http://www.pataphysics-lab.com/cgi-bin/cart.cgi?item_id=483&action=showitem
thoughts? feelings? did i miss the joke?m.
― msp, Wednesday, 22 January 2003 23:39 (twenty-three years ago)
― Carey, Wednesday, 22 January 2003 23:41 (twenty-three years ago)
Yes and yes.
― brg30 (brg30), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 23:52 (twenty-three years ago)
http://www.freakytrigger.co.uk/2003_01_01_hated.html#87724841
― Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 23:59 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ryan McKay (Ryan McKay), Thursday, 23 January 2003 02:06 (twenty-three years ago)
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Thursday, 23 January 2003 02:11 (twenty-three years ago)
m.
― msp, Thursday, 23 January 2003 06:21 (twenty-three years ago)
I think its a funny article, and I think Ian just enjoys spewing all sorts of rhetoric around for the sake of spewing rhetoric around.
the liner notes to "In Mass Mind" by the Make Up have a similar theme, about how electronic music made by one person is the logical next to final step in the "downsizing" of music, beginning from orchestras. (the final step being artistless music) basically his "point" is that its more economical to pay only one musician rather than an orchestra, and he shows the gradual decline in ensemble size over history.
the guy can write, that's for sure. I wonder what it'll look like when he actually has something to really write about, rather than his current sophistry (though I find it hilarious).
The Weird War "interview" liner notes are a riot as well...
― tinobeat (tinobeat), Thursday, 23 January 2003 07:06 (twenty-three years ago)
To quote MacKaye, "Boo fucking hoo."
― hstencil, Thursday, 23 January 2003 15:18 (twenty-three years ago)
if you read the article, its pretty clear that he's just having fun. c'mon, he even says that scratching records is meant to be "symbolic disdain" for what's on them, rather than a sound effect.
I think if anyone understands the preposterousness of his statements its him.
― tinobeat (tinobeat), Thursday, 23 January 2003 16:56 (twenty-three years ago)
i feel bad too cause i sucked everyone in with my loaded quote.
oy. what freakin folly.
why do i bother?
oh well, i suppose someone will find this amusing...even if they're laughing at me...
amusement of the universe +1,m.
― msp, Thursday, 23 January 2003 17:49 (twenty-three years ago)
― hstencil, Thursday, 23 January 2003 19:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― gareth (gareth), Thursday, 23 January 2003 19:21 (twenty-three years ago)
― msp, Thursday, 23 January 2003 19:29 (twenty-three years ago)
Ian has made it his thing to write Marx-styled or manifesto styled treatises on various aspects of popular culture, and I for one find it funny. I don't really care if it doesn't have a point.. most entertainment doesn't.
― tinobeat (tinobeat), Thursday, 23 January 2003 19:40 (twenty-three years ago)
*hangs self*
Seriously though, if the idea is to just be "entertainment" with these pieces, I for one would wish he'd stick to faux-gospel yelping.
― hstencil, Thursday, 23 January 2003 20:09 (twenty-three years ago)
I see where yr coming from. I like the writing more as liner notes to records, while having them just exist as articles isn't as strong.
I just remembered that he also has an article in the new BB Gun zine writing about how punk rock is intrinsically "gaysploitation."I haven't read it, but it sounds like a riot.
But really, its all about the Nation of Ulysses manifestos. those were priceless.
― tinobeat (tinobeat), Thursday, 23 January 2003 21:13 (twenty-three years ago)