Hands up if you love Can!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Alien pop music! Recorded in a castle by four Germans (one called Holger!) with a shy African giant and a shouty Japanese Jewish busker! And a drumemr named after an old-skool ickle girls' magazine! Future Days and Ege Bamyasi is both GREBT!

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 09:02 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm more of a Tago Mago man myself, but yes, Can were great.

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 25 February 2003 09:05 (twenty-three years ago)

Nick, are you going through some sort of "discovering music" phase?

But yes, I love Can.

Melissa W (Melissa W), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 09:14 (twenty-three years ago)

Horton is not here to tell me "feh! poo! Can are overrated! Neu! are shit! bleh!" so I can add to the Can-love and jump up and down and say yes, my name is Kate, I love Can, and my favourite song is "Mushroom Head". So there.

(Name-dropping factlette: the drummer for my old band in NYC, Fugue State - his dad used to be in a band with Malcolm Mooney! True!)

kate, Tuesday, 25 February 2003 09:18 (twenty-three years ago)

can are HISTORY. i can't listen to them anymore now. everyone goes on about thm like they're some kind of demigods or something as opposed to a slightly onorthodox funk rock band from germany. they plod. i do like their "unfashionable" disco period more and more though. try CIRCLE the finnish band for the supposed "motorik" aspect of krautrock. or the meters if you haven't already.

bob snoom, Tuesday, 25 February 2003 09:21 (twenty-three years ago)

The Meters are the Kings of Plod. Circle the Finnish band are inferior to Circle the band wot had Anthony Braxton and Chick Corea in their line-up.

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 25 February 2003 09:23 (twenty-three years ago)

Can are not motornik, man. They are free, man. Fr33 Ja22 Boi!!!

kate, Tuesday, 25 February 2003 09:23 (twenty-three years ago)

mushroom head.

RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 09:25 (twenty-three years ago)

I love Chick Corea.

Every day is a joy of discovering new music day!

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 09:30 (twenty-three years ago)

And as for the reason behind this post, I finally got Future Days in the post yesterday. My love affair Can (and mainly Ege Bamyasi) has been going on since I was about 18. Tago Mago is indeed wicked, apart from Aumgn, which I still think is the sound of Irmin Schmidt farting while Jacki moves furniture around the room.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 09:33 (twenty-three years ago)

The Meters are the Kings of Plod

The most absurd, laughable thing I've read on ILM.

You are good for a laugh, though, I'll give ya that!

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 09:40 (twenty-three years ago)

If you like Can, check out a band from London called Now. They've got the sort of jazz-drumming, funk bass and free form space-pop madness spiralling about it all vibe going on. Kinda like a cross between Can and ESG... (is it ESG or ESJ? I'm confused coz it's early and I haven't had my coffee yet? One is avante-funk girls from the Bronx and the other is a regular poster on ILX.)

kate, Tuesday, 25 February 2003 09:40 (twenty-three years ago)

Yes, Nick, "Aumgn" really bogs that album down unfortunately, great as the rest of it is. (prolly why it's mark's fave)

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 09:41 (twenty-three years ago)

ESG is the sister act from the Bronx. ESJ is Electric Sound of Jim.

Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 09:43 (twenty-three years ago)

I got Ege Bamyasi a couple of weeks back. I still haven't really listened to it enough yet but "Spoon" and the long one about halfway through the album with the scary keyboards are pretty good. I got the first Neu! as well, but this is a Can thread so I'll stop there.

Hayden Nicholls (Pop the Weasel), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 09:45 (twenty-three years ago)

I love 'em. 'Future Days', 'Mother Sky', 'Uphill' all worthy of adoration.

stevo (stevo), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 09:46 (twenty-three years ago)

"Aumgn" is the album's best track. Happy Mondays impossible without it. The Meters do not lead to Krautrock. They strut but lazily assume that "strut" is in itself necessarily a good thing. Otherwise autobahns would not be necessary.

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 25 February 2003 09:47 (twenty-three years ago)

I new Marcello was gonna say that. I'd rather do without Aumgn and suffer a world without Happpy Mondays, I think. Though I did dance to that Black Grape album a lot when I was 16.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 09:48 (twenty-three years ago)

"Vitamin C" just came on Nuclear Bunker Radio. :-)

Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 09:49 (twenty-three years ago)

There are radio stations that play Can at 10am? *Does best Dickie Attenborough in Matter Of Live And Death impression* Heaven!

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 09:53 (twenty-three years ago)

Mine does! (And it's 5 am here.)

Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 09:59 (twenty-three years ago)

The Happy freakin' Mondays? You're actually using them to justify a forgettable indulgence by Can? Anyway, I certainly wasn't making any comparison between Can and the Meters. That was some other guy.

First you say the Meters "plod", then you backtrack and say they "strut". ok. Then, "lazy" = lack-of-progression? Hmm, well if they had ended immediately following the '69-'70 period, it would have been enough for a legacy of great of-the-moment pop instrumentals, and an enduring contribution to the nascent funk lexicon. But in fact, they did expand and update their sound throughout the 70's with vocals, rock influences, and studio post-production. ALways successful? Heck no. But calling them lazy is groundless.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 10:09 (twenty-three years ago)

The Meters were never pop. They were infuriatingly empty vessels of purposeless rhythm into which the Miles Davis of On The Corner or the Clinton of Maggot Brain or One Nation Under A Groove might have injected some spirited semen. Only the Nick Hornbys of this world who fundamentally hate music ever listen to them, pretending to like them, because they've been told it's good for them. The Meters are thus musical castor oil when they should have been musical syrup o' figs. They had no intent and are not sufficiently interesting in themselves to be elevated to the divine realms of un-intent or supra-intent. Listening to the Meters is like clocking into a factory. It is to be endured and never screwed. It is an act of duty, which has no place in pop, unless your gospels are scrofulous enough to engage your interest in the colours they purvey.

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 25 February 2003 10:19 (twenty-three years ago)

Talk about Can please, not the bleedin' Meters!

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 10:28 (twenty-three years ago)

B.Snoom is OTM upthread. The Disco-period Can is ace, but 'classic' Can is a chore, Future Days excepted.

The Meters - yes, purposeless. Also - may I just say that Z. Modeliste is a rubbish drummer. OK at the loose n' funky, but singularly unable to lock it down real good when it NEEDS to be locked down real good.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 10:36 (twenty-three years ago)

Haha "Meters != pop" .. "Cissy Strut" = R&B #4, pop #23; "Sophisticated Cissy" = R&B #7, pop #34. There only problem was they miscalculated and took Booker T. a little too far out. Or are you attempting to be define the "genre" of pop here? Why did they update their sound throughout the seventies? In a successful bid to be unsuccessful?

"Nick Hornby's of this world" = some kind of weird sublimated rage toward a v. successful writer. Anyway, I sure know I've never read a lick of him (tho I did see that movie) (also, "[x]'s of this world" = very tired construct)

Anyway, I really don't want to hijack Nick's thread, so I'll just say that if Can's "Aumgn" led to the Happy Mondays (using whatever Chuck Eddy style derivation you wish), then Zig Modeliste's unparalleled high-hat work surely left an impression with Derrick May and Kevin Saunderson. And I'll take the two Americans, thank you.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 10:46 (twenty-three years ago)

oh yeah, many spelling errors, etc. but it's nearing 5 am and i must sleep.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 10:47 (twenty-three years ago)

Meters = electro (most ppls social lives occur in 'factories'), 'purposeless' = ?, also when does 'x' ever 'need' to be 'y'? What is that, 'constructive criticism'?

dave q, Tuesday, 25 February 2003 10:50 (twenty-three years ago)

"Hornby envy" - an equally tired construct. Not often that I agree with Rob Young in t'Wire, but his comments on "31 Songs" in the current issue are absolutely and completely OTM.

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 25 February 2003 10:51 (twenty-three years ago)

**also when does 'x' ever 'need' to be 'y'**

When I fucking say so.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 11:01 (twenty-three years ago)

''"Hornby envy" - an equally tired construct. Not often that I agree with Rob Young in t'Wire, but his comments on "31 Songs" in the current issue are absolutely and completely OTM.''

yeah. he didn't have to try hard tho': just the quotes from it makes me hate hornby. what a retard!

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 11:10 (twenty-three years ago)

Happy Monday inpossible without Mambo Sun from Electric Warrior.

David Gunnip, Tuesday, 25 February 2003 11:14 (twenty-three years ago)

Happy Mondays impossible without lots of drugs and some robbin'.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 11:24 (twenty-three years ago)

The Can > Factory connection includes Section 25's obv Can-a-like moments and ACR ripping off lots of Czukay's basslines for 'Sextet' era material (Knife Slits Water is one).

The best Happy Mondays track is also their most krautrock - 'The Egg' from the 'Freaky Dancin' 12 inch.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 12:43 (twenty-three years ago)

Re Can, I like their 'dry' shit better than the 'wet' shit. Stand near the Great Salt Lake and crank "Mother Sky". But have your eyelids removed first, for full effect. The 'wet' shit is just decadent.

dave q, Tuesday, 25 February 2003 12:46 (twenty-three years ago)

is the album with 'i want more' on it good?

minna (minna), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 12:58 (twenty-three years ago)

Flow motion - nah pretty boring and not much to chew on, but the Ethnological Forgery Series track, Smoke, is fantastic. I wished they would have explored a bit more that eastern ambient thing.
I never heard any of the other EFS, are they in the same vein?

one of my fave tracks, 'half past one', unfortunately the 'Landed' album is pretty pointless..

Fabrice (Fabfunk), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 13:28 (twenty-three years ago)

The Happy Mondays connection is valid, I mean, "Halleluhwah" has the definitive baggy beat. Try listening to it without having some strange desire to dance around your bedroom like Bez.

Anyway, on the matter of this sub-Julian Cope bullshit about Can being old hat. I feel sorry for Th' Faith Healers who were rocking out a bangin' version "Mother Sky" and writing their own heavy Kraut inspired drones over a decade ago to little or no attention. An overlooked gem of the early 90's Camden Lurch scene methinks.

Now, where's me copy of "Reptile Smile" gone?

Stephen Burrows (steveeeeeeeee), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 13:52 (twenty-three years ago)

Mark (MarkR), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 13:55 (twenty-three years ago)

http://www.bhds.org/marin/raised-hand.jpg

Mark (MarkR), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 13:56 (twenty-three years ago)

Nah, that can't be me, I'm surrounded by women.

Stephen Burrows (steveeeeeeeee), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 14:05 (twenty-three years ago)

For sure, there was a period when Can were name-dropped far too much, but Ege Bamyashi (the 'pop' one) and Monster Movie (the 'rock' one) are pretty much indespensible. Also check out arguably their most perfect, if not neccesarily representative, track 'Little Star Of Bethlehem'. But Can were never really about perfection, they are more about the moment, or more accuratly selecting the right moments.

Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 14:05 (twenty-three years ago)

It'd be nice if we could discuss how great a band (or whatever) is without devolving into pissing contests. *sigh*

hstencil, Tuesday, 25 February 2003 14:14 (twenty-three years ago)

Future Days is wonderful "finally finding a path home after driving around lost for an hour or so" music.

original bgm, Tuesday, 25 February 2003 14:16 (twenty-three years ago)

My hand is up.

And I actually really like "Aumgn". It's the track that made me fall in love with Tago Mago. I know, I'm 'difficult'.

(And agreed, Future Days is fantastic.)

die9o (dhadis), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 15:02 (twenty-three years ago)

(I killed another thread.)

The reason I like "Aumgn" is because it reminds me of the deep-space psych feeling to the later, stranger parts of 2001.

Or that's why I initially liked it. Now I just like the cool drumming and the neat high-pitched whine at the end. Or sumthing.

die9o (dhadis), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 17:06 (twenty-three years ago)

It's either you or me, die90.

hstencil, Tuesday, 25 February 2003 17:08 (twenty-three years ago)

I think it's something about knowing The Poodles that makes us such thread killers.

die9o (dhadis), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 17:10 (twenty-three years ago)

Anyway, on the matter of this sub-Julian Cope bullshit about Can being old hat.

Hah hah hah hah hah hah hah hah hah!!!

ROTFL!!! Considering my friend that advocates this opinion is probably the closest you can get to St. Julian without actually *being* Julian Cope...

kate, Tuesday, 25 February 2003 17:11 (twenty-three years ago)

Dear me, what a thread already.

Can = great I sez.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 17:19 (twenty-three years ago)

Neudonym, I don't personally like the genre myself, but I wonder if you have heard any Cuban timba, which supposedly draws heavily on funk.

Rockist Scientist, Wednesday, 26 February 2003 17:34 (twenty-three years ago)

I know who said what.

What you've said is that you like funk. So what? Tell me why you like funk.

Ben Williams, Wednesday, 26 February 2003 17:35 (twenty-three years ago)

Ben, according to your argument (and according to the way I feel when I hear it), I like funk because I like funk. Within that genre I have preferences, based on what I like. That's all I have the time to say about it.

How'd I do, then?

Rockist, I wouldn't know timba as a genre; I only know timba as a percussion instrument. I'll try to check that out.

Neudonym, Wednesday, 26 February 2003 17:41 (twenty-three years ago)

No! That is not my argument. My argument has nothing to do with liking or disliking funk. My argument has to do with the nature of funk as a musical form.

Ben Williams, Wednesday, 26 February 2003 17:43 (twenty-three years ago)

George Clinton made a metaphysical system out of James Brown.

Ben Williams, Wednesday, 26 February 2003 17:50 (twenty-three years ago)

And James Brown made a metaphysical system out of funk.

Ben, I'm not a student or a teacher of musical forms, so I can't respond to what you say your argument is. For me, it's all about liking or disliking funk, and I like it. I don't need to justify my tastes by slapping a whole mess of critic-think on them, and so I won't.

And I wonder how you can generalize about "funk as a musical form" by referring to James Brown, who although brilliant and one of the most important musicians of the century is certainly not the only musician in this genre. If it was all JB then there would be no arguments, I think (he said knowing ILM will be able to produce at least someone to say "I don't like James Brown").

But anyway, it's been kind of fun but I'm gonna drop out of this one, due to fatigue and the pressing need to get some work done so I don't get fired so I can afford to get that Dazz Band disc that's been flirting with me at Frugal Muse.

Neudonym, Wednesday, 26 February 2003 17:54 (twenty-three years ago)

Neudonym, there is a (very brief) thread about it in the archives.

Rockist Scientist, Wednesday, 26 February 2003 17:56 (twenty-three years ago)

What you've said is that you like funk. So what? Tell me why you like funk

What you've said is that you like garlic. So what? Tell me why you like garlic.

In most cases, explaining why you like certain thins is pointless and overly intellectual. This is esp true in the case of something like funk, where you 'feel' it more than you appreciate it at any higher level of thought.

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 17:58 (twenty-three years ago)

''In most cases, explaining why you like certain thins is pointless and overly intellectual. This is esp true in the case of something like funk, where you 'feel' it more than you appreciate it at any higher level of thought.''

where's my sick bag?

this is a discussion board ppl. so discuss funk. lets turn feeling to words.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 18:05 (twenty-three years ago)

Let's discuss garlic

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 18:10 (twenty-three years ago)

Julio, come on, there's a limit to how far you can break things down. You say "I like this music because I like x y and z," but sooner or later you hit "simples" (is that a word?) that can't be broken down any further. No one should feel obligated, even on a discussion board, to try to say what can't be said.

Rockist Scientist, Wednesday, 26 February 2003 18:11 (twenty-three years ago)

I didn't know that 'discuss' was a code word for 'analyzing in detail the precise reasons why I like something'.
Let's discuss why you like the sound of a guitar.
Let's discuss why you like versus-chorus-versus structure above all else.

Seems pointless to me, you either like it or you don't

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 18:15 (twenty-three years ago)

Of course, no one is obliged to try to explain their reasons for liking anything. But I'm afraid I really see no value in a perfect stranger writing under a pseudonym telling me they like something. I might be interested in hearing what a friend of mine whose taste I already know something about likes. But without that background of knowledge to work from, information about someone's likes and dislikes is in itself fairly worthless. Making the attempt to articulate the reasons, whether fully-formed or not, behind a taste judgement, while certainly not as easy as making flat declarations of opinion, is far more rewarding for both the person struggling with articulation--you might, after all, find out something you didn't know you knew--and the person reading about said struggle, who not only may gain some new and valuable insight into a heretofore misunderstood phenomenon, but also might be rewarded with a reason to give a flying fuck about said other person's opinion.

Ben Williams, Wednesday, 26 February 2003 18:24 (twenty-three years ago)

In my experience, when I try to break down what I like about a particular piece of music, or a genre, or the like, I quickly hit up against certain elements that I "just like" and can't break down any further. This is also what I think I've observed in watching other people try to do the same thing.

Rockist Scientist, Wednesday, 26 February 2003 19:44 (twenty-three years ago)

G.E. Moore to the thread.

Rockist Scientist, Wednesday, 26 February 2003 19:48 (twenty-three years ago)

Here is a good example of people explaining why they like something.

Ben Williams, Wednesday, 26 February 2003 20:14 (twenty-three years ago)

(Bring Rhetoric back to the curriculum, I say ;o)

Ben Williams, Wednesday, 26 February 2003 20:15 (twenty-three years ago)

All these people are doing is adding a few more things about which I could ask, "Yes, but why do you like that?" Why do they like compositional complexity? Why do they like something multi-layered? Why are extra unexpected snare sounds (or whatever the example was) desirable? Sure, you can break things down a bit more, but not much. I think this attempt to say why you like something works best when you can compare it to something in the same genre. I think it's easier to do a comparison and say why you like x better than y, then it is to just say why you like x.

I like Zekariya Ahmed and Riad el-Sounbatti's compositions for Oum Kalthoum better than Abdel Wahab's, generally, because, for one thing, they give her more room to improvise. But why I do like her improvising? Well, her voice goes here and goes there, and she does subtle variations on the same phrase. Why do I like that? Why do I like the taste of garlic?

(Apologies to those wanting to read about Can.)

Rockist Scientist, Wednesday, 26 February 2003 20:30 (twenty-three years ago)

i like can, they sound good

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 20:32 (twenty-three years ago)

Goddamn it, Ben Williams, you win. You need an explanation about why funk music has been the one constant in my musical life, you want me to quantify everything, to break it down it to its very last compound, FINE, I'll do that. But not now, not here, no time. I'll start a thread later that'll knock your rhetorical socks off. I just didn't think it belonged here on the Can thread, as I'm not as proficient in their work as I need to be.

Not that we haven't totally hijacked the fuckin' thread already. But still.

If that will remove me from the straw man position ("Remember that guy who wouldn't discuss why he liked funk music? Ha ha, what a maroon, good times, ah where are the snows of yesteryear"), then screw it, I'm in. Tonight, perhaps, or tomorrow. But I'm not promising that it'll be all that illuminating for anyone who isn't, say, me.

But you and Julio D. continue to insist that it IS important for me to spill my guts on this crucial issue. So okay then.

Neudonym, Wednesday, 26 February 2003 20:33 (twenty-three years ago)

I heard a lot of Can on the radio a long time ago, but I never really got into it. Heard something from "Tago Mago" lately that sounded pretty good, but nothing I was anxious to buy. I've listened to some audio samples of their music, but, although I used to hear them a lot, I don't recognize any of it.

Rockist Scientist, Wednesday, 26 February 2003 20:54 (twenty-three years ago)

Hmm, very interesting. You know, I say gingerly, I do think that discussion of funk is VERY relevant to a Can thread, since Can is all about that, in a very (to me) watered-down sorta "rock" context...

I don't think that Funkadelic is necessarily an improvement over what JB did...it's a modification, more "lyrical content" perhaps, but really, it's the same message. How does "One Nation Under a Groove" really differ--in its "message"--from most of what James Brown does? Plus JB certainly has "content" along with funk, doesn't it? Is not the obsessive namechecking of Mobile, lovely Atlanta, Augusta, Nashville-Johnny Cash-ville, and the dismissal (good-humored) of "Ohio" which JB pronounces "O-hye-a" content in and of itself? Assertion of pride of place?

I think Marcello was just pulling our leg, as I said earlier. The Meters is a bit empty, content-wise if you look at content as having something all mapped out beyond a blueprint, but isn't a blueprint meaningful? What does "Pungee" mean? "Dry Spell" sounds like one to me. And so forth...

Funk is a way of playing music for people who want to dance tightened up, is a simple, I'm sure I'll get dissed by people who say simplistic, way of looking at it, and of course it is deliberately simplistic. But I don't see how a way of playing music is necessarily only that, or how a methodology doesn't imply a worldview, I get a worldview from James Brown or even Lee Dorsey, two of my favorite artists ever, much more of one than I get from Can, a group from Germany whom I like and who was the original hands-up subject of this thread.

Jess Hill (jesshill), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 21:10 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm listening to some Can now online, "LIKE INOBE GOD." Did I hear someone say "Philadelphia"?! Maybe, because this sounds like it could be their take on the Philadelphia Soul sound.

Rockist Scientist, Wednesday, 26 February 2003 21:13 (twenty-three years ago)

Funk is a way of playing music for people who want to dance tightened up

What does this phrase "tightened up" mean here?

Rockist Scientist, Wednesday, 26 February 2003 21:15 (twenty-three years ago)

The Meters is a bit empty, content-wise

MESSAGE FROM THE METERS

People, like birds from a feather, let's get together.

dleone (dleone), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 21:18 (twenty-three years ago)

"of"...they distracted me with the beat

dleone (dleone), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 21:21 (twenty-three years ago)

shouldn't the tightened/loosened thing be reversed, blah blah kraftwerk blah blah

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 21:22 (twenty-three years ago)

Funk is a way of playing music for people who want to dance tightened up

What does this phrase "tightened up" mean here?

-- Rockist Scientist

You ever watch "Soul Train"?
The whole idea of playing that music is to tighten up. Count a measure of James Brown and you'll get the idea, it's a very stiff--tightened up--four beats. The chank of those rhythm guitarists is very tightened up, too. Staccato. Staccato "robot" dancing.

Jess Hill (jesshill), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 21:25 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm not fucking asking for musicological analysis. Just string a thought or two together. If some of the ppl here love and have been listening to funk for a long time then I think its fair to ask.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 22:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Hands up if you prefer Kraftwerk.

Paula G., Wednesday, 26 February 2003 22:10 (twenty-three years ago)

It was my best joke ever...sob.

http://www.niancrae.com/jayinterview2.gif

Paula G., Wednesday, 26 February 2003 22:17 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm not fucking asking for musicological analysis. Just string a thought or two together. If some of the ppl here love and have been listening to funk for a long time then I think its fair to ask.

-- Julio Desouza

Saying "count along to James Brown's four beats" is musicological analysis, Julio? Snap fingers/move/dance?

Jess Hill (jesshill), Thursday, 27 February 2003 00:43 (twenty-three years ago)

Here's a new thread about my funk obsession thing.

Neudonym, Thursday, 27 February 2003 04:30 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't like James Brown.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 27 February 2003 08:49 (twenty-three years ago)

ooops!! sorry, i meant the METEORS!!!!!

bob snoom, Thursday, 27 February 2003 09:11 (twenty-three years ago)

''Saying "count along to James Brown's four beats" is musicological analysis, Julio?''

it isn't.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 27 February 2003 09:17 (twenty-three years ago)

back to Can if u don't mind..
I've always been frustrated by the later releases. Stuff like 'Landed' and 'Flow Motion' shine in parts but are ultimately pretty patchy and inconsistent. A lot of fluff but really not much to chew on. hence, I still haven't come around getting 'Soon over Babaaluma'.. tragic mistake?

Future Days and Monster Movie are really the shit, tho coming on to me as functionally opposite albums. the first being the numbingly beautiful late-nite bliss out album, while Monster movie is the perfect sdtrack for speed-crazed mornings watching the pale winter sun come up..

Fabrice (Fabfunk), Thursday, 27 February 2003 09:59 (twenty-three years ago)

They never topped 'Delay 1968' (some days I even believe this).

Andrew L (Andrew L), Thursday, 27 February 2003 10:39 (twenty-three years ago)

soundtracks is thee best can rekkid

schnell schnell, Thursday, 27 February 2003 11:25 (twenty-three years ago)

I like "Soon Over Babaluma" much more than any of the later records.

Outside the title track, most of the music is much more busy fusion than the stripped minimal sound on their earlier albums. Damo is gone, but the vocals are better on this one than later on when they started trying to write songs, otherwards it is mostly instrumental.

Michael Karoli gets down on a violin on one track which mingles in nicely with these weird soundscapes that Irmin Schmidt coaxes out of an Alpha 77 (whatever that is).

earlnash, Thursday, 27 February 2003 13:50 (twenty-three years ago)

Agreed that Soon Over Babaluma is really good. Not as great as Future Days, but it is well worth getting. There's one song that's not so hot--it's basically Can's take on a tango. But one semi-bad song and four really good ones makes it worthwhile. Side 2 (the songs "Chain Reaction" and "Quantum Physics") is the high point for me.

die9o (dhadis), Thursday, 27 February 2003 20:02 (twenty-three years ago)

"Chain Reaction"/"Quantum Physics" is a high a point for music in general for me. I'm still amazed that human beings were able to produce the end of "Quantum Physics".

dleone (dleone), Thursday, 27 February 2003 22:47 (twenty-three years ago)

anyone knows where to find their soundtrack for Wenders' 'Alice in the Cities'?

Fabrice (Fabfunk), Friday, 28 February 2003 08:44 (twenty-three years ago)

Are you kidding here? "Bel Air" is the single worst thing Can ever did - it's the ONLY time they ever sounded like a Prog Rock band. I'm with Juilan Cope on this one - I loathe that track and that makes listening to "Future Days" problematic. As it is, I love Can but the truth of the matter is that there is only one Can album which has no crap on it and that's "Monster Movie"

Dadaismus, Friday, 28 February 2003 16:15 (twenty-three years ago)

I happen to like the single worst thing that Can ever did. Seems like one of the few times (out of their longer songs) they didn't let there experimental jamming tendencies run away w/them

oops (Oops), Friday, 28 February 2003 16:18 (twenty-three years ago)

'I'm still amazed that human beings were able to produce the end of "Quantum Physics"'

they were GERMAN

dave q, Friday, 28 February 2003 16:24 (twenty-three years ago)

boo

dleone (dleone), Friday, 28 February 2003 16:28 (twenty-three years ago)

i hate can. as in the case of the velvet underground i will admit many of my favorite bands rip can off mercilessly but the original flavor was a disaster mostly. neu sucks too.

keith (keithmcl), Saturday, 1 March 2003 04:18 (twenty-three years ago)

Hands up for me, I love Can, and even the remix album is supergrebt.

Millar (Millar), Saturday, 1 March 2003 04:44 (twenty-three years ago)

that remix album wasx just pointless mostly, i thought calling it "sacrilege" was really overstating it

duane, Saturday, 1 March 2003 09:43 (twenty-three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.