"So do I think we should do this? Well, depends on what "this" is. If "this" is "kill Saddam and then go home," oh God no. The very idea is terrifying and we will suffer for it someday. But if the idea of "this" is "give this nation a kick start towards freedom, while helping Afghanistan back up on its feet and finessing Iran towards its inevitable course to liberalizing," well, yeah, actually, I am. Americans have suffered for too long because of the events of the Middle East, events that really aren't that much of our doing. We've supported some dictators and eased others into power, but we never had much choice in these countries. (The vacuum of good leadership in the Arab world in the last century is truly tragic--Sadat, Ataturk and Katami notwithstanding.) We weren't the Turks, who ruled the region for 500 years, and we weren't the French and British, who stepped into the post-Ottoman breach for a much shorter period of time. We give Israel a lot of money, but we give Egypt almost as much (three billion a year to two billion a year) so the constant Arab cries of favoritism on our part aren't that convincing. I, having done some amateur but concerted investigation into the history of the Middle East, am hard pressed to really say that the problems facing the region--particularly those of the Arabs--is really America's to account for, so much that it justifies persistant terrorist attacks upon Americans here and abroad."
I'm not sure what to think about this, though at least he seems more rational and civilized about it than, say, Charlie Daniels.
― Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Saturday, 22 March 2003 02:36 (twenty-three years ago)
― Nordicskillz (Nordicskillz), Saturday, 22 March 2003 02:37 (twenty-three years ago)
But that solo song on the website is grate!!
― Adam A. (Keiko), Saturday, 22 March 2003 02:49 (twenty-three years ago)
― JP Albin (John Paul Albin), Saturday, 22 March 2003 04:14 (twenty-three years ago)
― keith (keithmcl), Saturday, 22 March 2003 05:14 (twenty-three years ago)
then again, sun ra would have also been against the war
― jess (dubplatestyle), Saturday, 22 March 2003 05:20 (twenty-three years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Saturday, 22 March 2003 07:52 (twenty-three years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Saturday, 22 March 2003 07:54 (twenty-three years ago)
Though we give Egypt almost as much "accountable" money as Israel does not mean there is no favortism towards the Zionist State. Almost 100 percent of the money that is given to Egyt is in military aid and a good part of that is funneled back to US companies through maintenance and training programs. The Egyptian military is highly dependent on US firms like Raytheon to keep their technology on-line. Other than the military investment, there is very little US involvement west of the Suez. And, when was the last time a vote in Congress went against Israel when a division was drawn between pan Arabia and the Zionist State?
― Imam Yrami, Saturday, 22 March 2003 08:14 (twenty-three years ago)
What about Israel?
― David Allen, Saturday, 22 March 2003 13:51 (twenty-three years ago)
― French Diplomat, Saturday, 22 March 2003 13:55 (twenty-three years ago)
― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Saturday, 22 March 2003 16:50 (twenty-three years ago)
Is this a piss take?
― Callum (Callum), Saturday, 22 March 2003 17:01 (twenty-three years ago)
― DV (dirtyvicar), Saturday, 22 March 2003 17:32 (twenty-three years ago)
― your null fame (yournullfame), Saturday, 22 March 2003 23:21 (twenty-three years ago)
― David Allen, Saturday, 22 March 2003 23:48 (twenty-three years ago)
― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Sunday, 23 March 2003 01:22 (twenty-three years ago)
I'll further point out the even more obvious and say that U.S. support for Egypt is just as questionable as our support for the Israeli occupation.
― Pete Scholtes, Sunday, 23 March 2003 21:34 (twenty-three years ago)
― P, Sunday, 23 March 2003 21:38 (twenty-three years ago)
― Kerry (dymaxia), Monday, 24 March 2003 00:47 (twenty-three years ago)
I mean, isn't the whole purpose of the protests to ensure that soldiers don't die for no reason? Save for the vast amount of protesting happening solely because of the hipness of it all, that is.
One person said "Rallying against the war is a slap in the face to the soldiers on the line." Aren't the soldiers fighting for our right to rally against the war? If it weren't, the war would be redundant.
― David Allen, Monday, 24 March 2003 01:38 (twenty-three years ago)
― Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 24 March 2003 04:27 (twenty-three years ago)
― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Monday, 24 March 2003 04:28 (twenty-three years ago)
you pieces of shit
― Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 24 March 2003 04:37 (twenty-three years ago)
― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Monday, 24 March 2003 04:54 (twenty-three years ago)
I think the argument goes: By protesting the war, you prolong it, and get more people killed.
― My name is Kenny (My name is Kenny), Monday, 24 March 2003 05:21 (twenty-three years ago)
― Tad (llamasfur), Monday, 24 March 2003 05:26 (twenty-three years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Monday, 24 March 2003 05:28 (twenty-three years ago)
War is not good for babies and other living things.
Your pal,http://members.aol.com/dubplatestyle/mase.jpgMa$e
― Ma$e, Monday, 24 March 2003 05:31 (twenty-three years ago)
David: in the excerpt above he pretends the amount of aid we send Egypt and Israel is somehow directly representative of our overall support for them -- "We give Egypt almost as much money as Israel," he seems to be saying, "so obviously there's no bias there." This completely ignores the millions of more important ways in which we pander to Israel, going well beyond the technical dollar figure of the aid we give them. Say, for instance, the glaring fact that we are ostensibly invading Iraq because of their non-compliance with UN resolutions, as compared to the fact that the US has done everything in its very great power to keep Israel from suffering any consequences for their non-compliance with UN resolutions -- like, I dunno, the settlements they keep building in clear violation of practically everything ever except for American say-so.
Pretending the gap between our treatment of Israel and the Muslim world is as simple as a $1 billion aid discrepancy between Israel and Egypt is dishonest on pretty unimaginable levels.
― nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 24 March 2003 05:43 (twenty-three years ago)
Even though I'm not a fan of Michael Moore, I do agree with what he said in his book, in regards to Israel. If the Palestinian people were to just peacefully protest; lying down in the road preventing Israeli tanks from coming into their town, in stead of blowing themselves up, the entire world would be much more sympathetic to their plight.
I'm personally frustrated by the American media's take on it all. I'm Jewish, so I obviously don't beleive in some Jewish run media, but I can say that all I ever hear about in the news is off Palestinian suicide bombers, never of anything Israel could have done to provoke it. There is a very obvious bias.
― David Allen, Monday, 24 March 2003 12:46 (twenty-three years ago)
― g--ff c-nn-n (gcannon), Monday, 24 March 2003 14:14 (twenty-three years ago)
(*unfortunately including the Americans who are running the US and th world right now)
― Dadaismus, Monday, 24 March 2003 14:19 (twenty-three years ago)
Hell, even when Americans do it the Israeli bulldozers run them over.
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 24 March 2003 18:48 (twenty-three years ago)
um.......... how? the protests didn't prevent the start of the war. the portestors are not in the war zone. the politicians in power pay little to no attention to the protestors. protest of this war is useful only as a symbolic gesture.
― bucky wunderlick (bucky), Monday, 24 March 2003 19:26 (twenty-three years ago)
― justin s., Tuesday, 25 March 2003 08:49 (twenty-three years ago)
― JP Albin (John Paul Albin), Sunday, 30 March 2003 23:40 (twenty-three years ago)
― justin s., Monday, 31 March 2003 01:08 (twenty-three years ago)
― David Allen, Monday, 31 March 2003 01:28 (twenty-three years ago)
(It's not that my sarcasm meter is off, it's just that I don't care.)
― justin s., Monday, 31 March 2003 01:37 (twenty-three years ago)
heheh. you like glassjaw.
― your null fame (yournullfame), Monday, 31 March 2003 02:44 (twenty-three years ago)
― justin s., Monday, 31 March 2003 02:50 (twenty-three years ago)
― justin s., Monday, 31 March 2003 02:56 (twenty-three years ago)