can morally reprehensible traits result in great music?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
(damn, I'm going to regret this thread)

I know that moralism = rockism, and as such ILM does not approve, but surely I'm not the only one who has at one point of their life gotten totally disgusted/outraged by a piece of music, not because you think it's badly made or clumsy or anything, but because you just find it, well, ugly?

It's a though issue to debate, because inevitably I fall into hypocrisy- in any example I could care to mention, there are other songs that embody exactly the same sort of emotion that I love, and mostly I couldn't even argue that they're better songs musically or whatever. Still, I can't shrug this almost instinctive disgust off. Am I just being foolish, or is there something in there? If you know what I'm talkin' 'bout, kindly list yr examples, too.

My own examples:

"Lost Cause" by Beck: I actually LOVED this song the first few times I heard, because I thought the chorus was "baby, I'm a lost cause"; as soon as I read the lyrics and found out it was actually "baby, you're a lost cause", I hated it, because that's just such an ugly thing to say- it's one of the few things that I think you shouldn't ever say to ANYONE, because well, I believe that we are all redeemable. Also the fact that this song is on Beck's Big Break Up Album, and his ex is sure to hear it someday and know the lines are directed *at her* makes it even more reprehensible to me.

And yet, it's not much more cruel than many of my favourite songs by Bob Dylan, Elvis Costello and Blur, to name but a few.

"Never Underestimate The Value Of A Holler", Kid606: For the most part, I'm willing to give Kid606 the benefit of the doubt- I'm willing to believe that he's not some swarmy Indie Kid making fun of the top40, but a guy with a very genuine love for music (be it Bikini Kill or Kylie or Black Sabbath) and a curiosity to find out what happens when you fuck with it- meaning he can appreciate all the artists he steals from on their own terms, but he doesn't turn them into symbols of holyness, he is willing to fuck with their songs w/o compromising his love of 'em, if that makes any sense.

But then there's that Missy Elliot sample: "don't copy me, don't copy me!" she says repeatedly in this song, and already I feel a bit queasy. Then it turns into an increasingly whiny "copy me!" until it ends in this long, pseudo-orgasmic moan of "coooopy meeee". It's aural rape, pure and simple, and it makes me sick to my stomach.

Yet, at the same time, the whole of rap music (to give you just one example) is frequently about ignoring (or being downright hostile towards) the intention of the original songs and fucking around with 'em as you bloody well please.

Anyway, this isn't supposed to be a game of Help Daniel Destroy The Paradoxes In His Moral Compass, I'm just wondering whether any of you have ever had similar problems with a certain song or album...

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Thursday, 23 January 2003 00:35 (twenty-three years ago)

I read that line in "Lost Cause" as meaning me thinking about you, my relationship with you, etc., is what's a lost cause. I don't find it hateful, but then again I don't know Beck's real intentions.

Sean (Sean), Thursday, 23 January 2003 00:52 (twenty-three years ago)

You mean like "Put It In Your Mouth"?

jm (jtm), Thursday, 23 January 2003 01:21 (twenty-three years ago)

the beatles had to do "hey jude" to compete with the rolling stones and provide a de facto b-side for "all you need is love"/ "we love you"

george gosset (gegoss), Thursday, 23 January 2003 01:45 (twenty-three years ago)

non-sequitur?

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Thursday, 23 January 2003 02:13 (twenty-three years ago)

http://image.tower.com/pulse/graceland/2001/06/on-record/ike-turner.jpg

Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 23 January 2003 02:36 (twenty-three years ago)

actually that line is what made "Lost Cause" stick out of an album I found too generic over all. Beck dismissing somebody, GOING for it angerwise, made it interesting. It's not a sentiment we should be proud of, but it may come up in your mind. People give up on people. I prefer that song to any self pitying about the world never turning for him or whatever. I understand your antipathy for it though.

to answer your thread question, yes. Lots of great music is founded on nihilism, which I find reprehensible but can be cathartic, as long as I assume the singer is "protesting too much." Iggy Pop isn't really that down all the time, but maaan, when he's DOWN.... that kinda thing.

I'm a strong believer that pop music is where we can let our little fantasy devils come out to play. The problem is when the ugliness isn't cathartic. What's a good example...um, for me that song by Blink 182 about how he needs a Girl that he can train does it for me. I can take a million "shut up, bitch/asshole" songs but wishing they could dehumanize somebody...ick.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Thursday, 23 January 2003 02:41 (twenty-three years ago)

or at the very least, Blink 182 shouldn't sound proud of their fantasy. Sicko fantasies usually go down easier when the pain or anguish behind them is audible.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Thursday, 23 January 2003 02:42 (twenty-three years ago)

Ladies and gentlemen -- THE FALL

donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 23 January 2003 02:48 (twenty-three years ago)

Interestingly, the private life of an artist has rarely shunned me off their music. At least not for long. I can still listen to Chuck Berry, R. Kelly, the Fall, the Who. I definitely have a harder time listening to a song that commits a crime than a singer who committed one. I mean, I find Avril Lavigne's "Complicated" to be too pompous to enjoy. The only Creed song I really like is "With Arms Wide Open" because I'm a sucker for I-wanna-be-a-good-daddy songs.

Daniel, what you're complaining about is one of the main arbiters of taste. If a song has lyrics, the way those lyrics affect you are entirely valid for deciding whether or not you like it. If it seems you have a hypocritical take on it, look deeper and there's probably some other difference that makes one tolerable and one not. If not, maybe its just a mood and you'll be fine with the song later.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Thursday, 23 January 2003 02:55 (twenty-three years ago)

http://www.crimelibrary.com/manson/images/mansonmugshot.jpg

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Thursday, 23 January 2003 04:11 (twenty-three years ago)

this came up on ILE wrt: Boyd Rice...

I have no problem distancing artwork from an artist... I like some NON records, that doesn't mean that I'd invite Boyd over for drinks.

but who's to say that beck isn't in character (although it sounds like his lyrics have taken quite a leap from "in the time of chimpanzees i was a monkey" on some old forgotten bongload records 7")... shame on daniel for assuming the voice and character of the lyrics is the author. or has beck become very confessional these days?

gygax!, Thursday, 23 January 2003 04:20 (twenty-three years ago)

I'd rather listen to G.G. Allin than Belle & Sebastian, but I'd rather invite the latter over for drinks.

hstencil, Thursday, 23 January 2003 06:27 (twenty-three years ago)

That's funny. I'd much rather listen to Belle & Sebastian, but I think a night of drinking with G.G. would've been a blast (as long as it could be at someone else's place, anyway). Drinking with Belle & Sebastian? Tea, maybe. At their mum's house.

Jesse Fox (Jesse Fox), Thursday, 23 January 2003 06:35 (twenty-three years ago)

Daniel, something about that sort of Kid606 track makes me very ill, too... I'll have to think about it more. It's like watching a teenager cutting up a squirrel or sticking a firecracker up a frog's ass.

Clarke B., Thursday, 23 January 2003 06:42 (twenty-three years ago)

Yikes! I'm defending Kid 606 here I guess, but the missy line as you'll recall is "copyrighten so don't copy me" and is endlessly quotable, but he's not COPYING her so much as playing with her and asking whether copyright means that she CAN'T be copied and only parodied and then about himself -- if he's copying of doing something different, asking how much his work transforms the track, asking what "fair use" is in a sort of tail-swallowing Adaptation manner. And anyway is it any coincidence that Timba picked the same line to sample and reuse and drop into the middle of Bubba Sparxxx' "Ugly"?

& he's probably more reverent and respectful of Missy than anyone else on that album.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 23 January 2003 07:39 (twenty-three years ago)

Geto Boys' "I'm Not a Gentleman" starts off with a sample of "Ladies First" that's cut off with a needle scratching across the vinyl

dave q, Thursday, 23 January 2003 07:42 (twenty-three years ago)

I would think a certain resolve to ignore the consequences of ones' actions is necessary to create anything that will affect other ppl in the first place

dave q, Thursday, 23 January 2003 07:43 (twenty-three years ago)

I agree with Anthony that "If it seems you have a hypocritical take on it, look deeper and there's probably some other difference that makes one tolerable and one not". I don't know if I'd even call it hypocrisy, though, if a person feels repelled by one song but not another. I mean, what's there to betray, necessarily, besides a feeling of certainty? It could be that some moral difficulty that surfaces for a person through a song or songs is just a chance for it be considered or articulated, which I don't think is a bad thing at all, even if it's not, or never even becomes, a solid argument for one take on a song or another (acceptance, rejection, or whatever). I don't think it's very good to consider music as something that only means what a listener wants it to mean, also, so I think it's probably worse to straighten things out for yourself or ignore an internal conflict just for the sake of not feeling hypocritical about what music you like. I'm too tired to think clearly enough about it, though, so I don't know if this really makes sense. I should have stopped when I realized that "Owner of a LONELY Heart" is on 90125, or 90210, or whatever; I'm going to bed.


tom (other one), Thursday, 23 January 2003 08:22 (twenty-three years ago)

Sometimes a song may be interesting solely by how much it offends my morals. (e.g. anal cunt, dwarves, etc.)
I have trouble explaining why I would like something that does this. Maybe it's because I try to keep myself openminded, so if something offends me I should see why and make it not offend me.

But sometimes being 'immoral' just becomes boring. I've been told that people who use "fuck" too much do it because they aren't smart enough to come up with a more interesting word.

A Nairn (moretap), Wednesday, 5 February 2003 04:43 (twenty-three years ago)

I've been told that people who use "fuck" too much do it because they aren't smart enough to come up with a more interesting word.
Glbrxth!

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Wednesday, 5 February 2003 14:59 (twenty-three years ago)

In Sk8r Boi Avril has a go at the ballet girl because she didn't "see the soul that is inside" of the sk8r boi in question, and yet Avril herself is quite happy to reduce the ballet girl to a one-dimensional cliché without attempting to see the soul that is inside her, which proves that Avril is a nasty little presumptious indie witch hell-bent on perpetuating the myth that townies = soulless fucks and therebye maintaining the status quo of teen class warfare!

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 5 February 2003 15:08 (twenty-three years ago)

You know, Nick, my girlfriend brought that up the other day. I still adore "Sk8erboi" despite this blatant cattiness (mainly for the melody, music, timbre all that), but it does reaffirm that Avril is one pompous kid.

It should also be noted that the reasons for disliking Avril's songs (which is different from disliking her for her tie or intelligence during interviews) is usually more "complicated" than disliking other teen-pop star's songs. Lavigne's songs usually have more unique details, observations. But like many country songs, for me those observations can be kinda off-putting. But when compared to crap like Vanessa Carlton's "Pretty Baby" it's kinda impressive.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Wednesday, 5 February 2003 15:16 (twenty-three years ago)

On "Lost Cause":

He doesn't really think she's a lost cause. He has to think she's a lost cause. It's ugly, but it's coping, it's defense. When emotions pile up so high that you can't ignore them anymore, sometimes the only thing you can do is smash them with a giant sweep of your arm. It's only one of the stages of the break-up presented on the album -- there's also regret and self-effacement. It's what we all go through when we lose someone that truly hurts us.

And, as you kinda pointed out, it's nowhere near as cruel as "Idiot Wind." Only Dylan included the self-effacement right in the same song, and Beck spreads the process out further across the album.

And as for his ex hearing it and being offended -- well, shit. She knows what he does for a living.

Kenan Hebert, Thursday, 6 February 2003 06:07 (twenty-three years ago)

five years pass...

This is complex. Someimes I find an arrogant musician to be quite charming and funny which makes me like their music more. Other times they will speak such utter garbage that i will be unable to listen to anything else they record without wanting to turn the record off. For example when i heard Billy Corgan I was instantly repulsed wheras mark e Smith was wonderful. I do think that it is good for people to believe in themselves. I suppose in some poeples case the words just don't match the picture. Interviews/ biography and background shouldn't effect the music that you hear but sometimes they just do. Can't help it.

Hinklepicker, Saturday, 11 October 2008 11:15 (seventeen years ago)

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v165/noodle_vague/Lex_Luger_-_Lawrence_Pfohl_14.jpg

Poll Wall (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 11 October 2008 11:16 (seventeen years ago)

I opened this thread feeling like I had a hundred things to say, but it turns out I've never really translated my internal reactions into anything resembling English. So all I'll say is that at best it's only an occasional issue with me for the simple fact that I'd have to disregard a lot of my favorite music if it were anything more. And since I can't see myself exclusively listening to accidental music recorded by outsiders, I'll have to settle for dudes who do it to get laid or have some insecurities that require they constantly re-validate their ego somehow (and so on, whatever whatever...)

The biography/story behind the music can become an equal part of the music, for better or worse, and for me I guess it's really part of the romance a good lot of the time. Just a matter of where you personally draw the line, I suppose.

^^^ (RabiesAngentleman), Saturday, 11 October 2008 11:51 (seventeen years ago)

I opened this thread feeling like I had a hundred things to say, but it turns out that the opening post was probably one of the worst in the history of ILM

The Slash My Father Wrote (DJ Mencap), Saturday, 11 October 2008 12:07 (seventeen years ago)

And that's some history, right?

Poll Wall (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 11 October 2008 12:09 (seventeen years ago)

I thought Lost Cause was about Winona Ryder? The only artist I've ever listened to less because of any trait was Beck - when I found out he was a Scientologist.

Treblekicker, Saturday, 11 October 2008 12:24 (seventeen years ago)

Yeah that opening post was just a spiral.

^^^ (RabiesAngentleman), Saturday, 11 October 2008 12:33 (seventeen years ago)

How morally reprehensible can these traits be if they result in great piles of money music?

M.V., Saturday, 11 October 2008 14:02 (seventeen years ago)

But then there's that Missy Elliot sample: "don't copy me, don't copy me!" she says repeatedly in this song, and already I feel a bit queasy. Then it turns into an increasingly whiny "copy me!" until it ends in this long, pseudo-orgasmic moan of "coooopy meeee". It's aural rape, pure and simple, and it makes me sick to my stomach.

uh....what?

M@tt He1ges0n, Saturday, 11 October 2008 15:02 (seventeen years ago)

http://991.com/newGallery/Hearsay-Pure-And-Simple-354284.jpg

internet person, Saturday, 11 October 2008 15:06 (seventeen years ago)

The following line or two about rap music didn't clear anything up either. (xp)

^^^ (RabiesAngentleman), Saturday, 11 October 2008 15:09 (seventeen years ago)

Haha, yeah guys I was like sixteen, don't worry it's all nonsense.

Daniel_Rf, Saturday, 11 October 2008 15:55 (seventeen years ago)

In Sk8r Boi Avril has a go at the ballet girl because she didn't "see the soul that is inside" of the sk8r boi in question, and yet Avril herself is quite happy to reduce the ballet girl to a one-dimensional cliché without attempting to see the soul that is inside her, which proves that Avril is a nasty little presumptious indie witch hell-bent on perpetuating the myth that townies = soulless fucks and therebye maintaining the status quo of teen class warfare!

Except that now she's swapped sides, and in the video for Girlfriend she's terrorising the non-conformist. Doesn't make her any less of a nasty little witch...but it does raise the narrative voice/authorship issue yet again.

JimD, Saturday, 11 October 2008 16:22 (seventeen years ago)

I think people with morally reprehensible traits may be able to make great music regardless of said traits.
See my ambivalence over the Skillet Lickers (and other old-timey musicians) and the use of racial slurs on the old time thread.

ian, Saturday, 11 October 2008 16:36 (seventeen years ago)

Yeah, these days it's pretty clear to me that pretty reprehensible traits can make for pretty great aesthetic experiences. Which is a diferent thing entirely from whether bad/messed up ppl can make good art (I don't think I had any doubts on that count even when I started the thread - Ike Turner etc.)

Daniel_Rf, Saturday, 11 October 2008 18:16 (seventeen years ago)

can morally reprehensible traits result in pretty photos?
can morally reprehensible traits result in tasty food?
can morally reprehensible traits result in comfortable clothes?
can morally reprehensible traits result in funny jokes?
can morally reprehensible traits result in engaging books?
can morally reprehensible traits result in solid bridges?
can morally reprehensible traits result in the Giants covering the spread?

Granny Dainger, Saturday, 11 October 2008 22:03 (seventeen years ago)

yes

Treblekicker, Saturday, 11 October 2008 22:07 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.