Michael Moore's Oscar speech: truely ROCK AND ROLL?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Seriously, this is the best rock and roll moment in ages.

Agree?

Calum, Friday, 28 March 2003 12:32 (twenty-three years ago)

"Punks should be either right-wing or apolitical, otherwise they're just hippies" - Johny Ramone

dave q, Friday, 28 March 2003 12:34 (twenty-three years ago)

Is this the same Ramone that wanted to 'bomb those towelheads'?

Calum, Friday, 28 March 2003 12:36 (twenty-three years ago)

Michael Moore for President, I say.
He can't possibly do a worse job than the current monkey, can he?

russ t, Friday, 28 March 2003 12:50 (twenty-three years ago)

Funny how he was applauded for pointing out the very thing he was then booed for. Confrontation is what he does. But was it rock & roll? Putting acid in the punch bowl at the White House is rock & roll.

dave225 (Dave225), Friday, 28 March 2003 12:54 (twenty-three years ago)

David Palmer for President dammit

stevem (blueski), Friday, 28 March 2003 12:55 (twenty-three years ago)

I can't actually believe anyone put a tick next to George Bush's name. I mean... really? Has Jeremy Beadle got something to do with this?

Calum, Friday, 28 March 2003 12:56 (twenty-three years ago)

no cuz rock n roll is lame and Michael Moore rules.

gabriel (gabe), Friday, 28 March 2003 12:57 (twenty-three years ago)

it didn't have much of a beat or a tune

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Friday, 28 March 2003 13:19 (twenty-three years ago)

so it was punk andrew ;-)

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 28 March 2003 13:32 (twenty-three years ago)

no it was the dead c! ;-)

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Friday, 28 March 2003 13:36 (twenty-three years ago)

:-(

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 28 March 2003 13:37 (twenty-three years ago)

I love the Dead C! Turn that :-( sideways! Sort of! One bit of it! You get the idea! :-)

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Friday, 28 March 2003 13:39 (twenty-three years ago)

'David Palmer for President dammit '

- but he already is! Even better would be if his son, surely the most stupid person on the planet (well, maybe kim is stupider..), became president after him, Bush dynasty style!

Robin Goad (rgoad), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:00 (twenty-three years ago)

well, if you love them a tiny bit then i'll turn it uside down AND add some more :-))))))))

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:10 (twenty-three years ago)

Damn right !
Rock and Roll ! He tells it like it is. Very refreshing.
As for the Statesman Blair ? You can keep him.

kevin brady (groeuvre), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:12 (twenty-three years ago)

Going to the Oscars isn't very rock n' roll.

hstencil, Friday, 28 March 2003 14:15 (twenty-three years ago)

HA I love them a LOT so y'know :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))) I just got Harsh 70s Reality on vinyl actually, and DR503 and to return to this thread I guess there's more to r'n'r than like REBELLION MAN and also hstencil makes a massively good point. Him not even being there to collect his oscar would've been pretty cool.

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:17 (twenty-three years ago)

''I just got Harsh 70s Reality on vinyl actually, and DR503''

on vinyl! and i haven't even got DR503. damn you!

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:54 (twenty-three years ago)

but you can get dr503C and get half of "the dead c perform max harris" cassette PLUS "the sun stabbed." and you're so up on the deal, you'll be expecting the guy you bought it from to shoot you in the back.

your null fame (yournullfame), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:55 (twenty-three years ago)

heh, Julio I've got both of those on vinyl too.

hstencil, Friday, 28 March 2003 14:59 (twenty-three years ago)

*sigh*

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:01 (twenty-three years ago)

Sorry, Julio. YES get DR503C, as far as Cd versions go it's GREAT. Actually I might be able to get my hands on one to sell you, maybe cheap (I don't know it isn't mine), email if yr interested, prob cheaper overall wherever you are... HA this seems to have become a DEAD C thread (for now, anyway). Good. Hey good one hstencil

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:01 (twenty-three years ago)

andrew- you got email.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:04 (twenty-three years ago)

Hold on - I want to backtrack a bit. Re: the Ramone quote that kicked off this discussion. Neutral punks, I have no problem whatsoever imagining, but right-wing punks? Give me a fucking break. Didn't British punk find its antithesis in the apotheosis of hardcore, self-righteous Thatcherism? Haven't the most strident punk groups (The Dead Kennedys, for example) always, if they've espoused any political views at all, been left-wing ones? I hate to air my political biases here, but I will. I just have a hard time picturing right-wing punks. Punks protesting for the war, punks hanging at the Republican National Convention, etc. Libertarian punks, definitely, but not punks as modern conservatives as it's considered today. Does anyone agree with me here, or should we go back to talking about dead c?

justin s., Friday, 28 March 2003 16:41 (twenty-three years ago)

Shouldn't we always?

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Friday, 28 March 2003 16:42 (twenty-three years ago)

It's been common knowledge for many, many years that Johnny Ramone is a right-wing asshole.

hstencil, Friday, 28 March 2003 16:44 (twenty-three years ago)

"I like Nixon, too!" - Paul Westerberg

dave q, Friday, 28 March 2003 16:45 (twenty-three years ago)

So there's one I guess... also the Dead Boys maybe, tho that was prob just image

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Friday, 28 March 2003 16:47 (twenty-three years ago)

There's a lot more lovin' for M. Moore here than there is on ILM's evil counterpart.

Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Friday, 28 March 2003 16:57 (twenty-three years ago)

ILE's evil counterpart, you mean. use yr moderator powah to make this post look stupid.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 28 March 2003 17:28 (twenty-three years ago)

The other post is on ILE, Julio. Keep up. =)

Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Friday, 28 March 2003 18:07 (twenty-three years ago)

jeez i made myself look stupid (not for the first time)

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 28 March 2003 18:21 (twenty-three years ago)

Would've been more effective if he didn't look like some slovenly couch potato up there, panting over the mic. Chomsky-isms and Big Mac attacks. Moral equivalence. Discuss.

maria b (maria b), Friday, 28 March 2003 19:37 (twenty-three years ago)

"Going to the Oscars isn't very rock n' roll. "
so i guess that means eminem is the *real* rock n roller.

although gael bernal is the indie rock heartbreaker. citing frida kahlo, breaking the academy rules to mention peace, introducing caetano veloso. being generally low key and looking damn finer than anyone else that night. *sigh*

lolita corpus (lolitacorpus), Friday, 28 March 2003 20:03 (twenty-three years ago)

"Would've been more effective if he didn't look like some slovenly couch potato up there, panting over the mic. Chomsky-isms and Big Mac attacks. Moral equivalence. Discuss."

OK, what? He should've been wearing a sequined gown? I think it was plenty effective just as it was. He is what he is, and I'm glad for it. We can't all look as good as I do. Faulty logic. Continue discussing.

matt riedl (veal), Saturday, 29 March 2003 01:08 (twenty-three years ago)

Michael Moore's no better than Ann Coulter, though his tits are bigger so maybe that's the tie breaker.

James Blount (James Blount), Saturday, 29 March 2003 01:11 (twenty-three years ago)

While I don't think Michael Moore is the most intelligent or articulate liberal out there, and I regret the fact that he's almost always pegged as a spokesman for liberalism... he's never said anything as virulently racist, hateful or outright retarded as certain comments that have escaped Coulter's mouth. She truly is a vicious bitch, and while Moore is something of a blowhard, he's nowhere NEAR as bad as Coulter. Give the poor guy a little credit. He's still smarting over that little incident at the Oscars.

If you had said that Michael Moore is no better than David Horowitz or Andrew Sullivan, that would have been different. (Actually I kind of like Andrew Sullivan...) But Anne Coulter? Ugh. Someone take her out of the gene pool, post-haste.

justin s., Saturday, 29 March 2003 01:50 (twenty-three years ago)

Hey! Hey! Michael Moore is fat. That says a lot about him and his politics.

Clan of the Moddest Mice, Saturday, 29 March 2003 02:52 (twenty-three years ago)

julio, just to help clear this up, there's dr503 cd (original vinyl plus "performs Max Harris" (which i have the vinyl, tape and cd of)) and dr503c cd (less of the original dr503 album but other useful single and ep stuff (which i have on vinyl as well)), and then there's harsh '70s reality which you'll want on vinyl (yes) for a couple of tracks, .. maybe it can be arranged for you to purchase some of this stuff (as these guys deserve not to be copied despite the damn limited editions)

george gosset (gegoss), Saturday, 29 March 2003 09:03 (twenty-three years ago)

the way the music comes in over the end of Moore as a sicko boo-fest fanfare, with the audience swinging/clapping so out of sync -- perfect dead c found sounds (if a bit too well known for their discerning obscure/elite hardcore fanbase)

thurston already cashed in on this one, but i guess he could do a sequel, but better would be the dead "covering" sy "Marilyn Moore" using aforementioned aritfacts qua appropriation of american corporate assets -- the bottomless dead c technological arsenal is what the world needs here

george gosset (gegoss), Saturday, 29 March 2003 09:13 (twenty-three years ago)

Discuss implications of 'bottomless technological arsenals' re current utopian situ the world is in today!

dave q, Saturday, 29 March 2003 10:37 (twenty-three years ago)

saw him give a speech the other night at some rally in nyc; he took the opportunity to finish his oscar speech. it was actually pretty funny. not sure if it was 'truly rock'n'roll', tho

geeta (geeta), Saturday, 29 March 2003 10:43 (twenty-three years ago)

did he cuss out 'the help' per usual

James Blount (James Blount), Saturday, 29 March 2003 10:46 (twenty-three years ago)

haha no

blount when are you gonna get aim?

geeta (geeta), Saturday, 29 March 2003 10:49 (twenty-three years ago)

I feel freaky perv enuff posting here, aims like a whole nuther level of cyberperv (ie. next month maybe)

James Blount (James Blount), Saturday, 29 March 2003 10:52 (twenty-three years ago)

haha cool

i'm still writing that lame-ass thesis (ie taking a five min break to post to ilm between every paragraph)

geeta (geeta), Saturday, 29 March 2003 10:54 (twenty-three years ago)

heh that me except insert 'going out for the evening' 9 pm: 'well I better get going; first I'll see whats going on ILx real quick though' five minutes later (seemingly) 'fuck it's six am'

James Blount (James Blount), Saturday, 29 March 2003 10:59 (twenty-three years ago)

''julio, just to help clear this up, there's dr503 cd (original vinyl plus "performs Max Harris" (which i have the vinyl, tape and cd of)) and dr503c cd (less of the original dr503 album but other useful single and ep stuff (which i have on vinyl as well)), and then there's harsh '70s reality which you'll want on vinyl (yes) for a couple of tracks, .. maybe it can be arranged for you to purchase some of this stuff (as these guys deserve not to be copied despite the damn limited editions)''

I'm sorry...wtf gg! was i dreaming abt that thread you started and we had that, what, five day fight over the dead c/opprobium crap and now you're telling me not to rip them off!

I like you gg. I'm not joking. you're one of the grebt posters.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Saturday, 29 March 2003 11:19 (twenty-three years ago)

Michael Moore deserves a Grammy for 'best spoken word performance' for that speech. There's nothing wrong with him existing or speaking his mind, but I wouldn't call him a 'liberal'--a true liberal in these days and times wouldn't have said anything, maybe flashed a peace sign or something, and would be properly appalled at such a breach of decorum

Moore is a radical, baby, and only his endorsement of Nader (who isn't really so much a radical as all that) (and is addicted to Losing Nobly) (and doesn't have that great a record on for example women's rights, by the way) keeps me from loving him all the way

Neudonym, Saturday, 29 March 2003 12:04 (twenty-three years ago)

michael moore is a fat, overstated, radical bastard. "haha i'm gonna use the oscar's as a means to convey my leftfield political opinions! hah! and EVERYONE will know what i said and they will all either love me or hate me! i can't believe no one else is doing what i'm doing right now!"
well, hey asshole we already know your thoughts on Dubya. this is a movie awards ceremony not Wolf Blitzer Reports.
jerkoff.

JP Albin (John Paul Albin), Sunday, 30 March 2003 23:34 (twenty-three years ago)

Michael Moore - VERY Annoying, one sided, biased, cuntrag who managed to somehow make a brilliant movie.

David Allen, Monday, 31 March 2003 01:08 (twenty-three years ago)

I think that Mr. Moore should stick with his "I think it sucks that the auto industry fired everyone and made Flint a shitty place to live" schtick. Someone that ugly shouldn't do things that everyone will boo him for.

Yes, this is coming from the guy who puts at least 3 Turbonegro references in every post.

Pesonally, I like war because of all the explosions and blood and shit.

Helltime Producto (Pavlik), Monday, 31 March 2003 01:11 (twenty-three years ago)

michael moore's a cool guy. i met him in person when my college's chapter of amnesty international invited him to give a lecture on September 11th. the reason he's raising so much noise right now is because he feels something important is at stake. and he had a right to speak out at the academy awards, just as if that stupid fucking bitch anne coulter or that fat fuck (i bet he's fatter than moore, and he's certainly uglier) rush limbaugh had been in attendance, invited to speak and wanted to speak out for the war, they would have had that right, too. except no rabid conservative will ever appear at the oscars, because there seems to be, to my mind anyway, this odd, though not total, correlation between liberalism & neutrality, and TALENT. so bravo michael moore. fight the good fight.

justin s., Monday, 31 March 2003 01:15 (twenty-three years ago)

"no rabid conservative will ever appear at the oscars"?!!! -

James Blount (James Blount), Monday, 31 March 2003 01:21 (twenty-three years ago)

word! -

James Blount (James Blount), Monday, 31 March 2003 01:23 (twenty-three years ago)

Mel Gibson: "There are some things worth fighting for. Imagine if you woke up one morning here in Los Angeles and found Lithuanians with sharp teeth crawling up the beach with golf clubs to beat your brains out. What would you do? That's a reason to defend yourself."

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Monday, 31 March 2003 01:24 (twenty-three years ago)

- trudat!

James Blount (James Blount), Monday, 31 March 2003 01:25 (twenty-three years ago)

"the reason he's raising so much noise right now is because he feels something important is at stake. and he had a right to speak out at the academy awards"

Also note the fact that him doing that, got him in almost every newspaper and talk show in the country... and they usually mentioned Bowling for Columbine too.

David Allen, Monday, 31 March 2003 01:25 (twenty-three years ago)

conservatives really don't have to be overly vocal about the issues. the silent majority as they call them is an appropriate term. they dont necassrily wanna 'recruit' esp. at awards ceremonies which are supposed to be apolitical in the first place.

david - they certainly did.

JP Albin (John Paul Albin), Monday, 31 March 2003 01:27 (twenty-three years ago)

plus guilt over helping get Bush elected in the first place

James Blount (James Blount), Monday, 31 March 2003 01:28 (twenty-three years ago)

my bad. i forgot charlie and mel. (i didn't know that mel was a rabid conservative until i read about that weird-ass ultra-catholic movie he's making. tres fucked up.) but c'mon, that's like two out of what, two hundred, two thousand? and don't forget i'm talking about rabid conservatism. those two definitely count, but someone like, say, dennis miller (who kicks ass, and who strikes me as rather sensible) doesn't. so there. i still, however, bow in the direction of james and anthony, but i think my general point survives their onslaught ;)

justin s., Monday, 31 March 2003 01:28 (twenty-three years ago)

don't forget Bruce Willis also

James Blount (James Blount), Monday, 31 March 2003 01:29 (twenty-three years ago)

i'd call them the silent majority, except for the fact that they're not a majority. not that i'm saying liberals are the majority either. but conservatives certainly aren't. a sort of (sometimes uninformed) neutrality is generally the american norm. being hardcore for the war, or hardcore against it, doesn't put you in a majority. unless you're a member of our fake president's cabinet.

anyway, i'd be pissed at moore if they explicitly told him that he couldn't speak, but they allowed everyone who won the award some screen time to do what they wanted with it. moore did what he want, he got booed by some, he shut up. nothing wrong there.

justin s., Monday, 31 March 2003 01:32 (twenty-three years ago)

anthony, that mel gibson quote is priceless. the man certainly has a way with images.

justin s., Monday, 31 March 2003 01:33 (twenty-three years ago)

Who would win in a wrestling match between Rush Limbaugh and Earthquake?

Or Rush Limbaugh and a Shitty Hitler?

Helltime Producto (Pavlik), Monday, 31 March 2003 01:41 (twenty-three years ago)

I tell ya - I have a guilty pleasure, I like the WWE/ WWF wrassling, and have done since I was a kid. It's fun, it's athletic, it's got mad storylines and the yanks go mad for the silliest of reasons and get worked into a fever by the dumbest of plots or characters. And there are mullets.

Now, I don't watch the WWE for intelligence, I doubt many of these guys argue about political issues for instance, but last night at Wrestlemania was a bit of a fiasco. Every given moment some redneck idiot would be saying: 'This goes out to our brave troops kicking ass in Iraq - go get 'em boys'. Erm... now can human beings be this stoopid or is this just a comment on sports fans in America in general?

Funny story: The WWE sent one of its wrestlers to 'boost' the boys in the Middle East and the chap flew over and gave riveting, patriotic speeches... only he thought Saddam was the President of Afghanastan.

Sigh.

And the States wants to rule over the middle east?

Calum, Monday, 31 March 2003 08:09 (twenty-three years ago)

what do sports and the wwe/f have to do with each other?

James Blount (James Blount), Monday, 31 March 2003 08:24 (twenty-three years ago)

I'd give Michael Moore's Oscar Speech a 7, but I can't dance to it.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Monday, 31 March 2003 11:18 (twenty-three years ago)

Michael Moore's Response, if you're willing to read it:
"By Michael Moore
March 27, 2003

A word of advice to future Oscar winners: Don't begin Oscar day by going to church.

That is where I found myself this past Sunday morning, at the Church of the Good Shepherd on Santa Monica Boulevard, at Mass with my sister and my dad. My problem with the Catholic Mass is that sometimes I find my mind wandering after I hear something the priest says, and I start thinking all these crazy thoughts like how it is wrong to kill people and that you are not allowed to use violence upon another human being unless it is in true self-defense.

The pope even came right out and said it: This war in Iraq is not a just war and, thus, it is a sin.

Those thoughts were with me the rest of the day, from the moment I left the church and passed by the homeless begging for change (one in six American children living in poverty is another form of violence), to the streets around the Kodak Theater where antiwar protesters were being arrested as I drove by in my studio-sponsored limo.

I had not planned on winning an Academy Award for "Bowling for Columbine" (no documentary that was a big box-office success had won since "Woodstock"), and so I had no speech prepared. I'm not much of a speech-preparer anyway, and besides, I had already received awards in the days leading up to the Oscars and used the same acceptance remarks. I spoke of the need for nonfiction films when we live in such fictitious times. We have a fictitious president who was elected with fictitious election results. (If you still believe that 3,000 elderly Jewish Americans -- many of them Holocaust survivors -- voted for Pat Buchanan in West Palm Beach in 2000, then you are a true devotee to the beauty of fiction!) He is now conducting a war for a fictitious reason (the claim that Saddam Hussein has stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction when in fact we are there to get the world's second-largest supply of oil).

Whether it is a tax cut that is passed off as a gift to the middle class or a desire to drill holes in the wilds of Alaska, we are continually bombarded with one fictitious story after another from the Bush White House. And that is why it is important that filmmakers make nonfiction, so that all the little lies can be exposed and the public informed. An uninformed public in a democracy is a sure-fire way to end up with little or no democracy at all.

That is what I have been saying for some time. Millions of Americans seem to agree. My book "Stupid White Men" still sits at No. 1 on the bestseller list (it's been on that list now for 53 weeks and is the largest-selling nonfiction book of the year). "Bowling for Columbine" has broken all box-office records for a documentary. My Web site is now getting up to 20 million hits a day (more than the White House's site). My opinions about the state of the nation are neither unknown nor on the fringe, but rather they exist with mainstream majority opinion. The majority of Americans, according to polls, want stronger environmental laws, support Roe vs. Wade and did not want to go into this war without the backing of the United Nations and all of our allies.

That is where the country is at. It's liberal, it's for peace and it is only tacitly in support of its leader because that is what you are supposed to do when you are at war and you want your kids to come back from Iraq alive.

In the commercial break before the best documentary Oscar was to be
announced, I suddenly thought that maybe this community of film people was also part of that American majority and just might have voted for my film, which, in part, takes on the Bush administration for manipulating the public with fear so it can conduct its acts of aggression against the Third World. I leaned over to my fellow nominees and told them that, should I win, I was going to say something about President Bush and the war and would they like
to join me up on the stage? I told them that I felt like I'd already had my moment with the success of the film and that I would love for them to share the stage with me so they could have their moment too. (They had all made exceptional films and I wanted the public to see these filmmakers and hopefully go see their films.)

They all agreed.

Moments later, Diane Lane opened the envelope and announced the winner: "Bowling for Columbine." The entire main floor rose to its feet for a standing ovation. I was immeasurably moved and humbled as I motioned for the other nominees to join my wife (the film's producer) and me up on the stage.

I then said what I had been saying all week at those other awards
ceremonies. I guess a few other people had heard me say those things too because before I had finished my first sentence about the fictitious president, a couple of men (some reported it was "stagehands" just to the left of me) near a microphone started some loud yelling. Then a group in the upper balcony joined in. What was so confusing to me, as I continued my remarks, was that I could hear this noise but looking out on the main floor, I didn't see a single person booing. But then the majority in the balcony -- who were in support of my remarks -- started booing the booers.

It all turned into one humungous cacophony of yells and cheers and jeers. And all I'm thinking is, "Hey, I put on a tux for this?"

I tried to get out my last line ("Any time you've got both the pope and the Dixie Chicks against you, you're not long for the White House") and the orchestra struck up its tune to end the melee. (A few orchestra members came up to me later and apologized, saying they had wanted to hear what I had to say.) I had gone 55 seconds, 10 more than allowed.

Was it appropriate? To me, the inappropriate thing would have been to say nothing at all or to thank my agent, my lawyer and the designer who dressed me -- Sears Roebuck. I made a movie about the American desire to use violence both at home and around the world. My remarks were in keeping with exactly what my film was about. If I had a movie about birds or insects, I would have talked about birds or insects. I made a movie about guns and Americans' tradition of using them against the world and each other.

And, as I walked up to the stage, I was still thinking about the lessons that morning at Mass. About how silence, when you observe wrongs being committed, is the same as committing those wrongs yourself. And so I followed my conscience and my heart.

On the way back home to Flint, Mich., the day after the Oscars, two flight attendants told me how they had gotten stuck overnight in Flint with no flight -- and wound up earning only $30 for the day because they are paid by the hour.

They said they were telling me this in the hope that I would tell others. Because they, and the millions like them, have no voice. They don't get to be commentators on cable news like the bevy of retired generals we've been watching all week. (Can we please demand that the U.S. military remove its troops from ABC/CBS/NBC/CNN/MSNBC/Fox?) They don't get to make movies or talk to a billion people on Oscar night. They are the American majority who are being asked to send their sons and daughters over to Iraq to possibly die so Bush's buddies can have the oil.

Who will speak for them if I don't? That's what I do, or try to do, every day of my life, and March 23, 2003 -- though it was one of the greatest days of my life and an honor I will long cherish -- was no different.

Except I made the mistake of beginning it in a church."

dave225 (Dave225), Monday, 31 March 2003 12:35 (twenty-three years ago)

Wow, despite being almost as wordy as a Jello Biafra rant, I have to agree that if I had lived through *that* exact same day, I'd be ranting at the mouth as well. Granted, I:
1) do not take the pope as seriously as he does; and knowing me
2) i'd come with C4 strapped to my chest and my speech would consist of "Eat Flaming Death, Fascist Media Pigs!"

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Monday, 31 March 2003 14:07 (twenty-three years ago)

I agree with him on some points, but overall, he comes off as a pompous self-righteous ass.

David Allen, Monday, 31 March 2003 15:54 (twenty-three years ago)

So does the president he's bitching about. But Moore can is more articulate without a speech prepared than Bush is *with* a speech prepared.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Monday, 31 March 2003 19:31 (twenty-three years ago)

he can is?

James Blount (James Blount), Monday, 31 March 2003 19:32 (twenty-three years ago)

I, unfortunately am NOT articulate without prep time.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Monday, 31 March 2003 19:34 (twenty-three years ago)

Compared to Bush, Michael Moore has a rhetorical competence that would make Marc Antony cry. I shouldn't hold someone's inarticulateness against them... but Bush is just an IDIOT. If he's not arrested for crimes against humanity first, he should be arrested for crimes against the English language.

justin s., Monday, 31 March 2003 23:28 (twenty-three years ago)

Very few politicans aren't retarded.

David Allen, Tuesday, 1 April 2003 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

how come bush has never been booed off stage? or has he? how great would that be the state of the union or whatever.
either way getting booed off stage = 64% rock n' roll

dyson (dyson), Tuesday, 1 April 2003 02:06 (twenty-three years ago)

justin - you know marc antony didn't actually say that stuff right? that shakespeare just made it up? the real marc antony had a sever stutter (check plutarch, tis true)

James Blount (James Blount), Tuesday, 1 April 2003 02:14 (twenty-three years ago)

I remember seeing clips of Bush on the David Letterman show back durning his presidential campaign. He got booed for some off-color remark or another... I think. Maybe someone else remembers this better because years of video games have left my brain and genitals shriveled and useless.

original bgm, Tuesday, 1 April 2003 02:16 (twenty-three years ago)

how come bush has never been booed off stage? or has he?
His own party has been slowly starting to turn against him for the last year and a half. In fact, one Republican Senator switched over to being a Democrat just to make his point.
If this war goes on any futher, or there are more terrorist attacks in retaliation for it, Bush will NOT be re-elected.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 1 April 2003 02:18 (twenty-three years ago)

have you seen his approval rating? if he keeps this war up for another year he'll coast into another term. there does seemt to be an interesting split between the neocons (bush & his immediate cronies) and the old-line conservatives, though i bet when it comes time to vote they all choose bush over whatever limp corpse the democrats cough up.

your null fame (yournullfame), Tuesday, 1 April 2003 02:21 (twenty-three years ago)

James, I'm afraid of the historical basis behind the play. It's more a reference to the dramatic and rhetorical aspects of the character. Silly git :)

j. stanley, Tuesday, 1 April 2003 02:44 (twenty-three years ago)

er, aware! goddamnit. coherency.. slipping.. down the drain..

j. stanley, Tuesday, 1 April 2003 02:44 (twenty-three years ago)

I just have a hard time picturing right-wing punks

I'm still mystified by this. Street punks? Oi!? Skinheads? "Nazi Punks Fuck Off (If There Were Nazi Punks, Except I Can't Really Picture Them)?"

nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 1 April 2003 04:06 (twenty-three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.