what's so great about "sincerity"?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
doesn't it seem as much of a pose - and an even more cynical one at times - than the currently out of vogue "irony"?

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Thursday, 6 March 2003 20:05 (twenty-three years ago)

if you don't mean what you're saying, then why are you saying it?

Al (sitcom), Thursday, 6 March 2003 20:09 (twenty-three years ago)

sincerity is not a rhetorical device. i would say it is generally above scrutiny.

Aaron A., Thursday, 6 March 2003 20:13 (twenty-three years ago)

eggars to thread.

or not.

please not.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 6 March 2003 20:13 (twenty-three years ago)

David Fricke to thread!

jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 6 March 2003 20:17 (twenty-three years ago)

no, but sincerity can be a pose.
then again, irony can be deeply serious.
some people distrust sincerity, others distrust irony. they both have their different audiences. sometimes I'm a member of both camps.
no I'm not. yes I am.

Neudonym, Thursday, 6 March 2003 20:18 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't see what's so bad about irony or sincerity.. they're both perfectly valid methods of expression.

And really, if you're not being ironic or sincere in some fashion, then what are you?

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Thursday, 6 March 2003 20:22 (twenty-three years ago)

Has anyone named their band The Scare Quotes?

(© 2003 Amateurist)

Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 6 March 2003 20:22 (twenty-three years ago)

like curtis says... I guess I'm really saying is that a pose - ironic or sincere - is a neccessary part of art so dismissing artists as poseurs is a dead end.

also that being insincere or ironic can be honest - it can be a way of saying what you mean.

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Thursday, 6 March 2003 20:24 (twenty-three years ago)

By it's nature, isn't sincerity not a pose? If you're posing as sincere, then you're actually being insincere.

I have nothing against irony, but without some kind of feeling/emotion/heart/whatever you want to call it, it's hard to connect with a band. The difference between a Nirvana and the four million Nirvana soundalikes.

When I put Interpol in between a couple of similar bands - say, Joy Division and Echo and the Bunnymen, or even contemporary NYC acts like the Ex-Models and Erase Errata, they come off weaker. The wink-and-nod factor is just too much.

miloauckerman, Thursday, 6 March 2003 20:40 (twenty-three years ago)

The paradox-problem here is that when sincerity is a pose people will argue that it’s just become insincere—i.e., you not only have to “mean what you say,” but now you have to really mean to mean what you say. This just keeps reducing back to the idea that all music should somehow just come pouring forth from the soul, and that any calculation between the intuitive stage and the final result somehow makes things worse.

Personally, much of my interest in music is in what seem to be people’s calculations and decisions, rather than just their untreated impulses. I don’t think the untreated impulses are actually as different or interesting as people like to imagine, and I get the feeling that the biggest source of calculation in music is precisely in the service of removing all traces of calculation from music. This is the sincerity-as-another-pose issue, and it’s weird because for many people this is (usually rock) music: an attempt to laboriously craft something that seems uncrafted and immediate.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 6 March 2003 20:44 (twenty-three years ago)

The Scare Quotes address this on their newest record "'"'We Mean It, "Man"'"'"

Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 6 March 2003 20:48 (twenty-three years ago)

By it's nature, isn't sincerity not a pose? If you're posing as sincere, then you're actually being insincere.
...and we disappear into our own fundaments.

The key word here is POSE. If you're not posing Thhhhheeennnnnn you are sincere.
And, hey, lets not get toooo cynical. At least accept the faint, ethereal possibility that someone might actually be sincere/that the sincerity isn't an act.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Thursday, 6 March 2003 20:48 (twenty-three years ago)

argh! The post-moderness of this thread is irritating

oops (Oops), Thursday, 6 March 2003 20:49 (twenty-three years ago)

The only problem I have with sincerity is when it is used as a reason that I should like music that doesn't speak to me.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 6 March 2003 20:52 (twenty-three years ago)

(responding to a few earlier posts)

I think most artists are sincere. Sometimes even the major ones.

*

Sincerity doesn't have a lot to do with an artist not making "calculations and decisions." Johnny Cash's "American" recordings - covering modern rock songs. Sincere but calculated.

*

And I agree with Dan Perry that sincerity isn't necessarily positive on its own. An attribute, not an accolade.

miloauckerman, Thursday, 6 March 2003 20:55 (twenty-three years ago)

sincerity + irony x nitrous-oxide = Ween

nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 6 March 2003 20:58 (twenty-three years ago)

is the use of "calculated" as a pejorative a fetishization of the accidental? are we all a little over-concerned that an artist is manipulating us? we listen to music hoping it will illicit an emotional response in us, but we don't like it when we can smell that intent in it.

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Thursday, 6 March 2003 21:01 (twenty-three years ago)

do music fans sometimes overvalue heart over the head?

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Thursday, 6 March 2003 21:03 (twenty-three years ago)

I haven't heard of The Head, but Heart sux

oops (Oops), Thursday, 6 March 2003 21:06 (twenty-three years ago)

barracuda & magic man rock!

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Thursday, 6 March 2003 21:08 (twenty-three years ago)

I think the idea, Custos, is that making music is an act, and it’s almost necessarily a calculated act—on some level decisions are always being made about what is or isn’t a good chord progression, which lyrics are good one and which should be scratched out. And so sincerity operates on that level as well: any given piece of music is a set of those decisions “sincerely” meant to have a particular effect. The effect you’re shooting for can be one of what we call “sincerity” or what we call “irony” but in either case it’s a decision you’ve made in all honesty.

So low-level decisions never get called insincere—tuning one’s guitar or using non-improvised lyrics is rarely considered some sort of insincere pose—but at what point do we start drawing lines? The problem with the idea, in practice, is that it winds up being used to refer, basically, to whether or not artists’ music or lyrics can be reasonably believed to have to do with their actual lives, which is a bit silly—there’s no reason music can’t operate on the level of fiction or artifice just as “sincerely” as it can on the level of confessionalism. Beyond which “sincerity” winds up getting used to refer not to anything about the music’s production but about its, well, genre, about what types of things we usually deem sincere. (In an honest appraisal nothing could be more “sincere” than Max “I only sing about things that happen to me” Tundra, and yet I imagine you’d find more people calling him ironic or insincere than the other way round.)

This isn’t to say that “sincerity” as a concept doesn’t exist, just that its usual application to music leaves something to be desired. I get the sense Fritz and I are thinking about this very much the same way -- this fetishizing of spontaneity thing. I wrote some long thing about Stephin Merrit on here once addressing this issue.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 6 March 2003 21:10 (twenty-three years ago)

Put simply: why is music expected to operate on a level more intuitive and confessional and Dionysian, less crafted or artificial or Appollonian, than something like fiction is?

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 6 March 2003 21:12 (twenty-three years ago)

dan is otm

robin (robin), Thursday, 6 March 2003 21:13 (twenty-three years ago)

I presume you ask that question with prejudice, but I actually think there may be an answer -- which customarily I can only grope at meekly: music has a more immediate effect on people.

Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 6 March 2003 21:14 (twenty-three years ago)

Put simply: why is music expected to operate on a level more intuitive and confessional and Dionysian, less crafted or artificial or Appollonian, than something like fiction is?

is it because people think songs are somehow inherently auto-biography or selfportraiture no matter what?

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Thursday, 6 March 2003 21:15 (twenty-three years ago)

I think we entrust a piece of music with a greater share of our audiovisual/cognitive capacity than literature and thus we perhaps feel a greater stake in whether or not we're being "lied" to.

Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 6 March 2003 21:16 (twenty-three years ago)

Er, why did I say "audiovisual"?

Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 6 March 2003 21:16 (twenty-three years ago)

How about a nice mix of irony and sincerity? You know, something like "humanity"?

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Thursday, 6 March 2003 21:21 (twenty-three years ago)

Don't worry, Amat: audio for music and visual for lit! I definitely follow your point, so let me shift the examples to musical ones: take (a) musicals and show-tunes, and (b) popular music up to World War II or so. Both of these include really high levels of artifice, in the former to the extent of, well, outright acting. But I feel like similar levels of carefully-crafted stage-play in contemporary music get written off as dishonest and impossible to be moved by in anything but a distant conceptual way.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 6 March 2003 21:29 (twenty-three years ago)

The only problem I have with sincerity is when it is used as a reason that I should like music that doesn't speak to me.

What he said, of course.

"But the Dave Matthews Band are so sincere!"

"They still suck."

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 6 March 2003 21:31 (twenty-three years ago)

Also also: film occupies WAY more of our senses than music, and while it has similar issues with "naturalism" people don't necessarily prize honesty/sincerity as much as they do with music -- quite often they prize outright fantasy. (This has to do with that thing I was saying about Hal Hartley dialogue the other day -- how its staginess is a sincerity unto itself, and how for whatever reason I tend to like that sort of thing.)

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 6 March 2003 21:32 (twenty-three years ago)

Sincere question #1146: Nabisco, who are you talking about when you say "similar levels of carefully-crafted stage-play in contemporary music get written off as dishonest"?

Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 6 March 2003 21:52 (twenty-three years ago)

(I think clarification is in order, because "That Guy"--The Sincericist--is sort of becoming the bogeyman of ILX.)

Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 6 March 2003 21:54 (twenty-three years ago)

people don't necessarily prize honesty/sincerity as much as they do with music

Hmmm. I prize "naturalism" in film and literature WAY more than in music. (Been thinking about this especially after seeing All the Real Girls.) But maybe that's because I use music almost strictly for pleasure -- the pure, ephemeral enjoyment of sounds coming together in interesting ways -- and almost never to confront any stark emotional truths. (Which is not to say I don't prize "emotion" in music -- but that its function is mostly aesthetic.)

jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 6 March 2003 22:52 (twenty-three years ago)

B-b-but "naturalism" can be perceived in literature and film because the dominant modes of those forms of art are representational--i.e. the attempt to duplicate, in some fashion, lived experience. Music is (not essentially, but as it is now), by and large, formal--or at least not representational in any easily-perceiveable or -reproduceable way. So the question of sincerity and intentionality is inevitably more fraught.

(I'm going to start an All the Real Girls thread tomorrow; can you wait for me?)

Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 6 March 2003 22:55 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm much less bothered with sincerity these days than I am with 'authenticity' as described by Heidegger, ie; just understanding what you're doing and why and how, a full and reasoned engagement with motivations and causes and effects - I've not got anything to hand and I'm absolutely shattered after a marathon read last night, or I'd describe it better. 'Sincerity' implies a degree of connection between artist and art that I'm dubious about.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 6 March 2003 23:01 (twenty-three years ago)

Amat: that’s why I’m thinking of “sincerity” as the “naturalism” of music. (Actually there’s a certain sense of naturalism available to music—i.e., “real”-sounding recordings of “real people” playing “real instruments,” not stylized by intermediary technology or whatever—and, as might be expected, that gets conflated with “sincerity” a decent amount.)

You’re right, the Sincere Guy has totally been made a Bogeyman of ILM, though I’m glad you said Bogeyman instead of Straw Man, because not only does Sincere Guy exist all over the place, but the general idea he’s built on is one that functions just as much in here. I mean, I know I think that way sometimes. But I think the concept of “sincerity” that kind of thinking is built on is actually sort of a faux-concept, or at least not quite what it seems, so I’m skeptical of it in a lot of cases—especially since a lot of things I’ve liked lately have been tagged insincere or soulless or what have you and I just don’t hear that at all.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 6 March 2003 23:30 (twenty-three years ago)

To me, "sincerity" has the same problems as "the artist's intentions" -- both are impossible to gauge with any degree of certainty, which makes them kind of useless as measuring sticks.

Burr, Friday, 7 March 2003 00:09 (twenty-three years ago)

yeah!

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Friday, 7 March 2003 00:12 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh now I see why the kids like Bright Eyes....

brg30 (brg30), Friday, 7 March 2003 04:22 (twenty-three years ago)

Though I still think Jandek is the most sincere motherfucker of them all.

brg30 (brg30), Friday, 7 March 2003 04:24 (twenty-three years ago)

Why do I get the creepy impression we soon won't be able to to use the words s*nc*r* or s*nc*r*ty on the forum, the same way we aren't supposed to use *nfl**nc*?

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Friday, 7 March 2003 05:15 (twenty-three years ago)

Custos, a few people's deciding that "infuence" is not a useful word has probably led to more usage of the word "influence" here than there otherwise would have been: as a gag it's a tremendously ineffective one.

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 7 March 2003 05:52 (twenty-three years ago)

which gag?

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Friday, 7 March 2003 05:55 (twenty-three years ago)

I like how "ironic" lyrics are (potentially) extremely specific, and the "sincere" ones are usually one half-assed water-treading rockmetaphor after another. "writing frightening verse to a bucktoothed girl in luxembourg" vs "[eeuh tried to think of an Elliott Smith lyric and thankfully couldn't]"

g.cannon (gcannon), Friday, 7 March 2003 06:04 (twenty-three years ago)

"To me, "sincerity" has the same problems as "the artist's intentions" -- both are impossible to gauge with any degree of certainty, which makes them kind of useless as measuring sticks."

If there were some other, objective, "measuring sticks," then the subjectivity of sincerity or intent would render them irrelevant. But there aren't. All criticism is subjective, drawing on what the critic perceives of the work and what the critic perceives of the artist.

miloauckerman, Friday, 7 March 2003 06:11 (twenty-three years ago)

(Custos: "gag" as in thing that stops you from speaking, not joke.)

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 7 March 2003 06:37 (twenty-three years ago)

Ah.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Friday, 7 March 2003 13:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Sincerity - impossible to prove, as Nabisco says.

"Sincerity" as musical ticksheet i.e. stripped-down instrumentation, 'hushed' vocals or alternately very passionate/soulful vocals - bogus, and often horrible sounding.

Claiming to especially value sincerity as a listener/critic - generally a pose, because of the impossibility to prove thing and because it is a dodge to win the moral high ground when often all you really mean is 'I like the genre of Sincere Music' (see para above). Not that you insincerely like that music, obviously.

BUT BUT BUT. I adore Dexy's Midnight Runners and part of the reason I do is that Kevin Rowland sounds so utterly, foolishly, frighteningly sincere. So I'm not going to dismiss sincerity. But maybe I need to find better words for what he does. Or work out a position whereby Kevin Rowland is the only pop star to have EVER been sincere!

Tom (Groke), Friday, 7 March 2003 13:10 (twenty-three years ago)

"By it's nature, isn't sincerity not a pose? If you're posing as sincere, then you're actually being insincere."

I agree

"but without some kind of feeling/emotion/heart/whatever you want to call it, it's hard to connect with a band."

I don't feel i have to "connect" with a band to love them. shyness, goofing around to avoid expressing emotion, coldness, cynicism - it's all as fascinating to behold as someone being "sincere". that said, i've nothing against sincerity - but I agree that it's impossible to prove: without knowing an artist personally, you can't know if they "mean it". (I always get a vibe of : "I like the tunes" = "They mean it!" and "I don't like the tunes" = "They don't mean it!").

weasel diesel (K1l14n), Friday, 7 March 2003 13:15 (twenty-three years ago)

i think the last 2 posts kinda nail it

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Friday, 7 March 2003 14:44 (twenty-three years ago)

No, I don't like that habit of tossing out words because their meaning is fraught with complications. I think sincerity is something that can be divined, can be appreciated, can even be honored in music as in the other arts. Certain reigning conceptions of sincerity leave much to be desired. Just because the language is lacking, it doesn't mean that the underlying impression is false or worthless.

Amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 7 March 2003 16:24 (twenty-three years ago)

HERE, HERE! Give the Amatuerist a pat on the back.
I agree with all my heart and soul with what he just said.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Friday, 7 March 2003 16:27 (twenty-three years ago)

I think at the very least though there needs to be a shift away from the idea that sincerity is always a good - if it is a musical quality it can be mishandled or mismanaged just like any other. The prevailing criticisms of Eminem or Bright Eyes - that they are self-indulgent, giving simply too much information about their lives and feelings - are examples of critics finding sincerity to be badly.

Tom (Groke), Friday, 7 March 2003 16:29 (twenty-three years ago)

I wonder what you all will make of this article on Todd Haynes's Velvet Goldmine. To sum up, if I can: once we have realized that "realism" (substitute "sincerity" re. music, per Nabisco's formulation above) is a construction, we need not be "post-realism"--we can choose between realisms, and judge them on their own merits.

Amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 7 March 2003 16:34 (twenty-three years ago)

I want to note that I am not in any sense advocating tossing the idea of "sincerity," only reconsidering the way in which it's currently used -- mostly because I think artifice can be completely sincere as well, and I don't like for it to be thought of as a liability in the face of what gets called "sincere" music.

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 7 March 2003 16:50 (twenty-three years ago)

I just want to make sure we're not putting a damper on attempts to divine traces of sincerity in an artists' music because doing so is difficult. "Artifice" can be as much a crutch as "sincerity" (viz, again, Momus).

Amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 7 March 2003 17:06 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh, and now that I think about it, I think I tend to use the word "earnest" instead of sincere, since for whatever reason earnestness seems to imply less of a split between genuine/ingenuine and more just some quality in the way someone's chosen to present material to you. Ed Burns films would be "earnest" whether they were sincere or not; Miss Kittin is not very "earnest" whether she's sincere or not.

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 7 March 2003 17:32 (twenty-three years ago)

(And "earnest" also swings nicely from artificial to not: old musicals are earnest as hell, but also patently artificial and insincere.)

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 7 March 2003 17:35 (twenty-three years ago)

Does "earnest" imply for you a certain level of commitment to the work? An emotional investment?

Amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 7 March 2003 17:37 (twenty-three years ago)

(On the part of the author[s]...)

Amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 7 March 2003 17:38 (twenty-three years ago)

My beef with sincerity (or artistic intent) is not that it's HARD to devine, but that it's impossible to. And even if it weren't, I don't see that it really gets you anywhere.

Burr, Friday, 7 March 2003 18:10 (twenty-three years ago)

The prevailing criticisms of Eminem or Bright Eyes - that they are self-indulgent, giving simply too much information about their lives and feelings - are examples of critics finding sincerity to be badly.
Well, I don't think Eminem bitchin' 'bout his ma has anything to do with sincerity. In fact, considering that part of it might be phony baloney childish whining from someone whose mom didn't (in real life) treat him all that bad. (Or, considering how he behaves, mebbe she didn't spank him ENOUGH.)

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Friday, 7 March 2003 18:16 (twenty-three years ago)

The difficulty with sincerity is that it's only derived from lyrics. Guitarists/drummers/DJs/pianists all of these people aren't typically called sincere, unless there are surrounding circumstances to make a listener consider the motivation of their creation. So instead you see the "sincere" tag stuck on, essentially, singer/songwriter types -- the Springsteens, Mitchells, Rundgrens, Obersts and even Eminems. Listeners have a hard time understanding that some artists choose to sing in character, that "I" != the artist (a quick example: on Wilco's Summerteeth Tweedy sings in "Via Chicago," "I dreamt about killing you again last night/ And it felt alright to me." This was widely interpreted to be his acknowledgement of a violent impulse toward his wife. At a couple of shows after the record came out, some people were holding up signs calling him a wife beater). Artists have to work to create a schism between themselves and their art -- Eminem's personas, for instance -- but this is largely unsuccessful, because people search so hard for real life crossover with an artist's music. Some artists respond by becoming vague with their lyrics, which can work wonders ("pop music's greatest strength is its ability to depict the torments of personal crises through lyrical ambiguities," I wrote once, and I stand by that) or can result in being labeled pretentious (hello Malkmus!). The other possible response: to slur your words, making the sound as a whole the message more than anything, which can be extremely powerful ("Louie Louie" the obvious example). What this boils down to is that many times what a listener decides is sincere is just an act by the artist. And since sincerity is undeniably seen as a postive trait by many, it has flooded the market in a disgusting way (a reason why I dislike bands like Staind, for instance) that has rendered the concept of sincerity obsolete. This is all slightly off topic, but my senior thesis was along these lines and this thread got me thinking about it again...

Yanc3y (ystrickler), Friday, 7 March 2003 18:54 (twenty-three years ago)

Does "earnest" imply for you a certain level of commitment to the work? An emotional investment?

Not at all, and that's why I like "earnest" as a word: to me it just implies that the tone of the work, the way it's presented, has qualities of ostensible honesty and forthrightness.

For instance, Hollywood makes movies all the time where there's not what we conventionally call "commitment to the work" or "emotional investment" on anyone's part (on the "artistic" level, anyway), but the tone of these movies can be "earnest" beyond all belief.

So I like "earnest" as a possible description of the results of artistic decisions, and the way the listener or viewer is being communicated with; I'm skeptical of "sincere" because it shifts that focus further back on whether someone "really" means what they say. (I mean, can art lie?)

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 7 March 2003 19:11 (twenty-three years ago)

"I quite liked that singer-songwriter."

"Yeah, kinda, but he was so, I dunno, goddamned earnest."

That's what I'm thinking when I hear the word earnest.

Cozen (Cozen), Friday, 7 March 2003 19:17 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't think sincerity is just a matter of lyrics.

Amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 7 March 2003 19:20 (twenty-three years ago)

I guess "earnest" does sort of slant that way, doesn't it. But, for instance: the most earnest thing I've heard in the past year has been the Streets record. "Weak Become Heroes," "Stay Positive" -- this stuff is as earnest as any singer-songwriter, and in a good way. I just hesitate to call it "sincere" because I don't want to imply that he "means" what he's saying/doing any more than, I dunno, Nelly "means" what he's saying/doing.

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 7 March 2003 19:37 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't think sincerity is just a matter of lyrics.

I like this sentence because I think its right, but I think that sincerity is almost always talked about in terms of lyrics. But no it isn't, I lied back there, a few words ago, because sincerity is talked about in terms of image (Shania), in terms of sound ("dude, they're not punk; yeah mebbes they sound it, but they don't act it") which also brings in the way folks act.

I like the idea of saying "I really like the drumming on this record, it's so sincere."

Cozen (Cozen), Friday, 7 March 2003 19:50 (twenty-three years ago)

If I didn't have the dual problems that nits is having of a) telling whether the artist really means it or not b) deciphering whether sincerity is really a sought value. (Which, looking at the surrounding discussions in print media we see 'he means it, man' used to be a common rhetorical flourish [maybe still is] for the sincerity brigade but was transmogrified by the anti-dudes into a put down of that brigade).

I'm lost, you are too, right?

Cozen (Cozen), Friday, 7 March 2003 19:53 (twenty-three years ago)

What I neglected to clearly put in my message was that, for a lot of people, lyrics = the artist. So lyrics are a direct window into an artist's psyche. For someone to be considered "sincere" (I'm with Cozen on the interpretation of "earnest"), the image has to match up with the lyrical content or, to a lesser extent, that person's sound. When it doesn't (Shania's Ramones T), then the artist is being calculating.

Yanc3y (ystrickler), Friday, 7 March 2003 19:54 (twenty-three years ago)

If I didn't have the dual problems that nits is having of a) telling whether the artist really means it or not b) deciphering whether sincerity is really a sought value.

I definitely think that sincerity is a sought value. Listening to music, for many people, is a very personal endeavor, and listeners want to feel that an artist has just as much personally at stake. It's hard to tell if an artist really means what they're saying for the most part, but for the ILX Boogeyman that Amateurist identified upthread, the artists that are sincere are generally the artists that he/she likes the most. It's an attribute bestowed by the listener, because if you deeply care about someone's music it's natural to think/hope/want that they care about it too.

Yanc3y (ystrickler), Friday, 7 March 2003 19:58 (twenty-three years ago)

[B]ecause if you deeply care about someone's music it's natural to think/hope/want that they care about it too.

A very odd, odd thing to say. But interesting. I don't agree but similarly I don't have any thoughts right now, sorry. But, yeah, odd thing to say, I think.

Cozen (Cozen), Friday, 7 March 2003 23:06 (twenty-three years ago)

"Claiming to especially value sincerity as a listener/critic - generally a pose, because of the impossibility to prove thing and because it is a dodge to win the moral high ground when often all you really mean is 'I like the genre of Sincere Music' (see para above)."

I was thinking about this whole notion that people think they "know the singer means it", cos you can tell when you look into the whites of his eyes and listen to his pained wail. and if you suggest that proving they "mean it" is actually impossible without knowing the singer personally, they'll suggest you're a soulless bastard who has "missed the point" of "what makes music great". but imagine i applied these criteria to a political debate and said "I know Bush isn't after Iraq's oil because i looked into the whites of his eyes and heard the passion and sincerity in his voice!", then i would (rightly) be called naive.

weasel diesel (K1l14n), Tuesday, 18 March 2003 09:32 (twenty-three years ago)

fifteen years pass...

one of my buddies said he questioned the sincerity of no tears left for cry (in the vocal performance) - which i found super weird. how do you qualify sincerity in music and what doesn't feel sincere to you?

sweetheart of the Neo Geo (Ross), Monday, 24 September 2018 16:45 (seven years ago)

I can judge when a performer is attempting to convey sincerity, and whether or not it's believable is entirely up to the skill of the performer. Whether it is *actually* sincere cannot be determined.

Οὖτις, Monday, 24 September 2018 16:52 (seven years ago)

Man what a weird fucking time it was that pundits were *sincerely* suggesting that "irony is dead" because someone blew up a couple buildings and disrupted our otherwise fat lives.

Fedora Dostoyevsky (man alive), Monday, 24 September 2018 17:14 (seven years ago)

yeah that was p ridiculous

Οὖτις, Monday, 24 September 2018 17:17 (seven years ago)

David Brooks types opining that irony was dead in the pages of the paper of record gave me at least as much of a creeping fascism feeling at that time as anything going on today.

Fedora Dostoyevsky (man alive), Monday, 24 September 2018 18:24 (seven years ago)

I think music is generally sincere, insofar as it's expression and requires talent. It's harder to fake because you need to construct something that is not truthful, just like lies are more elaborate than truth.
Can we feel fake music / emotions ? Yeah I guess.
Then again, music can be about something. A cultural commentary for example. You can be ironic then.
That's as far as my analysis goes, I don't really get what "irony" was supposed to be in the indie context, it was rather confusing and I couldn't give a shit. People seemed to celebrate it. As seen from 2018, it seems very silly.

Nabozo, Monday, 24 September 2018 18:48 (seven years ago)

i thought irony died when alanis released that song and muddled the definition beyond all recovery

milkshake duck george bernard shaw (rushomancy), Monday, 24 September 2018 22:45 (seven years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.