― gareth (gareth), Wednesday, 29 January 2003 13:42 (twenty-three years ago)
― bob snoom, Wednesday, 29 January 2003 14:13 (twenty-three years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 29 January 2003 14:17 (twenty-three years ago)
Now I suspect they've been pretty swamped by (better?) soundalikes.
― phil jones (interstar), Wednesday, 29 January 2003 14:38 (twenty-three years ago)
― Nordicskillz (Nordicskillz), Wednesday, 29 January 2003 20:32 (twenty-three years ago)
― Millar (Millar), Wednesday, 29 January 2003 22:19 (twenty-three years ago)
― ron (ron), Thursday, 30 January 2003 01:23 (twenty-three years ago)
Tipsy are excellent. No love for them on this board? Dense, loungey, fun and very rewarding. On Mike Patton's label. Don't let any of this put you off. A lot like Esquivel and if you know Esquivel thats all the recommendation you'll need.
― Hinklepicker, Tuesday, 22 December 2009 03:19 (sixteen years ago)
Esquivel meets David Lynch. It could be a very weird Christmas.
― Hinklepicker, Tuesday, 22 December 2009 04:08 (sixteen years ago)
yeah its great stuff. their live shows are worth checking out as well. way more psychedelic and weird.
― oscar, Tuesday, 22 December 2009 04:16 (sixteen years ago)
They are amazing!
― twice boiled cabbage is death, Tuesday, 22 December 2009 04:17 (sixteen years ago)
Hooray for Tipsy! Any thoughts on which one is best? I am pretty familiar with Trip Tease and Uh Oh but not so with Buzzz. The first two are flawless I think. Its a whole crazy universe.
― Hinklepicker, Tuesday, 22 December 2009 04:25 (sixteen years ago)
I love Tipsy. Have every album and listen to them all the time. I was listening to XXXmas today already. Uh Oh and the Remix one are my favourites but they are all excellent and pretty much as good as each other. Get them all!
― everything, Tuesday, 22 December 2009 04:49 (sixteen years ago)
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_pkv51AYRgCM/SgzecgjivBI/AAAAAAAABLQ/ZMg0PzQi4Nw/s400/moongas.jpg
― meisenfek, Tuesday, 22 December 2009 04:52 (sixteen years ago)
In response to the post upthread that compares them to Lemon Jelly and the other one that calls them lounge/techno. One of the best things about them is that there is really no techno elements to their music at all. The remix album has maybe 2 tracks with an obvious drum machine but otherwise there's no bleeps, loops, beat or vocals ever. Most of the remixers respected that. The other albums are just tons of lounge or exotica albums mashed together to make new interesting tunes.
― everything, Tuesday, 22 December 2009 04:58 (sixteen years ago)
thought this would be about the j-kwon song :(
― otm da hoosmarker (The Reverend), Tuesday, 22 December 2009 05:09 (sixteen years ago)
The track that got me into Tipsy was their remix of Pulp's "This Is Hardcore" - the Swedish Erotica mix as it's known. So amazing.
― everything, Tuesday, 22 December 2009 17:32 (sixteen years ago)
I cannot think of many who have made such a great trio of albums as Tipsy to so little fanfare. Yeah alright Esquivel said it all before but still there is an impious delirium to them that makes me smile. Some of the more out there stuff they did wouldn't sound out of place on a John Zorn/Dreamers recording. Underrated.
― Damo Suzuki's Parrot, Sunday, 21 April 2013 00:49 (thirteen years ago)
read that as "imperious delirium", which sounds v metal
― I have many lovely lacy nightgowns (contenderizer), Sunday, 21 April 2013 01:20 (thirteen years ago)
Ha! try it anyways, despite my clumsy bollocks description. Not much metal but still imperious and occasionally delirious!
― Jason Dowd, Sunday, 21 April 2013 01:34 (thirteen years ago)
they do a lot of one off warehouse secret gigs here in sf and they are killer live. agreed. very underrated band. i dj'ed with one of the members a few years back and his record collection is world class.
― oscar, Sunday, 21 April 2013 01:57 (thirteen years ago)
wasn't criticizing "impious delirium", which i also love. i'm a fan, fwiw, though a casual one. i like what i've heard (mostly from a friend who adores them), but haven't heard much.
― I have many lovely lacy nightgowns (contenderizer), Sunday, 21 April 2013 02:27 (thirteen years ago)
Haven't listened to them in a while, but Uh-Oh was one of my go-to LPs for a good few years.
― emil.y, Sunday, 21 April 2013 16:36 (thirteen years ago)
they are still active?
― akm, Sunday, 21 April 2013 18:26 (thirteen years ago)
Don't really know much more than they are from SF and I recall someone telling me they do jingles for a living.
― Jason Dowd, Monday, 22 April 2013 00:08 (thirteen years ago)