Is this a good thing or a bad thing? Does anyone else ingest their music in non-standard ways?
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Thursday, 30 January 2003 04:30 (twenty-three years ago)
― JasonD (JasonD), Thursday, 30 January 2003 05:06 (twenty-three years ago)
― gaz (gaz), Thursday, 30 January 2003 09:01 (twenty-three years ago)
I almost never listen to whole CDs by bands ... I just pick the best stuff to burn to compilations.
Of course, sometimes I trawl through the back catalogue to find new "best stuff".
― phil jones (interstar), Thursday, 30 January 2003 13:00 (twenty-three years ago)
I have all of my CDs in 300 disc changers. I set the things on random and see what happens. Occasionally, I listen to a CD all the way through.
― dave225 (Dave225), Thursday, 30 January 2003 13:17 (twenty-three years ago)
― Nick A. (Nick A.), Thursday, 30 January 2003 14:19 (twenty-three years ago)
― Lynskey (Lynskey), Thursday, 30 January 2003 18:23 (twenty-three years ago)
This extends to the digital sphere as well. Some people consider mp3s a totally track driven medium - well, notin my fetishistic world. With a broadband connection, I have no problem downloading entire albums, sortingthem into folders by artist and year.
So, if albums are an anachronism, I'm a counterrevolutionary.And if that makes me weird, that's fine - I never understood vinyl people, either.
― Squirlplise, Thursday, 30 January 2003 18:32 (twenty-three years ago)
― Yanc3y (ystrickler), Thursday, 30 January 2003 18:34 (twenty-three years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 30 January 2003 18:45 (twenty-three years ago)
That being said, I need to have something else to do while I listen--can't just stare at a wall and listen for an hour. Of course, if I'm stoned out of my gord, there's (almost) nothing else I'd rather do than listen to a whole album and stare at the wall.
― andy, Thursday, 30 January 2003 18:51 (twenty-three years ago)
― man, Thursday, 30 January 2003 19:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― g (graysonlane), Thursday, 30 January 2003 19:24 (twenty-three years ago)
I'm a sucker for context. A song sounds so much better to me when it comes between other songs just different enough that the aural juxtaposition enhances the song's individual identity.
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 30 January 2003 19:38 (twenty-three years ago)
― Chris V. (Chris V), Thursday, 30 January 2003 19:42 (twenty-three years ago)
PIC! PIC! PIC!
― Yanc3y (ystrickler), Thursday, 30 January 2003 19:43 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 30 January 2003 19:43 (twenty-three years ago)
― christoff (christoff), Thursday, 30 January 2003 20:23 (twenty-three years ago)
― ara, Thursday, 30 January 2003 21:15 (twenty-three years ago)
yes. but sometimes stark ridiculous contrast is the order of the day.
― gaz (gaz), Thursday, 30 January 2003 21:27 (twenty-three years ago)
I think my love of stuff like this is why some of my favorite albums are arranged with pieces in "stark ridiculous contrast" to each other...like on Phrenology with the "Rock You" into "!!!!!" into "Sacrifice" song-sequence and stuff like that. Like, by being placed next to something that SHOULD be inappropriate, it seems to enhance that song's impact.
Maybe it's 'cause I have ADD, though. ;D
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 30 January 2003 21:32 (twenty-three years ago)
― gaz (gaz), Thursday, 30 January 2003 21:42 (twenty-three years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Thursday, 30 January 2003 22:26 (twenty-three years ago)