 (twenty-three years ago)

it's called "the john hammond" tracer

Ronan (Ronan), Saturday, 18 January 2003 21:04 (twenty-three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.