― T. Weiss (Timmy), Tuesday, 21 January 2003 05:37 (twenty-three years ago)
If the vinyl, then HELL YES! Japanese import: download it instead.
― paul cox (paul cox), Tuesday, 21 January 2003 05:41 (twenty-three years ago)
― Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 21 January 2003 08:27 (twenty-three years ago)
― nathalie (nathalie), Tuesday, 21 January 2003 08:35 (twenty-three years ago)
― nathalie (nathalie), Tuesday, 21 January 2003 08:36 (twenty-three years ago)
i still haven't found my copy, so yeah if you could burn one up for me that would be smashing.
― Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 21 January 2003 09:06 (twenty-three years ago)
― nathalie (nathalie), Tuesday, 21 January 2003 09:12 (twenty-three years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Tuesday, 21 January 2003 15:15 (twenty-three years ago)
― bob snoom, Tuesday, 21 January 2003 15:33 (twenty-three years ago)
Snoom is a jaded robot, but hey I like Prince too. Why compare apples and oranges?
― hstencil, Tuesday, 21 January 2003 15:35 (twenty-three years ago)
― bob snoom, Tuesday, 21 January 2003 15:53 (twenty-three years ago)
um, you promised me a copy as well. do u rememeber?
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 21 January 2003 16:55 (twenty-three years ago)
― J (Jay), Tuesday, 21 January 2003 17:38 (twenty-three years ago)
― hstencil, Tuesday, 21 January 2003 18:06 (twenty-three years ago)
if you've been looking for something for long enough, sometimes 40$ isn't that rediculous, just to shake the feeling of inadequacy and longing off your back.
i just forked out 40$ + shipping for the first This Heat record, got it home, and realized that although it was great, i already had most of the songs on the peel sessions or other comps. bah!
the only other record i've spent that much on before was Tim Buckley's Starsailor. by the time i finally got a copy, i didn't care as much.
so maybe the answer is no, it's not worth it if you've been waiting for so long. they hype may be stronger than the bite
― JasonD (JasonD), Tuesday, 21 January 2003 18:24 (twenty-three years ago)
Is that what the followup to 'Loveless' is called?
― J (Jay), Tuesday, 21 January 2003 19:14 (twenty-three years ago)
― dave225 (Dave225), Tuesday, 21 January 2003 19:23 (twenty-three years ago)
the high prices the vinyl copies fetch seem to be directly related to that wonderful ebay phenomenon of "how much will some sucker in japan/iowa/greece pay for THIS?"
― your null fame (yournullfame), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 00:23 (twenty-three years ago)
― Sean (Sean), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 00:35 (twenty-three years ago)
Yeah, maybe so, but I'm of the perspective that having downloaded simply the music "isn't enough"? I need the whole package -- artwork, liner notes, lyrics, etc. To quote Tod [A]shley from Firewater: "I like the artifact. This is, I'm sure, very passé, but I like books, I like records, and I like cd's. I like that there's something to hold in your hands and look at. I like the physicality of it, the tactile aspect of it. You can look through the book and see the images and hold something in your hands. Not that it's a product, mind you, but it's not just some abstract wave form or file on your computer, but rather a physical, tangible thing. It's more like a work of art than something you happened to download. Maybe I'm just old and sentimental, though. There's something also something about the permanence. You have this 'thing,' -- it's an actual object. You could buy it at a flea market or find it in the trash. It's a tangible thing, it's not just something floating around in outer space. It's an actual object. It's a document. Why that's different to me, I'm not really sure."
I agree completely.
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 00:37 (twenty-three years ago)
― JasonD (JasonD), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 04:37 (twenty-three years ago)
I think its a joke. a poor excuse for charging 40 bucks. I don't buy recs for more than £12. anything more is unfair. downloading is a great way to correct for inflation of CD prices.
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 10:12 (twenty-three years ago)
True enough, Coolio. I'm not defending the obscene amounts of money they currently demand for a cd (which costs what? Under a dollar to manufacture?), but I still prefer the whole package. Call me old-fashioned.
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 15:17 (twenty-three years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 15:18 (twenty-three years ago)
― 5finger, Sunday, 20 April 2003 07:30 (twenty-three years ago)
― gaz (gaz), Sunday, 20 April 2003 09:16 (twenty-three years ago)
― SplendidMullet (iamamonkey), Sunday, 20 April 2003 11:44 (twenty-three years ago)
― Sasha Frere-Jones (Sasha Frere-Jones), Sunday, 20 April 2003 12:50 (twenty-three years ago)
― robin (robin), Sunday, 20 April 2003 14:02 (twenty-three years ago)
― Mike Taylor (mjt), Sunday, 20 April 2003 19:51 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ian Johnson, Sunday, 20 April 2003 19:53 (twenty-three years ago)
http://www.cargorecords.co.uk/release_zoom.php?item=1548
― stirmonster (stirmonster), Wednesday, 7 September 2005 23:37 (twenty years ago)
is it worth it?
no
― JAXON (jaxon), Wednesday, 7 September 2005 23:46 (twenty years ago)
― Bobby Count (jaxon), Thursday, 6 October 2005 16:05 (twenty years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 6 October 2005 16:12 (twenty years ago)
― Laurel (Laurel), Thursday, 6 October 2005 16:35 (twenty years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 6 October 2005 16:37 (twenty years ago)