I'd like you to tell us about some writing about music that has actually made music more enjoyable after you've read it.
(Writing that has encouraged you to buy or hear particular music for the first time doesn't count, because you haven't had a time listening to the music before reading about it.)
― mei (mei), Saturday, 14 June 2003 07:58 (twenty-two years ago)
However, I think films often benefit from explanation and discussion after the fact. I watched American Psycho for the first time a few days ago and subsequently read this piece:
http://www.cinephiles.net/American_Psycho/Cinephiles-Gate.html
which, by explaining some things that _might_ have happened in the film, certainly increased my appreciation and enjoyment of the movie.
― mei (mei), Saturday, 14 June 2003 08:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Saturday, 14 June 2003 08:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― ham on rye (ham on rye), Saturday, 14 June 2003 09:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― ham on rye (ham on rye), Saturday, 14 June 2003 09:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mark (MarkR), Saturday, 14 June 2003 11:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Saturday, 14 June 2003 12:01 (twenty-two years ago)
I can't think of a single movie improved by a review in the New Yorker, but my enjoyment of rock was severely enhanced by Creem circa 1972-76.
― Chris Clark (Chris Clark), Saturday, 14 June 2003 12:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― Cozen (Cozen), Saturday, 14 June 2003 12:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― mei (mei), Saturday, 14 June 2003 12:23 (twenty-two years ago)
the fag-
― faggotry, Saturday, 14 June 2003 12:28 (twenty-two years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Saturday, 14 June 2003 12:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Saturday, 14 June 2003 12:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― frenchbloke (frenchbloke), Saturday, 14 June 2003 12:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tom May (Tom May), Saturday, 14 June 2003 12:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― weasel diesel (K1l14n), Saturday, 14 June 2003 13:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jerry (Jerry), Saturday, 14 June 2003 14:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Saturday, 14 June 2003 16:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― Rem Lezar, Saturday, 14 June 2003 20:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Saturday, 14 June 2003 21:44 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jazzbo (jmcgaw), Sunday, 15 June 2003 00:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sean Thomas (sgthomas), Sunday, 15 June 2003 01:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― My name is Kenny (My name is Kenny), Sunday, 15 June 2003 04:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Sunday, 15 June 2003 04:50 (twenty-two years ago)
I don't think any of the examples so far are where writing has ctually made music you listen to anyway more enjoyable.
Mark's, Jerry's, Cozen's, Nick's, Rem's and Julio's answers might fit the bill, but you didn't explain how.
Can anyone explian how some writing has made music more enjoyable?
― mei (mei), Monday, 16 June 2003 08:40 (twenty-two years ago)
The R Kelly thread is a great example - it's full of people enthusing about a song, which is good, but they're also pointing out stuff to look out for in it, which might make you go 'oh yes!' next time you hear it.
― Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Monday, 16 June 2003 09:01 (twenty-two years ago)
Thanks for the pointer to the R Kelly thread, I've got to hear the song now.
― mei (mei), Monday, 16 June 2003 10:14 (twenty-two years ago)